XI.

Among the inquiries that must be raised by my fragmentary recital, I am

only too keenly aware of the difficulty of answering one which I do not

see my way altogether to ignore. I refer to that affecting the domestic

relations of the eternal world.

It will be readily seen that I might not be permitted to share much of

the results of my observation in this direction, with earthly curiosity,

or even earthly anxiety. It is not without thought and prayer for close

guidance that I suffer myself to say, in as few words as possible, that

I found the unions which go to form heavenly homes so different from the

marriage relations of earth, in their laws of selection and government,

that I quickly understood the meaning of our Lord’s few revealed words

as to that matter; while yet I do not find myself at liberty to explain

either the words or the facts. I think I cannot be wrong in adding,

that in a number of cases, so great as to astonish me, the marriages of

earth had no historic effect upon the ties of Heaven. Laws of

affiliation uniting soul to soul in a relation infinitely closer than a

bond, and more permanent than any which the average human experience

would lead to if it were socially a free agent, controlled the

attractions of this pure and happy life, in a manner of which I can only

say that it must remain a mystery to the earthly imagination. I have

intimated that in some cases the choices of time were so blessed as to

become the choices of Eternity. I may say, that if I found it lawful to

utter the impulse of my soul, I should cry throughout the breadth of the

earth a warning to the lightness, or the haste, or the presumption, or

the mistake that chose to love for one world, when it might have loved

for two.

For, let me say most solemnly, that the relations made between man and

woman on earth I found to be, in importance to the individual, second to

nothing in the range of human experience, save the adjustment of the

soul to the Personality of God Himself.

If I say that I found earthly marriage to have been a temporary

expedient for preserving the form of the eternal fact; that freedom in

this as in all other things became in Heaven the highest law; that the

great sea of human misery, swelled by the passion of love on earth,

shall evaporate to the last drop in the blaze of bliss to which no human

counterpart can approach any nearer than a shadow to the sun,--I may be

understood by those for whose sake alone it is worth while to allude to

this mystery at all; for the rest it matters little.

Perhaps I should say, once for all, that every form of pure pleasure or

happiness which had existed upon the earth had existed as a type of a

greater. Our divinest hours below had been scarcely more than

suggestions of their counterparts above. I do not expect to be

understood. It must only be remembered that, in all instances, the

celestial life develops the soul of a thing. When I speak of eating and

drinking, for instance, I do not mean that we cooked and prepared our

food as we do below. The elements of nutrition continued to exist for us

as they had in the earth, the air, the water, though they were available

without drudgery or anxiety. Yet I mean distinctly that the sense of

taste remained, that it was gratified at need, that it was a finer one

and gave a keener pleasure than its coarser prototype below. I mean that

the _soul of a sense_ is a more exquisite thing than what we may call

the body of the sense, as developed to earthly consciousness.

So far from there being any diminution in the number or power of the

senses in the spiritual life, I found not only an acuter intensity in

those which we already possessed, but that the effect of our new

conditions was to create others of whose character we had never dreamed.

To be sure, wise men had forecast the possibility of this fact,

differing among themselves even as to the accepted classification of

what they had, as Scaliger who called speech the sixth sense, or our

English contemporary who included heat and force in his list (also of

six); or more imaginative men who had admitted the conceivability of

inconceivable powers in an order of being beyond the human. Knowing a

little of these speculations, I was not so much surprised at the facts

as overwhelmed by their extent and variety. Yet if I try to explain

them, I am met by an almost insurmountable obstacle.

It is well known that missionaries are often thwarted in their religious

labors by the absence in savage tongues of any words corresponding to

certain ideas such as that of purity or unselfishness. Philologists have

told us of one African tribe in whose language exist six different words

descriptive of murder; none whatever expressive of love. In another no

such word as gratitude can be found. Perhaps no illustration can better

serve to indicate the impediments which bar the way to my describing to

beings who possess but five senses and their corresponding imaginative

culture, the habits or enjoyments consequent upon the development of ten

senses or fifteen. I am allowed to say as much as this: that the growth

of these celestial powers was variable with individuals throughout the

higher world, or so much of it as I became acquainted with. It will be

readily seen what an illimitable scope for anticipation or achievement

is given to daily life by such an evolution of the nature. It should be

carefully remembered that this serves only as a single instance of the

exuberance of what we call everlasting life.

Below, I remember that I used sometimes to doubt the possibility of

one’s being happy forever under any conditions, and had moods in which I

used to question the value of endless existence. I wish most earnestly

to say, that before I had been in Heaven days, Eternity did not seem

long enough to make room for the growth of character, the growth of

mind, the variety of enjoyment and employment, and the increase of

usefulness that practically constituted immortality.

It could not have been long after my arrival at my father’s house that

he took me with him to the great music hall of our city. It was my first

attendance at any one of the public festivals of these happy people,

and one long to be treasured in thought. It was, in fact, nothing less

than the occasion of a visit by Beethoven, and the performance of a new

oratorio of his own, which he conducted in person. Long before the

opening hour the streets of the city were thronged. People with holiday

expressions poured in from the country. It was a gala-day with all the

young folks especially, much as such matters go below. A beautiful thing

which I noticed was the absence of all personal insistence in the crowd.

The weakest, or the saddest, or the most timid, or those who, for any

reason, had the more need of this great pleasure, were selected by their

neighbors and urged on into the more desirable positions. The music

hall, so-called, was situated upon a hill just outside the town, and

consisted of an immense roof supported by rose-colored marble pillars.

There were no walls to the building, so that there was the effect of

being no limit to the audience, which extended past the line of

luxuriously covered seats provided for them, upon the grass, and even

into the streets leading to the city. So perfect were what we should

call below the telephonic arrangement of the community, that those who

remained in their own homes or pursued their usual avocations were not

deprived of the music. My impressions are that every person in the city,

who desired to put himself in communication with it, heard the oratorio;

but I am not familiar with the system by which this was effected. It

involved a high advance in the study of acoustics, and was one of the

things which I noted to be studied at a wiser time.

Many distinguished persons known to you below, were present, some from

our own neighborhood, and others guests of the city. It was delightful

to observe the absence of all jealousy or narrow criticism among

themselves, and also the reverence with which their superiority was

regarded by the less gifted. Every good or great thing seemed to be so

heartily shared with every being capable of sharing it, and all personal

gifts to become material for such universal pride, that one experienced

a kind of transport at the elevation of the public character.

I remembered how it used to be below, when I was present at some musical

festival in the familiar hall where the bronze statue of Beethoven,

behind the sea of sound, stood calmly. How he towered above our poor

unfinished story! As we grouped there, sitting each isolated with his

own thirst, brought to be slaked or excited by the flood of music;

drinking down into our frivolity or our despair the outlet of that

mighty life, it used to seem to me that I heard, far above the passion

of the orchestra, his own high words,--his own music made

articulate,--“_I go to meet Death with joy._”

When there came upon the people in that heavenly audience-room a stir,

like the rustling of a dead leaf upon crusted snow; when the stir grew

to a solemn murmur; when the murmur ran into a lofty cry; when I saw

that the orchestra, the chorus, and the audience had risen like one

breathless man, and knew that Beethoven stood before us, the light of

day darkened for that instant before me. The prelude was well under

way, I think, before I dared lift my eyes to his face.

The great tide swept me on. When upon earth had he created sound like

this? Where upon earth had we heard its like? There he is, one listening

nerve from head to foot, he who used to stand deaf in the middle of his

own orchestra--desolate no more, denied no more forever, all the

heavenly senses possible to Beethoven awake to the last delicate

response; all the solemn faith in the invisible, in the holy, which he

had made his own, triumphant now; all the powers of his mighty nature in

action like a rising storm--there stands Beethoven immortally alive.

What knew we of music, I say, who heard its earthly prototype? It was

but the tuning of the instruments before the eternal orchestra shall

sound. Soul! swing yourself free upon this mighty current. Of what will

Beethoven tell us whom he dashes on like drops?

As the pæan rises, I bow my life to understand. What would he with us

whom God chose to make Beethoven everlastingly? What is the burden of

this master’s message, given now in Heaven, as once on earth? Do we hear

aright? Do we read the score correctly?

“Holy--holy”--

A chorus of angel voices, trained since the time when morning stars sang

together with the sons of God, take up the words:

“Holy, _holy_, HOLY is the Lord.”

* * * * *

When the oratorio has ended, and we glide out, each hushed as a hidden

thought, to his own ways, I stay beneath a linden-tree to gather breath.

A fine sound, faint as the music of a dream, strikes my ringing ears,

and, looking up, I see that the leaf above my head is singing. Has it,

too, been one of the great chorus yonder? Did he command the forces of

nature, as he did the seraphs of Heaven, or the powers of earth?

The strain falls away slowly from the lips of the leaf:

“Holy, holy, holy,”--

It trembles, and is still.

Beyond the Gates · 第 25 / 37 题