On Thursday morning of his last week Jesus sends two of his friends

before him into Jerusalem to prepare the Passover meal, while he does

not himself enter the city until the afternoon. There he meets his

friends, and after the supper he takes the bread and wine and with

entire naturalness asks them, as they eat and drink, to remember him.

Then he talks with them and prays with them, and they go out again on

the road toward Bethany; and coming to a little garden at the foot of

the hill called the Mount of Olives he bids his companions wait while

he goes, as his custom was, to pray.

We hear much discussion about prayer and its possibilities,--what we

can pray for and what God can do in return, and what is the true answer

to prayer. But what a silence comes over all such questionings when

one notices that this prayer of Jesus uttered thus {157} in this most

solemn hour was not, in the sense of these discussions, answered by his

God. It was the moment of the supreme agony of Christ. The falseness

of friends, the blindness of his people, the malice of their

leaders,--all these things seem more than he can bear. "Let this cup

pass from me," he prays, and, behold, his prayer is not accepted, and

what he asks is denied, and the cup is to be drunk. And yet in a far

deeper sense his, prayer is answered. "Thy will be done," he

prays,--not in spite of me, or over me, but through me. Make me, my

Father, the instrument of thy will; and so praying he rises with

absolute composure and kingly authority, and goes out with his prayer

answered to do that will.

What should we pray for? Why, we should pray for what we most deeply

want. There is no sincerity in praying for things which are fictitious

or abstract or mere theological blessings. Open to God the realities

of your heart and seek the blessings which you sincerely desire. But

in all prayers desire most to know the will of God toward you, and to

do it. Prayer is not offered to deflect God's will to yours, but to

adjust your will to His. When a ship's captain is setting out on a

{158} voyage he first of all adjusts his compasses, corrects their

divergence, and counteracts the influences which draw the needle from

the pole. Well, that is prayer. It is the adjustment of the compass

of the soul, it is its restoration from deflection, it is the pointing

of it to the will of God. And the soul which thus sails forth into the

sea of life finds itself--not indeed freed from all storms of the

spirit, but at least sure of its direction through them all.

{159}

LXIV

AN IMPOSSIBLE NEUTRALITY

_John_ xviii. 28-38.

(PASSION DAY--FRIDAY)

The story of Friday in this last week of Jesus begins with this meeting

with the Roman governor, and certainly few persons in history would be

more surprised than Pilate at the judgment of the world concerning him.

If Pilate felt sure of anything it was that he did not commit himself

in the case of Jesus. He undertook to be absolutely neutral. See how

nicely he poises his judgment. On the one hand he says: "I find no

fault in him," and then on the other hand he says: "Take him away and

crucify him;" First he washes his hands to show that he is innocent of

the blood of this just person, and then he delivers Jesus to the Jews

to take him away. It was a fine balancing of a judicial mind, and I

suppose he withdrew from the judgment hall saying to himself: "Whatever

may happen in this case, at least I am not responsible." But what does

history think {160} of this judicial Pilate? It holds him to be a

responsible agent in the death of Jesus. He was attempting a

neutrality which was impossible. The great wind was blowing across the

threshing floor of the nation, and the people were separated into two

distinct heaps, and must be counted forever as chaff or as wheat. He

that was not with Christ was against him, and Pilate's place, even in

spite of himself, was determined as among those who brought Jesus to

his cross that afternoon.

I was once talking with a cultivated gentleman who volunteered to tell

me his attitude toward religion. He wished me to understand that he

was in sympathy with the purposes and the administration of worship.

He desired that it should prevail. He welcomed its usefulness in the

university. But as for himself it appeared better that he should hold

a position of neutrality. His responsibility seemed to him better met

by standing neither for religion nor against it, but in a perfectly

judicial frame of mind. He did not take account, however, of the fact

that this neutrality was impossible; that it was just what Pilate

attempted, and just wherein he failed. If he {161} was not to be

counted among those who would by their presence encourage worship, then

he must be counted among those who by their absence hinder its effect.

On one side or other in these great issues of life every man's weight

is to be thrown, and the Pilates of to-day--as of that earlier time--in

their impossible neutrality are often the most insidious, although most

unconscious opponents of a generous cause.

And so to-day on this most solemn anniversary of religious history,

while it is, as the passage says of this interview with Pilate, "yet

early," let us set before ourselves, the issue just as it is now and

just as it was then. This morning demands of any honest-minded man an

answer to the question: "On which side do I propose to stand?" It is

not a demand for absoluteness of conviction or unwavering loyalty, but

it is a summons to recognize that Jesus Christ died on this day largely

at the hands of intellectual dilettanteism and indifferentism,--the

peculiar and besetting sin of the cultivated and academic life. On

which side, then, do I propose to stand; with the cultivated neutral

and his skillful {162} questioning: What is truth? or with the prisoner

who in this early morning says: "Every one who is of the truth heareth

my voice;" with Pilate in his neutrality or with Jesus on his cross?

{163}

LXV

THE FINISHED LIFE

_John_ xix. 30.

(PASSION WEEK--SATURDAY)

The last word of Jesus as he gives up his spirit is: "It is finished."

But was it what could be called a finished life? Was it not, on the

contrary, a terribly unfinished life, prematurely cut short, without

any visible effect of his work, and with everything left to live for?

Surely, if some sympathetic friend of Jesus had been telling of his

death, one of the first things he would be tempted to say would be

this: "What a fearful pity it was that he died so soon! What a loss it

was to us all that he left his life unfinished. Think what might have

happened if he could only have lived to sixty and had had thirty years

for his ministry instead of three!" And yet, as Jesus said, it was a

finished life; for completeness in life is not a thing of quantity, but

of quality. What seems to be a fragment may be in reality the most

perfect thing on earth. You stand in {164} some museum before a Greek

statue, imperfect, mutilated, a fragment of what it was meant to be.

And yet, as you look at it, you say: "Here is perfect art. It is

absolutely right; the ideal which modern art may imitate, but which it

never hopes to attain." Or, what again shall we say of those young men

of our civil war, dying at twenty-five at the head of their troops,

pouring out all the promise of their life in one splendid instant? Did

they then die prematurely? Was not their life a finished life? What

more could they ever have done with it? Why do we write their names on

our monuments so that our young men may read of these heroes, except

that they may say to us that life may be completed, if one will, even

at twenty? All of life that is worth living is sometimes offered to a

man not in a lifetime, but in a day.

And that is what any man must set before him as the test and the plan

of his own life. You cannot say to yourself: "I will live until I am

seventy, I will accomplish certain things, and will attain a certain

position;" for the greatest and oldest of men when they look back on

their lives see in them only a fragment of what they once dreamed that

they {165} might do or be. But you can design your life, not according

to quantitative completeness, but according to qualitative

completeness. It may be long or short, but in either case it may be of

the right stuff. It may be carved out of pure marble with an artist's

hand, and then, whether the whole of it remains to be a thing of beauty

or whether it is broken off, like a fragment of its full design, it is

a finished life. You give back your life to God who gave it, perhaps

in ripe old age, perhaps, as your Master did, at thirty-three, and you

say: "I have accomplished, not what I should like to have done, but

what Thou hast given me to do. I have done my best. It is finished.

Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit."

{166}

LXVI

ATTAINING TO THE RESURRECTION

_Philippians_ iii. 11.

(MONDAY AFTER EASTER)

This is certainly a very extraordinary saying of St. Paul--that he

hopes to attain unto the resurrection from the dead. We are so apt to

think of the resurrection as a remote truth, to be realized in some

distant future, when some day we shall die and live again, that the

very idea of attaining to such a resurrection now is not easy to grasp.

But here we have a resurrection which can be attained any day. "I have

not already attained," says St. Paul, "but I press on." It is

possible, that is to say, for a man to-day, who seems perfectly

healthy, to be dying or dead, and for a man to rise from the dead

to-day and attain to the resurrection.

And thus the fundamental question of the Easter season is not: "Do I

believe that people when they die shall rise again from the dead?" but

it is "Have I risen from the dead {167} myself?" "Am I alive to-day,

with any touch of the eternal life?" Mr. Ruskin describes a grim

Scythian custom where, when the king died, he was set on his throne at

the head of his table, and his vassals, instead of mourning for him,

bowed before his corpse and feasted in his presence. That same ghastly

scene is sometimes repeated now, and young men think they are sitting

at a feast, when they are really sitting at a funeral, and believe

themselves to be, as they say, "seeing life," when they are in reality

looking upon the death of all that is true and fair. And on the other

hand the most beautiful thing which is permitted for any one to see is

the resurrection of a human soul from the dead, its deliverance from

shame and sin, its passing from death into life. As the father of the

prodigal said of his boy, he was dead and is alive again, and in that

coming to his true self he attains, as surely as he ever can in any

future world, unto the resurrection from the dead.

{168}

LXVII

SIMON OF CYRENE

_Luke_ xxiii. 20-26.

This Simon, the Cyrenian, was just a plain man, coming into town on his

own business, and meeting at the gate this turbulent group surging out

toward the place of crucifixion, with the malefactor in their midst.

Suddenly Simon finds himself turned about in his own journey, swept

back by the crowd with the cross of another man on his shoulder, and

the humiliation forced upon him which there seemed no reason for him to

bear.

How often that happens in many a life! You are going your own way,

carrying your own load, and suddenly you are called on to take up some

one else's burden,--a strange cross, a home responsibility, a business

duty; and you find yourself turned square round in the road you meant

to go. Your plan of life is interrupted by no fault of your own, and

you are summoned to bear an undeserved and unexpected cross.

{169}

And yet, how certain it is that this man of Cyrene came to look back on

this interruption of his journey as the one thing he would not have

missed? When others were remembering the wonderful career of Jesus,

how often he must have said: "Yes, but I once had the unapproached

privilege of bearing his cross for him. On one golden morning of my

life I was permitted to share his suffering. I was called from all my

own hopes and plans to take up this burden of another, and I did not

let it drop. It seemed a grievous burden, but it has become my

crowning joy. I did not know then, but I know now, that my day of

humiliation was my day of highest blessedness.

"I think of the Cyrenian

Who crossed the city-gate,

When forth the stream was pouring

That bore thy cruel fate.

* * * *

"I ponder what within him

The thoughts that woke that day

As his unchosen burden

He bore that unsought way.

* * * *

"Yet, tempted he as we are!

O Lord, was thy cross mine?

Am I, like Simon, bearing

A burden that is thine?

{170}

"Thou must have looked on Simon;

Turn, Lord, and look on me

Till I shall see and follow

And bear thy cross for Thee." [1]

[1] Harriet Ware Hall, _A Book for Friends_, p. 90. (Privately

printed.) 1888.

{171}

LXVIII

POWER AND TEMPTATION

_Matthew_ iv. 1-11.

All these temptations of Jesus came to him through the very sense of

power of which he could not but be aware. Here was this great

consciousness of capacity in him to do wonders, to display himself, to

get glory. How should he use his gifts? Should it be for himself, for

honor, for praise, or should it be for service, for sacrifice, for God?

The devil's temptation was that Jesus should take the gifts of which he

was conscious and make them serve his own ends of ambition or success.

The first great decision in the work of Jesus Christ was the decision

of the end to which his powers should be dedicated; the use to which

his powers should be put.

The same fundamental decision comes to every young man in his own

degree. Here are your gifts and capacities, great or small. What are

you to do with them? Are they for glory or for use? Are they for

ambition {172} or for service? The sooner that decision is made the

better. Some people have never quite done with that temptation of the

devil. They go on trying to direct their gifts to the end of

reputation, or wealth, or dominion; and they attain that end only to

find that it is no end, and that their lives, which should have grown

broader and richer, have grown shrunken, and meagre, and unsatisfied.

Such a life is like a fish swimming into the labyrinth of a weir. It

follows along the line of its vocation until the liberty to return

grows less and less; and, at last, in the very element where it seems

most free, it is in fact a helpless captive. The man's occupation has

become his prison. He is the slave of his own powers. The devil has

withered that life with his touch.

And then, on the other hand, you turn to lives which have given

themselves to the life of service, and what do you see? You see their

capacity enlarged through use, you see small gifts multiplied into

great powers. Few things are more remarkable in one's experience of

life than to see men who by nature are not extraordinarily endowed

achieve the highest success by sheer dedication of their {173} moderate

gifts. Their capacities expand through their self-surrender, as leaves

unfold under the touch of the sun. They lose themselves and then they

find themselves. The devil tempts these men, not with a sense of their

greatness, but with their self-distrust; yet he tempts them in vain.

Their weakness issues into strength; their temptation develops their

power. The angels of God have come and ministered unto them.

{174}

LXIX

LOVING WITH THE MIND

_Mark_ xii. 30.

In the great law of love to God and love to man which Jesus repeats as

the law of his own teaching, there is one phrase that seems not wholly

clear. You can love God with your heart and your soul; you can even

increase your strength by love; but how can you love with the mind? Is

it not the very quality of a trained mind to be unmoved by love or

hate, dispassionate and unemotional? Is not this the scientific

spirit, this attitude of criticism, with no prejudice or affection to

color its results?

Of course one must answer that there is much truth which can be

discovered by a loveless mind. Yet there is, on the other hand, much

truth which cannot be discerned without love. There are many secrets

of literature, of art, of music, and of the higher traits of character

as well, into which you cannot enter unless you give your mind to these

things with sympathy and affection and responsiveness; loving them, as

Jesus says, with the mind. One {175} of our preachers has lately

called attention to the new word in literature which illustrates this

attitude of the mind.[1] When people wrote in earlier days of other

people and their works they wrote biographies or criticisms or studies,

but now we have what are called "appreciations;" the attempt, that is

to say, to enter into a character and appreciate its traits or its art,

and to love it with the mind. Perhaps that is what this ancient law

asks of you in your relation to God, to come not as a critic, but as a

lover, to the rational appreciation of the ways of God. Here is the

noblest capacity with which human life is endowed. It is a great thing

to love God with the heart and soul, to let the emotions of gratitude

to Him or of joy in his world run free; but to rise into sympathetic

interpretation of his laws, to think God's thoughts after Him, and to

be moved by the high emotions which are stirred by exalted ideas,--to

love God, that is to say, with the mind,--that, I suppose, is the

highest function of human life, and the quality which most endows a man

with insight and power.

[1] Rev. Leighton Parks, D. D., in a sermon at the Diocesan Convention

of the Protestant Episcopal Church, Boston, May, 1895.

{176}

LXX

AM I MY BROTHER'S KEEPER?

_Genesis_ iv. 9.

Cain was the first philosophical individualist; the first

"laissez-faire" economist. When God asked: "Where is Abel?" Cain

answered: "What responsibility have I for him? My business is to take

care of myself. Am I my brother's keeper?" But the interesting fact

is that Cain had been his brother's keeper though he declined

responsibility for him. He refused to be responsible for his brother's

life, but he certainly was responsible for his brother's death. He

refused to be his brother's keeper, but he was willing to be his

brother's slayer. There are plenty of people to-day who are trying to

maintain this same impossible theory of social irresponsibility. They

affirm that they have no social duty except to mind their own business;

but that very denial of responsibility is what makes them among the

most responsible agents of social disaster. They deal with their

affairs on the principle that they are nobody's {177} keeper, and so

they are stirring every day the fires of industrial revolt. We are

passing through dark days in the business world, and there are many

causes for the trouble, but the deepest cause is Cain's theory of life.

"Where is thy brother?" says God to the business man to-day,--"thy

brother, the wage-earner, the victim of the cut-down and the lockout?"

"Where is thy brother?" says God again to the unscrupulous agitator,

bringing distress into many a workman's home for the satisfactions of

ambition and power. And to any man who answers: "I know not. Am I my

brother's keeper?" the rebuke of God is spoken again: "Cursed art thou!

The voice of thy brother crieth against thee from the ground."

{178}

LXXI

PROFESSIONALISM AND PERSONALITY

1 _Corinthians_ xii. 31.

The wonderful chapter which follows this verse becomes still more

interesting when one considers its connection with the preceding

passage. Paul has been looking over the life of his Christian

brethren, and he sees in it a great variety of callings. Some of his

friends are preachers,--apostles and prophets, as he calls them. Some

are teachers, some are doctors, with gifts of healing; some are

politicians, with gifts of government. The apostle speaks to them as

though he were advising young men as to the choice of their profession,

and he says: "Among all these professional opportunities covet the

best; take that which most fills out and satisfies your life." But

then he turns from these professional capacities and adds: "Be sure

that these gifts do not crowd out of your life the higher capacity for

sympathy. For you may understand all knowledge and speak with all

tongues, and if you have lost thereby {179} the personal, human,

sympathetic relation with people which we call love you are not really

to be counted as a man. You are nothing more than an instrument of

sound, a wind instrument like a trumpet, or a clanging instrument like

a cymbal." That is the apostolic warning to the successful

professional man,--the warning against the narrowing, self-contented

result which sometimes taints even great attainments and professional

distinction. Covet the best. Be satisfied with nothing less than the

highest professional work of doctor, politician, or teacher. But

beware of the imprisoning effect which sometimes comes of this very

success in professional life, the atrophy of sensibility, the

increasing incapacity for sympathy, for public spirit, for charity,--an

incapacity which makes some men of the highest endowments among the

least serviceable, least loving, and least loved of a community. "If,"

says the apostle, "in the gain of professional success you lose the

higher gift of love, you are no longer a great man; you are not even to

be described as a small man. You are 'nothing.'"

{180}

LXXII

THE CENTRAL SOLITUDE

_John_ xvi. 32.

In one of Frederick Robertson's sermons he speaks of the conduct of

life as like the conduct of atoms, which have a certain attraction for

each other, but at a certain point of approach are repelled and do not

touch. There is in every large life a certain central solitude of this

kind into which no other soul can enter. Some persons fear this

solitude, some rejoice in it, but the use of it is the test of a man's

life. A very near friend of Dr. Brooks's once heard of a man who said

that he knew Dr. Brooks intimately; and this friend said: "No man ought

to say that. Not one of us knew Dr. Brooks intimately. There was a

central Holy of Holies in his life, into which none of us ever

entered." So it was. And this preservation of an inner privacy for

the deeper experiences of life is what proves a soul to be peaceful and

strong. Guard your soul's individual life. In the midst of the social

world keep a place for the {181} nurture of the isolated life, for the

reading and for the thoughts which deal with the interior relations of

the single soul to the immanent God.

"Thyself amid the silence clear,

The world far off and dim,

His presence close, the bright ones near,

Thyself alone with Him."

That is what makes a man strong under the tests of life. He is not a

parasitic plant deriving its life from some other life; he is rooted

deep in the soil of the Eternal. As was said of John Henry Newman,

such a man is never less alone than when alone. "He is not alone,

because the Father is with him."

{182}

LXXIII

IF THOU KNEWEST THE GIFT OF GOD

_John_ iv. 10.

We usually notice in this story the great words of Jesus--perhaps the

deepest and richest series of utterances that have ever fallen from

human lips. Yet it is almost as striking to notice the attitude of

mind in which the woman remained throughout these wonderful scenes.

She seems to have been entirely oblivious of the situation, and unaware

that anything great was going on.

Jesus speaks to her of the living water, and she thinks it must be some

device which shall save her coming with her pitcher to the well. Then

Jesus looks on her with infinite pathos and says: "If you only knew the

gift of God, and who it is that is now speaking to you!" But she does

not know, and shoulders her pitcher and trudges home again, reporting

only that she has seen some one who appeared a wonderful

fortune-teller, and never dreaming that the greatest words of human

history had been spoken to her, and her alone.

{183}

Mornings in the College Chapel Short Addresses to Young Men on Personal Religion · 第 6 / 8 段