GIVING UP PRINCIPLES.

There is nothing more important for individuals or bodies of people

than clearly defined and well settled principles. To stand the test,

and be of any importance to the world, the principles of an individual

or a body of people, must be correct, and of vital importance. They

should also be clearly defined, well understood, and constantly kept

in view. It is then not only safe, but of the highest importance to

adhere to them with the most determined pertinacity, fixed purpose

and inflexible firmness. When principles are of the character we have

described, it is dangerous to swerve, shrink or depart from them, in

the least degree. Adherence—the most strict, rigid and determined

adherence—to correct, clearly defined and settled principles, of

a vital character, is indispensable to permanence, stability and

happiness. If the principles thus defined are divine, departure from

them is _apostasy_.

We are not speaking of _subtle principles_, requiring the utmost

stretch of intelligence or learning to understand, or even to perceive

them, when clearly set forth. There may he principles of this kind,

correct ones, too, but we think, _never practical_. That which is

practical and vital, is never so subtle as to require the utmost

stretch of intelligence, either to set it forth or understand it. The

Bible has its deep things, profound and wonderful, requiring the utmost

stretch of human intelligence to set them forth, or understand them;

or, it may be, deeper than human intelligence can fully fathom, but

they are not the practical, and if vital in any sense, it is not vital

that we should understand them. If we could not be Christians, serve,

or please our heavenly Father, without understanding all such, it would

certainly put it out of the power of the masses, to be acceptable at

all. We know this is not so.

In precisely the same way, in nature, there are certain things that

we must know, or we can not enjoy the blessings God has in nature for

us. There are certain principles in nature that are _practical_ and

_vital_, and we must know them and act in continual reference to them,

or we will come to inevitable ruin. But they are not subtle, deep and

profound principles, requiring the utmost stretch of intelligence to

set them forth or understand them. These lie upon the surface, are the

first things we come to, and may be easily learned, and understood

sufficiently for all practical purposes. God has wisely arranged, in

both nature and grace, or in the temporal and spiritual kingdoms,

so that what we _must know_ may be easily learned, thus showing his

benevolence in both, and that both have marks of the same Authorship.

In these matters there is no excuse for being misled. In other words,

if any one is misled, he must be an _easy dupe_, a _willing victim_.

In religion, on the part of the man of faith, certain principles

are settled, and not to be opened anew, and investigated from the

foundation, every time any new phase may appear. Certain other matters

are so self-evident, that they need only to be well stated to satisfy

any ordinary mind. These are the matters that move the world, and

not the abstruse and subtle things. They are the matters that carry

conviction to the mind, settle the understanding, and leave it in a

state of satisfaction and rest. They call out the response, almost

involuntarily, _that is so_. It does not have to be proved again.

As an illustration:—In a union meeting in which we participated, many

years ago, and after the discussions had continued eight days and

nights, in which some ten parties participated, on the last evening of

the meeting, a gentleman rose and inquired if he might speak, at the

same time explaining that he was a sceptic. The chairman said that it

was no church meeting, and if he intended speaking to the point before

the meeting, he should be heard. Several expressed a desire to hear

him, and no one objected. He said he only intended to say a few words.

Pointing to those of us who contended for union on the Bible, he said:

“If the Bible is true, these men are right, for they insist on your

taking _the Bible and going by it_. If the Bible is not true, _I am

right_, and there is no show at all for the balance of you.” That is a

case that needs no argument.

Before we belonged to the church, we spent a few days in a worthy

family. The head of the family was a class leader in the M. E. Church,

a kind-hearted and good man. He was zealous, and desired to benefit

us religiously, and made sundry attempts to talk to us. We knew but

little about the matters of which he talked, and really did not desire

to say enough to discover to him how little we did know. But after

further acquaintance we inquired of him as follows: “If a man will take

the Scriptures, read them, believe them, and do what they require,

will he not be a Christian?” With somewhat of an air of surprise, he

replied: “No; he must have something more than that.” This “something

more than that” was the perplexing part. What more could there be than

the Scriptures require? _Then, if there is something more than the

Scriptures require, how did any man find it out?_ And, still further,

what is it? _If it is not required in Scripture, how does any man know

that it is required at all?_ Of course we mean on the human part, or

that which is required _of man_. When we inquire how a man is to obtain

a crop of corn, we do not mean how he is to _make soil_, how he is to

get atmosphere, sunshine, rain, etc., but how he is to perform _his

part_. If the soil has not in it the qualities to produce corn; if the

right state of atmosphere is not given, the sun does not shine, and

the rain does not come, he is not to blame. It is useless to preach

about the properties of the soil, the atmosphere, the warm sunshine,

the rain, etc., in showing a man how to grow corn. On all these matters

a man might preach philosophically, learnedly and correctly, but not

another grain of corn would grow, for all his fine talk. This is not

the _practical_ nor the _human part_. But the man must be instructed

how to put the ground in order, how to plant and cultivate, in showing

him _how_ to obtain a crop of corn, _with_ the divine blessing, but

certainly not _without it_.

_First._ We have long since settled the question about the authority of

the Bible. That is no more an open question, unless we please, for the

sake of argument, to look at it as an open question. We receive what

the Bible says _implicitly_, or because _the Bible says it_.

_Second._ Then it is _the rule_, and there is not a reason in this

world for not taking it and _going by it_. It is the rule, the final,

the absolute authority. It must be received in all things.

_Third._ Then the gospel preached by the apostles—precisely, no more,

no less, no other—must be preached by us. What they preached then or

in their time must be preached now or in our time.

_Fourth._ The gospel preached by the apostles was precisely what the

people were required to believe, in their time, and what they did

believe to the salvation of their souls. This same gospel precisely is

what the people in our time are required to believe, and what they must

believe to the salvation of their souls, or not be saved at all.

_Fifth._ The things commanded to be done in the preaching of the gospel

by the apostles were the things which they did that they might be

saved. The same things precisely which they were commanded to do, and

which they did to be saved, are the things now commanded to be done by

those who believe the gospel, that they may be saved. These things must

be done now for precisely the same purpose as they were then.

_Sixth._ If, with precisely the same faith, the same things are done,

for the same purpose, the same result will follow. No man can give a

reason against this conclusion.

_Seventh._ When persons are turned to the Lord now or have become

christians, the same instructions imparted to the first Christians

should be imparted to them, to show them how to serve God and be

finally saved. If this is not so, then no man can show how we are to be

guided to the everlasting city.

We give these as a few of the clear principles from which we can

not turn away without apostasy and utter ruin. These are vital and

fundamental matters, and no man can infringe on them or treat them with

indifference without being held in distrust. No man will turn round

and repudiate all of them at once, but those who turn away will depart

little by little, introducing a little _new_, leaving a little out, and

encroaching on these principles, first in this and then in that. Such

men will flounder and think themselves abused if we do not think they

are perfectly _sound_. But there are some things we _can not think_.

We can not think white is black, or that black is white. We can not

believe without evidence. If men desire us to think they are sound they

must give us the evidence to prove it and we will rejoice to believe

it. They can easily do this if they are sound.

A Book of Gems, or, Choice selections from the writings of Benjamin Franklin · 第 201 / 251 题