BIBLE NAMES.

But there is one course infallibly safe for us, and that is to follow

the New Testament phraseology. We ought not only to use New Testament

names, but should pay some regard to the frequency of the use of those

names. When a man uses the name _christian_ more in one half hour

than it is used in the whole New Testament, it is a clear evidence

that there is something wrong with him. The same is true of the name

Disciple, or any other designation found in the Scriptures. The man who

is truly under Jesus, not only uses New Testament designations for the

people of God, but uses them in the same manner as found in Scripture.

We never find “Christian church” in Scripture. We find no “Disciple

church,” or “Disciples’ church,” in the New Testament. Such names are

incongruous. Yet they are current in some sections of country. In

some parts of Kentucky and Indiana you hear of the “Christian church”

very frequently. In the Western Reserve, Ohio, you will hear both

“Disciple church” and “Disciples’ church” very frequently. In the New

Testament “the church of Christ” is found; but “the church of God”

much more frequently. The members are called Christians, Disciples,

and frequently only designated “people of God,” “children of God,”

“brethren,” etc. By giving a little attention, we can converse in the

same way. In nine cases out of ten, we can express ourselves in the

simple words, “the brethren,” “the church,” etc., and be as perfectly

understood as if we would adopt the most sectarian designation.

The adoption of all names unknown to the New Testament, is wholly

unwarrantable. There is no matter of more importance than this. Let us

learn to use the precise language of the New Testament, and use it in

the same sense as used there; and, above all, see to it, that we not

only call ourselves Christians and Disciples, but that we be indeed

_Christians, Disciples_.

A Book of Gems, or, Choice selections from the writings of Benjamin Franklin · 第 185 / 251 题