A. CAMPBELL’S SUCCESSORS AND CRITICS.

Some fifteen years ago a few of our more advanced men gradually

commenced opening up to our benighted minds, the fact, that A. Campbell

was not the great man we had thought he was; that he was not the

scholar we had thought; that some of his chief ideas were erroneous,

and that we should have much trouble in _undoing_ what he had _done

wrong_. We were growing up many young men, and being illiterate and

unlearned, we knew not but we had over estimated A. Campbell, and

that some mighty men were rising among us, that would throw him in

the shade. But we had one comfort all the time, and that was that we

were not alone in the opinion that A. Campbell was a man of superior

learning and parts. We noticed that he attracted the fire of the great

guns of the infidels, the Universalists, the Roman Catholics, the

Methodists, the Presbyterians, and sectarians in general. He attracted

the attention of the great men of Christendom, distinguished the hills

of Bethany, and gave them a name that will extend down to the end of

the ages. No man on this continent called forth anything like the same

amount of attention he did, for the space of forty years. It was not a

mere fortuity that gave him notoriety, but sound learning, correct and

abundant information, persistent and determined work, with a fixed and

settled purpose, to which he addressed the energies of his life. He was

a mighty man in the highest sense, and to this the impression he made

on the people of this great country, will testify till the Lord shall

come.

We have been amused with two classes of men among us. Those of one

class were adjusting themselves for the mantle of A. Campbell to fall

on them when he would depart. Had that mantle fallen on one of them,

he would have appeared like a boy with his father’s great coat on—it

would have fit nowhere. The other class are finding his errors and

going beyond him. But it is remarkable, that in almost every instance,

these _advanced_ men prove to be wrong themselves. Instead of their

discovering some _new truth_, they resurrect some _old error_. We do

not think it is advancing very far ahead of A. Campbell to resuscitate

the Romish and Restorationist idea of an obscure Scripture. We

frequently think of the man’s invention, that claimed that he could

grow sheep _without wool_—it is more curious than profitable.

It is not _inventive_ genius we need in the Church, nor _explorers_ to

_invent_ something new, or to _make discoveries_; but we need humble

and honest men, who know and love the truth, and will press it on the

world. We know humble men, of but limited talent and information, who

are building up churches, reforming men and women, and bringing them to

God. We know also men of considerable learning and talent, who do not

turn a bare dozen to the Lord in a year, and who build up no churches

nor anything else, but who are starting subtleties, speculations and

questions to no profit, but only tend to subvert the hearer. Why can

men not be content with the plain truth, the precious truth that makes

men wise to salvation, through faith in Christ? It is easily learned,

easily preached and readily believed and obeyed to the salvation of

the soul. It is for the people, the whole people, and adapted to them.

The kind of greatness we need, is that which manifests itself in

preaching great truth in plain and easy terms, and bringing it to the

comprehension of the people. The command is, and will be till the Lord

comes, “Preach the word.”

A Book of Gems, or, Choice selections from the writings of Benjamin Franklin · 第 115 / 251 题