COMMUNION.

The Lord gave the commemoration of his sufferings and death to _his

disciples_, and Paul, in Corinth, gave it to the congregation of the

saints, and not to any others. Those who are his disciples, who are in

Christ, in the body, are communicants, and those not in Christ, are not

communicants. We “neither invite nor exclude,” but show to whom the

Lord has given the communion, and that no others have any right to it,

only those in good standing in the body, and _give it to no others_.

But for any preacher or church to arrange _purposely_ for communion

with persons whom they know are not in Christ, not in the kingdom, and

try to blur over the clear violation of the law of the kingdom, as thus

deliberately arranged for, by defining the position of his church to be

that they “neither invite nor exclude,” is certainly a weak and shallow

device. It is an attempt to ignore the very act by which we enter into

union with the Father and with the Son, as, also, the “whole family

in heaven and on earth,”—immersion into Christ, into the name of the

Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, under the sham pretext

of a _union_ meeting, a _union_ communion. There is no _Christian

union_ in any meeting that intends to ignore the clear law of induction

into the kingdom of God. It is only a _union in disloyalty_ to the

Great King—_ignoring his law_.

A Book of Gems, or, Choice selections from the writings of Benjamin Franklin · 第 103 / 251 题