THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS.

We need a vast amount of instruction in regard to both the Old

Testament and the New, not only in the sunday-school, but in the

church, the family, and to individuals. We need some thorough work in

this matter. Much of what is now passing for _teaching_ both the Old

Testament and New is in no proper sense teaching either the Old or New

Testament. The general idea is, that the Old Testament embraces all the

sacred writings or the books of the Bible, beginning with Genesis and

ending with Malachi, and that the New Testament embraces all the sacred

writings or books of the Bible, beginning with Matthew and ending with

Revelation. Such is the sense in which these terms are now used. When

it is said, the Old Testament is abolished, the idea generally received

is that all the sacred writings, or the books of the Bible, from the

beginning of Genesis to the end of Malachi, are set aside, of no use,

and not to be studied. This is a very superficial view, and one that in

no sense comprehends the matter.

The word “testament” means _covenant_, and the Old Testament is simply

in the Bible sense the Old Covenant. This was made with the seed of

Abraham, or fleshly Israel, and includes what Paul calls “the law.”

This is what he calls “our _pedagogue_ to bring us to Christ.” It is

not “school-master” as the common version has it, but _pedagogue_.

His office was different from that of school-teacher. It was to take

charge of the children from the time they started from their homes

till they reached the school-room and put under the teacher. This

was the office of the law of Moses, to take charge of the seed of

Abraham, Israel according to the flesh, and bring them to Christ the

School-teacher. Paul does not say, as some quote him, “The law _is_

our school-master to bring us to Christ,” but being a Jew, and speaking

as such, he says, “The law _was_ our pedagogue to bring us to Christ,”

the School-teacher. This law, containing a full development of all

that was in the covenant with the seed of Abraham, or fleshly Israel,

is what was abolished, had waxed old, and was ready to vanish away in

Paul’s day. This most certainly did not include the history in the five

books of Moses, or any other history in the Old Book, commonly called

the “Old Testament,” the book of Job, the Psalms, Proverbs, or the

Prophecies. None of these are abolished, but are all of as much value

to those under Christ, and as legitimate books for study, as they ever

were to any people in any age of the world. They are not included in the

law, or the covenant, or in what was abolished, but have a relation to

the gospel, to those in the kingdom of Christ, and are of immense value.

By making ourselves well acquainted with the sacred writings, the

dealings of God with man, and the portions of revelation given in

various manners and at sundry times, we can see as we can in nature now

that we have revelation through which to read it, that there was one

Divine Mind before the beginning of time that looked down through the

ages, and by the agency of men that did not understand him, carried

out his wise and gracious counsels according to his eternal purpose.

Going back to the early sacred writings found in the Old Book we look

down through these writings to Christ, the kingdom of God, the gospel,

as one looking through a telescope at objects in the distance; but,

standing at the other end of revelation, we look up through the New

Book containing the revelations given at later periods to the persons

and events of the Old Book, as one who turns the telescope the other

end foremost, and bring Moses and the prophets down near to us.

Christ is the soul of the Bible, _the theme_ of the revelation from God

to man. Turn the portions of revelation given at early periods, next

to the eye and look down through the Bible, and through the ages to

Christ, and then turn the last part of revelation to the eye, and look

up through it to Christ, and we thus find that it all centers in Him

“who is Head over all things to the church.”

It is not right in the church, family, or anywhere, to teach the Old

Scriptures _exclusively_, or the New, but _teach both_, in their

relation to each other. The New can not be thoroughly and successfully

studied without the Old, nor the Old without the New.

The popular custom of memorizing and repeating verses in view of prizes

to the most successful, or the study and answer of such questions, as

who was the first man, who was the oldest man, who was the meekest

man, etc., gives us no understanding of the Scriptures. Much of this

is a mere exercise of the memory, and there is nothing in it to make

a pious impression, or give any comprehension of the mind of God. It

appears at times wonderful how many things can be taught, and correctly

enough too, _about_ the Bible, and at the same time keep out of view

entirely the _divine purpose_, the very _import_ and _intention_ of the

wonderful book professedly taught. The eternal purpose of God, running

through the Bible from side to side, as it does through the works of

nature, should be taught and kept in view, not to find any definite

number that will certainly be saved or lost, but to find the Lord’s

Anointed, his gospel and kingdom; a revelation of the mystery, an

unfolding of the secret hid in God from before the beginning of time,

but now made manifest, and by the Scriptures of the prophets, according

to the commandment of the everlasting God made known to all nations for

the obedience of faith.

A Book of Gems, or, Choice selections from the writings of Benjamin Franklin · 第 21 / 251 题