LONDON AND THE PROVINCES COMPARED.

It is the nature of prosperous communities, and the fashion of modern

times, to centralize too much their numbers and their powers. But the

question of distribution and proportion is almost as important in

politics as that of production itself. Money and manure are not the only

things which are the better for being spread. London and the country

would both be gainers by transplanting bodily, a hundred miles off, some

dozens of its streets--inhabitants and all. There are whole counties

which we should like to colonize with the surplus talent of the

metropolis. That surplus talent comprises scores of men, waiting on

Providence, feeding on foolish speculations, hanging on the skirts of

some frivolous circle, doing nothing there, or worse than nothing,

spoiling and wasting daily, who, planted out into a sphere of more

favourable opportunities, are capable of being a blessing to a

neighbourhood. However, it is not a case for violent measures. We do not

propose that London should be compressed into _London proper_,--within

the bills of mortality; or that its clubs should be called out on

country service. Patriots, philosophers, and diners out, rusticating by

royal proclamation, and under the _surveillance_ of the police, would

not come with a temper very suitable to our purpose. An experiment of

that sort was made under more likely circumstance, and failed;--as all

experiments must, which seek to remove the symptoms, instead of trying

to act upon the cause. It was in vain that James I. pulled down the new

houses as fast as they were built; and that Charles I. ordered home the

country gentlemen.

Although there seems something artificial, and almost monstrous, in the

actual size of London, the means which have led to this result are

altogether natural. Indeed, whatever forcing has been at any time used,

or prejudice fostered, has told the other way. Nothing has existed which

can be called a court or courtiers for the last two hundred years; and a

sort of feudal feeling still keeps our squires faithful to their halls.

Two exceptions only can be set down to our institutions. The distinction

of local courts obliges the English Bar to reside near Westminster; and

the duration of a modern session substitutes a house for the family of a

Member of Parliament, in the place of lodgings for himself. Under these

circumstances, as "the wen" has not been produced, so is it not likely

to be dispersed by any direct legislative application. To say the truth,

the grievance, in our opinion, is not in the _absolute_, but in the

_relative_ amount of the wealth, intelligence, and virtue, squeezed

together on those marvellous square miles upon which the capital stands.

We do not grudge it the pretty country which is hid under its basement

stories, any more than the social activity and happiness which live

along its crowded streets. We serve ejectments upon nobody. The only

question is, whether some would not do well to move of themselves. Among

the hopes and objects by whose influence 1,200,000 human beings are

collected on the same spot, a certain proportion will be found, which

have not been at all,--and more still, which have not been very

judiciously or magnanimously, considered. There are many in the higher

classes of its inhabitants especially, who, we suspect, on examining

into their principles and habits, will have some difficulty in

satisfying themselves that they have not chosen ill for their real

happiness; and, for all real usefulness, a great deal worse. But the

mistaken notion which most strips the country of its natural guardians,

is the fallacy, on the part of young and sanguine dispositions, of

believing that the motives and sphere of individual action rise in

proportion to the apparent magnitude of the scene. These are the

absentees most to be regretted. In the single line of professional

practice, and in its most successful instances, that may be the case.

But in taking ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, and in every other of

the varied departments of social duty, the sphere of useful action,

however nominally extended, will be found to be strictly and

substantially reduced.

There can be as little fear that London will ever want any of the

elements of an enlightened and well-constituted community, as that it

will not be large enough. It is very different with the provinces. The

capital offers so many real, and still more, so many plausible

attractions to all that is active and refined, as well as to all that is

idle and selfish in human nature, that a long list of supernumaries and

expectants is sure, in every case, always to be at hand. It is the

lottery into which the credulous are eager to put in;--it is the theatre

on whose stage ambition and vanity are impatient to appear;--it is the

land of Cockayne, in whose crowded mazes the selfish escape from every

duty, and reduce their intercourse with their fellow-creatures to the

sympathies of visiting and of shopping. It is the seat also of liberal

society, and independent existence, among the friends and occupations of

one's choice. Lord Falkland, the love of his age, admitted, that

quitting London was the only thing which he was not sufficiently master

of himself ever to manage without a struggle. In this state of things,

it is plain that nobody can be of such consequence there but that he is

easily spared. The death of a town wit is handsomely celebrated, if it

furnishes five minutes' conversation for the table where he dined the

day before. He is replaced with the same regularity and indifference as

fresh snuff is put into a snuff-box, or fresh flowers are set out upon

the epergne. Nobody misses him. The machine goes on without perceiving

that the blue-bottle or the gnat has fallen from its wheel.

The vastness and multiplicity and complexity of the organization by

which the movements of the capital proceed, as it were mechanically, do

not act merely by diminishing the general importance of individuals to

the system. Except in the case of very happy, and universal, and flowing

natures, or under the influence of accidental counteractions, a personal

risk, between extreme vagueness and extreme narrowness of character, is

incurred by the individual himself. In respect of employment, the

division of intellectual labour is so complete, that most persons in

such a situation are tempted to do their own piece of work, and no

more;--to rest satisfied with manufacturing the pin's head which happens

to have fallen to their share. Does a London life tend to quicken the

moral pulse and expand the heart? The forms of society are thrown into

too large a scale, and its pace is too rapid, to afford an opportunity

for the sort of intercourse by which alone a real acquaintance with,

understanding of, and affection for, each other can be obtained. No

means exist of getting there at any thing further than talents in men,

and beauty or accomplishments in women.

Qualities which can be exhibited as a show are discovered and

appreciated accordingly. But wisdom and virtue, which are to the mind

what breath is to the body, have no part assigned or assignable to them

on such a stage. A man may pass a life in London without an occasion

arising by which his neighbours can learn whether he is an honest fellow

or a rogue. The consequence is, that a good deal of such a man's moral

nature gets imperfectly developed, and dies away. The appropriate object

is not brought sufficiently close and home to him to stimulate and call

forth his latent powers. Charity is perhaps better off than most. By a

satisfactory compromise, it falls into the hands of a mendicity society.

But there are other virtues which do not admit of being compounded for,

and their burden transferred to a committee, for two guineas a-year. In

these cases the moral tax is too often evaded altogether. We are well

aware that men of pleasure are far from being the only persons who have

turned into a maxim of life the sentence which the Duke of Buckingham

passed upon the dog which barked after him,--"Would to God you were

married and settled in the country!" It is evident that the word

_provincial_ is often felt, by characters of a higher strain and object,

to imply an imputation or admission of mediocrity. Now, greatly as

nations differ, it is generally admitted that all capitals are pretty

much alike. It follows therefore, that the characteristic spirit and

principle of a nation do not appear there to most advantage. Enow worthy

representatives of that spirit and principle are doubtless there; but

they are there too much as though they were not. It is an atmosphere

which no individual powers can penetrate, and where it needs more than

an ordinary sun to make itself felt or seen. We are satisfied that, on a

just estimate of the whole case, the provinces, as distinguished from

the metropolis, would be found in many instances, perhaps in most, to be

the home which a wise lover of himself, and a sincere lover of his kind,

would do well to fix in;--not indeed as the scene of a brilliant or

sybarite existence, but as the post of that salutary influence which

sinks deepest; and of that usefulness and happiness which last the

longest; as most visibly incorporated with, and represented by, our

fellow-beings.--_Edinburgh Review._

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 19, No. 547, May 19, 1832 · 第 19 / 22 题