THOMSON.

Of the pictures in this room nearly all the more important are the

works of three masters--Claude and the two Poussins. It is of them,

therefore, that a few general remarks will here be made. It should be

noticed in the first place how very different this French School of

the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is from the French School of

to-day. The latter school is distinguished for its technical skill,

which makes Paris the chief centre of art teaching in the world, but,

also, and still more markedly, for its "excessive realism and gross

sensuality." "A few years ago," adds Professor Middleton, "a gold

medal was won at the Paris _Salon_ by a 'naturalist' picture--a real

masterpiece of technical skill. It represented Job as an emaciated old

man covered with ulcers, carefully studied in the Paris hospitals for

skin diseases." There could not be a greater contrast than between such

art as that and the "ideal" landscapes of Claude, the Bacchanalian

scenes of Poussin, or the soft girl-faces of Greuze.

Confining ourselves now to Claude and the Poussins--with whom, however,

the contemporary works of Salvator Rosa (in Room XIII.) should be

studied, we note that in spite of considerable differences between

them they agree in marking a great advance in the art of landscape

painting. The old conventionalism has now altogether disappeared; there

is an attempt to paint nature as she really is. There are effects of

nature, too,--not shown in any earlier pictures, and here painted for

the first time,--graceful effects of foliage, smooth surface of water,

diffusion of yellow sunlight. In some of these effects Claude has

never been surpassed; but when his pictures are more closely examined,

they are often found to be untrue to the forms of nature. Trees are

not branched, nor rocks formed, nor mountains grouped as Claude and

Poussin represent. Their conception of landscape, and especially of

its relation to human life, is governed by the "classical ideal,"

to which as far as possible they made their pictures approach. This

"classical" landscape is "the representation of (1) perfectly trained

and civilised human life; (2) associated with perfect natural scenery,

and (3) with decorative spiritual powers. (1) There are no signs in

it of humiliating labour or abasing misfortune. Classical persons

must be trained in all the polite arts, and, because their health is

to be perfect, chiefly in the open air. Hence the architecture around

them must be of the most finished kind, the rough country and ground

being subdued by frequent and happy humanity. (2) Such personages

and buildings must be associated with natural scenery, uninjured by

storms or inclemency of climate (such injury implying interruption

of the open air life); and it must be scenery conducing to pleasure,

not to material service; all cornfields, orchards, olive-yards, and

such-like being under the management of slaves, and the superior

beings having nothing to do with them; but passing their lives under

avenues of scented and otherwise delightful trees--under picturesque

rocks and by clear fountains. It is curious, as marking the classical

spirit, that a sailing vessel is hardly admissible, but a galley

with oars is admissible, because the rowers may be conceived as

absolute slaves. (3) The spiritual powers in classical scenery must

be decorative; ornamental gods, not governing gods; otherwise they

could not be subjected to the principles of taste, but would demand

reverence. In order, therefore, as far as possible, without taking

away their supernatural power, to destroy their dignity ... those only

are introduced who are the lords of lascivious pleasures. For the

appearance of any great god would at once destroy the whole theory of

classical life; therefore Pan, Bacchus, and the Satyrs, with Venus

and the Nymphs, are the principal spiritual powers of the classical

landscape" (abridged from _Modern Painters_, vol. v. pt. ix. ch. v. §§

1-8).

It may be interesting to point out how entirely this ideal accords with

the prevailing taste and literature of their time. The painting of

Claude and Salvator precisely corresponds to what is called "_pastoral_

poetry, that is to say, poetry written in praise of the country, by

men who lived in coffee-houses and on the Mall[36]-- ... the class

of poetry in which a farmer's girl is spoken of as a 'nymph,' and a

farmer's boy as a 'swain,' and in which, throughout, a ridiculous

and unnatural refinement is supposed to exist in rural life, merely

because the poet himself has neither had the courage to endure its

hardships, nor the wit to conceive its realities.... Examine the

novels of Smollett, Fielding, and Sterne, the comedies of Molière,

and the writings of Johnson and Addison, and I do not think you will

find a single expression of true delight in sublime nature in any one

of them. Perhaps Sterne's _Sentimental Journey_, in its total absence

of sentiment on any subject but humanity ... is the most striking

instance; ... and if you compare with this negation of feeling on one

side, the interludes of Molière, in which shepherds and shepherdesses

are introduced in court dress, you will have a very accurate conception

of the general spirit of the age.[37] It was in such a state of

society that the landscape of Claude, Gaspar Poussin, and Salvator Rosa

attained its reputation. It is the complete expression on canvas of the

spirit of the time" (Edinburgh _Lectures on Architecture and Painting_,

pp. 163-167). The reputation thus gained survived unimpaired almost

into the present century, until Wordsworth in poetry and Turner in

painting led the return to nature, and the modern school of landscape

arose.

It is, however, the art of Constable to which direct influence

must be attributed in the foundation of the modern school of

landscape--_paysage intime_--in France (see Vol. II., pp. 93-4). Of

this school, wholly unrepresented until lately in our National Gallery,

a few examples--characteristic, if not very important--may now be seen

in Room XVII. (see Nos. 2058, 2135, etc.).

--> _We have now concluded our survey of the Foreign Schools. The

western doors in Room XVII. lead down a side staircase into the

entrance Hall, and thus form an exit from the Gallery. On the

staircases leading to the Hall and thence down to the basement, some

foreign pictures are now placed. The visitor who wishes to see the

British School should return into Room XVI. and thence proceed into

the East Vestibule, where a few portraits by British masters are hung.

Descending the steps and ascending those opposite, the visitor will

come into the West Vestibule, which leads to the rooms of the British

School--XVIII., XIX., XX., and XXI. Finally, at the east end of the

Gallery, we reach Room XXII., devoted to the Turner Collection. For

remarks on the British School see Volume II. From the Entrance Hall,

the visitor reaches the West Basement, and by corresponding stairs on

the other side the East Basement. In the Basement Rooms are collections

of copies from Old Masters and the Turner Water Colours. For notes on

the former, see end of this volume; for the Turners, see Volume II._

[Illustration]

A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin · 第 78 / 1401 题