CHAPTER XI.

ANTONELLI.

He was born in a den of thieves. His native place, Sonnino, is more

celebrated in the history of crime than all Arcadia in the annals of

virtue. This nest of vultures was hidden in the southern mountains,

towards the Neapolitan frontier. Roads, impracticable to mounted

dragoons, winding through brakes and thickets; forests, impenetrable

to the stranger; deep ravines and gloomy caverns,--all combined to

form a most desirable landscape, for the convenience of crime. The

houses of Sonnino, old, ill-built, flung pell-mell one, upon the

other, and almost uninhabitable by human beings, were, in point of

fact, little else than depots of pillage and magazines of rapine. The

population, alert and vigorous, had for many centuries practised armed

robbery and depredation, and gained its livelihood at the point of the

carbine. New-born infants inhaled contempt of the law with the

mountain air, and drew in the love of others' goods with their

mothers' milk. Almost as soon as they could walk, they assumed the

_cioccie_, or mocassins of untanned leather, with which they learned

to run fearlessly along the edge of the giddiest mountain precipices.

When they had acquired the art of pursuing and escaping, of taking

without being taken, the knowledge of the value of the different

coins, the arithmetic of the distribution of booty, and the principles

of the rights of nations as they are practised among the Apaches or

the Comanches, their education was deemed complete. They required no

teaching to learn how to apply the spoil, and to satisfy their

passions in the hour of victory.

In the year of grace 1806, this sensual, brutal, impious,

superstitious, ignorant, and cunning race endowed Italy with a little

mountaineer, known as Giacomo Antonelli.

Hawks do not hatch doves. This is an axiom in natural history which

has no need of demonstration. Had Giacomo Antonelli been gifted at his

birth with the simple virtues of an Arcadian shepherd, his village

would have instantly disowned him. But the influence of certain events

modified his conduct, although they failed to modify his nature. His

infancy and his childhood were subjected to two opposing influences.

If he received his earliest lessons from successful brigandage, his

next teachers were the gendarmerie. When he was hardly four years old,

the discharge of a high moral lesson shook his ears: it was the French

troops who were shooting brigands in the outskirts of Sonnino. After

the return of Pius VII. he witnessed the decapitation of a few

neighbouring relatives who had often dandled him on their knees. Under

Leo XII. it was still worse. Those wholesome correctives, the wooden

horse and the supple-jack, were permanently established in the village

square. About once a fortnight the authorities rased the house of some

brigand, after sending his family to the galleys, and paying a reward

to the informer who had denounced him. St. Peter's Gate, which adjoins

the house of the Antonellis, was ornamented with a garland of human

heads, which eloquent relics grinned dogmatically enough in their iron

cages. If the stage be a school of life, surely such a stage as this

is a rare teacher. Young Giacomo was enabled to reflect upon the

inconveniences of brigandage, even before he had tasted its sweets.

About him some men of progress had already engaged in industrial

pursuits of a less hazardous nature than robbery. His own father, who,

it was whispered, had in him the stuff of a Grasparone or a Passatore,

instead of exposing himself upon the highways, took to keeping

bullocks, he then became an Intendant, and subsequently was made a

Municipal Receiver; by which occupations he acquired more money at

considerably less risk.

The young Antonelli hesitated for some time as to the choice of a

calling. His natural vocation was that of the inhabitants of Sonnino

in general, to live in plenty, to enjoy every sort of pleasure, to

make himself at home everywhere, to be dependent upon nobody, to rule

others, and to frighten them, if necessary, but, above all, to violate

the laws with impunity. With the view of attaining so lofty an end

without exposing his life, for which he ever had a most particular

regard, he entered the great seminary of Rome.

In our land of scepticism, a young man enters the seminary with the

hope of being ordained a priest: Antonelli entered it with the

opposite intention. But in the capital of the Catholic Church, young

Levites of ordinary intelligence become magistrates, prefects,

councillors of state, and ministers, while the "dry fruit[6] is

thought good enough for making priests."

Antonelli so distinguished himself, that (with Heaven's help) he

escaped the sacrament of Ordination. He has never said mass: he has

never confessed a penitent; I won't swear he has even confessed

himself. He gained what was of more value than all the Christian

virtues--the friendship of Gregory XVI. He became a prelate, a

magistrate, a prefect, Secretary General of the Interior, and Minister

of Finance. No one can say he has not chosen the right path. A finance

minister, if he knows anything of his business, can lay by more money

in six months than all the brigands of Sonnino in twenty years.

Under Gregory XVI. he had been a reactionist, to please his sovereign.

On the accession of Pius IX., for the same reason, he professed

liberal ideas. A red hat and a ministerial portfolio were the

recompense of his new convictions, and proved to the inhabitants of

Sonnino that liberalism itself is more lucrative than brigandage. What

a practical lesson for those mountaineers! One of themselves clothed

in purple and fine linen, actually riding in his gilt coach, passed

the barracks, and their old friends the dragoons presenting arms,

instead of firing long shots at him!

He obtained the same influence over the new Pope that he had over the

old one, thus proving that people may be got hold of without stopping

them on the highway. Pius IX., who had no secrets from him, confided

to him his wish to correct abuses, without concealing his fear of

succeeding too well. He served the Holy Father, even in his

irresolutions. As President of the Supreme Council of State, he

proposed reforms, and as Minister he postponed their adoption. Nobody

was more active than he, whether in settling or in violating the

constitution of 1848. He sent Durando to fight the Austrians, and

disavowed him after the battle.

He quitted the ministry as soon as he found there were dangers to be

encountered, but assisted the Pope in his secret opposition to his

ministers. The murder of Count Rossi gave him serious cause for

reflection. A man don't take the trouble to be born at Sonnino, in

order to let himself be assassinated: quite the contrary. He placed

the Pope--and himself--in safety, and then went to Gaeta to play the

part of Secretary of State _in partibus_.

From this exile dates his omnipotence over the will of the Holy

Father, his reinstatement in the esteem of the Austrians, and the

consistency in his whole conduct. Since then no more contradictions in

his political life. They who formally accused him of hesitating

between the welfare of the nation and his own personal interest are

reduced to silence. He wishes to restore the absolute power of the

Pope, in order that he may dispose of it at his ease. He prevents all

reconciliation between Pius IX. and his subjects; he summons the

cannon of Catholicism to effect the conquest of Rome. He ill-uses the

French, who are willing to die for him; he turns a deaf ear to the

liberal counsels of Napoleon III.; he designedly prolongs the exile of

his master; he draws up the promises of the _Motu Proprio_, while

devising means to elude them. At length, he returns to Rome, and for

ten years continues to reign over a timid old man and an enslaved

people, opposing a passive resistance to all the counsels of diplomacy

and all the demands of Europe. Clinging tenaciously to power, reckless

as to the future, misusing present opportunities, and day by day

increasing his fortune--after the manner of Sonnino.

In this year of grace 1859, he is fifty-three years of age. He

presents the appearance of a well-preserved man. His frame is slight

and robust, and his constitution is that of a mountaineer. The breadth

of his forehead, the brilliancy of his eyes, his beak-like nose, and

all the upper part of his face inspire a certain awe. His countenance,

of almost Moorish hue, is at times lit up by flashes of intellect. But

his heavy jaw, his long fang-like teeth, and his thick lips express

the grossest appetites. He gives you the idea of a minister grafted on

a savage. When he assists the Pope in the ceremonies of the Holy Week

he is magnificently disdainful and impertinent. He turns from time to

time in the direction of the diplomatic tribune, and looks without a

smile at the poor ambassadors, whom he cajoles from morning to night.

You admire the actor who bullies his public. But when at an evening

party he engages in close conversation with a handsome woman, the play

of his countenance shows the direction of his thoughts, and those of

the imaginative observer are imperceptibly carried to a roadside in a

lonely forest, in which the principal objects are prostrate

postilions, an overturned carriage, trembling females, and a select

party of the inhabitants of Sonnino!

He lives in the Vatican, immediately over the Pope. The Romans ask

punningly which is the uppermost, the Pope or Antonelli?

All classes of society hate him equally. Concini himself was not more

cordially detested. He is the only living man concerning whom an

entire people is agreed.

A Roman prince furnished me with some information respecting the

relative fortunes of the nobility. When he gave me the list he said,

"You will remark the names of two individuals, the amount of

whose property is described as unlimited. They are Torlonia

and Antonelli. They have both made large fortunes in a few

years,--the first by speculation, the second by power."

The Cardinals Altieri and Antonelli were one day disputing upon some

point in the Pope's presence. They flatly contradicted one another;

and the Pope inclined to the opinion of his Minister. "Since your

Holiness," said the noble Altieri, "accords belief to a _ciociari_[7]

rather than to a Roman prince, I have nothing to do but to withdraw."

The Apostles themselves appear to entertain no very amicable feelings

towards the Secretary of State. The last time the Pope made a solemn

entry into his capital (I think it was after his journey to Bologna),

the Porta del Popolo and the Corso were according to custom hung with

draperies, behind which the old statues of St. Peter and St. Paul were

completely hidden. Accordingly the people were entertained by finding

the following dialogue appended to the corner of the street:--

_Peter to Paul_. "It seems to me, old fellow, that we are somewhat

forsaken here."

_Paul to Peter_. "What would you have? We are no longer anything.

There is but James in the world now."

I am aware that hatred proves nothing--even the hatred of Apostles.

The French nation, which claims to be thought just, insulted the

funeral procession of Louis XIV. It also occasionally detested Henri

IV. for his economy, and Napoleon for his victories. No statesman

should be judged upon the testimony of his enemies. The only evidence

we should admit either for or against him, is his public acts. The

only witnesses to which any weight should be attributed are the

greatness and the prosperity of the country he governs.

Such an inquiry would, I fear, be ruinous to Antonelli. The nation

reproaches him with all the evils it has suffered for the last ten

years. The public wretchedness and ignorance, the decline of the arts,

the entire suppression of liberty, the ever-present curse of foreign

occupation,--all fall upon his head, because he alone is responsible

for everything.

It may be alleged that he has at least served the reactionary party. I

much doubt it. What internal factions has he suppressed? Secret

societies have swarmed in Rome during his reign. What remonstrances

from without has he silenced? Europe continues to complain

unanimously, and day by day lifts up its voice a tone or two higher.

He has failed to reconcile one single party or one single power to the

Holy father. During his ten years' dictatorship, he has neither gained

the esteem of one foreigner nor the confidence of one Roman. All he

has gained is time. His pretended capacity is but slyness. To the

trickery of the present he adds the cunning of the red Indian; but he

has not that largeness of view without which it is impossible to

establish firmly the slavery of the people. No one possesses in a

greater degree than he the art of dragging on an affair, and

manoeuvring with and tiring out diplomatists; but it is not by

pleasantries of this sort that a tottering tyranny can be propped up.

Although he employs every subterfuge known to dishonest policy, I am

not quite sure that he has even the craft of a politician.

The attainment of his own end does not in fact require it. For after

all, what is his end? In what hope, with what aim, did he come down

from the mountains of Sonnino?

Do you really believe he thought of becoming the benefactor of the

nation?--or the saviour of the Papacy?--or the Don Quixote of the

Church? Not such a fool! He thought, first, of himself; secondly, of

his family.

His family is flourishing. His four brothers, Filippo, Luigi,

Gregorio, and--save the mark!--Angelo, all wore the _cioccie_ in their

younger days; they now, one and all, wear the count's coronet. One is

governor of the bank, a capital post, and since poor Campana's

condemnation he has got the Monte di Pietà. Another is Conservator of

Rome, under a Senator especially selected for his incapacity. Another

follows openly the trape of a monopolist, with immense facilities for

either preventing or authorizing exportation, according as his own

warehouses happen to be full or empty. The youngest is the commercial

traveller, the diplomatist, the messenger of the family, _Angelus

Domini_. A cousin of the family, Count Dandini, reigns over the

police. This little group is perpetually at work adding to a fortune

which is invisible, impalpable, and incalculable. The house of

Antonelli is not pitied at Sonnino.

As for the Secretary of State, all who know him intimately, both men

and women, agree that he leads a pleasant life. If it were not for the

bore of making head against the diplomatists, and giving audience

every morning, he would be the happiest of mountaineers. His tastes

are simple; a scarlet silk robe, unlimited power, an enormous fortune,

a European reputation, and all the pleasures within man's reach--this

trifle satisfies the simple tastes of the Cardinal Minister. Add, by

the bye, a splendid collection of minerals, perfectly classified which

he is constantly enriching with the passion of an amateur and the

tenderness of a father.

I was saying just now that he has always escaped the sacrament of Holy

Orders. He is Cardinal Deacon. The good souls who will have it that

all goes well at Rome, dwell with fervour on the advantage he

possesses in not being a priest. If he is accused of possessing

inordinate wealth, these indulgent Christians reply, that he is not a

priest! If you charge him with having read Machiavelli to good

purpose; admitted--what then?--he is no priest! If the tongue of

scandal is over-free with his private life; still the ready reply,

that he is not a priest! If Deacons are thus privileged, what latitude

may we not claim who have not even assumed the tonsure?

This highly-blest mortal has one weakness--truly a very natural one.

He fears death. A certain fair lady, who had been honoured by his

Eminence's particular attentions, thus illustrated the fact,

"Upon meeting me at our rendezvous, he seized me like a

madman, and with trembling eagerness examined my pockets. It

was only when he had assured himself that I had no concealed

weapon about me that he seemed to remember our friendship."

One man alone has dared to threaten a life so precious to itself, and

he was an idiot. Instigated by some of the secret societies, this poor

crazed wretch concealed himself beneath the staircase of the Vatican,

and awaited the coming of the Cardinal. When the intended victim

appeared, the idiot with much difficulty drew from beneath his

waistcoat--a table-fork! Antonelli saw the terrible weapon, and

bounded backwards with a spring which an Alpine chamois-hunter might

have envied. The miserable assassin was instantly seized, bound, and

delivered over to justice. The Roman tribunals, so often lenient

towards the really guilty, had no mercy for this real innocent. He was

beheaded. The Cardinal, full of pity, fell--officially--at the Pope's

feet, and asked for a pardon which he well knew would be refused. He

pays the widow a pension: is not this the act of a clever man?

Since the day when that formidable fork glittered before his eyes, he

has taken excessive precautions. His horses are broken to gallop

furiously through the streets, at considerable public risk.

Occasionally, his carriage knocks down and runs over a little boy or

girl. With characteristic magnanimity, he sends the parents fifty

crowns.

Antonelli has been compared to Mazarin. They have, in common, the fear

of death, inordinate love of money, a strong family feeling, utter

indifference to the people's welfare, contempt for mankind, and some

other accidental points of resemblance. They were born in the same

mountains, or nearly so. One obtained the influence over a woman's

heart which the other possesses over the mind of an old man. Both

governed unscrupulously, and both have merited and obtained the hatred

of their contemporaries. They have talked French comically, without

being insensible to any of the delicate niceties of the language.

Still there would be manifest injustice in placing them in the same

rank. The selfish Mazarin dictated to Europe the treaties of

Westphalia, and the Peace of the Pyrenees: he founded by diplomacy the

greatness of Louis XIV., and managed the affairs of the French

monarchy, without in any way neglecting his own.

Antonelli has made his fortune at the expense of the nation, the Pope,

and the Church. Mazarin may be compared to a skilful but rascally

tailor, who dresses his customers well, while he contrives to cabbage

sundry yards of their cloth; Antonelli, to those Jews of the Middle

Ages, who demolished the Coliseum for the sake of the old iron in the

walls.

The Roman Question · 第 11 / 20 章