CHAPTER IX

Constructional Details of Pistons--Aluminum Cylinders and

Pistons--Piston Ring Construction--Leak Proof Piston Rings--

Keeping Oil Out of Combustion Chamber--Connecting Rod Forms--

Connecting Rods for Vee Engines--Cam-Shaft and Crank-Shaft

Designs--Ball Bearing Crank-Shafts--Engine Base Construction.

CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF PISTONS

The piston is one of the most important parts of the gasoline motor

inasmuch as it is the reciprocating member that receives the impact of

the explosion and which transforms the power obtained by the combustion

of gas to mechanical motion by means of the connecting rod to which it

is attached. The piston is one of the simplest elements of the motor,

and it is one component which does not vary much in form in different

types of motors. The piston is a cylindrical member provided with a

series of grooves in which packing rings are placed on the outside and

two bosses which serve to hold the wrist pin in its interior. It is

usually made of cast iron or aluminum, though in some motors where

extreme lightness is desired, such as those used for aeronautic work, it

may be made of steel. The use of the more resisting material enables the

engineer to use lighter sections where it is important that the weight

of this member be kept as low as possible consistent with strength.

[Illustration: Fig. 116.--Forms of Pistons Commonly Employed in Gasoline

Engines. A--Dome Head Piston and Three Packing Rings. B--Flat Top Form

Almost Universally Used. C--Concave Piston Utilized in Knight Motors and

Some Having Overhead Valves. D--Two-Cycle Engine Member with Deflector

Plate Cast Integrally. E--Differential of Two-Diameter Piston Used in

Some Engines Operating on Two-Cycle Principle.]

A number of piston types are shown at Fig. 116. That at A has a round

top and is provided with four split packing rings and two oil grooves. A

piston of this type is generally employed in motors where the combustion

chamber is large and where it is desired to obtain a higher degree of

compression than would be possible with a flat top piston. This

construction is also stronger because of the arched piston top. The most

common form of piston is that shown at B, and it differs from that

previously described only in that it has a flat top. The piston outlined

in section at C is a type used on some of the sleeve-valve motors of the

Knight pattern, and has a concave head instead of the convex form shown

at A. The design shown at D in side and plan views is the conventional

form employed in two-cycle engines. The deflector plate on the top of

the cylinder is cast integral and is utilized to prevent the incoming

fresh gases from flowing directly over the piston top and out of the

exhaust port, which is usually opposite the inlet opening. On these

types of two-cycle engines where a two-diameter cylinder is employed,

the piston shown at E is used. This is known as a "differential

piston," and has an enlarged portion at its lower end which fits the

pumping cylinder. The usual form of deflector plate is provided at the

top of the piston and one may consider it as two pistons in one.

[Illustration: Fig. 117.--Typical Methods of Piston Pin Retention

Generally Used in Engines of American Design. A--Single Set Screw and

Lock Nut. B--Set Screw and Check Nut Fitting Groove in Wrist Pin. C,

D--Two Locking Screws Passing Into Interior of Hollow Wrist Pin.

E--Split Ring Holds Pin in Place. F--Use of Taper Expanding Plugs

Outlined. G--Spring Pressed Plunger Type. H--Piston Pin Pinned to

Connecting Rod. I--Wrist Pin Clamped in Connecting Rod Small End by

Bolt.]

[Illustration: Fig. 118.--Typical Piston and Connecting Rod Assembly.]

[Illustration: Fig. 119.--Parts of Sturtevant Aviation Engine.

A--Cylinder Head Showing Valves. B--Connecting Rod. C--Piston and

Rings.]

One of the important conditions in piston design is the method of

securing the wrist pin which is used to connect the piston to the upper

end of the connecting rod. Various methods have been devised to keep the

pin in place, the most common of these being shown at Fig. 117. The

wrist pin should be retained by some positive means which is not liable

to become loose under the vibratory stresses which obtain at this point.

If the wrist pin was free to move it would work out of the bosses

enough so that the end would bear against the cylinder wall. As it is

usually made of steel, which is a harder material than cast iron used in

cylinder construction, the rubbing action would tend to cut a groove in

the cylinder wall which would make for loss of power because it would

permit escape of gas. The wrist pin member is a simple cylindrical

element that fits the bosses closely, and it may be either hollow or

solid stock. A typical piston and connecting rod assembly which shows a

piston in section also is given at Fig. 118. The piston of the

Sturtevant aeronautical motor is shown at Fig. 119, the aluminum piston

of the Thomas airplane motor with piston rings in place is shown at Fig.

120. A good view of the wrist pin and connecting rod are also given. The

iron piston of the Gnome "Monosoupape" airplane engine and the

unconventional connecting rod assembly are clearly depicted at Fig 121.

[Illustration: Fig. 120.--Aluminum Piston and Light But Strong Steel

Connecting Rod and Wrist Pin of Thomas Aviation Engine.]

The method of retention shown at A is the simplest and consists of a set

screw having a projecting portion passing into the wrist pin and

holding it in place. The screw is kept from turning or loosening by

means of a check nut. The method outlined at B is similar to that shown

at A, except that the wrist pin is solid and the point of the set screw

engages an annular groove turned in the pin for its reception. A very

positive method is shown at C. Here the retention screws pass into the

wrist pin and are then locked by a piece of steel wire which passes

through suitable holes in the ends. The method outlined at D is

sometimes employed, and it varies from that shown at C only in that the

locking wire, which is made of spring steel, is passed through the heads

of the locking screws. Some designers machine a large groove around the

piston at such a point that when the wrist pin is put in place a large

packing ring may be sprung in the groove and utilized to hold the wrist

pin in place.

[Illustration: Fig. 121.--Cast Iron Piston of "Monosoupape" Gnome Engine

Installed On One of the Short Connecting Rods.]

The system shown at F is not so widely used as the simpler methods,

because it is more costly and does not offer any greater security when

the parts are new than the simple lock shown at A. In this a hollow

wrist pin is used, having a tapered thread cut at each end. The wrist

pin is slotted at three or four points, for a distance equal to the

length of the boss, and when taper expansion plugs are screwed in place

the ends of the wrist pin are expanded against the bosses. This method

has the advantage of providing a certain degree of adjustment if the

wrist pin should loosen up after it has been in use for some time. The

taper plugs would be screwed in deeper and the ends of the wrist pin

expanded proportionately to take up the loss motion. The method shown at

G is an ingenious one. One of the piston bosses is provided with a

projection which is drilled out to receive a plunger. The wrist pin is

provided with a hole of sufficient size to receive the plunger, which is

kept in place by means of a spring in back of it. This makes a very

positive lock and one that can be easily loosened when it is desired to

remove the wrist pin. To unlock, a piece of fine rod is thrust into the

hole at the bottom of the boss which pushes the plunger back against the

spring until the wrist pin can be pushed out of the piston.

Some engineers think it advisable to oscillate the wrist pin in the

piston bosses, instead of in the connecting rod small end. It is argued

that this construction gives more bearing surface at the wrist pin and

also provides for more strength because of the longer bosses that can be

used. When this system is followed the piston pin is held in place by

locking it to the connecting rod by some means. At H the simplest method

is outlined. This consisted of driving a taper pin through both rod and

wrist pin and then preventing it from backing out by putting a split

cotter through the small end of the tapered locking pin. Another method,

which is depicted at I, consists of clamping the wrist pin by means of a

suitable bolt which brings the slit connecting rod end together as

shown.

ALUMINUM FOR CYLINDERS AND PISTONS

Aluminum pistons outlined at Fig. 122, have replaced cast iron members

in many airplane engines, as these weigh about one-third as much as the

cast iron forms of the same size, while the reduction in the inertia

forces has made it possible to increase the engine speed without

correspondingly stressing the connecting rods, crank-shaft and engine

bearings.

[Illustration: Fig. 122.--Types of Aluminum Pistons Used In Aviation

Engines.]

Aluminum has not only been used for pistons, but a number of motors will

be built for the coming season that will use aluminum cylinder block

castings as well. Of course, the aluminum alloy is too soft to be used

as a bearing for the piston, and it will not withstand the hammering

action of the valve. This makes the use of cast iron or steel imperative

in all motors. When used in connection with an aluminum cylinder block

the cast iron pieces are placed in the mould so that they act as

cylinder liners and valve seats, and the molten metal is poured around

them when the cylinder is cast. It is said that this construction

results in an intimate bond between the cast iron and the surrounding

aluminum metal. Steel liners may also be pressed into the aluminum

cylinders after these are bored out to receive them. Aluminum has for a

number of years been used in many motor car parts. Alloys have been

developed that have greater strength than cast iron and that are not so

brittle. Its use for manifolds and engine crank and gear cases has been

general for a number of years.

At first thought it would seem as though aluminum would be entirely

unsuited for use in those portions of internal combustion engines

exposed to the heat of the explosion, on account of the low melting

point of that metal and its disadvantageous quality of suddenly

"wilting" when a critical point in the temperature is reached. Those who

hesitated to use aluminum on account of this defect lost sight of the

great heat conductivity of that metal, which is considerably more than

that of cast iron. It was found in early experiments with aluminum

pistons that this quality of quick radiation meant that aluminum pistons

remained considerably cooler than cast iron ones in service, which was

attested to by the reduced formation of carbon deposit thereon. The use

of aluminum makes possible a marked reduction in power plant weight. A

small four-cylinder engine which was not particularly heavy even with

cast iron cylinders was found to weigh 100 pounds less when the cylinder

block, pistons, and upper half of the crank-case had been made of

aluminum instead of cast iron. Aluminum motors are no longer an

experiment, as a considerable number of these have been in use on cars

during the past year without the owners of the cars being apprised of

the fact. Absolutely no complaint was made in any case of the aluminum

motor and it was demonstrated, in addition to the saving in weight, that

the motors cost no more to assemble and cooled much more efficiently

than the cast iron form. One of the drawbacks to the use of aluminum is

its growing scarcity, which results in making it a "near precious"

metal.

PISTON RING CONSTRUCTION

As all pistons must be free to move up and down in the cylinder with

minimum friction, they must be less in diameter than the bore of the

cylinder. The amount of freedom or clearance provided varies with the

construction of the engine and the material the piston is made of, as

well as its size, but it is usual to provide from .005 to .010 of an

inch to compensate for the expansion of the piston due to heat and also

to leave sufficient clearance for the introduction of lubricant between

the working surfaces. Obviously, if the piston were not provided with

packing rings, this amount of clearance would enable a portion of the

gases evolved when the charge is exploded to escape by it into the

engine crank-case. The packing members or piston rings, as they are

called, are split rings of cast iron, which are sprung into suitable

grooves machined on the exterior of the piston, three or four of these

being the usual number supplied. These have sufficient elasticity so

that they bear tightly against the cylinder wall and thus make a

gas-tight joint. Owing to the limited amount of surface in contact with

the cylinder wall and the elasticity of the split rings the amount of

friction resulting from the contact of properly fitted rings and the

cylinder is not of enough moment to cause any damage and the piston is

free to slide up and down in the cylinder bore.

[Illustration: Fig. 123.--Types of Piston Rings and Ring Joints.

A--Concentric Ring. B--Eccentrically Machined Form. C--Lap Joint Ring.

D--Butt Joint, Seldom Used. E--Diagonal Cut Member, a Popular Form.]

These rings are made in two forms, as outlined at Fig. 123. The design

shown at A is termed a "concentric ring," because the inner circle is

concentric with the outer one and the ring is of uniform thickness at

all points. The ring shown at B is called an "eccentric ring," and it is

thicker at one part than at others. It has theoretical advantages in

that it will make a tighter joint than the other form, as it is claimed

its expansion due to heat is more uniform. The piston rings must be

split in order that they may be sprung in place in the grooves, and also

to insure that they will have sufficient elasticity to take the form of

the cylinder at the different points in their travel. If the cylinder

bore varies by small amounts the rings will spring out at the points

where the bore is larger than standard, and spring in at those portions

where it is smaller than standard.

It is important that the joint should be as nearly gas-tight as

possible, because if it were not a portion of the gases would escape

through the slots in the piston rings. The joint shown at C is termed a

"lap joint," because the ends of the ring are cut in such a manner that

they overlap. This is the approved joint. The butt joint shown at D is

seldom used and is a very poor form, the only advantage being its

cheapness. The diagonal cut shown at E is a compromise between the very

good form shown at C and the poor joint depicted at D. It is also widely

used, though most constructors prefer the lap joint, because it does not

permit the leakage of gas as much as the other two types.

There seems to be some difference of opinion relative to the best piston

ring type--some favoring the eccentric pattern, others the concentric

form. The concentric ring has advantages from the lubricating engineer's

point of view; as stated by the Platt & Washburn Company in their

text-book on engine lubrication, the smaller clearance behind the ring

possible with the ring of uniform section is advantageous.

Fig. 124, A, shows a concentric piston ring in its groove. Since the

ring itself is concentric with the groove, very small clearance between

the back of the ring and the bottom of its groove may be allowed. Small

clearance leaves less space for the accumulation of oil and carbon

deposits. The gasket effect of this ring is uniform throughout the

entire length of its edges, which is its marked advantage over the

eccentric ring. This type of piston ring rarely burns fast in its

groove. There are a large number of different concentric rings

manufactured of different designs and of different efficiency.

[Illustration: Fig. 124.--Diagrams Showing Advantages of Concentric

Piston Rings.]

Figs. 124, B and 124, C show eccentric rings assembled in the ring

groove. It will be noted that there is a large space between the thin

ends of this ring and the bottom of the groove. This empty space fills

up with oil which in the case of the upper ring frequently is

carbonized, restricting the action of the ring and nullifying its

usefulness. The edges of the thin ends are not sufficiently wide to

prevent rapid escape of gases past them. In a practical way this leakage

means loss of compression and noticeable drop in power. When new and

properly fitted, very little difference can be noted between the

tightness of eccentric and concentric rings. Nevertheless, after several

months' use, a more rapid leakage will always occur past the eccentric

than past the concentric. If continuous trouble with the carbonization

of cylinders, smoking and sooting of spark-plugs is experienced, it is

a sure indication that mechanical defects exist in the engine, assuming

of course, that a suitable oil has been used. Such trouble can be

greatly lessened, if not entirely eliminated, by the application of

concentric rings (lap joint), of any good make, properly fitted into the

grooves of the piston. Too much emphasis cannot be put upon this point.

If the oil used in the engine is of the correct viscosity, and serious

carbon deposit, smoking, etc., still result, the only certain remedy

then is to have the cylinders rebored and fitted with properly designed,

oversized pistons and piston rings.

LEAK-PROOF PISTON RINGS

In order to reduce the compression loss and leakage of gas by the

ordinary simple form of diagonal or lap joint one-piece piston ring a

number of compound rings have been devised and are offered by their

makers to use in making replacements. The leading forms are shown at

Fig. 125. That shown at A is known as the "Statite" and consists of

three rings, one carried inside while the other two are carried on the

outside. The ring shown at B is a double ring and is known as the

McCadden. This is composed of two thin concentric lap joint rings so

disposed relative to each other that the opening in the inner ring comes

opposite to the opening in the outer ring.

The form shown at C is known as the "Leektite," and is a single ring

provided with a peculiar form of lap and dove tail joint. The ring shown

at D is known as the "Dunham" and is of the double concentric type being

composed of two rings with lap joints which are welded together at a

point opposite the joint so that there is no passage by which the gas

can escape. The Burd high compression ring is shown at E. The joints of

these rings are sealed by means of an H-shaped coupler of bronze which

closes the opening. The ring ends are made with tongues which interlock

with the coupling. The ring shown at F is called the "Evertite" and is

a three-piece ring composed of three members as shown in the sectional

view below the ring. The main part or inner ring has a circumferential

channel in which the two outer rings lock, the resulting cross-section

being rectangular just the same as that of a regular pattern ring. All

three rings are diagonally split and the joints are spaced equally and

the distances maintained by small pins. This results in each joint being

sealed by the solid portion of the other rings.

[Illustration: Fig. 125.--Leak-Proof and Other Compound Piston Rings.]

The use of a number of light steel rings instead of one wide ring in the

groove is found on a number of automobile power plants, but as far as

known, this construction is not used in airplane power plants. It is

contended that where a number of light rings is employed a more flexible

packing means is obtained and the possibility of leakage is reduced.

Rings of this design are made of square section steel wire and are given

a spring temper. Owing to the limited width the diagonal cut joint is

generally employed instead of the lap joint which is so popular on wider

rings.

KEEPING OIL OUT OF COMBUSTION CHAMBERS

An examination of the engine design that is economical in oil

consumption discloses the use of tight piston rings, large centrifugal

rings on the crank-shaft where it passes through the case, ample cooling

fins in the pistons, vents between the crank-case chamber and the valve

enclosures, etc. Briefly put, cooling of the oil in this engine has been

properly cared for and leakage reduced to a minimum. To be specific

regarding details of design: Oil surplus can be kept out of the

explosion chambers by leaving the lower edge of the piston skirt sharp

and by the use of a shallow groove (C), Fig. 126, just below the lower

piston ring. Small holes are bored through the piston walls at the base

of this groove and communicate with the crank-case. The similarity of

the sharp edges of piston skirt (D) and piston ring to a carpenter's

plane bit, makes their operation plain.

[Illustration: Fig. 126.--Sectional View of Engine Showing Means of

Preventing Oil Leakage By Piston Rings.]

The cooling of oil in the sump (A) can be accomplished most effectively

by radiating fins on its outer surface. The lower crank-case should be

fully exposed to the outer air. A settling basin for sediment (B) should

be provided having a cubic content not less than one-tenth of the total

oil capacity as outlined at Fig. 126. The depth of this basin should be

at least 2-1/2 inches, and its walls vertical, as shown, to reduce the

mixing of sediment with the oil in circulation. The inlet opening to the

oil pump should be near the top of the sediment basin in order to

prevent the entrance into the pump with the oil of any solid matter or

water condensed from the products of combustion. This sediment basin

should be drained after every five to seven hours air service of an

airplane engine. Concerning filtering screens there is little to be

said, save that their areas should be ample and the mesh coarse enough

(one-sixteenth of an inch) to offer no serious resistance to the free

flow of cold or heavy oil through them; otherwise the oil in the

crank-case may build up above them to an undesirable level. The

necessary frequency of draining and flushing out the oil sump differs

greatly with the age (condition) of the engine and the suitability of

the oil used. In broad terms, the oil sump of a new engine should be

thoroughly drained and flushed with kerosene at the end of the first

200 miles, next at the end of 500 miles and thereafter every 1,000

miles. While these instructions apply specifically to automobile motors,

it is very good practice to change the oil in airplane engines

frequently. In many cases, the best results have been secured when the

oil supply is completely replenished every five hours that the engine is

in operation.

CONNECTING ROD FORMS

The connecting rod is the simple member that joins the piston to the

crank-shaft and which transmits the power imparted to the piston by the

explosion so that it may be usefully applied. It transforms the

reciprocating movement of the piston to a rotary motion at the

crank-shaft. A typical connecting rod and its wrist pin are shown at

Fig. 120. It will be seen that it has two bearings, one at either end.

The small end is bored out to receive the wrist pin which joins it to

the piston, while the large end has a hole of sufficient size to go on

the crank-pin. The airplane and automobile engine connecting rod is

invariably a steel forging, though in marine engines it is sometimes

made a steel or high tensile strength bronze casting. In all cases it is

desirable to have softer metals than the crank-shaft and wrist pin at

the bearing point, and for this reason the connecting rod is usually

provided with bushings of anti-friction or white metal at the lower end,

and bronze at the upper. The upper end of the connecting rod may be one

piece, because the wrist pin can be introduced after it is in place

between the bosses of the piston. The lower bearing must be made in two

parts in most cases, because the crank-shaft cannot be passed through

the bearing owing to its irregular form. The rods of the Gnome engine

are all one piece types, as shown at Fig. 127, owing to the construction

of the "mother" rod which receives the crank-pins. The complete

connecting rod assembly is shown in Fig. 121, also at A, Fig. 127. The

"mother" rod, with one of the other rods in place and one about to be

inserted, is shown at Fig. 127, B. The built-up crank-shaft which makes

this construction feasible is shown at Fig. 127, C.

[Illustration: Fig. 127.--Connecting Rod and Crank-Shaft Construction of

Gnome "Monosoupape" Engine.]

Some of the various designs of connecting rods that have been used are

shown at Fig. 128. That at A is a simple form often employed in

single-cylinder motors, having built-up crank-shafts. Both ends of the

connecting rod are bushed with a one-piece bearing, as it can be

assembled in place before the crank-shaft assembly is built up. A

built-up crank-shaft such as this type of connecting rod would be used

with is shown at Fig. 106. The pattern shown at B is one that has been

used to some extent on heavy work, and is known as the "marine type." It

is made in three pieces, the main portion being a steel forging having a

flanged lower end to which the bronze boxes are secured by bolts. The

modified marine type depicted at C is the form that has received the

widest application in automobile and aviation engine construction. It

consists of two pieces, the main member being a steel drop forging

having the wrist-pin bearing and the upper crank-pin bearing formed

integral, while the lower crank-pin bearing member is a separate forging

secured to the connecting rod by bolts. In this construction bushings of

anti-friction metal are used at the lower end, and a bronze bushing is

forced into the upper- or wrist-pin end. The rod shown at D has also

been widely used. It is similar in construction to the form shown at C,

except that the upper end is split in order to permit of a degree of

adjustment of the wrist-pin bushing, and the lower bearing cap is a

hinged member which is retained by one bolt instead of two. When it is

desired to assemble it on the crank-shaft the lower cap is swung to one

side and brought back into place when the connecting rod has been

properly located. Sometimes the lower bearing member is split diagonally

instead of horizontally, such a construction being outlined at E.

[Illustration: Fig. 128.--Connecting Rod Types Summarized.

A--Single Connecting Rod Made in One Piece, Usually Fitted in Small

Single-Cylinder Engines Having Built-Up Crank-Shafts. B--Marine Type, a

Popular Form on Heavy Engines. C--Conventional Automobile Type, a

Modified Marine Form. D--Type Having Hinged Lower Cap and Split Wrist

Pin Bushing. E--Connecting Rod Having Diagonally Divided Big End.

F--Ball-Bearing Rod. G--Sections Showing Structural Shapes Commonly

Employed in Connecting Rod Construction.]

In a number of instances, instead of plain bushed bearings anti-friction

forms using ball or rollers have been used at the lower end. A

ball-bearing connecting rod is shown at F. The big end may be made in

one piece, because if it is possible to get the ball bearing on the

crank-pins it will be easy to put the connecting rod in place. Ball

bearings are not used very often on connecting rod big ends because of

difficulty of installation, though when applied properly they give

satisfactory service and reduce friction to a minimum. One of the

advantages of the ball bearing is that it requires no adjustment,

whereas the plain bushings depicted in the other connecting rods must be

taken up from time to time to compensate for wear.

This can be done in forms shown at B, C, D, and E by bringing the lower

bearing caps closer to the upper one and scraping out the brasses to fit

the shaft. A number of liners or shims of thin brass or copper stock,

varying from .002 inch to .005 inch, are sometimes interposed between

the halves of the bearings when it is first fitted to the crank-pin. As

the brasses wear the shims may be removed and the portions of the

bearings brought close enough together to take up any lost motion that

may exist, though in some motors no shims are provided and depreciation

can be remedied only by installing new brasses and scraping to fit.

[Illustration: Fig. 129.--Double Connecting Rod Assembly For Use On

Single Crank-Pin of Vee Engine.]

The various structural shapes in which connecting rods are formed are

shown in section at G. Of these the I section is most widely used in

airplane engines, because it is strong and a very easy shape to form by

the drop-forging process or to machine out of the solid bar when extra

good steel is used. Where extreme lightness is desired, as in small

high-speed motors used for cycle propulsion, the section shown at the

extreme left is often used. If the rod is a cast member as in some

marine engines, the cross, hollow cylinder, or U sections are sometimes

used. If the sections shown at the right are employed, advantage is

often taken of the opportunity for passing lubricant through the center

of the hollow round section on vertical motors or at the bottom of the U

section, which would be used on a horizontal cylinder power plant.

[Illustration: Fig. 130.--Another Type of Double Connecting Rod for Vee

Engines.]

Connecting rods of Vee engines are made in two distinct styles. The

forked or "scissors" joint rod assembly is employed when the cylinders

are placed directly opposite each other. The "blade" rod, as shown at

Fig. 129, fits between the lower ends of the forked rod, which oscillate

on the bearing which encircles the crank-pin. The lower end of the

"blade" rod is usually attached to the bearing brasses, the ends of the

"forked" rod move on the outer surfaces of the brasses. Another form of

rod devised for use under these conditions is shown at Fig. 130 and

installed in an aviation engine at Fig. 132. In this construction the

shorter rod is attached to a boss on the master rod by a short pin to

form a hinge and to permit the short rod to oscillate as the conditions

dictate. This form of rod can be easily adjusted when the bearing

depreciates, a procedure that is difficult with the forked type rod. The

best practice, in the writer's opinion, is to stagger the cylinders and

use side-by-side rods as is done in the Curtiss engine. Each rod may be

fitted independently of the other and perfect compensation for wear of

the big ends is possible.

[Illustration: Fig. 131.--Part Sectional View of Wisconsin Aviation

Engine, Showing Four-Bearing Crank-Shaft, Overhead Cam-Shaft, and Method

of Combining Cylinders in Pairs.]

[Illustration: Fig. 132.--Part Sectional View of Renault Twelve-Cylinder

Water-Cooled Engine, Showing Connecting Rod Construction and Other

Important Internal Parts.]

CAM-SHAFT AND CRANK-SHAFT DESIGN

Before going extensively into the subject of crank-shaft construction it

will be well to consider cam-shaft design, which is properly a part of

the valve system and which has been considered in connection with the

other elements which have to do directly with cylinder construction to

some extent. Cam-shafts are usually simple members carried at the base

of the cylinder in the engine case of Vee type motors by suitable

bearings and having the cams employed to lift the valves attached at

intervals. A typical cam-shaft design is shown at Fig. 133. Two main

methods of cam-shaft construction are followed--that in which the cams

are separate members, keyed and pinned to the shaft, and the other where

the cams are formed integral, the latter being the most suitable for

airplane engine requirements.

[Illustration: Fig. 133.--Typical Cam-Shaft, with Valve Lifting Cams and

Gears to Operate Auxiliary Devices Forged Integrally.]

The cam-shafts shown at Figs. 133 and 134, B, are of the latter type, as

the cams are machined integrally. In this case not only the cams but

also the gears used in driving the auxiliary shafts are forged integral.

This is a more expensive construction, because of the high initial cost

of forging dies as well as the greater expense of machining. It has the

advantage over the other form in which the cams are keyed in place in

that it is stronger, and as the cams are a part of the shaft they can

never become loose, as might be possible where they are separately

formed and assembled on a simple shaft.

[Illustration: Fig. 134.--Important Parts of Duesenberg Aviation Engine.

A--Three Main Bearing Crank-Shaft. B--Cam-Shaft with Integral Cams.

C--Piston and Connecting Rod Assembly. D--Valve Rocker Group. E--Piston.

F--Main Bearing Brasses.]

The importance of the crank-shaft has been previously considered, and

some of its forms have been shown in views of the motors presented in

earlier portions of this work. The crank-shaft is one of the parts

subjected to the greatest strain and extreme care is needed in its

construction and design, because practically the entire duty of

transmitting the power generated by the motor to the gearset devolves

upon it. Crank-shafts are usually made of high tensile strength steel of

special composition. They may be made in four ways, the most common

being from a drop or machine forging which is formed approximately to

the shape of the finished shaft and in rare instances (experimental

motors only) they may be steel castings. Sometimes they are made from

machine forgings, where considerably more machine work is necessary than

would be the case where the shaft is formed between dies. Some engineers

favor blocking the shaft out of a solid slab of metal and then machining

this rough blank to form. In some radial-cylinder motors of the Gnome

and Le Rhone type the crank-shafts are built up of two pieces, held

together by taper fastenings or bolts.

[Illustration: Fig. 135.--Showing Method of Making Crank-Shaft. A--The

Rough Steel Forging Before Machining. B--The Finished Six-Throw,

Seven-Bearing Crank-Shaft.]

The form of the shaft depends on the number of cylinders and the form

has material influence on the method of construction. For instance, a

four-cylinder crank-shaft could be made by either of the methods

outlined. On the other hand, a three- or six-cylinder shaft is best made

by the machine forging process, because if drop forged or cut from the

blank it will have to be heated and the crank throws bent around so that

the pins will lie in three planes one hundred and twenty degrees apart,

while the other types described need no further attention, as the

crank-pins lie in planes one hundred and eighty degrees apart. This can

be better understood by referring to Fig. 135, which shows a

six-cylinder shaft in the rough and finished stages. At A the

appearance of the machine forging before any of the material is removed

is shown, while at B the appearance of the finished crank-shaft is

clearly depicted. The built-up crank-shaft is seldom used on

multiple-cylinder motors, except in some cases where the crank-shafts

revolve on ball bearings as in some automobile racing engines.

[Illustration: Fig. 136.--Showing Form of Crank-Shaft for Twin-Cylinder

Opposed Power Plant.]

[Illustration: Fig. 137.--Crank-Shaft of Thomas-Morse Eight-Cylinder Vee

Engine.]

Crank-shaft form will vary with a number of cylinders and it is possible

to use a number of different arrangements of crank-pins and bearings for

the same number of cylinders. The simplest form of crank-shaft is that

used on simple radial cylinder motors as it would consist of but one

crank-pin, two webs, and the crank-shaft. As the number of cylinders

increase in Vee motors as a general rule more crank-pins are used. The

crank-shaft that would be used on a two-cylinder opposed motor is shown

at Fig. 136. This has two throws and the crank-pins are spaced 180

degrees apart. The bearings are exceptionally long. Four-cylinder

crank-shafts may have two, three or five main bearings and three or four

crank-pins. In some forms of two-bearing crank-shafts, such as used when

four-cylinders are cast in a block, or unit casting, two of the pistons

are attached to one common crank-pin, so that in reality the crank-shaft

has but three crank-pins. A typical three bearing, four-cylinder

crank-shaft is shown at Fig. 134, A. The same type can be used for an

eight-cylinder Vee engine, except for the greater length of crank-pins

to permit of side by side rods as shown at Fig. 137. Six cylinder

vertical tandem and twelve-cylinder Vee engine crank-shafts usually have

four or seven main bearings depending upon the disposition of the

crank-pins and arrangement of cylinders. At Fig. 138, A, the bottom

view of a twelve-cylinder engine with bottom half of crank case removed

is given. This illustrates clearly the arrangement of main bearings when

the crank-shaft is supported on four journals. The crank-shaft shown at

Fig. 138, B, is a twelve-cylinder seven-bearing type.

[Illustration: Fig. 138.--Crank-Case and Crank-Shaft Construction for

Twelve-Cylinder Motors. A--Duesenberg. B--Curtiss.]

[Illustration: Fig. 139.--Counterbalanced Crank-Shafts Reduce Engine

Vibration and Permit of Higher Rotative Speeds.]

In some automobile engines, extremely good results have been secured in

obtaining steady running with minimum vibration by counterbalancing the

crank-shafts as outlined at Fig. 139. The shaft at A is a type suitable

for a high speed four-cylinder vertical or an eight-cylinder Vee type.

That at B is for a six-cylinder vertical or a twelve-cylinder V with

scissors joint rods. If counterbalancing crank-shafts helps in an

automobile engine, it should have advantages of some moment in airplane

engines, even though the crank-shaft weight is greater.

BALL-BEARING CRANK-SHAFTS

While crank-shafts are usually supported in plain journals there seems

to be a growing tendency of late to use anti-friction bearings of the

ball type for their support. This is especially noticeable on block

motors where but two main bearings are utilized. When ball bearings are

selected with proper relation to the load which obtains they will give

very satisfactory service. They permit the crank-shaft to turn with

minimum friction, and if properly selected will never need adjustment.

The front end is supported by a bearing which is clamped in such a

manner that it will take a certain amount of load in a direction

parallel to the axis of the shaft, while the rear end is so supported

that the outer race of the bearing has a certain amount of axial freedom

or "float." The inner race or cone of each bearing is firmly clamped

against shoulders on the crank-shaft. At the front end of the

crank-shaft timing gear and a suitable check nut are used, while at the

back end the bearing is clamped by a threaded retention member between

the fly-wheel and a shoulder on the crank-shaft. The fly-wheel is held

in place by a taper and key retention. The ball bearings are carried in

a light housing of bronze or malleable iron, which in turn are held in

the crank-case by bolts. The Renault engine uses ball bearings at front

and rear ends of the crank-shaft, but has plain bearings around

intermediate crank-shaft journals. The rotary engines of the Gnome, Le

Rhone and Clerget forms would not be practical if ball bearings were not

used as the bearing friction and consequent depreciation would be very

high.

ENGINE-BASE CONSTRUCTION

One of the important parts of the power plant is the substantial casing

or bed member, which is employed to support the cylinders and

crank-shaft and which is attached directly to the fuselage engine

supporting members. This will vary widely in form, but as a general

thing it is an approximately cylindrical member which may be divided

either vertically or horizontally in two or more parts. Airplane engine

crank-cases are usually made of aluminum, a material which has about the

same strength as cast iron, but which only weighs a third as much. In

rare cases cast iron is employed, but is not favored by most engineers

because of its brittle nature, great weight and low resistance to

tensile stresses. Where exceptional strength is needed alloys of bronze

may be used, and in some cases where engines are produced in large

quantities a portion of the crank-case may be a sheet steel or aluminum

stamping.

[Illustration: Fig. 140.--View of Thomas 135 Horse-Power Aeromotor,

Model 8, Showing Conventional Method of Crank-Case Construction.]

[Illustration: Fig. 141.--Views of Upper Half of Thomas Aeromotor

Crank-Case.]

Crank-cases are always large enough to permit the crank-shaft and parts

attached to it to turn inside and obviously its length is determined by

the number of cylinders and their disposition. The crank-case of the

radial cylinder or double-opposed cylinder engine would be substantially

the same in length. That of a four-cylinder will vary in length with

the method of casting the cylinder. When the four-cylinders are cast in

one unit and a two-bearing crank-shaft is used, the crank-case is a very

compact and short member. When a three-bearing crank-shaft is utilized

and the cylinders are cast in pairs, the engine base is longer than it

would be to support a block casting, but is shorter than one designed to

sustain individual cylinder castings and a five-bearing crank-shaft. It

is now common construction to cast an oil container integral with the

bottom of the engine base and to draw the lubricating oil from it by

means of a pump, as shown at Fig. 140. The arms by which the motor is

supported in the fuselage are substantial-ribbed members cast

integrally with the upper half.

[Illustration: Fig. 142.--Method of Constructing Eight-Cylinder Vee

Engine, Possible if Aluminum Cylinder and Crank-Case Castings are Used.]

[Illustration: Fig. 143.--Simple and Compact Crank-Case, Possible When

Radial Cylinder Engine Design is Followed.]

The approved method of crank-case construction favored by the majority

of engineers is shown at the top of Fig. 141, bottom side up. The upper

half not only forms a bed for the cylinder but is used to hold the

crank-shaft as well. In the illustration, the three-bearing boxes form

part of the case, while the lower brasses are in the form of separately

cast caps retained by suitable bolts. In the construction outlined the

bottom part of the case serves merely as an oil container and a

protection for the interior mechanism of the motor. The cylinders are

held down by means of studs screwed into the crank-case top, as shown at

Fig. 141, lower view. If the aluminum cylinder motor has any future, the

method of construction outlined at Fig. 142, which has been used in cast

iron for an automobile motor, might be used for an eight-cylinder Vee

engine for airplane use. The simplicity of the crank-case needed for a

revolving cylinder motor and its small weight can be well understood by

examination of the illustration at Fig. 143, which shows the engine

crank-case for the nine-cylinder "Monosoupape" Gnome engine. This

consists of two accurately machined forgings held together by bolts as

clearly indicated.

Aviation Engines: Design—Construction—Operation and Repair · 第 9 / 15 章