Secondly, Ireland is governed to-day from Merrion Street, not from

Dublin Castle or from Whitehall. That, I believe, marks the close,

as I said, of a secular conflict; but before we glance at the future,

in the few words I have to say to you to-night, I do not think we

shall waste our time in dwelling for a few minutes on the paths that

we have trodden in the past, and the paths we are treading to-day.

We have been too used through the generations and the centuries to

conflict between our peoples and our nations, and we know--now that

we can look at these things from afar, I trust--that the root of that

conflict went deep down into the characters of the two peoples, and

that those characters themselves were moulded by their very different

histories. In Ireland you look back, as the Celt always will look

back, to the golden age. You were nourished on memories of that time

when Ireland was, according to the tradition of her historians and of

folk-lore, the island of saint and scholar. You look back to the

work of St. Patrick, who, I may remark, first converted Ulster before

he took in hand the rest of Ireland. We have relics of those days in

the luminous pages of your manuscripts and in the rare work of cross

and chalice which now lie in your museums. All that time, while we

in England were growing slowly into a united nation, with a

consolidated government, in Ireland, whatever the reason, the great

privilege was not yours because for centuries there was disunion, and

the stable government which broadened from age to age, following

precedent with us, had no such chance with you. This struggle for

centuries culminated at a time when hell was let loose throughout the

whole of Europe, and it is good that we should now forget those days.

With you, as with the rest of Europe--to use the words of one of your

own historians--"The soul of man was bloodied and bruised," but now

murdering hate is a dead thing, and once more in this struggling

world the love of God has some chance to contend against the eternal

stupidity of mankind.

The rule of reason is slowly emerging from the riot of violence, and

is throughout the world cleansing the foul parts of the infected

world with its medicine. In that process the veil of illusion has

been rent, but as compensation the rhetoricians are silent, and it

always seems to me that, with the first sense of responsibility and

the passage into full freedom, one of the most difficult times that

can face the Celt confronts you. For the Celt of all nations is a

man who has dwelt with his dreams, and to be plunged from his dreams

into the white light of the twentieth century is indeed a staggering

shock, and in that fierce light it is little wonder if with many

another man he finds himself precipitated from the heights on which

he fancied he dwelt into a pit of depression and of cynicism. But

all these things will pass. They are but the consequent evils of the

day, and the people will learn that salvation comes to them by the

industry of their own hands and by the work of their own brains.

If they cannot achieve it in that way, they will be no more able to

achieve it from Merrion Street than from Whitehall. The people must

save themselves. It is a hard and painful task, as we all know, to

build up. It is easy enough to destroy. It is easier to face death

for an ideal than it is to face the daily duty and the daily drudgery

against the forces of vice and ignorance, which have to be faced in

the attainment of any ideal. But Ireland is fortunate in this, that

in the North she has a statesman, an Irishman and a man of deep

wisdom; and in Dublin, in the Free State, you have as statesmen men

who have looked into the eyes of both life and death. They are

facing an almost insuperable burden to-day with courage and honesty

rare amongst statesmen.

We in England wish them well with all our hearts. We want the two

Governments of Ireland to have fair play from the world. We want

them to have a fair chance of settling down to their work, and so far

as we are concerned I think we have given proof of the sincerity of

our desires for the prosperity of Ireland. I have only one word more

to add. I have been told that just as the virtue of truth, on which

perhaps we English are apt to credit ourselves, is sometimes

presented in a form not dissimilar from aggressiveness and

insolence--I have been told that by those who do not love us--so I

have been told that the Celtic virtue of courtesy is sometimes

extended to a point where it almost becomes insincerity. As an

illustration, I have been told that if you ask an Irish peasant how

far you are from your destination, he is always more anxious to give

you satisfaction than information, and the illimitable distance you

have to travel before you reach your journey's end--the land of

heart's desire--is to him only "just beyond the hill." That is a

failing of all people with prophetic souls.

That ideal state, to which Mr. Cosgrave would lead his people along

an Irish road, and to which I would lead mine along an English road,

we tell each other is just over the hills. We know in our hearts we

shall never reach it, but if we did not believe that it was only just

over the hills we should never have the strength to go through that

dreary, dusty walk in attending to the needs of the caravan on its

journey day by day throughout this world. Our courses are set the

same. Our goal is the same. Our method of travelling may be

different, but it is because our paths run alongside, and because you

have asked me here to-night, that I feel we may now fairly join hands

as we proceed across that narrow strip of water, those of us who live

on this side and you who live on that.

WALES

AT THE ST. DAVID'S DAY DINNER

2_nd March_, 1925

I suppose that when an Englishman comes to dine with you he tries to

find some link by which he may explain his presence. In asking me

you have asked one that was born and bred, and whose people have

lived for a very long time, in those border counties where in the old

days we knew a great deal about you. In Shropshire, whence my family

migrated into Worcestershire to get a little farther from the border,

there are still to-day, I believe, about one-fifth of all the castles

that exist in England. Why they were crowded into that narrow area I

have no idea. And when I do go home and look from my garden, four

miles across the valley is the hill on which, according to tradition,

Owen Glendower had his camp, on, I think, the last invasion of our

county by the Welsh.

My family has some connection with Wales if you go back far enough.

Long, long years ago there were two Baldwins who tossed a coin at

some remote place on the Continent, and one went East, where he

became King of Jerusalem, and thereby preceded by about a thousand

years Sir Herbert Samuel, and another went West, crossed over, first

into England and then into Wales, where his name was softened, as you

soften everything in Wales, and he gave his name to what we in

England call the county of Montgomery.

Another century slipped by, and an archbishop of my name, translated

to Canterbury from Worcester, went on a pilgrimage into Wales. He

went with a very specific object. He knew that the Welsh were

devout, and he had been told that they made most admirable foot

soldiers, so he tried to secure them for the Crusades, and he took

with him an eloquent archdeacon and journalist by name Giraldus. I

regret to say, however pure one's motives, the twelfth century

differed little from the present. There were those who said that my

ancestor, if I may call him so, really went to Wales because he

wished by celebrating Mass at the High Altar of each of the four

Welsh cathedrals to establish the supremacy of Canterbury. I don't

know whether that was true, but some of the priests in Wales,

thinking that it was, did their best to impede his progress, though

without success, and the only part of Wales in which this holy man

met with an unfavourable reception, I regret to say, was in the

county of Carnarvon. It is a source of infinite regret to me that

the distinguished representative of that part of Wales[1] is unable

to be present to-night, for we might then have got to the bottom of

this secular trouble. But so undisturbed am I by what happened all

those centuries ago that I am thinking this summer of starting on a

pilgrimage myself, not by palfrey, but by motor-car, and I shall

leave Bewdley by what we still call the Welsh Gate and go to preside

over--a word of ten letters signifying a national festival--to be

held at a little town of eight letters.[2]

It is strange, indeed, to look at the border country to-day and to

think that it was for so long by Severn and Wye a scene of

interminable raids. Now there is no more peaceful part of England

than that of which the Shropshire poet wrote:

In valleys of springs of rivers,

By Ony and Teme and Clun,

A country of pleasant livers,

The quietest under the sun.

We tried, it is true, in those days to keep you out of England, and

now we come to do homage to you in our own capital, of which you have

almost taken possession. Not for the first time in history have the

Greeks defeated their conquerors, and, indeed, this country had a

very narrow escape in the years immediately succeeding the War from

the imposing of Welsh as the diplomatic language of Europe.

There are times in the life of a Prime Minister when he is able, not

without difficulty, to get away from his arduous work and disappear

for a short time unseen by the public and unknown to the Press. I

had the good fortune so to disappear and find myself by accident in

the studio of a Chelsea sculptor. When there I saw an exquisitely

beautiful statue of a young shepherd, the original of the figure

which now stands in a mountain village in Merionethshire--the figure

of a poet (Hedd Wyn) who took his part in the Great War. You have

all heard of the story of this private soldier in the trenches who

had written a poem for your great festival at Birkenhead, and how he

was killed on Pilkem Ridge before he received the crown that would

have been given to him; and the sculptor explained to me that the

poet's Hero had been composed of Prometheus and the Man of

Nazareth--the energy that makes for kindliness and beauty; whenever I

think of Wales, it is not of her industrial areas, but of the

country, and I look upon that figure as a type of what our rural

civilisation can produce. That poet has again proved the truth of

the old saying that "The Celt goes forth to battle and has always

fallen"; but there is the additional truth that there are some

defeats which mean more than victories, and which are in themselves

victories everlasting.

Finally, I would like to remind you of the beautiful words used by

St. David the last time he spoke to his own people:

"Be joyful and keep your faith, and believe and perform the small

things which you have heard and seen with me, and I will go the road

which our fathers have travelled. Be courageous while you are upon

the earth, for you will not see me any more in this world."

If that can still be a message to the people of these islands, and if

they will listen to it, we shall have nothing to fear in the future,

and the name of St. David will go down the ages blessed by the

English as well as by the Welsh.

[1] Mr. Lloyd George.

[2] Pwllheli.

GLASGOW

AT GLASGOW

1_st October_, 1925

It is a matter of peculiar pride to become a burgess of a city which

is one of the most famous in the world. There can be few corners of

the world into which the fame and name of Glasgow have not

penetrated, and where there cannot be found some product of your

manifold energies, and, in these latter days, where the echoes of the

voices of your Parliamentary representatives have not been heard. I

know full well that the honour you have done me is to me as first

Minister of the Crown, and I believe you have made me this

presentation as a recognition that I have tried, at any rate, to

discharge my duties as the chief servant of the people in no party

spirit, and that you mean it as an encouragement to try to go forward

and do better.

I am receiving the great honour from you at a time of very grave

difficulty. No progressive country has ever been free or ever will

be free from difficulties. We have come through a prolonged and

terrific struggle for our very existence, we are borne down under a

burden of taxation resulting from that struggle, we are perplexed by

the changes occurring under our eyes in the channels of the world

trade on which we are so dependent, and we are profoundly depressed

at the thought of the numbers of unemployed, and of the continuance

of unemployment.

Nothing could be easier than to paint a sombre picture full of

shadows, and to ask ourselves: "Does Scotland stand where she did?"

or "Is England played out?" But that would not be a true picture.

The life of Glasgow is the story in miniature of the whole

country--the gradual evolution, the increase in population, power and

prosperity. It was not so long ago, as the generations of men are

reckoned, that Glasgow was but a village, and almost before the

people realised what was happening her traders began to go out over

the seas of the world. The Clyde was deepened, coal and iron were

discovered in your neighbourhood, your great series of pioneers and

inventors from James Watt to Lord Kelvin made their names and the

name of the city known throughout the world, and in two short

centuries Glasgow passed from being a little country town into a

mighty city of a million souls, which has drawn into its vortex not

only the people from the glens of the North, but from the farming

country and, indeed, from overseas, so that you now have a fourth

part of the population of Scotland packed together in this area in a

density greater than that which exists in most of our English towns.

The story of Glasgow is thus a story of stupendous adventure and

achievement, answering to some of the deepest instincts of human

nature. Such a story has not been achieved without strain and

conflict, and even loss. Past generations have left to us a city,

and we have to maintain its character, noted particularly for the

fierce energy of its people, the high quality of their workmanship,

and the boldness of their municipal enterprise. It is true to say

that the labours of Glasgow, industrial, commercial and municipal,

have profoundly affected the current of modern civilisation in all

parts of the world, and have affected it largely for good.

This has been done by the co-operation of mind and brain. There has

been no standing still; there is no standing still to-day. We have

to remember that while in the time of our fathers the changes that

always came, came slowly, what is apt to disconcert us is the speed

at which changes come to-day--changes social, industrial and

commercial. To-day the chemist is revolutionising industry. We are

beginning to make various things by artificial processes which might

have seemed like miracles a quarter of a century ago. To-day I am to

have the pleasure of seeing a great municipal experiment which you

are making in order to learn whether you cannot light your city, dye

your clothes, clear your atmosphere and drive your motor cars out of

coal. It is this ceaseless activity that has made Glasgow what she

is, and that is the hope of her future.

What Burke said of the State is true of the city. We have a

partnership, not only between those who are living, but a partnership

over many generations with those who have gone before us and with

those who will follow us. The life of a city is a continuous thing,

a living organisation, and its citizens are members not only of one

another but heirs of those who went before. And so, while we inherit

a civilised way of life and opportunities and comforts and pleasures

far beyond the dreams of our ancestors, it is also true that we

cannot escape inheriting the very texture of city life, the results

of the failings of good men and of the sins of evil men.

No problem which faces Glasgow is greater than that of housing, our

inheritance from an age when the Industrial Revolution swept so

quickly through the land that it had done its work before people

realised that it had come at all. Quite apart from the essential

wrong of such conditions of housing as still exist to-day, there is

no doubt that those conditions are the most fertile source of that

social discontent which is known so well in this city, as in other

congested parts of the kingdom. Grievous as it may be to see social

discontent, it is yet a better thing than cynical indifference or

lazy acquiescence in conditions such as I saw in this city yesterday

afternoon. I know how aggravated the problem is here, particularly

through the tenement-house system and through the rush of

immigration. It is not for us to apportion blame; it is a waste of

time to do so. We are all to blame, and we have all come short of

perfection. Let us see that our sympathy is not wasted in noisy

declamation or in mere fault-finding. Let us rather wed the social

enthusiasm that does exist here to experience and reason. The task

of improving the worst quarters in our great cities is hard enough to

demand the co-operation of the best men and women of all classes, and

those who withstand such an aim, whether from a selfish regard for

their wealth or property, or from a desire to monopolise their skill

and exploit the city--these people, in whatever ranks of life they

are found, are the worst enemies of the communal life.

I am convinced myself that the day will come when we shall have to

eviscerate our great cities, a tremendous task, but one to which the

imagination and the vision and the wisdom of the best of us may well

be devoted. The task is enormous, and therefore it is all the better

worth doing. I like to think that even at a time like this, when we

are preoccupied with unemployment and the hardship arising out of it,

we are yet giving our minds to try to raise up in this kingdom

better, healthier, more beautiful communities than exist to-day, and

I should like to think that I am becoming a burgess of your city at a

time when the public conscience is stirred on these matters as never

before, and when in Glasgow there are those who are striving might

and main to make Glasgow what she once was and might be again,

namely, one of the fairest cities in the kingdom. In that high task

I would fain be associated with my fellow-burgesses. I shall follow

you in your struggle to solve the problems that surround you, knowing

that as you accomplish them you are not only making Glasgow better,

happier, healthier and more prosperous, but are contributing in large

measure to the security, prosperity and happiness of the people at

large in these islands which are our home.

ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP

THE ANNUAL RE-UNION DINNER OF THE BRITISH

WAR MISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES

29_th April_, 1925

Looking back, I think that if there was one thing that struck our

delegates, on whatever task they were engaged in America, it was the

amazing and the generous hospitality showered on all alike by their

new friends in every part of the United States. Apart from the

personal side they were struck by the immense effort that the United

States made in those early days of the war, when they showed an

example of enthusiasm, of hard work, and of receptiveness to

ideas--when they showed that natural characteristic of hero-worship,

and came forward to do everything in their power to help their Allies

to bring to a successful issue the terrible undertaking in which they

were engaged.

Living as I was at that time in London, and working at the Treasury,

I cannot help in a gathering of this kind recalling the day when the

first American troops appeared in London. I do not know how the

reception of those troops affected the Americans themselves. The

outlook was different to them from what it was to us, but I shall

never forget standing on the Horse Guards Parade watching them

marching by, not to a storm of cheers, which perhaps some had

expected, but in a deep, profound silence, which to me was far more

moving than any cheers.

Speaking for myself, I understand what was passing through the minds

and hearts of that crowd. As we looked at these young men, the pick

of their nation, so fresh, so keen, so enthusiastic, with their fine

military bearing, the thought that was prominent in my mind was how

they had come three thousand, four thousand and five thousand miles

to Europe to help us.

I wondered how it looked to them. I thought of the homes from which

they had come, the strangeness of the surroundings to them, their

feeling of fresh enthusiasm, of our feeling of worn but grim

determination begotten of the three years of hell through which we

had passed, and I could not help thinking how little, in the triumph

of that march, they could realise what that fiery furnace was towards

which they were going, and from which few of those early regiments

could ever hope to return. It seemed to me then as impossible to

cheer as I always find it impossible to applaud when I have heard the

most beautiful music that stirs the soul rather than the head.

But, after all, we are here to-night to celebrate friendships which

were made in a time such as I have endeavoured to depict, friendships

which certainly individually, I believe, in hundreds of cases have

only grown stronger with the passage of time. We thought then much

of our combined and united influence on the world. Possibly the

freshness of that feeling, maybe in both countries, has to some

extent evaporated in the strenuous years of peace which have

followed. But there is just as much need, if not more need, to-day

for that understanding, for that co-operation, and for that mutual

help, as ever there was in the time of war. Strangers as many of us

were to each other, we rapidly became acquaintances, and

acquaintances became friends, and gatherings such as these will keep

those friendships alive, if indeed anything be necessary for that

purpose, and we hope that through us they may help to keep alive the

friendship of the nations.

If I may say one more word to the English here--it is not necessary

to you, but it is necessary to our country people, and I look to you

to teach our country people--it is this: it is quite true that we and

the Americans have much in common, but what most English people who

do not know America forget is that the essential thing for mutual

understanding is to realise what we have not got in common.

The root of any differences which may occur at any time between our

two peoples is the root of most of the trouble in this world--it is

the root of ignorance. And it is because it is one of the objects of

this society to dispel and eradicate that ignorance that I rejoice in

its existence and in its continuance. I think probably many of you

taught America something of the nature, the quality, and the

character of our people, just as many of those who came from America

during the war taught the same lesson to our people. But it rests

with you, and I am glad to hear it from Sir Thomas Royden to-night,

to carry out the good work and to teach those who have not had our

advantages what we ourselves have learned, because friendship at the

best of times is fragile; a friendship will not run long of itself;

friendship requires care and consideration.

I do not think there is much more on that subject I can say to you,

and I think that what I would say has been far better expressed by

others than I could express it myself. I will content myself by

using some words which were uttered more than sixty years ago, which

epitomise all that I would say, and all that I hope, and all that I

believe:

"Whatever else may happen, whatever misfortune may befall your

country or my own, the peace and friendship which now exist between

the two nations will be, as it shall be my desire to make them,

perpetual."

These were the words of Abraham Lincoln. Since those words were

uttered we have passed through Armageddon together. May the

friendship between the two nations, based on mutual knowledge and

understanding, be perpetual for the benefit of the whole world.

FRIENDLY SOCIETIES

AT STOURPORT, AT THE ANNIVERSARY DINNER OF THE

ANCIENT ORDER OF FORESTERS (STOUR VALLEY)

18_th February_, 1924

On England, and other addresses · 第 13 / 14 段