THE IDEA OF PRE-EXISTENCE

"If A Bikkhu should desire, O brethren, to call to mind his

various temporary states in days gone by--such as one birth, two

births, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, fifty, one

hundred, or one thousand, or one hundred thousand births,--in all

their modes and all their details, let him be devoted to quietude

of heart,--let him look through things, let him be much alone."

--Akankheyya Sutta.

I

Were I to ask any reflecting Occidental, who had passed some

years in the real living atmosphere of Buddhism, what fundamental

idea especially differentiates Oriental modes of thinking from

our own, I am sure he would answer: "The Idea of Pre-existence."

It is this idea, more than any other, which permeates the whole

mental being of the Far East. It is universal as the wash of air:

it colors every emotion; it influences, directly or indirectly,

almost every act. Its symbols are perpetually visible, even in

details of artistic decoration; and hourly by day or night, some

echoes of its language float uninvited to the ear. The utterances

of the people,--their household sayings, their proverbs, their

pious or profane exclamations, their confessions of sorrow, hope,

joy, or despair,--are all informed with it. It qualifies equally

the expression of hate or the speech of affection; and the term

_ingwa_, or _innen_,--meaning karma as inevitable retribution,

--comes naturally to every lip as an interpretation, as a

consolation, or as a reproach. The peasant toiling up some steep

road, and feeling the weight of his handcart straining every

muscle, murmurs patiently: "Since this is ingwa, it must be

suffered." Servants disputing, ask each other, "By reason of what

ingwa must I now dwell with such a one as you?" The incapable or

vicious man is reproached with his ingwa; and the misfortunes of

the wise or the virtuous are explained by the same Buddhist word.

The law-breaker confesses his crime, saying: "That which I did I

knew to be wicked when doing; but my ingwa was stronger than my

heart." Separated lovers seek death under the belief that their

union in this life is banned by the results of their sins in a

former one; and, the victim of an injustice tries to allay his

natural anger by the self-assurance that he is expiating some

forgotten fault which had to, be expiated in the eternal order of

things.... So likewise even the commonest references to a

spiritual future imply the general creed of a spiritual past. The

mother warns her little ones at play about the effect of

wrong-doing upon their future births, as the children of other

parents. The pilgrim or the street-beggar accepts your alms with

the prayer that your next birth may be fortunate. The aged

_inkyo_, whose sight and hearing begin to fail, talks cheerily of

the impending change that is to provide him with a fresh young

body. And the expressions _Yakusoku_, signifying the Buddhist

idea of necessity; _mae no yo_, the last life; _akirame_,

resignation, recur as frequently in Japanese common parlance as

do the words "right" and "wrong" in English popular speech.

After long dwelling in this psychological medium, you find that

it has penetrated your own thought, and has effected therein

various changes. All concepts of life implied by the idea of

preexistence,--all those beliefs which, however sympathetically

studied, must at first have seemed more than strange to you,--

finally lose that curious or fantastic character with which

novelty once invested them, and present themselves under a

perfectly normal aspect. They explain so many things so well as

even to look rational; and quite rational some assuredly are when

measured by the scientific thought of the nineteenth century. But

to judge them fairly, it is first necessary to sweep the mind

clear of all Western ideas of metempsychosis. For there is no

resemblance between the old Occidental conceptions of soul--the

Pythagorean or the Platonic, for example--and the Buddhist

conception; and it is precisely because of this unlikeness that

the Japanese beliefs prove themselves reasonable. The profound

difference between old-fashioned Western thought and Eastern

thought in this regard is, that for the Buddhist the conventional

soul--the single, tenuous, tremulous, transparent inner man, or

ghost--does not exist. The Oriental Ego is not individual. Nor is

it* even a definitely numbered multiple like the Gnostic soul. It

is an aggregate or composite of inconceivable complexity,--the

concentrated sum of the creative thinking of previous lives

beyond all reckoning.

Kokoro: Hints and Echoes of Japanese Inner Life · 第 64 / 102 题