The speech closed as follows:--

“The Roman Cato, after declaring his belief in the immortality

of the soul, added, that, if this were an error, it was an

error he loved. And now, declaring my belief in Liberty and

Equality as the God-given birthright of all men, let me say,

in the same spirit, if this be an error, it is an error I

love,--if this be a fault, it is a fault I shall be slow to

renounce,--if this be an illusion, it is an illusion which I

pray may wrap the world in its angelic forms.”[267]

The discussion still proceeded, and only a month later, March 7, 1866,

I made another elaborate effort with the same object, from which I read

my constant testimony:--

“I do not stop to exhibit the elective franchise as essential

to the security of the freedman, without which he will be

the prey of Slavery in some new form, and cannot rise to the

stature of manhood. In opening this debate I presented the

argument fully. Suffice it to say that Emancipation will fail

in beneficence, if you do not assure to the former slave all

the rights of the citizen. Until you do this, your work will be

only _half done_, and the freedman only _half a man_.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 17 (of 20) · 第 66 / 69 题