Sech spworts be only meant for thaay

As likes their mazzards broke for love.

But I should be sorry to believe that there are fewer youngsters to-day

in the West country who “likes their mazzards broke for love” than there

used to be half a century ago.

The Divining-Rod, 21st September 1889.

About a quarter of a century ago, I had the chance of seeing some

experiments in the search for water by the use of “the divining rod” on

a thirsty stretch of the Berkshire chalk range. Oddly enough (what a lot

of odd things there are lying all round us!) at the highest points of

this very range you might come on “dew-ponds,” which never seemed to run

dry, though how the white chalky water got there, or kept there, no

one, I believe, has ever been able to explain from that day to this. But

these “dew-ponds” were of no use, of course, to the cottages scattered

along the hillside, and whoever wanted spring-water, had to go down

about 400 feet for it. Well, I neglected that chance, and ever since

have been regretting it.

My notion of the water-diviner was gathered from Sir Walter’s famous

portrait of Dousterswivel in the _Antiquary_; a fellow “who amongst

fools and womankind talks of the Cabala, the divining-rod, and all the

trumpery with which the Rosicrucians cheated a darker age, and which,

to our eternal disgrace, has in some degree revived in our own.” I was

resolved that the revival should in no case be forwarded by me, and so

lost my opportunity, and have been ever since tantalised by reports of

marvels wrought by the hazel-wand, as to which I was quite at a loss

to form any reasonable opinion. It was with no little satisfaction,

therefore, that I received, and accepted, an invitation to assist at

a water-search about to be undertaken by a diviner of considerable

reputation in the outskirts of Deer Leap Wood, in the parish of Wootton,

Surrey.

This wood, notable even amongst the loveliest of that favoured county,

belongs to the worthy representative of the author of _Sylva_ and the

_Memoirs_, who, having built some excellent cottages on its confines,

desires to find the occupants a good supply of spring-water _in situ_.

Accordingly a group of us, men and women of all ages, and of all

degrees of scepticism--for I doubt if there was a single believer in the

efficacy of the rod, though the squire himself and a friend preserved

a judicious silence--gathered last Friday after breakfast on the lawn

before Wootton House, to await the arrival of the water-doctor, whom the

agent had gone to meet at the station. It was agreed on all hands that a

preliminary test should be applied, and that the lawn on which we stood

offered quite admirable facilities for this purpose. For, more than two

hundred years ago, John Evelyn had diverted a portion of the stream,

which runs down the valley in which the house stands, for the purpose of

making a fountain on the terraces. (Let it be noted in passing, that the

lead-work of that fountain has needed no repair from that day to this!

There _were_ plumbers in those days!) From this fountain two pipes carry

the water into the house, under the lawn on which we stood. Now the lawn

turf is as smooth as a billiard-table, without the slightest indication

of the whereabouts of these pipes, which indeed was only known vaguely

to the squire, and not at all to any one else of those present. If the

divining-rod could discover these, the experiment at “Deer Leap Wood”

might be undertaken with good hope.

Well, the doctor, conducted by the steward, arrived in due course, a

stout middle-aged man, of the stamp of a high-class mechanic; plain and

straightforward in speech, and with no pretence whatever to mystery. In

answer to our questions, he said: “He couldn’t tell how it came about;

but of this he was sure, that he could find springs and running water.

Thirty years ago he was working as a mason at Chippenham, with a Cornish

miner amongst others. He saw this man find water with the rod; had then

tried it himself, and found he could do it. That was all he knew. Any

one*of us might have the same power. Why, two young gentlemen who saw

him working at Warleigh, near Bath, had copied him, and found a spring

right under their father’s library.” We listened, and then proposed that

he should just try about the lawn. He produced a hazel twig shaped like

a Y, the arms, each some eighteen inches long; the point, perhaps,

six inches. I may note, however, that the dimensions can be of no

consequence, for he used at least half a dozen in his trials, cutting

them at random out of the hazel-bush as we walked along, and taking

no measure of any of them. Taking an arm of the Y between the middle

fingers of each hand, he walked across the lawn slowly, stooping

slightly forward, so as to keep the point downwards, about a foot from

the ground. He had not gone a dozen yards before the rod quivered, and

then the point rose at once straight up into the air. “There’s running

water here,” he said, “and close to the surface.” We marked the spot

and followed him, and some twenty-five yards further the point of the

Y again sprang up into the air. The steward, who knew the plans

accurately, was appealed to, and admitted that these were the precise

spots under which the pipes ran. In answer to the suggestion that the

point sprang up by pressure of his fingers, voluntary or involuntary, he

asked two of us to hold the arms beyond his fingers, and see if we could

prevent the point rising. We did so (I being one), and did all we could

to keep it pointed downwards, but it rose in spite of us, and I watched

his hands carefully at the same time and could detect no movement

whatever of the muscles. Then he broke one of the arms, all but the

bark, and still the point rose as briskly as ever. Lastly, he proposed

that each of us should try if we had the power. We did so, but without

success, except that in the case of Mrs. Evelyn and another lady the

point trembled, and seemed inclined, though unable, to rise. He then

took hold of their wrists, and at once it rose, nearly as promptly as

it had done with him. This was enough; and we started in procession, on

ponies, in carriage^, or walking, to Deer Leap Wood, where in the

course of an hour he marked with pegs some half dozen spots, under which

running water will be found at from 70 feet to 100 feet. He did not

pretend to be able to give the exact depth, but only undertook to give

the outside limits. And so we all went back to lunch, and Mullins

took his fee and departed. I know, sir, that you have many scientific

readers, and can picture to myself the smile tinged with scorn with

which they will turn to your next page when they get thus far. Well, I

own that the boring remains to be done, the results of which I hope to

send you in due course. Meantime, let me remind them of a well-known

adventure of one of the most famous of their predecessors towards the

end of last century. Sir Joseph Banks, botanising on the downs on a

cloudless June day, came across a shepherd whom he greeted with the

customary “Fine day,”--“Ees,” was the reply, “but there’ll be heavy rain

yet, afore night.” Sir Joseph passed on unheeding, and got a thorough

drenching before he reached his inn. Next morning he went back, found

the shepherd, and put a guinea in his hand, with “Now, my man, tell me

how you knew there was going to be rain yesterday afternoon.”

“Whoy,” said Hodge, with a grin, “I zeed my ould ram a shovin’ hisself

back’ards in under thuck girt thornin bush; and wenever a doos that

there’ll sartin sure be heavy rainfall afore sundown.”

Note.--Water was found where it was expected by the Diviner, and this

well is now used by the tenants of the Deer Leap Cottages.--October

1895.

Sequah’s “Flower of the Prairie,” Chester, 26th March 1890.

“Why, what on earth can this be?” I asked of the man who stood next me

in the Foregate some ten days ago, as we paused at a crossing to allow

the strange object which had drawn from me the above ejaculation to pass

on, with its attendant crowd. It was a mighty gilded waggon, certainly

fourteen feet long by six feet or seven feet broad. It was drawn by four

handsome bays. On two raised seats at the front sat eight men, English,

I fancy, every man of them, but clad over their ordinary garments in

long leather coats with fringes, such as our familiar Indians wear in

melodrama, and in the broad-brimmed, soft felts of the Western cowboy.

They were all armed with brass instruments and made the old streets

resound with popular airs. Behind these raised seats, in the body of

the waggon, rode some half dozen, including three strapping brown men,

Indians, I fancy they pose for, but they looked to me more like the

half-castes whom one sees on the Texan and Mexican ranches on the Bio

Grande. They also were clad in fringed leather coats, and wore sombreros

over their long black locks. The sides of the waggon, where not gilt,

were panelled with mirrors, on which were emblazoned the Stars and

Stripes and other coloured devices. Altogether, the thing seemed to me

well done in its way, whatever it might mean; and I turned inquiringly

to my neighbour and repeated my question, as the huge gilded van and

its jubilant followers passed away down the station road. “Oh! ’tis the

‘Merikin chap, as cures folks’s rheumatics and draws their teeth.”

“He must draw something more than their teeth,” I said, “to keep up all

that show.” My neighbour grinned assent. “He’ve drawed pretty nigh all

the loose money as is going hereabouts already,” he said as we parted.

“One more quack to fleece the poor,” I thought, as I walked on. “Well,

anyhow, they get a show for their shillings; that van beats Barnum!”

In this mind I reached the vicarage of one of our biggest city parishes

to which I was bound. “I don’t know about quack,” said the vicar, when

I had detailed my adventure on the way, using that disparaging phrase;

“but this I do know, that I have given over writing certificates for

my poor from downright shame, the demand is so great.” And then he

explained that the “medicineman,” whose stage name was Sequah, made no

charge to any patient who brought a clergyman’s certificate of poverty;

that the van had now been in the town above a week; and at first he,

the vicar, had given such certificates freely, both for treatment

(tooth-drawing) and for the medicines, but now refused except in the

case of the very poorest. No! not because Sequah was an impostor; on the

contrary, he had done several noteworthy cures--at any rate temporary

cures--on some of the vicar’s own parishioners: notably in the case of

one old man who had been drawn up to the van in a wheel-chair. He had

had rheumatism for two years, which had quite disabled him, and was in

great pain when he got on the platform. After he had been treated he

walked down the steps without help, and wheeled his chair home himself.

Unluckily, Sequah had advised him to get warm woollen underclothing,

and on his pleading that he had not the money to buy it, had given him

a sovereign. This so elated him that he felt quite a new man, and could

not help breaking his sovereign on the way home to give the new man a

congratulatory glass at a favourite pot-house. This had thrown him back,

and his knees were a little stiff again, but the pain had not returned

even in this case.

After such testimony from a thoroughly trustworthy and matter-of-fact

witness, I resolved to see this strange thing with my own eyes, and

went off straight from the vicarage to the scene of action, to which

the vicar directed me. This was an old tan-yard about half an acre in

extent, and was full of people when I arrived, the space immediately

round the waggon being densely crowded. It was drawn up in the middle of

the plot. The eight brass-bandsmen had wheeled round so as to look down

from their raised benches on the floor of the waggon, on which was a

large leather chair. In front of the chair, speaking to the crowd

from the end of the waggon, stood a tall figure, in a finer kind of

leather-fringed coat, ornamented with rows of blue, red, and white

beads. At first glance I thought it was a woman from the fineness of

the features, and masses of long, light hair falling on the shoulders. A

second glance, however, showed me that it was a man, and a vigorous and

muscular one too. He was explaining that the medicines he was going

to sell presently were not “scientific,” but “natural” medicines,

“compounded of the water of a Californian spring and certain botanic

ingredients”! I will not trouble you with a list of all the ailments

they will cure if taken steadily and in sufficient doses, but get on

at once to the performance. Having finished his speech, he put on his

sombrero, took up a pair of forceps from a table on which a row of

them were displayed, and stood by the chair. Upon this, advanced an

apparently endless line of men, women, and children, marshalled by the

Indians who stood at the foot of the steps. One by one they came up, sat

down in the chair, passed under Sequah’s hands, and descended the steps

on the other side of the waggon into the wondering crowd, while the band

discoursed vigorous and continuous music. I watched him draw at least

fifty teeth in less than as many minutes. The patient just sat down,

opened his mouth, pointed to the peccant tooth, and it was out in most

cases before he could wink. There were perhaps three or four cases (of

adults) in which things did not go quite so smoothly, and one--that of a

young woman, who seized her bonnet and rushed down the steps in evident

pain and rage--after which he stopped the band, and explained to us that

her tooth was so decayed that he had had to break the stump in the jaw.

This he had done, and should have taken the pieces out without causing

any further pain, if she had just waited a few more seconds. There are

rumours flying round that the infirmary is crowded daily with patients

in agonies from broken fangs which have been left in by Sequah. On the

other hand, two of our doctors whom I have met admit that he is a very

remarkable “extractor,” and has first-rate instruments.

There were still crowds waiting their turn when he finished his

tooth-drawing for the day, and announced that he would now treat a case

of rheumatism. Thereupon, an elderly man--who gave his name and address,

and stated that he had been rheumatic for twelve years, unable to walk

for two, and was now in great pain--was carried up the steps and put in

the chair. Then buffalo-robes were brought by the Indians, two of

whom held them up so as to conceal Sequah and the third, a rubber,

who remained inside with the patient. Then the brass band struck up

boisterously, the buffalo-robe screen was agitated here and there, and a

strong and very pungent smell (not unlike hartshorn) spread all round.

I timed them, and at the end of eighteen minutes the buffalo-robes

were lowered, and there was the old man dressed again and seated in the

chair. The band stopped. Sequah asked the old man if he felt any pain

now. He replied, “No,” and then was told to walk to the front of the

platform, which he did; then to get down the ladder, walk round the

waggon amongst the crowd, and come up on the other side, which he did,

looking, I must say, as astonished as I was, at his own performance.

Then six or seven men, mostly elderly, came up and declared that they

had been similarly treated, and were wonderfully better, some of them

quite cured and at work again. Then Sequah invited any person who had

been treated by him or taken his medicines and were none the better, to

come up into the waggon and tell us about it, as that was their proper

place and not below. This offer seemed quite _bona fide_, but it did

not impress me, as I doubt whether any protesting patient would have had

much chance of ascending the steps, which were kept by the Indians and

their able-bodied confederates. No one answering, two big portmanteaus

were brought up, out of which he began to sell his medicines at a dollar

(4s.) the set--two bottles and two small packets. The rush to be served

began, people crushing and struggling to get near enough to hand up

their hats or caps with 4s. in them, which were returned with the

medicines in them. I watched for at least ten minutes, when, there

being apparently no end to the purchases, I strolled away, musing on the

strange scene, and wondering what the attraction can be in the Bohemian

life which could induce a man of this evident power to wander about

the world in a gilded waggon, in a ridiculous costume, and talking

transparent clap-trap, to sell goods which apparently want no lies

telling about them.

I may add that I went again last Saturday, when there was even a greater

crowd, and an older and more severe case of rheumatism was treated with

quite as great (apparent) success.

French Popular Feeling, 15th August 1890.

I doubt if any of your readers has less sympathy than I with the

yearning to go back twenty, thirty, or forty years (as the case may be),

which seems to be a note of contemporary literature, and therefore, I

take it, of the average mind of the men and women of our day, who have

passed out of their first youth. “The Elixir of Life,” which Bulwer

dreamed and wrote of, which should restore youth, with its bounding

pulses and golden locks, its capacity for physical enjoyment, and for

building castles in Spain, I think I may say with confidence I would

not drink four times a day, with twenty minutes’ promenade between the

glasses (as I am just now drinking of the _source Cosar_ here), even

if an _elixir vito source_ were to come bubbling up to-morrow in this

enchanting Auvergne valley, and our English doctor here at Royat--known

to all readers of Mr. _Punch’s_ “Water Course”--were to put it

peremptorily on my treatment-paper to-morrow morning. It is not surely

the “_good fellows_ whose beards are gray,” who sigh over the departure

of muscular force, and sure quickness of eye and nerve, which enabled

them in years gone by to jump five-barred gates or get down to

leg-shooters. They are glad to see the boys doing these things, and

rejoicing in them; but, for themselves, do not desire any more to jump

five-barred gates or get down to leg-shooters. They have learned the

wise man’s lesson, that there is a time for all things, and that

those who linger on life’s journey and fancy they can still occupy the

pleasant roadside places after their part of the column has passed on

ahead, will surely find themselves in the way of, and be shouldered out

by, the next division, without a chance of being able to regain their

place in the line, side by side with old comrades and contemporaries.

But it is one thing to fall out of the line of march of one’s own

accord, from an unwise hankering after roadside pleasures, and quite

another to have to fall out because one can no longer keep one’s old

place in the column by reason of failing wind, or muscle, or nerve;

and the man of sense who feels his back stiffening, or his feet getting

tender, will do well to listen to such hints betimes, and betake himself

at once to whatever place or regimen holds out the best hope of enabling

him to keep step once more, till the day is fairly over and the march

done. It is for this reason, at any rate, that I find myself at Royat,

from which I have been assured by more than one trustworthy friend who

has tested the waters, that I shall return after three weeks “with new

tissues,” and “fit to fight for my life.” I don’t see any prospect

of having to fight for my life in my old age, though one can’t be too

confident with the new Radicalism looming up so menacingly, and am very

well content with my old tissues, if they can’ only be got into fair

working order again, of which I already begin to think there is good

prospect here, though my experience of the _sources_ “Eugénie” and

“Cæsar” is as yet not a week old.

It is more than twenty years since I have written to you from France

over this signature, and since that time I have only been once in Paris,

for two days on business. The gay city is much less changed than I

expected to find it, so far as one can judge from a drive across it from

the Gare de l’Ouest to the Gare de Lyon, and a stroll (after depositing

luggage at the latter station) along the Rue de Rivoli and the Quais,

and through the streets of the old city. The clearance which has left

an open space in front of Notre Dame, so that one can get a good view

of the western front, seemed to me the most noteworthy improvement. The

great range of public buildings and offices which have been added to

the Louvre are stately and impressive, but cannot make up for

the disappearance of the Tuileries. The Eiffel Tower is a great

disappointment. All buildings should be either beautiful or useful; but

it is neither, and only seems to dwarf all the other buildings. But one

change impressed me grievously. Where are all the daintily dressed women

and children gone to? Perhaps the world of fashion may be out of town;

but there must be some two millions of people left in Paris, a quarter

of them at least well-to-do citizens, and able to give as much care as of

old to their toilets. Nevertheless, I assure you, I sought in vain for

one really dainty figure such as one used to meet by the score in every

street. Can twenty years of the true Republic have made La Belle France

dowdy? It is grievous to think of it, and I hope to be undeceived before

I get back amongst the certainly better got-up women of my native land.

For my nine hours’ journey south, I bought a handful of the cheap

illustrated papers--_Le Grelot, Le Troupier_, and others--which seem to

be as much the daily intellectual fare of the French travelling public

as (I regret to say) _Tit-Bits_ and its congeners are, at any rate in

my part of England. Of course it is always difficult to know what “the

people” are thinking or caring about; but to get at what they read must

be not a bad test. A perusal of these certainly surprised me favourably,

especially in this respect, that they were almost entirely free from

the pruriency which is so generally supposed to be the characteristic of

modern French literature.

I wish I could speak half as favourably of the attitude of France, so

far as these journals disclose it, towards her neighbours; but this is

about as bad as it can be, touchy, jealous, and unfair, all round. Take,

for instance, the _Troupier_, which is specially addressed to the

Army. The cartoon represents the “Grand Jeu de Massacre,” at which all

passers-by are invited to join free of charge. The _jeu_ consists of

throwing at a row of puppets, citizens of Alsace-Lorraine, in which

a brutal German soldier is indulging, while the French “Ministre

des Affaires (qui lui sont) Etrangères” slumbers peacefully on a

neighbouring seat. But we come off at least as badly as Germany. In

a vigorous leader, entitled “Une Reculade,” on the Zanzibar Question,

after a very bitter opening against England--“il n’y a guère de pays qui

n’ait été roulé dupé et volé par elle,”--the _Troupier_ breaks into a

song of triumph over the backing-down of England, “flanquée d’Allemagne

et de ses alliés,” before the resolute attitude of France. “Cette

reculade,” it ends, “de nos ennemis indique suffisamment que La France a

repris la place et le rang qui lui conviennent, et qu’elle est de

taille à se faire respecter partout et par tous. C’est tout ce que nous

desirions.” In all commercial and industrial matters we are equally

grasping and unscrupulous. There seems to be just now a great stir

in the sardine industry, and, so far as I can make out, English and

American Companies seem to be competing for a monopoly of that savoury

little fish. It is, however, upon the English “Sardine Union Company,

Limited”--“qui s’appelle en France, Société Générale de l’Industrie

Sardinière de France”--that the vials of journalistic wrath are being

emptied. “Sept polichinelles,” it would seem, have subscribed for one

share each, and the whole scheme is utterly rotten. Nevertheless, this

bogus Company threatens to buy up all the sardine manufactories

in France at fancy prices, and, the control being in England,

will manufacture there all the metal boxes, and will build all the

fishing-boats over there, “au détriment de nos constructeurs Français,”

and so on, and so on. I was getting quite melancholy over all these

onslaughts on my native country, when I came upon a topic which

alone seems to excite the petit-journaliste more than the sins of the

long-toothed Englishman--viz. those of priests and their followers and

surroundings. Here is a comic example, over which the Grelot foams

in trenchant and sarcastic but incredibly angry sentences. A Belgian

Council has decided to divide the 500 fr. which it has voted to the

“Institut Pasteur,” the vote being “pour M. Pasteur et pour St. Hubert.”

This remarkable vote was carried on the pleading of a Deputy, who, after

paying homage to M. Pasteur, added: “C’est un grand homme qui a opéré

des cures merveilleuses; seulement il y a un autre grand homme, qui

depuis onze cent soixante-trois années a opéré des miracles, c’est St.

Hubert--M. Pasteur devra travailler longtemps avant d’en arriver là.”

I am afraid you will have no room for more than one of the scathing

sentences in which the writer tosses this unlucky vote backwards and

forwards: “M. Pasteur acceptera-t-il de partager les 500 fr. avec St.

Hubert (adresse inconnue), ou St. Hubert refusera-t-il de partager avec

M. Pasteur (adresse connue)?--‘That is the question/ comme disait le

nommé Shakespeare.”

It was in the midst of such instructive if not entirely pleasant

reading, that I arrived at Clermont, the old capital of Auvergne, by far

the most interesting town I have been in this quarter of a century,

not excepting Chester. From thence, one comes up to Roy at, about three

miles, in an electric tramway, or by ’bus or cab.

Royat les Bains, 23rd August 1890.

Some thirty years ago, more or less, I remember reading with much

incredulous amusement Sir Francis Head’s “Bubbles of the Brunnen.”

It was in the early days of the Saturday Review, when the infidel

Talleyrand gospel of surtout jooint de zèle was being preached to young

England week by week in those able but depressing columns. I, like the

rest of my contemporaries, was more or less affected by the cold water

virus, and was certainly inclined to look from the superior person

standpoint on what I could not but regard as the outpourings of the

second childhood of an eccentric septuagenarian, who was really asking

us to believe that the Schwalbach waters were as miraculously potent as

the thigh-bone of St. Glengulphus, of which is it not written in _The

In-goldsby Legends_:--

And cripples, on touching his fractured _os femoris_,

Threw down their crutches and danced a quadrille.

I need scarcely say to you, sir, that it is many years since I have been

thoroughly disabused of this depressing heresy; but perhaps one never

quite recovers from such early demoralisation. At any rate, now that I

find myself approaching Sir Francis’s age, and much in his frame of mind

when he blew his exhilarating bubbles, I can’t quite make up my mind to

turn myself loose, as he did, and in Lowell’s words, “pour out my hope,

my fear, my love, my wonder,” upon you and your readers. The real fact,

however, stated in plain (Yankee) prose is, that Schwalbach (I have been

there) “is not a circumstance” to this refuge for the victim of gout,

rheumatism, eczema, dyspepsia, and I know not how many more kindred

maladies, amongst the burnt-out volcanoes of the Department Puy-de-Dome.

Nevertheless, you may fairly say, and I should agree, that my ten days’

experience of the effect of the waters is scarcely sufficient to make

me a trustworthy witness as to the healing properties of these springs.

Twenty-one days is the prescribed course, and as I am as yet but half

through, I will not “holloa till I am out of the wood,” but will try in

the first place to give you some idea of this Royat les Bains and its

surroundings.

Let us look out from this third-floor window at which I am writing, on

the highest guest-floor of the topmost hotel in Royat, to which a happy

chance (or my good angel, if I have one) led me on my arrival. I look

out across a narrow valley, from three to four hundred yards wide, upon

a steep hill which forms its opposite side. They say this hill is a

burnt-out volcano. However that may be, it is now clothed with vineyards

on all but the almost precipitous places where the rock peeps out. On

the highest point, against the sky-line, stands out a small white house,

calling itself the Hôtel de l’Observatoire, from which there must be a

magnificent view; but how it is to be reached I have not yet learned,

for there is no visible road or footpath, and the peasants object to

one’s attempting the ascent through the vineyards. The valley winds up

round this hill, taking a turn to the north, our side widening out and

sweeping back behind Royat Church and village, to which the retreating

hill behind forms a most picturesque background. For, on the lower

slope, just above the houses, are stretches of bright green meadow,

interspersed amongst irregular clumps of oak; above this comes a

brown-red belt of rough ground, growing heather and wild strawberries;

and, again above that, all along the brow, are dense pine woods. The

constant changes of colour which this southern sun brings out all day

long on this hillside make it difficult to break away from one’s window

and descend to the _établissement_ to drink waters and take baths.

This institution lies down at the bottom of the valley I have been

describing, some 200 feet below this window, and 150 feet below the

broad terrace which is thrown out from the ground-floor of this hotel.

From the terrace a rough zigzag path leads down to the brook, which

rushes down from Royat village in a succession of tiny waterfalls,

sending up to us all day the murmur of running water. On reaching the

brook’s bank, we have about one hundred yards to walk by its side, when,

crossing a good road which runs round it, we reach the low wall of

the park, in which lies the bathing establishment. From this point the

electric tram-cars run to Clermont, carrying backwards and forwards

for two sous baigneurs and holiday-folk enough, I should say, to pay

handsome dividends. This park occupies the whole breadth of the valley,

pushing back the houses on either side against the hillsides. Its main

building, a handsome structure, built of lava, with red-tiled roof,

contains all the separate baths and a _piscine_, or swimming bath,

besides a good-sized hall for sanitary gymnastics, and a _salle

d’escrime_, in which a professor instructs pupils daily in fencing and

_le boxe_. The broad path runs from top to bottom of this park, having

this _établissement_ building on its left or northern side, and on its

right two parallel terraces, one above the other. On the lower of

these is the great _source_, the “Eugénie,” which bubbles up here in

magnificent style, sending up some millions of gallons daily. Over the

Eugénie _source_ is a pavilion, with open sides and striped red and

white curtains. A second pavilion on the same terrace, a little lower

down, is devoted to the band, which plays every afternoon for two or

three hours; and below that again, the casino. On the second or upper

terrace are a few favoured _châlet_ shops, for the sale of books,

pictures, photographs, and the pottery and _bijouterie_ of Auvergne.

Then, above again, comes the road which encloses the park, on the

opposite side of which are the row of large hotels built against the

rocky side of the valley, and communicating at the back from their upper

stories with the road which runs up to Royat village. The rest of the

park is laid out in lawns and garden-beds, full of bright flowers and

walks, amongst which are found three other sources--the Cæsar, the St.

Mart, and the St. Victor, each of which has its small drinking-pavilion.

In front of these several pavilions and along the terraces are a

plentiful supply of seats, and chairs which you can carry about to any

spot you may select under the shade of the plane-trees and acacias

which line the terraces and walks, with weeping-willows, chestnuts, and

poplars happily interspersed here and there. The abundant water-supply

which the brook brings down is well utilised, so that the whole

park, some six acres in extent, is kept as fresh and green, and the

flower-beds as luxuriant and bright with colour, as if it were in dear,

damp England. At the bottom of the park, a handsome viaduct of arches,

built of lava, spans the valley, seeming to shut Royat in from the

outer world, and beyond, the valley broadens out into a wide plain, with

Clermont, the capital of Auvergne, in the foreground, and beyond the

city, stretching right away to Switzerland, a splendid sea (as it were)

of corn and maize and vines and olives, the richest, it is said, in the

whole of _la belle_ France. It is stated in all the guidebooks, and by

trustworthy residents, that on a clear day you may see Mont Blanc from

Royat, but as yet I have not been lucky enough.

Unless I have failed altogether in describing the view which lies

constantly before me--from the pine-clad hillside over Royat village,

with its gray church and white red-roofed houses to the west, away down

over the park and surrounding hotels and shops, and viaduct and city and

plain to the far east--you can now fancy what it must be in the early

morning, when the light mist is lying along the hillsides until the sun

has had time to dispose of the clouds in the upper air, or at night,

when the clear sky is thick with stars, and the Northern Lights flame up

behind the silent volcano opposite this Hôtel de Lyon. There is no place

on earth, from the back-slums of great cities to the mountain-peak

or mid-ocean, to which early morns and evening twilights do not bring

daily, or almost daily, some touch of the beauty of light-pictures which

sun and moon and stars paint for us so patiently, whether we heed them

or no; but to get them in their full perfection, one should be able

to look at them in the light, dry, warm air of such places as these

volcanic highlands of Auvergne.

And now for the life we lead in this air and scenery. Every morning

at six I arrive at the Cæsar spring and drink two glasses, with twenty

minutes’ interval between them. Then I climb the hill to _café au lait_

and two small rolls and butter on the terrace, which comes off about

7 A.M., as soon as the last of our party of four has come up from the

park. Rest till eleven follows, when we have _déjeûner à la fourchette_,

which, as we sit down about a hundred, lasts for an hour. In the

afternoon I drink two glasses at the St. Mart spring, and between them

have twenty minutes in the _piscine_, which is my great treat of

the day. Going punctually at two, when the ladies surrender this

swimming-bath to the men, I almost always get it to myself, and enjoy

it as I used to do years ago, when my blood was warm enough, lying about

amongst the waves on the English coast, and letting them just tumble

and toss me about as they would. This water comes warm from the Eugénie

spring daily, and is so buoyant that one can lie perfectly still on the

top of it with one’s hands behind one’s head; and if there were no roof

to the _piscine_, and one could only look straight up all the time into

the deep-blue sky, twice as high, so it looks, as ours in England, the

physical enjoyment would be perfect. It is not far from that as it is,

and I thoroughly sympathise with Browning’s Amphibian:--

From worldly noise and dust,

Vacation Rambles · 第 36 / 55 题