Don’t drink? All serene, if you’ll p’int me to summat that’s better

than drink.

To that “summat” the Victoria Hall Council, all honour to them, have

pointed with quite encouraging success. There is no department of the

Hall which is not in a healthy condition, and the fact that £1800 was

taken in pennies and twopences for admissions during 1887, though

the Hall was closed in the summer for repairs, may well encourage the

Council and their devoted manager to take courage and persevere in their

present effort to purchase the freehold as a fitting memorial to Mr.

Samuel Morley. There was no part of his wide work of philanthropy which

that fine old English merchant valued more than this. He supported it

lavishly during his life, and had he lived till the freehold came into

the market, there would have been little difficulty in raising the

necessary sum, £17,000. Of this, £3500 has already been promised by

members of the Council, and I cannot believe that the opportunity will

be allowed to slip, and the deposit-money of £500 already paid to be

forfeited. It seems that the Charity Commissioners have let it be known

that the old “Vic.” will be accepted by them as one of the People’s

Palaces for South London, if the freehold can only be obtained; and I

cannot for a moment doubt that this will be done if the facts are only

fairly known. The teetotalers ought to do all that remains to be done,

in gratitude for the best story in their quiver, which they owe to the

“Vic.” A short meeting is held, called the “Temperance Hour,” _outside_

the house on Friday nights, at which working men are the speakers. One

of them, a carter, stuck fast at the bottom of a hill in the suburbs one

day. Another man who was passing, unhitched his own team and helped him

up. On an offer to pay being made, the good Samaritan declared he had

been paid beforehand. “Why, I never saw you before in my life, did I?”

“I’ve seen you, though,” said the other; “I heard you speak one night

outside the ‘Vic.’ and I went in and took the pledge--me and my family

has been happy ever since!”

Whitby and the Herring Trade, 30th August 1888.

Any fresh herrings for breakfast, sir? Four a penny this morning, sir!”

Such was my greeting this day, as I turned out of my lodgings for an

early lungs’-full of this inspiring air. I had almost broken out on that

fish-wife with, “Why, you abominable old woman, you asked me twopence

for three yesterday”; but restraining my natural, if not righteous

indignation, I replied meekly, “Four a penny! Why, what makes them so

cheap, ma’am?”

“T’ boats all full--ha’n’t had sech a catch this summer,” which news

gladdened me almost as much as if the catch had been my own. No one can

watch these grand fellows, the Dogger Bank fishermen, and not feel, a

sort of blood-relationship to them, and the keenest sympathy with their

heroic business on the great waters. So, thinks I, I’ll go down to the

quay directly after breakfast, and see them all at their best, those

hard-handed, big-bearded, soft-hearted sea-kings from all the East and

South Coast towns of England, from Sunderland to Penzance. When they are

such grand, silent, kindly creatures on every day in the week, even when

the catch has been poor and light, what will they be to-day?

I had spent most of my mornings for some days on the quay, watching the

fish-market there with much interest. It goes on nearly all the forenoon

on the pavement, just above that part of the harbour-wall to which

the herring-boats run when they come in from their night’s work on the

Dogger Bank. A simple, hand-to-mouth kind of business, the auction;

but well adapted, at any rate, to clear the boats, and get their daily

contents to market in the quickest and cheapest way. As soon as a boat

comes to the quay, one of the crew (generally numbering five men, or

four men and a boy) comes on shore with a basket half-full of herrings,

and turns them out on the pavement. The fish-broker who acts for that

boat comes up, looks at the sample, and makes an offer for the ship’s

take by “the lash” or ten thousand. If this is accepted, the unloading

begins at once; but if not, as is oftenest the case, the take is put

up to auction. The broker rings a bell, which soon brings round him the

seven or eight other brokers like himself, and other buyers (if any) who

are within hearing. Up goes the first last of ten thousand at once, and

no time is lost or talk thrown away. In very few minutes the whole is

sold, and a cart or lorry from the railway is standing by to carry off

the barrels in which the herrings are packed then and there. Now, on the

previous day I had heard the prices ranging from £7: 10s. to £8 for “the

last,” and had not remarked that only some six boats of the whole fleet

had come back from the fishing-grounds, and that none of these had made

anything like a big catch. Consequently, I came down prepared to hear

something like the same prices ruling, and to see most of the crews

drawing at least from £15 to £20 for their night’s work.

Well, in a long life I don’t remember ever to have been more hopelessly

wrong or unpleasantly surprised. I could see at once that all was not

right by the faces of the men and women in the small groups scattered

about the market, which now drew together as the broker’s bell rang for

the sale of the herrings, which lay, a lovely, gleaming mass, at least

three feet deep in the uncovered hold of the _Mary Jane_, as she rocked

gently on the harbour swell, some twenty feet down below us. I could

scarcely believe my ears as I heard the bids slowly rising by 5 s. at a

time till they reached 30s. the last, and there stopped dead. The hammer

fell, and the whole catch of the _Mary Jane_ passed to the purchaser in

about two minutes at that figure. The next boat, and next but one, did

no better. Broker after broker knocked his client’s catch down at 30s.

Once only I heard an advance on that figure, and this was by private

contract. The handsome Hercules, in long leather boots and blue jersey,

who represented one of the Whitby boats, appealed in my hearing to the

broker, who relented with no very good grace, and agreed to give £2 per

last of ten thousand of the catch of Hercules’s boat.

It was a depressing sight, I must own, even in the bright sunshine of

this most picturesque of English harbours, and Sam Weller’s earnest

inquiry to his master, “Ain’t somebody to be wopped for this?” rose

vividly in my mind as the fittest comment on the whole business. Just

then a tug which had been getting up steam was ready to leave the

harbour, and two Hartlepool smacks, whose freights of herrings were

still unsold, hitched on, to be towed out to sea and then run home,

in the hope of finding a better market in the Durham port. An old salt

stood next me, whose fishing days were well over, and who had just taken

a good bite of the blackest kind of pigtail to comfort himself. I looked

inquiringly at him as the tug steamed out between the two lighthouses,

with the smacks in tow; but he shook his head sorrowfully. “Well, but

they can’t do worse than here,” I remonstrated; “herrings maybe scarcer

in the colliery district.” He jerked his head towards the little group

of brokers and buyers,--“They’d know the prices at Hartlepool in five

minutes,” he said. This telegraphing was to his mind the worst thing

that had happened for fishermen in his time. “Did prices often go up and

down like this?” I asked. “Yes,” and worse than this. He had known them

as low as 15s. and as high as £15 within a few days. No, he couldn’t see

what was “to odds it” much for the better. Last time he was across

at Liverpool he had stopped at a big fish-shop where he saw barrels

standing which he recognised. “What’s the price of those herrings?” he

asked. “Eight for 6d.” the man answered. “So I told him I saw they was

from Whitby, and that he got them at Whitby for 6d. a hundred.”

Whitby and the Herring Trade, 31st August 1888.

I had got thus far last night, and posted down again early this morning

to the market, which has a sombre kind of attraction for me. Only two

boats in, with light catches of from one and a half to two lasts each.

The first sold at £5: 5s., which price the second boat refused. Theirs

were a first-rate lot, and they shouldn’t go under £6, for which they

were holding out when I had to leave, and there seemed to be a general

belief that they would get it. This was puzzle enough for any man, to

see under his own eyes the same fish sold on three consecutive summer

days for £7:10s., £1:10s., and £5:5s.!--a sort of thing no fellow can

understand. To add to my bewilderment, I learnt that at Great Grimsby

yesterday (the £1:10s. day here) the last had sold for upwards of £15!

So that my old salt’s view as to the telegraph doesn’t quite hold water,

and the two smacks which shook the water off their bows and sailed for

Hartlepool, may have made a good day’s work of it, after all. Indeed,

a sailor on the quay declared that they had sold at £5, so that, after

paying £2 apiece for the tug, which had towed them all the way, they

still got £3 a last, or double the price they would have realised at

Whitby. “So it comes to this, that the more fish you catch, the less

pay you get,” I said to my informant. “Yes,” he seemed to think that was

mostly the case, adding that to his mind it was the railways that made

all the money out of fish--

Sic vos non vobis mellificatis apes.

It is an old story enough, but scarcely less true or sad in 1888 than

when most of the world’s hardest work was done by slaves. However there

are, happily, signs in the air that, here in England at any rate, we are

waking up to the truth, that if we can find no better way of organising

industry than competition run mad, we are going to have real bad times.

Royal Commissions on the sweating system; Toynbee Hall interventions in

great strikes; co-operative effort springing up all over the country,

and finding its most zealous and devoted advocates at least as much

amongst those who don’t work with their hands as those who do,--all go

to prove that the reign of king _laissez faire_, with his golden rule

of “cash payment the sole _nexus_ between man and man,” is over.

Indeed, our danger may soon be from too much meddling with and mothering

industry. Nevertheless, no one can spend a few hours on the quay here in

the herring season and not long for some one--scholar, philanthropist,

political economist (new style), co-operator--to come along and teach

these fine fellows to read their sphinx riddle. It would not be, surely,

such a difficult task as it looks at first sight. There is no need to

begin with the vast herring-fishing industry, with its distant markets

at Billingsgate, Liverpool, and Manchester. The reform might begin at

once on a modest scale. Beside the herrings, one sees every

morning other fish lying on the quay--skate, cod, ling, whiting,

rock-salmon--brought in by the smaller and less venturesome boats by

dozens, not by lasts of ten thousand. Take the cod as the most valuable

of these fish. I saw four fine cod-fish sold by auction yesterday on the

quay for 5s. 3d. Within a few hundred yards, and all over the town, cod

was selling at the shops at 6d. the pound. Surely a very moderate amount

of organising ability would enable those who catch these fish to get the

retail prices prevailing on the same day in the home market, and then

the experience gained might assist materially in the solution of the

larger problem.

Meantime, besides the almost unique interest and beauty of its

surroundings,--the steep cliffs, on which the quaint old red-roofed

houses, with their wooden balconies, are piled in most picturesque and

unaccountable groups; the grand old abbey ruin looking down from the

highest point; the swing-bridge between the two harbours, and the

estuary beyond, running up into a fine amphitheatre of green meadow and

dark wood, dotted with village churches and old windmills, and backed by

the high moors,--there is a joyous side to Whitby harbour, even on days

when the market goes most against the Dogger Bank fishermen. If the

fathers have too often to eat sour grapes, their children’s teeth are

not set on edge,--such merry, well-fed, bare-footed urchins of both

sexes I never remember to have seen elsewhere. They swarm, out of school

hours, along the quays; skim up and down the water-worn harbour-walls

wherever there is a rope hanging; run over the herring boats lying side

by side, as soon as the freights are cleared; and toboggan down the boat

slides at the gangways, dragging themselves along on their stomachs when

these are not slippery enough for the usual method of descent. There

seems, too, to be a large supply of old rickety tubs kept for their

special use; for all day long you see two or three of them scrambling

into one of these, and sculling about the harbour, no man hindering or

apparently noticing them. Finer training for their future life would be

hard to find, and one cannot help doubting as one sees their straight

toes, as handy almost as fingers in their climbing feats, whether the

last word has been spoken as to clothing the human foot, at any rate up

to the age of ten or twelve. It is not often, I think, that one comes

on early surroundings and heroes entirely suited to each other; but

Whitby’s hero--patron saint I had nearly called him--could have found

no such suitable place to have been raised in all the world round. James

Cook was born in a neighbouring village, but first apprenticed on board

a Whitby collier, and to the last days of his life retained a most

loving remembrance of the old town. Every one of his famous ships,

the _Endeavour_, the _Resolution_, and the _Discovery_, were built at

Whitby. The house, of his master, Mr. Walker, with whom he lived during

his apprenticeship as a sailor lad, and to whom most of his letters were

written after he had mapped the Quebec reaches of the St. Lawrence

under the fire of the French guns, and was a gold-medallist of the Royal

Society and the most famous of eighteenth century navigators, is still

fondly pointed out in a narrow street running down to the inner harbour.

Sunday by the Sea, Whitby, 7th September 1888.

We saw something of the industrial life of Whitby last week. The

spiritual is quite as interesting, and certainly, so far as my

observation goes, has a character of its own, distinct from that of any

other of our popular seaside resorts. It may be the presence of so

large a seagoing element; at any rate, unless appearances are quite

misleading, there is an earnest and deep though quiet religious impulse

working amongst the harbour-folk and townspeople, not without its

influence in the new quarter which has grown on to the old town, and

with its casino and large cricket and lawn tennis grounds, is becoming a

popular--though, happily, not a fashionable--summer resort. This is, of

course, most apparent on Sundays, on which the absence of anything like

the annoyances, both religious and secular, which spoil the day of

rest at so many health-resorts, is very noteworthy. Not that Whitby is

without its open-air services. On the contrary, they are at least as

frequent as elsewhere, on quays, shore, cliffs; but after watching them

with some care I do not remember anything fanatical or startling, or

in the bad taste of coarse familiarity with mysteries which so often

revolts one in street and field preaching elsewhere. One of these I had

never seen the like of before, and am inclined to think it may interest

your readers. On my first Sunday afternoon I was watching a crowded

service on the quay, at the foot of the West Cliff, from above. As it

ended, and began to disperse, a man in sailor’s Sunday suit of thick

blue cloth severed himself from the crowd, and came leisurely up the

stone steps, with a Bible and hymn-book in his hand. At the top of the

steps is a public grass-plot, some thirty by twenty yards in size, the

only part of the sea-front which has escaped enclosure on this cliff.

Round it are some fifteen or sixteen benches, very popular with those

who will not pay to go into the casino enclosure. They were all occupied

by people chatting, smoking, courting, looking at the view, when the

newcomer walked into the middle of the plot, took off his fur-trimmed

sailor’s cap, opened his Bible, and looked round. He was good to look

at, with his strong, weather-beaten, bronzed features, short-cropped,

grizzled hair, and kindly blue eye, part-owner and best man in one of

the Penzance boats, I heard. On looking at him, passages in the lives

of Drake and Hawkins, and Wesley and Whitfield, and Charles Kingsley’s

loving enthusiasm for the Cornish sailor-folk, became clearer to me. Not

a soul noticed him or moved from their seats, and the talking, smoking,

courting went on just as though he were not there, standing alone on

the grass, Bible in hand. I quite expected to see him shut his book and

depart. Not a bit of it. Clearly he had come up there to deliver his

testimony. That was his business; whether any one chose to listen to it

or not, was theirs. So he read out two or three verses from the Epistle

to the Romans, and began to preach. His subject was Paul’s conversion,

which he described almost entirely in St. Luke’s and the Apostle’s own

words, which he quoted without referring to his Bible, and then urged

roughly, but with an earnestness which made his speech really eloquent,

that the same chance was open to every one. He himself had heard the

call thirty years ago, and had been happy ever since. He had been in

peril of death again and again since then, had seen boats founder with

all hands, but had no fear, nor need any man have, by sea or land, who

would just hear and follow that call. Then he stopped, wiped his brow,

and looked round. The sitters had all become silent, but not a soul of

them moved or spoke. I was standing, with one or two others, behind the

high rails of the enclosure, or I think we should have gone and stood by

him as he gave out a hymn; but we knew neither words nor tune, so were

helpless. He sang it through by himself, made a short prayer “that the

word that day might not have been spoken in vain,” and then put on his

cap, and went down the steps into the crowd below. One voice from the

benches said “Thank you!” as he left the plot.

The next service I came across was a strange contrast. Under the cliff,

in front of the Union Jack planted in the sands, was a large gathering,

composed mostly of children sitting in rows, with mothers and nurses

interspersed, and a number of men and women standing round the circle.

As I came up, I was handed a leaflet of hymns, which explained that it

was a gathering of the “Children’s Special Service Mission,” which has

its head-quarters, it seems, in London, and is presided over by Mr.

Stuart, the vicar of St. James’s, Holloway. The service was conducted by

a young man not in orders, with a strong choir to help him. He, too, did

his preaching earnestly and well; and though it seemed to me above the

younger children’s heads, who for the most part made sand-castles or

mud-pies furtively, was evidently listened to sympathetically by the

elder part of the audience who stood round. But if the teaching scarcely

touched the children, they all left their mud-pies and enjoyed the

singing. The Mission, I was told, holds these services on the sands

through the seaside season, at all the chief resorts on the coast.

The leaders and organisers are mostly young men and women, and all, I

believe, volunteers. A noteworthy sign of our time the Mission seemed

to me, and I was glad to hear that it is countenanced, if not actively

supported, by the resident Church clergy.

If we turn from the volunteer to the regular side of Church work, Whitby

still has an almost unique attraction for the student of the religious

movement in England. The late Dean Stanley, who loved every phase of the

historical development of the life of the National Church, and mourned

over the thoroughness of recent restorations, which, as he thought,

threaten the entire disappearance of the surroundings and forms of the

worship of the Georgian era, would have thanked God and taken courage

if he could have visited Whitby Parish Church in 1888, for church and

service are a perfect survival. The wave of Victorian ecclesiastical

reform, without destroying anything, seems to have gently removed all

that was really objectionable, and breathed new life into the dry

bones of Georgian worship. I am not sure that I should say “everything

objectionable,” for probably the vast majority of even truly Catholic

church-goers would not agree as to the big shield with the national arms

which hangs over the centre of the chancel arch, dividing the two tables

of the Ten Commandments. I am prepared to admit that this particular

lion and unicorn are not good specimens of discreet beasts of their

respective kinds. But even as they stand they are national symbols, and

no reminder that Church and nation are still one can be spared nowadays;

and they are not half so grotesqile as most of the gurgoyles you will

see in the noblest Gothic cathedrals. And then they vividly remind my

generation of the days when they first toddled to church in the

family procession. The church itself is a gem, though with no orthodox

architectural beauty, for it retains traces of the handiwork of thirty

generations in its walls, pillars, galleries, and stunted square

tower,--from the round arches (there are still two, though the best, a

fine Norman window, has been bricked up) of its earliest builders in the

twelfth, to the white-washed walls and ceilings and square-paned windows

of eighteenth century churchwardens. I should think the three-decker (I

am obliged to use the profane name, having forgotten the correct one),

the clerk’s desk, reading-desk, and pulpit rising one above the other

in front of the chancel, must be unique, the last of its race. The clerk

has, indeed, retired into the choir; but the rector still reads the

prayers and lessons admirably from his desk, and ascends the pulpit,

where he is on a level with the faculty pew of the squire, and the low

galleries, to deliver his excellent short discourses. Long may he and

his successors do so. One is only inclined to regret that he does not

take off his surplice in the reading-desk, and ascend to preach in his

black gown. Curious it is to remember that less than thirty years ago

Bryan King and others excited riots in many parishes by preaching in

the surplice. The pews on the floor are all high oaken boxes with

doors, though the great majority of them are now free. The visitor in

broadcloth is put into one of the larger ones, lined with venerable

baize, once green. These are somewhat narrow parallelograms with seats

round the three sides, so that it requires caution in kneeling to avoid

collision with your opposite neighbour. And the body of the church being

nearly square by reason of the addition of side aisles at different

periods, and the “three-decker” well out on the floor, the pews have

been planned so that they all face towards it, and consequently all the

congregation can see each other. This is supposed to be a drawback to

worship; probably is--must be, where people have been always used to

looking all one way. That it really hinders a hearty service, no one

would maintain who has attended one in Whitby Parish Church. It was

quite full, when I was there, of a congregation largely composed of men,

and the majority of these sailors and other working folk. Let any reader

who still goes to church make a point of ascending the 190 stone steps

which lead up to it from the old town, and looking at the matter with

his own eyes, if ever he should be within reach. The rector is a sort

of successor to the old abbots of St. Hilda, with ecclesiastical

jurisdiction over the whole town, wherein are five or six churches

worked by curates, all in the modern style, seats facing eastward, no

three-deckers, surpliced choirs, and chanted psalms, and canticles.

Indeed, in one place of worship, those who have a taste for gabbled

prayers, bowings and posturings, lighted candles, and the rest of the

most modern ritual, can find it, but in a proprietary chapel not under

the jurisdiction of the rector.

Singing-Matches in Wessex, 28th September 1888.

I remember, sir, that some quarter of a century ago, you were

interested in the popular songs of our English country-folk, and so may

possibly think gleanings in this field still worthy of notice. In that

belief, I send this note of some “singing-matches,” which, by a lucky

chance, I was able to attend last week in West Berks. The matches in

question were for both men and women, a prize of half a crown being

offered in each case. The occasion was the village “veast,” or annual

commemoration of the dedication of the parish church, still the

immemorial day of gathering and social reunion in every hamlet of this

out-of-the-way district. I was glad to find the old word still in use,

for as a Wessex man it would have been an unpleasant shock to me to

find the “veast” superseded by a “festival,” habitation, or other modern

gathering. In some respects, however, I must own that the character of

the “veast” has changed; these singing-matches, for instance, being

a complete novelty to me. There used to be singing enough after the

sports, as the sun went down, and choruses, rollicking and sentimental,

came rolling out of the publicans’ booths--for the most part of dubious

character--but singing-matches for prizes I never remember. I suppose

the craze for competitive examination in every department of life may

account for this new development; anyhow, there were the matches to come

off--so the bills assured us--in the village schoolroom, of all places,

which was thrown open for this purpose, and for dancing, at sunset.

Hither, then, I repaired from the vicar’s fields, where the sports had

been held, in the wake of a number of rustic couples and toffee-sucking

children. The school is a lofty room, fifty feet long, with a smaller

class-room as transept at the upper end, along which ran a temporary

platform. Upon this the Farringdon Blue-Ribbon Band, in neat uniforms,

were already playing a vigorous polka. Presently this first dance ended,

the band stood back, and the three judges coming to the front, announced

the terms of the competition, the men to begin, and a dance to be

interpolated after every two songs, every singer, one at a time, to come

up on the platform. There was no hesitation amongst the singers, the

first of whom stepped up at once, and so the matches went on, two songs

and a dance alternately, until all who cared to compete had sung. Then,

at about 9 P.M., the prizes were awarded, and I left, the dancing going

on merrily for another two hours.

I was amused by the award of the men’s prize to the singer of a

vociferously applauded ditty, entitled “The Time o’ Day,” for it showed

that the keenest zest of the Wessex rustic is still, as it was

thirty years ago, to get a rise out of--or, in modern slang, to score

off--“thaay varmers.” It began:--

A straanger wunst in Worcestershèer,

A gen’lman he professed,

He lived by takin’ o’ people in,

He wuz so nicely dressed.

Wi’ my tol-de-rol, etc.

This stranger, having a gold chain round his neck, swaggers in the

farmers’ room on market-day, till--

He zets un in a big arm-cheer,

And, bein’ precious deep,

Sticks out his legs, drows back his arms,

And “gammots” off to sleep.

The farmers canvas him, and doubt if he has any watch to his chain. His

friend, “by them not understood,” pulls out the chain, shows a piece of

wood at the end, and puts it back. The stranger wakes; the farmers ask

him “the time o’ day”; he excuses himself, on the plea that last night,

having taken a glass too much, he did not wind up his watch. At this--

The varmers said, and did protest,

Ez sure ez we’re alive,

Vacation Rambles · 第 33 / 55 题