MY DEAR SIR,--My last letter to you I delivered to the care of

Dr. Williamson, who sailed with Capt. ----------in December last.

The general assembly has since been sitting, and the important

subject of the judges of the superior court being made dependent

on the crown for thier salaries, was again taken up by the house

of representatives with spirit and firmness. The house had in a

former session passed divers resolutions expressing their sense

of the dangerous tendency of this innovation, and declaring that

unless the justices should renounce the salaries from the crown,

and submit to a constitutional dependence upon the the assembly

for their support, they would proceed to impeach them before the

governor and council. One of them, Mr. Trowbridge, very early in

the session, in a letter to the speaker, expressed his former

compliance with that resolve, which letter was communicated to

the house and voted satisfactory. The other four had taken no

notice of the resolve. The house therefore having waited from the

26th of January, which was the first day of the session, till the

1st of February, then came to a resolution, that unless they

should conform to their order on or before the fourth of the same

month, farther proceedings would be had on such neglect. The

effect of this resolve was, that three of them, viz:--Hutchinson,

(a brother to him who is called governor), --------, ----------,

made similar declarations to that of Trowbridge, which were also

voted satisfactory. Mr. Justice Oliver, who is a brother of the

lieutenant-governor, and is connected with the governor by the

marriage of their children, came to a different determination;

which occasioned a controversy between the governor and the two

houses, inserted at large in the enclosed papers. Therein you

will see that the governor has treated the petitions, complaints,

and remonstrances of the representative body, with haughty

contempt. The people view it with deep resentment as an effect of

his independency; whereby he is aliened from them, and become a

fitter instrument in the hands of the ministry to carry into

effect their destructive plans. They are irritated to the highest

degree, and despair of any constitutional remedy against the

oppressions of a corrupt officer, while the governor, BE HE WHO

HE MAY, is thus dependent on ministers of state. They have ever

since the trial of Preston and his soldiers been murmuring at the

conduct of the superior court, and the partiality which many say

is so clearly discovered in causes between revenue officers and

the government, abettors, and other subjects. Indeed, the house

of representatives two or three years ago passed a resolution

that such conduct in several instances had been observed, as

appears in their printed journals. To give you some idea of what

the temper of that court has been, a lawyer1 of great eminence in

the province, and a member of the house of representatives, was

thrown over the bar a few days ago, because he explained in a

public newspaper the sentiments he had advanced in the house when

he had been misrepresented; and a young lawyer of great genius in

this town, who had passd the regular course of study, (which is

more than can be said of the chief-justice) has been and is still

refused by the governor, only because he mentioned the name of

Hutchinson with freedom, and that not in court, but in a Boston

town-meeting some years before. And to show you from whence this

influence springs, I must inform you that not long ago the

governor, the lieutenant-governor, and three of the judges, which

make a majority of the bench, were nearly related; and even now

the governor has a brother there, and is brother-in-law to the

chief-justice. Such combinations are justly formidable, and the

people view them with a jealous eye. They clearly see through a

system formed for their destruction. That the parliament of

Britain is to make laws, binding them in all cases whatsoever;

that the colonies are to be taxed by that parliament without

their own consent; and the crown enabled to appropriate money for

the support of the executive and arbitrary powers; that this

leaves their own assembly a body of very little significance;

while the officers of government and judges, are to be totally

independent of the legislature, and altogether under the control

of the king's ministers and counselors; and there an union will

be effected, as dangerous as it will be powerful; the whole power

of government will be lifted from the hands into which the

constitution has placed it, into the hands of the king's

ministers and their dependents here. This is in a great measure

the case already; and the consequences will be, angry debates in

our senate, and perpetual tumults and confusions abroad; until

these maxims are entirely altered, or else, which God forbid, the

spirits of the people are depressed, and they become inured to

disgrace and servitude. This has long been the prospect in the

minds of speculative men. The body of the people are now in

council. Their opposition grows into a system. They are united

and resolute. And if the British administration and government do

not return to the principles of moderation and equity, the evil

which they profess to aim at preventing by their rigorous

measures, will the sooner be brought to pass, viz:--THE ENTIRE

SEPARATION AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE COLONIES.

Mr. Cushing obliged me with a sight of your letter to him of the

22d Dec. last. I think I am not so clearly of opinion as you seem

to be, that "the declaratory act is a mere nullity," and that

therefore "if we can obtain a repeal of the revenue acts from

1764, without their pernicious appendages, it will be enough."

Should they retract the exercise of their assumed power, you ask

when will they be able to renew it? I know not when, but I fear

they will soon do it, unless, as your worthy brother in Virginia

in a letter I yesterday received from him expresses himself, "we

make one uniform, steady effort to secure an explicit bill of

rights for British America." Let the executive power and right on

each side be therein stipulated, that Britain may no longer have

a power or right to make laws to bind us, in all cases

whatsoever. While the claim is kept up, she may exercise the

power as often as she pleases; and the colonies have experienced

her disposition to do it too plainly since she in anger made the

claim. Even imaginary power beyond right begets insolence. The

people here I am apt to think will be satisfied on no other terms

but those of redress; and they will hardly think they are upon

equitable terms with the mother country, while by a solemn act

she continues to claim a right to enslave them, whenever she

shall think fit to exercise it. I wish for a permanent union with

the mother country, but only on the principles of liberty and

truth. No advantage that can accrue to America from such an union

can compensate for the loss of liberty. The time may come sooner

than they are aware of it, when the being of the British nation,

I mean the being of its importance, however strange it may now

appear to some, will depend on her union with America. It

requires but a small portion of the gift of discernment for any

one to foresee, that providence will erect a mighty empire in

America; and our posterity will have it recorded in history, that

their fathers migrated from an ISLAND in a distant part of the

world, the inhabitants of which had long been revered for wisdom

and valour. They grew rich and powerful; these emigrants

increased in numbers and strength. But they were at last absorbed

in luxury and dissipation; and to support themselves in their

vanity and extravagance they coveted and seized the honest

earnings of those industrious emigrants. This laid a foundation

of distrust, animosity and hatred, till the emigrants, feeling

their own vigour and independence, dissolved every former band of

connexion between them, and the ISLANDERS sunk into obscurity and

contempt.

May I whisper in your ear that you paid a compliment to the

speaker when you told him you "always spoke under the correction

of his better judgment." I admire what you say to him, and I hope

it will have a good impression on his mind; THAT WE SHALL BE

RESPECTED IN ENGLAND EXACTLY IN PROPORTION TO THE FIRMNESS AND

STRENGTH OF OUR OPPOSITION.

I am sincerely your friend,

As Capt. Wood is now about to sail, there is not time to have

copies of the papers; I will send them by the next opportunity.

In the mean time I refer you to Dr. Franklin, to whom they are

sent by this vessel.

________________________________________________________________

1Joseph Hawley, Esq., of North Hampton. [back]

TO ARTHUR LEE.

[R. H. Lee, Life of Arthur Lee, vol. ii., pp. 220, 221.]

BOSTON, April , 1774.

MY DEAR SIR,--Capt. Wood being still detained, I have the

opportunity of acknowledging your favour of the 22d Dec. last,1

which is just now come to my hand. As Mr. Cushing received your

letter of the same date near three weeks ago, I am at a loss to

conjecture the reason of my not receiving it at the same time.

I do not depend much upon Lord Dartmouth's inclination to relieve

America, upon terms which we shall think honourable; upon his

ability to do it, I have no dependence at all. He might have said

with safety, when called upon by Lord Shelburne, that he had

prepared a plan to pursue at the hazard of his office; for I have

reason to believe it was grounded upon the hopes that we could be

prevailed upon, at least impliedly, to renounce our claims. This

would have been an acceptable service to the ministry, and would

have secured to him his office. No great advantage can be made

against us from the letter which you mention to Lord Dartmouth

from the two houses of our assembly; for upon a review of it I

think the most that is said in it is, that if we are brought back

to the state we were in at the close of the last war, we shall be

as easy as we then were. I do not like any thing that looks like

accommodating our language to the humour of a minister; and am

fully of your opinion that "the harmony and concurrence of the

colonies, is of a thousand times more importance in our dispute,

than the friendship or patronage of any great man in England."

At the request of our friend, Mr. Hancock, I beg your acceptance

of an oration delivered by him on the fifth of March last. I

intend to write to you again very soon; in the mean time I remain

your assured friend,

_________________________________________________________________

1R. H. Lee, Life of Arthur Lee, vol. i., pp. 238-240.

TO JOHN DICKINSON.

[MS., Samuel Adams Papers, Lenox Library.]

BOSTON April 21 1774.

SIR/

I take the Liberty to inclose an Oration deliverd on the last

Anniversary of the 5th of March 1770, by Mr Hancock; which I beg

you to accept as a Token of my great Regard for you. This

Institution in a great Measure answers the Design of it, which

is, to preserve in the Minds of the People a lively Sense of the

Danger of standing Armies. We are again threatned with that great

Evil; the British Ministry being highly provoked at the Conduct

of the People here in destroying the East India Companys Tea.

They shut their Eyes to what might appear obvious to them, that

the Governors Refusal to suffer it to repass our Castle,

compelled to that Extremity. The Disappointment of the Ministry,

and, no doubt, the Govrs aggravated Representations, have

inflamed them to the highest Degree. May God prepare this People

for the Event, by inspiring them with Wisdom and Fortitude! At

the same time they stand in Need of all the Countenance that

their Sister Colonies can afford them; with whom to cultivate and

strengthen an Union, was a great object in View. WE have borne a

double Share of ministerial Resentment, in every Period of the

Struggle for American Freedom. I hope this is not to be

attributed to our having, in general, imprudently acted our Part.

Is it not rather owing to our having had constantly, Governors

and other Crown officers residing among us, whose Importance

depended solely upon their blowing up the flame of Contention? We

are willing to submit our Conduct to the Judgment of our Friends,

& would gladly receive their Advice.

Coll Lee the Bearer of this Letter and Mr Dalton his Companion,

are travelling as far as Maryland. They are Gentlemen of Fortune

and Merit; and will be greatly disappointed if they should miss

the Pleasure of seeing the common Friend of America, The

Pennsylvania Farmer. Allow me, Sir, to recommend them to you, and

to assure you that I am with great Sincerity,

Your affectionate Friend and humble servt,

TO ELBRIDGE GERRY.

[J. T. Austin, Life of Elbridge Gerry, vol. i., pp. 45, 46.]

BOSTON, May 12, 1774.

MY DEAR SIR,

I duly received your excellent letter of this day, while I was in

town-meeting. I read it there, to the great satisfaction of my

fellow townsmen, in as full a town-meeting as we have ever had. I

think you and the worthy colonel Orne must by no means refuse to

come to the general assembly. Every consideration is to give way

to the public. I cannot see how you can reconcile a refusal to

your own principles. Excuse my honest freedom. I can write no

more at present, being now in committee of correspondence upon

matters of great importance. This waits on you by Mr. Oliver

Wendel, who is one of a committee of this town to communicate

with the gentlemen of Salem and Marblehead, upon the present

exigency.

I am, in haste, your friend,

TO THE COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENCE OF PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

[MS., Public Record Office, London.1]

BOSTON 12th May 1774.

GENTLEMEN

I am Desired by the freeholders and other Inhabitants of this

Town to enclose you an attested copy of their Vote passed in Town

meeting Legally Assembled this day--The Occasion of this meeting

is most Alarming: we have receiv'd a Copy of an Act of the

British Parliament--which is inclosed, wherein it appears that

the Inhabitants of this Town have been Tryed condemn'd and are to

be punished by shutting up the Harbour and otherways, without

their having been called to Answer for, nay, for ought that

appears without their having been accused of any crime committed

by them, for no such crime is alleged in the Act--the town of

Boston is now Suffering the stroke of Vengeance in the Common

cause of America, I hope they will sustain the Blow with Becoming

Fortitude, and that the Effect of this cruel act Intended to

intimidate and subdue the Spirits of all America will by the

joint efforts of all be frustrated.

The people receive this Edict with indignation; it is expected by

their Enemies, and fear'd by some of their Friends, that this

town singly will not be able to support the cause under so severe

a Tryal--as the very Being of every Colony considered as a free

people depends upon the event a thought so Dishonorable to our

Brethren cannot be entertain'd as that this town will be left to

struggle alone.

Your Hume St

_________________________________________________________________

1The copy from which the text is printed was an enclosure in a

letter of Governor Wentworth, dated June 8, 1774.

THE TOWN OF BOSTON TO THE COLONIES.1

[MS., Committee of Correspondence Papers, Lenox Library.]

BOSTON May 13th : 1774

I am Desired by the Freeholders and other Inhabitants of this

Town to enclose you an Attested Copy of their Vote passed in Town

meeting legally assembled this day.2 The Occasion of this Meeting

is most Alarming: We have receiv'd a Copy of an Act of the

British Parliament (which is also inclos'd) wherein it appears

that the Inhabitants of this Town have been tryed and condemned

and are to be punished by the shutting up of the Harbour, and

other Ways, without their having been called to answer for, nay,

for aught that appears without their having been even accused of

any crime committed by them; for no such Crime is alleged in the

Act.

The Town of Boston is now Suffering the Stroke of Vengeance in

the Common Cause of America. I hope they will sustain the Blow

with becoming fortitude; and that the Effects of this cruel Act,

intended to intimidate and subdue the Spirits of all America will

by the joynt Efforts of all be frustrated.

The People receive this Edict with Indignation. It is expected by

their Enemies and feard by some of their Friends, that this Town

singly will not be able to support the Cause under so severe a

Tryal. As the very being of every Colony, considerd as a free

People depends upon the Event, a Thought so dishonorable to our

Brethren cannot be entertaind, as that this Town will now be left

to struggle alone.

General Gage is just arrivd here, with a Commission to supercede

Govr Hutchinson. It is said that the Town of Salem about twenty

Miles East of this Metropolis is to be the Seat of Government--

that the Commissioners of the Customs and their numerous Retinue

are to remove to the Town of Marblehead a Town contiguous to

Salem and that this if the General shall think proper is to be a

Garrisond Town. Reports are various and contradictory.

I am &c.

Sent to the Come of Correspondence for

Connecticutt New York New Jersey & Philadelphia

by Mr Revere--and in that sent to Philadelphia there were Copies

of the Vote of the Town inclosd for the Colonies to the

Southward of them which they were desired to forward with all

possible Dispatch with their own Sentiments.

to

Rhode Island Providence p Post Portsmouth p Ditto

to Peyton Randolph Esqr to be communicated by him to the

Gentlemen in Virginia which was sent by Mr Perez Moulton as far

as Philadelphia to be thence forwarded by the Post.

_______________________________________________________________

1The letter was signed by Adams, but only the annotations at the

end are in his autograph. Another draft is also in the Committee

of Correspondence Papers. The final text of the letter as sent to

the Committee of Correspondence of Connecticut, with the

subscription and signature in the autograph of Adams and the body

of the letter in the autograph of Thomas Cushing, is in Emmet

MS., No. 344, Lenox Library, and is printed in Bulletin of New

York Public Library, vol. ii., p. 201.

2Boston Record Commissioner's Report, vol. xviii., pp. 173, 174.

THE COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENCE OF BOSTON TO THE COMMITTEE OF

CORRESPONDENCE OF PHILADELPHIA.1

[MS., Committee of Correspondence Papers, Lenox Library.]

BOSTON May 13 1774

GENTLEMEN

We have just receivd the Copy of an Act of the British Parliament

passd in the present Session whereby the Town of Boston is

treated in a Manner the most ignominious cruel and unjust. The

Parliament have taken upon them, from the Representations of our

Governor & other Persons inimical to and deeply prejudiced,

against the Inhabitants, to try, condemn and by an Act to punish

them, UNHEARD; which would have been in Violation of NATURAL

JUSTICE even if they had an acknowledgd Jurisdiction. They have

orderd our port to be entirely shut up, leaving us barely so much

of the Means of Subsistance as to keep us from perishing with

Cold and Hunger; and it is said, that [a] Fleet of British Ships

of War is to block up our Harbour, until we shall make

Restitution to the East India Company, for the Loss of their Tea,

which was destroyed therein the Winter past, Obedience is paid to

the Laws and Authority of Great Britain, and the Revenue is duly

collected. This Act fills the Inhabitants with Indignation. The

more thinking part of those who have hitherto been in favor of

the Measures of the British Government, look upon it as not to

have been expected even from a barbarous State. This Attack,

though made immediately upon us, is doubtless designd for every

other Colony, who will not surrender their sacred Rights &

Liberties into the Hands of an infamous Ministry. Now therefore

is the Time, when ALL should be united in opposition to this

Violation of the Liberties of ALL. Their grand object is to

divide the Colonies. We are well informd, that another Bill is to

be brought into Parliament, to distinguish this from the other

Colonies, by repealing some of the Acts which have been complaind

of and ease the American Trade; but be assured, YOU will be

called upon to surrender your Rights, if ever they should succeed

in their Attempts to suppress the Spirit of Liberty HERE. The

single Question then is, Whether YOU consider Boston as now

suffering in the Common Cause, & sensibly feel and resent the

Injury and Affront offerd to her? If you do, (and we cannot

believe otherwise) May we not from your Approbation of our former

Conduct, in Defence of American Liberty, rely on your suspending

your Trade with Great Britain at least, which, it is acknowledgd,

will be a great, but necessary Sacrifice, to the Cause of

Liberty, and will effectually defeat the Design of this Act of

Revenge. If this should be done, you will please to consider it

will be, though a voluntary Suffering, greatly short of what we

are called to endure under the immediate hand of Tyranny.

We desire your Answer by the Bearer; and after assuring you,

that, not in the least intimidated by this inhumane Treatment we

are still determind to maintain to the utmost of our Abilities

the Rights of America we are,

Gentlemen,

your Friends & Fellow Countrymen,

________________________________________________________________

1Intended also for the Committees of Correspondence of New York,

New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Portsmouth. An

endorsement upon the draft also states that it was written with

the concurrence of the Committees of Correspondence of

Charlestown, Cambridge, Brookline, Newton, Roxbury, Dorchester,

Lexington, and Lynn. Cf. Proceedings, Bostonian Society, 1891,

pp. 39, 40.

TO JAMES WARREN.

[Collections of Massachusetts Historical Society, 4th ser., vol.

iv., pp. 390-392; a draft, with several variances, is in the

Samuel Adams Papers, Lenox Library.]

BOSTON, May 14, 1774.

MY DEAR SIR,

This Town has received the Copy of an Act of the British

Parliament, wherein it appears that we have been tried and

condemned, and are to be punished, by the shutting up of the

harbor and other marks of revenge, until we shall disgrace

ourselves by servilely yielding up, in effect, the just and

righteous claims of America. If the Parliament had a Right to

pass such an EDICT, does it not discover the want of every moral

principle to proceed to the destruction of a community, without

even the accusation of any crime committed by such community? And

for any thing that appears, this is in fact the case. There is no

crime alleged in the Act, as committed by the Town of Boston.

Outrages have been committed within the Town, and therefore the

community, as such, are to be destroyed, without duly inquiring

whether it deserved any punishment at all. Has there not often

been the same kind of reason why the Port of London should be

shut up, to the starving of hundreds of thousands, when their own

mobs have surrounded the Kings Palace? But such are the councils

of a nation, once famed and revered for the character of humane

just and brave.

The people receive this cruel edict with abhorrence and

indignation. They consider themselves as suffering the stroke

ministerial--I may more precisely say, Hutchinsonian vengeance,

in the common cause of America. I hope they will sustain the blow

with a becoming fortitude, and that the cursed design of

intimidating and subduing the spirits of all America, will, by

the joint efforts of ALL, be frustrated. It is the expectation of

our enemies, and some of our friends are afraid, that this Town,

SINGLY, will not be able to support the cause under so severe a

trial. Did not the very being of every sea-port town, and indeed

of every Colony, considered as a free people, depend upon it, I

would not even then entertain a thought so dishonorable of them

as that they would leave us now to struggle alone.

I enclose you a copy of a vote, passed by this Town at a very

full meeting yesterday, which stands adjourned till Wednesday

next, to receive the report of a committee appointed to consider

what is proper further to be done. The inhabitants in general

abhor the thought of paying for the tea, which is one condition

upon which we are to be restored to the grace and favor of Great

Britain. Our Committee of Correspondence have written letters to

our friends in the Southern Colonies, and they are about writing

to the several towns in this Province. The merchants of

Newburyport have exhibited a noble example of public spirit, in

resolving that, if the other sea-port Towns in this Province

alone, will come into the measure, they will not trade to the

southward of South Carolina, nor to any part of Great Britain and

Ireland, till the harbor of Boston is again open and free; or

till the disputes between Britain and the Colonies are settled,

upon such terms as all rational men ought to contend for. This is

a manly and generous resolution. I wish Plymouth, which has

hitherto stood foremost, would condescend to second Newburyport.

Such a determination put into practice would alter the views of a

nation, who are in full expectation that Boston will be unthought

of by the rest of the continent, and even of this Province, and

left, as they are devoted, to ruin. The heroes who first trod on

your shore, fed on clams and muscles, and were contented. The

country which they explored, and defended with their richest

blood, and which they transmitted as an inheritance to their

posterity, affords us a superabundance of provision. Will it not

be an eternal disgrace to this generation, if it should now be

surrendered to that people who, if we might judge of them by one

of their laws, are barbarians. IMPIUS HAEC TAM CULTA NOVALIA

MILES HABEBIT? BARBARUS HAS SEGETES? If our brethren feel and

resent the affront and injury now offered to this town; if they

realize of how great importance it is to the liberties of all

America that Boston should sustain this shock with dignity; if

they recollect their own resolutions, to defend the public

liberty AT THE EXPENSE OF THEIR FORTUNES AND LIVES, they cannot

fail to contribute their aid by a temporary suspension of their

trade.

I am your friend,

TO SILAS DEANE.1

[MS., Samuel Adams Papers, Lenox Library; a text, with

variations, is in Correspondence of Samuel B. Webb, W. C. Ford,

vol. i., pp. 23, 24.]

BOSTON May 18 1774

SIR

The Writings of Samuel Adams - Volume 3 · 第 7 / 26 段