The most ancient manuscripts, both on papyrus and parchment, were kept

in rolls, called in Latin _volumina_, whence our English word "volume."

Chinese paper, made from the bark of the bamboo, the mulberry, or the

khu-ku tree, and so extremely thin that it can only be used on one side,

is supposed to have been invented fifty years before the Christian era

or earlier. Chinese rice-paper is made from the stems of the bread-fruit

tree, cut into slices and pressed. The skins of all kinds of animals

are used--among them the African skin, of a brown color, upon which the

Hebrew Pentateuch and service-books used in the Jewish synagogues were

formerly written. Silk-paper was prepared for the most part in Spain

and its colonies, but was never brought to much perfection. Asbestos, a

fibrous mineral, was made into paper, tolerably light and pliant, which,

being incombustible, was denominated "eternal paper." Herodotus tells

us that cloth was made of asbestos by the Egyptians; and Pliny mentions

napkins made of it in A.D. 74. We know by tradition that the intestines

of a serpent served for Homer's _Iliad_ and _Odyssey_; and that the

_Koran_ was written in part on shoulder-bones of mutton, kept in a

domestic chest by one of Mahomet's wives.

We now come to the great period of writing-papers made from cotton and

linen rags, as used at the present day, and which from the first were

so perfect that they have since undergone no material improvement.

Cotton-paper was an Eastern invention, probably introduced in the ninth

century, although not generally used in Europe till about the twelfth and

thirteenth centuries. Greek manuscripts are found upon it of the earlier

period, and Italian manuscripts of the later. It seems to have prevailed

at particular periods, in particular countries, according to the

facilities for procuring it, as it now does almost exclusively in

America. Linen paper, the most valuable and important of all the bases

available for writing or printing, is likewise supposed to have been

introduced into Europe from the East, early in the thirteenth century,

although not in general use till the fourteenth.

Before the end of the fourteenth century, paper-mills had been

established in many parts of Europe, first in Spain, and then

successively in Italy, Germany, Holland, and France. They seem to have

come late into England, for Caxton printed all his books on paper

imported from the Low Countries; and it was not till Winkin de Worde

succeeded him, in 1495, that paper was manufactured in England. The

Chinese are supposed to have used it for centuries before, and appear to

have the best title to be considered the inventors of both cotton and

linen paper.

Paper may be made of many other materials, such as hay, straw, nettles,

flax, grasses, parsnips, turnips, colewort leaves, wood-shavings, indeed

of anything fibrous; but as the invention of printing is not concerned in

them, I see no occasion to consider their merits.

Before I pass from paper, it may not be irrelevant to say a word or

two on the names by which we distinguish the sorts and sizes. The

term "post-paper" is derived from the ancient water-mark, which was a

post-horn, and not from its suitableness to transport by post, as many

suppose. The original watermark of a fool's cap gave the name to that

paper, which it still retains, although the fool's cap was afterward

changed to a cap of liberty, and has since undergone other changes. The

smaller size, called "pot-paper," took its name from having at first

been marked with a flagon or pot. Demy-paper, on which octavo books

are usually printed, is so called from being originally a "demi" or

half-sized paper; the term is now, however, equally applied to hard or

writing papers. Hand-cap, which is a coarse paper used for packing, bore

the water-mark of an open hand.

I will now say a few words about pens and ink, for without them we could

neither have had printing nor books. Pens are of great antiquity, and are

frequently alluded to in the Bible. Pens of iron, which may mean styles,

are mentioned by Job and Jeremiah. Reed pens are known to have been in

common use by the ancients, and some were discovered at Pompeii. Pens of

gold and silver are alluded to by the classical writers, and there

is evidence of the use of quills in the seventh century. Of whatever

material the pen was made, it was called a _calamus_, whence our familiar

saying, "_currente calamo_" ("with a flowing pen"). The use of styles, or

iron pens, must have been very prevalent in ancient days, as Suetonius

tells us that the emperor Caligula incited the people to massacre a Roman

senator with their styles; and, previous to that, Caesar had wounded

Cassius with his style.

The next, and not the least important, ingredient in writing and printing

is ink. Staining and coloring matters were well known to the ancients at

a very early period, witness the lustrous pigments on Etruscan vases more

than two thousand years ago; and inks are often mentioned in the Bible.

Gold, silver, red, blue, and green inks were thoroughly understood in

the Middle Ages, and perhaps earlier; and the black writing-ink of the

seventh down to the tenth century, as seen in our manuscripts, was in

such perfection that it has retained its lustre better than some of

later ages. Printing-ink, by the time it began to be currently used for

book-printing in the fifteenth century, had attained a perfection which

has never been surpassed, and indeed scarcely equalled.

Paper and ink being at their highest point, we will now consider the

advances which had in the mean time been made in engraving and type or

letter cutting. It will be seen that the material elements of printing

were by degrees converging to a culminating point. The evidences of

engraving, both in relief and intaglio, are of very ancient date. I need

hardly remind you of the exquisite workmanship on coins, cameos, and

seals, many centuries before the Christian era, to illustrate the high

state of cultivation at which the arts must then have arrived. The art of

casting and chasing in bronze was extensively practised in the twelfth

century, and I have seen a specimen with letters so cut in relief that

they might be separated to form movable type. The goldsmiths were

certainly among the greatest artists of the early ages, and were

competent to execute forms or moulds of any kind to perfection.

In the British Museum is a brass signet stamp, more than two thousand

years old, on which two lines of letters are very neatly engraved

in relief, in the reversed order necessary for printing; and as the

interstices are cut away very deeply and roughly, there is little doubt

but that this stamp was used with ink on papyrus, parchment, or

linen, for paper was not then known. Indeed, the experiment of taking

impressions from it in printing-ink has been tried, and found to answer

perfectly. A large surface so engraved would at once have given to the

world an equivalent to what is now regarded as the most advanced state of

the art of printing; that is, a stereotype plate. Vergil mentions brands

for marking cattle with their owner's name; probably this kind of brass

stamp, but larger.

I could cite many more examples of ancient engraving which would yield

impressions on paper, either by pressure or friction. But our business is

with printing rather than engraving; I will, therefore, go back to the

subject, and cite a very early and interesting example of stamping

engraved letters on clay. I mean the Babylonian bricks, supposed to be

four thousand years old, mostly sun-baked, but some apparently kiln-burnt

almost to vitrification. Of these there are now many examples in England,

added to our stores by the indefatigable researches of Layard, Rawlinson,

and others. These bricks, which are about a foot square and three inches

thick, are on one side covered with hieroglyphics, evidently impressed

with a stamp, just as letters are now stamped on official papers.

Another evidence of the same kind, and of about the same age, is the

famous Babylonian cylinder found in the ruins of Persepolis, and now

preserved in the library of Trinity College, Cambridge. It is about

seven inches high, barrel-shaped, and covered with inscriptions in the

cuneiform character, disposed in vertical lines, and affording a positive

example of an indented surface produced by mechanical impression. Such

cylinders are supposed to have been memorials of matters of national or

family importance, and were in early ages, as we know by tradition, very

numerous. Stamped or printed blocks of lead, bearing the names of Roman

authorities, are to be found in the British Museum.

Printing on leather was practised by the Egyptians, as we discover from

their mummies, which have bandages of leather round their heads, with the

name of the deceased printed on them. And in Pompeii a loaf was found on

which the name of the baker and its quality were printed. Among ancient

testimonies, one of the most interesting is that afforded by Cicero in

his _de Natura Deorum_. He orders types to be made of metal, and calls

them _forma literarum_--the very words used by our first printers; and in

another place he gives a hint of separate cut letters when he speaks of

the impossibility of the most ingenious man throwing the twenty-four

letters of the alphabet together by chance, and thus producing the famous

_Annals_ of Ennius. He makes that observation in opposition to the

atheistical argument of the creation of the world by chance.

We have besides, in what is generally classed as a manuscript, a

reasonable although disputed evidence of an elementary stage of printing;

I mean the _Codex Argenteus_ (or _Silver Book_) of Upsala, which contains

a portion of the gospels in Mesogothic, supposed to be of the fourth or

fifth century, the work of Ulfilas. In this codex the first lines of each

gospel and of the Lord's Prayer are in large gold letters, apparently

printed by a stamp, in the manner of a bookbinder, as there are

indentations on the back of the vellum. The small letters are written in

silver. The whole is on a light purple or violet colored vellum.

Having said enough, I think, of the ancients' knowledge of type-forms and

printing materials, I pass on to the recognized establishments of the art

in the fifteenth century; for, whatever knowledge the ancients had

of printing, it would appear to have yielded no immediate fruits to

posterity.

But before I proceed to modern times, I am bound to note that the

Chinese, who seem to have been many centuries in advance of Europe in

most of the industral arts, are supposed to have practised

block-printing, just as they do now, more than a thousand years ago. Nor

does the complicated nature of their written language, which consists of

more than one hundred thousand word-signs, admit of any readier mode. But

they print, or rather rub off, impressions with such speed--seven

hundred sheets per hour--that, until the introduction of steam, they far

outstripped Europeans. Gibbon, it will be remembered, regrets that the

emperor Justinian, who lived in the sixth century, did not introduce the

art of printing from the Chinese, instead of their silk manufacture.

Block-printing ushered in the great epoch; and the first dawn of it

in Europe seems to have been single prints of saints and scriptural

subjects, with a line or two of description engraved on the same wooden

plate. These are for the most part lost; but there is one in existence,

large and exceedingly fine, of St. Christopher, with two lines of

inscription, dated 1423, believed to have been printed with the ordinary

printing-press. It was found in the library of a monastery near Augsburg,

and is therefore presumed to be of German execution. Till lately this was

the earliest-dated evidence of block-printing known; but there has since

been discovered at Malines, and deposited at Brussels, a wood-cut

of similar character, but assumed to be Dutch or Flemish, dated

"MCCCCXVIII"; and though there seems no reason to doubt the genuineness

of the cut, it is asserted that the date bears evidence of having been

tampered with.

There is a vague tradition, depending entirely on the assertion of a

writer named Papillon, not a very reliable authority, which would give

the invention of wood-cut-printing to Venice, and at a very early period.

He asserts that he once saw a set of eight prints, depicting the deeds

of Alexander the Great, each described in verse, which were engraved in

relief, and printed by a brother and sister named Cunio, at Ravenna,

in 1285. But though the assertion is accredited by Mr. Ottley, it is

generally disbelieved.

There is reason to suppose that playing-cards, from wooden blocks, were

produced at Venice long before the block-books, even as early as 1250;

but there is no positive evidence that they were printed; and some insist

that they were produced either by friction or stencil-plates. It seems,

however, by no means unlikely that cards, which were in most extensive

use in the Middle Ages, should, for the sake of cheapness, have been

printed quite as early, if not earlier, than even figures of saints; and

the same artists are presumed to have produced both.

From single prints, with letter-press inscriptions, the next stage, that

of a series of prints accompanied by letter-press, was obvious. Such are

our first recognized block-books, among which are the Apocalypse, and the

_Biblia Pauperum_ (or _Poor Man's Bible_), supposed to have been printed

at Haarlem by Laurence Koster, between 1420 and 1430; I say supposed,

because we have no positive evidence either of the person, place, or

date; and Erasmus, who was born at Rotterdam in 1467, and always ready

to advance the honor of his country, is silent on the subject. We rely

chiefly upon the testimony of Ulric Zell, an eminent printer of Cologne,

who is quoted in the _Cologne Chronicle_ of 1499, and Hadrian Junius, a

Dutch historian of repute, who wrote in the next century. Both agree in

ascribing the invention of book-printing from wooden blocks, as well as

the first germ of movable wood and metallic type printing, to Haarlem;

and Junius adds the name of Laurence Koster. His surname of Koster is

derived from his office, which was that of custodian, sexton, or warden

of the Cathedral Church of Haarlem. The story told of the accident by

which the discovery was made is as follows:

Koster, as he was one day walking in a wood adjoining the city, about the

year 1420, cut some letters on the bark of a beech tree, from which he

took impressions on paper for the amusement of his brother-in-law's

children. The idea then struck him of enlarging their application;

and, being a man of an ingenious turn, he invented a thicker and more

tenacious ink than was in common use, which blotted, and began to print

figures from wooden tablets or blocks, to which he added several lines of

letters, first solid, and then separate or movable. These wooden types

are said to have been fastened together with string.

One thing seems pretty clear, which is, that, whether or not Koster was

the printer, the first block-books were produced somewhere in Holland, as

several are in Dutch, a language seldom, if ever, printed out of its own

country. They were generally printed in light-brown ink, like a sepia

drawing, which, I think, was adopted with a view to their being

colored--a condition in which we find the greater part of them. When

these prints were colored they presented very much the appearance of the

Low Country stained-glass windows.

Block-books continued to be printed and reprinted, first in Holland and

afterward in Germany, with considerable activity, for twenty or thirty

years, during which period we had several editions of the _Biblia

Pauperum_, the _Ars Moriendi_ (or _Art of Dying),_ the _Speculum Humanae

Salvationis_, and many others, chiefly devoted to the promulgation of

scripture history. The earliest ones are printed, or rather transferred

by friction--and therefore on one side only of the paper--entirely from

solid blocks; later on, some portions were printed with movable types of

wood; and at last the letter-press was entirely of movable metal types.

Junius says that Koster by degrees exchanged his wooden types for leaden

ones, and these for pewter; and I will add that it is not unlikely they

may have been cast in lead or pewter plates from the wooden blocks, as

metal-casting was well understood at the time.

The pretensions of Haarlem and Koster have for more than a century been a

matter of fierce controversy; and there have been upward of one hundred

and fifty volumes written for or against, without any approach to a

satisfactory decision. This one thing is certain, that, whether or not we

owe the first idea of movable type to Laurence Koster or to Haarlem, we

do not owe to the period any very marked use of it; that was reserved for

a later day.

There is a story current, dependent on the authority of Junius, that

Koster's principal workman, assumed to be Hans or John Faust--and some,

to reconcile improbabilities, even say John Gutenberg--who had been sworn

to secrecy, decamped one Christmas Eve, after the death of Koster, while

the family were at church, taking with him types and printing apparatus

and, after short sojourns at Amsterdam and Cologne, got to Mainz or

Mayence with them, and there introduced printing. He is said by Junius

to have printed, about the year 1442--that is, two years after Koster's

death--the _Doctrinale_ of Alexander Gallus and the _Tracts_ of Peter of

Spain, with the very types which Koster made use of in Haarlem; but as no

volume of this kind has ever been discovered, nor any trace of one, the

entire story is generally regarded as apocryphal. Laurence Koster died

in 1440, at the age of seventy; therefore any printing attributed to him

must be within that period.

What has hitherto been advanced proves only that mankind had walked for

many centuries on the borders of the two great inventions, chalcography

and typography, without having fully and practically discovered either of

them.

We now come to the great epoch of printing--I mean the complete

introduction, if not actually the first invention, of movable metal

or fusile types. This took place at Mainz, in or before 1450, and the

general consent of Europe assigns the credit of it to Gutenberg. Of a man

who has conferred such vast obligations on all succeeding ages, it may be

desirable to say a few words.

John Gutenberg was born at Mainz in 1397, of a patrician and rather

wealthy family. He left his native city, it is said, because implicated

in an insurrection of the citizens against the nobility, and settled

at Strasburg, where, in 1427, we find him an established merchant, and

sustaining a suit of breach of promise brought against him by a lady

named Ann of the Iron Door, whom he afterward married. While resident

here, and before 1439, his attention appears to have been actively

directed to the art of printing, as we learn by a legal document of the

time, found of late years in the archives of Strasburg. He is there

stated to have entered into an engagement with three persons, named

Dreizehn, Riffe, and Heilmann, to reveal to them "a secret art of

printing which he had lately discovered," and to take them into

partnership for five years, upon the payment of certain sums.

The death of Dreizehn before he had paid up all his instalments led to a

suit on the part of his relations, which ended in Gutenberg's favor. In

the course of the evidence one of the witnesses, a goldsmith, deposed to

having received from Gutenberg three or four years previously--that

is, about 1435--upward of three hundred florins for materials used in

printing. Other witnesses proved the anxiety that Gutenberg had shown to

have four pages of type distributed which appear to have been screwed up

in chase, and lying on a press on the deceased's premises.

This would be evidence that Gutenberg had arrived at a knowledge of

movable types, either of wood or metal, and probably of both, before

1440; and, had it not been for the rupture of the partnership before

anything had been printed by the new process, Strasburg might have

claimed the honor which is now given to Mainz.

Soon after this--it is supposed in 1444--Gutenberg returned to his native

city, by leave of the town council, which he was obliged to ask, bringing

with him all his materials. In 1446 he entered into a partnership with

John Faust--a wealthy and skilful goldsmith and engraver--who

engaged, upon being taught the secrets of the art and admitted into a

participation of the profits, to advance the necessary funds, which he

did to the extent of two thousand two hundred florins. Goldsmiths, it

should be borne in mind, were then the great artists in all kinds of

metal work, and extremely skilful in modelling, engraving, and casting,

which were exactly the arts required for type-founding.

The new partnership immediately commenced operations, hired a house

called Zumjungen, and took into their employ Peter Schoeffer, who had

been Faust's apprentice, as their assistant. Faust is supposed to have

employed himself in cutting the type, which is an extremely slow process,

till Peter Schoeffer, afterward his son-in-law, suggested an improved

mode of casting it in copper matrices struck by steel punches, pretty

much in the same manner as was till recently practised throughout Europe.

The firm had for some time previously adopted a method of casting type in

moulds of plaster, which was a tedious process, as every letter required

a new mould.

Although to Gutenberg are undoubtedly due all the main features of

metal-type printing, yet we owe, perhaps, to the practical skill of

Faust, and the taste of Schoeffer, who was an accomplished penman, the

exquisite finish and perfection with which their first joint effort came

forth to the world. This was a Latin Vulgate, printed in a large cut

metal type, and commonly called the Mazarin Bible, because the first copy

known to bibliographers was found in the library of Cardinal Mazarin.

It consists of six hundred and forty-one leaves, forming two, sometimes

four, large volumes in folio; some copies on paper of beautiful texture,

some on vellum. It was without date or names of the printers, as it was

evidently intended to present the appearance of a manuscript; but it is

supposed, on good evidence, to have been printed between 1450 and 1455,

and it is not improbable the volumes were all that time, that is,

five years, and some say more, at press; for we know, by certain

technicalities, that every page was printed off singly.

These precious volumes, as splendid as they are wonderful, have excited

the admiration of all beholders. The sharpness and elegant uniformity of

the type, the lustre of the ink, and the purity of the paper leave that

first great monument of the typographic art unsurpassed by any subsequent

effort; nor could it be exceeded with all the appliances of the present

day.

"It is a striking circumstance," says Mr. Hallam, "that the high-minded

inventors of this great art tried, at the very outset, so bold a flight

as the printing of an entire Bible, and executed it with astonishing

success. It was Minerva leaping on earth in her divine strength and

radiant armor, ready, at the moment of her nativity, to subdue and

destroy her enemies."

There is a curious story current about this Bible, which, as it is

connected with a popular fiction, I will venture to repeat. It is that

Faust went to Paris with some of his Bibles for sale, one of which,

printed on vellum and richly illuminated, he sold to the King for seven

hundred and fifty crowns, and another to the Archbishop of Paris for

three hundred crowns, and to the poorer clergy and the laity copies on

paper as low as fifty crowns, and even less. Faust does not appear to

have disclosed the secret of how they were produced, and probably let it

be supposed that they were manuscript; for the aim of the first printers

was to make their books equal in beauty to the finest manuscripts, and

as far as possible undistinguishable from them, to which end the large

capitals and decorations were filled in by hand.

The Archbishop, proud of his purchase, showed it to the King, who,

comparing it with his own, found with surprise that they tallied so

exactly in every respect, excepting the illuminated ornaments, as

convinced them that they were produced by some other art than

transcription; and on further inquiry they found that Faust had sold

a considerable number exactly similar. Orders, therefore, were given

without delay to apprehend and prosecute him as a practitioner of the

black art in multiplying Holy Writ by aid of the devil. Hence arose the

popular fiction of the Devil and Dr. Faustus, which, under different

phases, has found its way into every country in Europe, and probably gave

rise to Goethe's celebrated drama.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 08 The Later Renaissance: from Gutenberg to the Reformation · 第 2 / 38 段