THE SUNBEAM AND THE SHADOW.

The virtue of the world is not mainly in its leaders. In the midst of

the multitude which follows there is often something better than in the

one that goes before. Old generals wanted to take Toulon, but one of

their young colonels showed them how. The junior counsel has been known

not unfrequently to make a better argument than his senior fellow,--if,

indeed, he did not make both their arguments. Good ministers will tell

you they have parishioners who beat them in the practice of the virtues.

A great establishment, got up on commercial principles, like the

Apollinean Institute, might yet be well carried on, if it happened to

get good teachers. And when Master Langdon came to see its management,

he recognized that there must be fidelity and intelligence somewhere

among the instructors. It was only necessary to look for a moment at

the fair, open forehead, the still, tranquil eye of gentle, habitual

authority, the sweet gravity that lay upon the lips, to hear the clear

answers to the pupils' questions, to notice how every request had the

force without the form of a command, and the young man could not doubt

that the good genius of the school stood before him in the person of

Helen Darley.

It was the old story. A poor country-clergyman dies and leaves a widow

and a daughter. In Old England the daughter would have eaten the bitter

bread of a governess in some rich family. In New England she must keep

a school. So, rising from one sphere to another, she at length finds

herself the _prima donna_ in the department of instruction in Mr. Silas

Peckham's educational establishment.

What a miserable thing it is to be poor! She was dependent, frail,

sensitive, conscientious. She was in the power of a hard, grasping,

thin-blooded, tough-fibred, trading educator, who neither knew nor cared

for a tender woman's sensibilities, but who paid her and meant to have

his money's worth out of her brains, and as much more than his money's

worth as he could get. She was consequently, in plain English,

overworked, and an overworked woman is always a sad sight,--sadder a

great deal than an overworked man, because she is so much more fertile

in capacities of suffering than a man. She has so many varieties of

headache,--sometimes as if Jael were driving the nail that killed Sisera

into her temples,--sometimes letting her work with half her brain while

the other half throbs as if it would go to pieces,--sometimes tightening

round the brows as if her cap-band were Luke's iron crown,--and then her

neuralgias, and her back-aches, and her fits of depression, in which she

thinks she is nothing and less than nothing, and those paroxysms which

men speak slightingly of as hysterical,--convulsions, that is all, only

not commonly fatal ones,--so many trials which belong to her fine and

mobile structure,--that she is always entitled to pity, when she is

placed in conditions which develop her nervous tendencies. The poor

teacher's work had, of course, been doubled since the departure of Mr.

Langdon's predecessor. Nobody knows what the weariness of instruction

is, as soon as the teacher's faculties begin to be overtasked, but those

who have tried it. The _relays_ of fresh pupils, each new set with its

exhausting powers in full action, coming one after another, take out

all the reserved forces and faculties of resistance from the subject of

their draining process.

The day's work was over, and it was late in the evening, when she

sat down, tired and faint, with a great bundle of girls' themes or

compositions to read over before she could rest her weary head on the

pillow of her narrow trundle-bed, and forget for a while the treadmill

stair of labor she was daily climbing.

How she dreaded this most forlorn of all a teacher's tasks! She

was conscientious in her duties and would insist on reading every

sentence,--there was no saying where she might find faults of grammar or

bad spelling. There might but have been twenty or thirty of these themes

in the bundle before her. Of course she knew pretty well the leading

sentiments they could contain: that beauty was subject to the accidents

of time; that wealth was inconstant, and existence uncertain; that

virtue was its own reward; that youth exhaled, like the dew-drop

from the flower, ere the sun had reached its meridian; that life was

o'ershadowed with trials; that the lessons of virtue instilled by our

beloved teachers were to be our guides through all our future career.

The imagery employed consisted principally of roses, lilies, birds,

clouds, and brooks, with the celebrated comparison of wayward genius to

a meteor. Who does not know the small, slanted, Italian hand of these

girls'-compositions,--their stringing together of the good old

traditional copy-book phrases, their occasional gushes of sentiment, the

profound estimates of the world, sounding to the old folks that read

them as the experience of a bantam-pullet's last-hatched young one

with the chips of its shell on its head would sound to a Mother Cary's

chicken, who knew the great ocean with all its typhoons and tornadoes?

Yet every now and then one is liable to be surprised with strange

clairvoyant flashes, that can hardly be explained, except by the

mysterious inspiration which every now and then seizes a young girl and

exalts her intelligence, just as hysteria in other instances exalts the

sensibility,--a little something of that which made Joan of Arc, and the

Burney girl who prophesied "Evelina," and the Davidson sisters. In the

midst of these commonplace exercises which Miss Darley read over so

carefully were two or three that had something of individual flavor

about them, and here and there there was an image or an epithet which

showed the footprint of a passionate nature, as a fallen scarlet feather

marks the path the wild flamingo has trodden.

The young lady teacher read them with a certain indifference of manner,

as one reads proofs,--noting defects of detail, but not commonly

arrested by the matters treated of. Even Miss Charlotte Ann Wood's poem,

beginning

"How sweet at evening's balmy hour,"

did not excite her. She marked the inevitable false rhyme of Cockney and

Yankee beginners, _morn_ and _dawn_, and tossed the verses on the pile

of those she had finished. She was looking over some of the last of them

in a rather listless way,--for the poor thing was getting sleepy in

spite of herself,--when she came to one which seemed to rouse her

attention, and lifted her drooping lids. She looked at it a moment

before she would touch it. Then she took hold of it by one corner and

slid it off from the rest. One would have said she was afraid of it,

or had some undefined antipathy which made it hateful to her. Such odd

fancies are common enough in young persons in her nervous state. Many of

these young people will jump up twenty times a day and run to dabble

the tips of their fingers in water, after touching the most inoffensive

objects.

This composition was written in a singular, sharp-pointed, long,

slender hand, on a kind of wavy, ribbed paper. There was something

strangely suggestive about the look of it,--but exactly of what, Miss

Darley either could not or did not try to think. The subject of the

paper was The Mountain,--the composition being a sort of descriptive

rhapsody. It showed a startling familiarity with some of the savage

scenery of the region. One would have said that the writer must have

threaded its wildest solitudes by the light of the moon and stars as

well as by day. As the teacher read on, her color changed, and a kind

of tremulous agitation came over her. There were hints in this strange

paper she did not know what to make of. There was something in its

descriptions and imagery that recalled,--Miss Darley could not say

what,--but it made her frightfully nervous. Still she could not help

reading, till she came to one passage which so agitated her that the

tired and overwearied girl's self-control left her entirely. She sobbed

once or twice, then laughed convulsively, and flung herself on the bed,

where she worked out a set hysteric spasm as she best might, without

anybody to rub her hands and see that she did not hurt herself.

By-and-by she got quiet, rose and went to her bookcase, took down a

volume of Coleridge and read a short time, and so to bed, to sleep and

wake from time to time with a sudden start out of uneasy dreams.

Perhaps it is of no great consequence what it was in the composition

which set her off into this nervous paroxysm. She was in such a state

that almost any slight agitation would have brought on the attack, and

it was the accident of her transient excitability, very probably, which

made a trifling cause the seeming occasion of so much disturbance.

The theme was signed, in the same peculiar, sharp, slender hand, _E.

Venner_, and was, of course, written by that wild-looking girl who had

excited the master's curiosity and prompted his question, as before

mentioned.

The next morning the lady-teacher looked pale and wearied, naturally

enough, but she was in her place at the usual hour, and Master Langdon

in his own. The girls had not yet entered the schoolroom.

"You have been ill, I am afraid," said Mr. Bernard.

"I was not well yesterday," she answered. "I had a worry and a kind of

fright. It is so dreadful to have the charge of all these young souls

and bodies! Every young girl ought to walk, locked close, arm in arm,

between two guardian angels. Sometimes I faint almost with the thought

of all that I ought to do, and of my own weakness and wants--Tell me,

are there not natures born so out of parallel with the lines of natural

law that nothing short of a miracle can bring them right?"

Mr. Bernard had speculated somewhat, as all thoughtful persons of his

profession are forced to do, on the innate organic tendencies with which

individuals, families, and races are born. He replied, therefore, with

a smile, as one to whom the question suggested a very familiar class of

facts.

"Why, of course. Each of us is only footing-up of a double column of

figures that goes back to the first pair. Every unit tells,--and some of

them are _plus_, and some _minus_. If the columns don't add up right, it

is commonly because we can't make out all the figures. I don't mean to

say that something may not be added by Nature to make up for losses and

keep the race to its average, but we are mainly nothing but the answer

to a long sum in addition and subtraction. No doubt there are people

born with impulses at every possible angle to the parallels of Nature,

as you call them. If they happen to cut these at right angles, of course

they are beyond the reach of common influences. Slight obliquities are

what we have most to do with in education. Penitentiaries and insane

asylums take care of most of the right-angle cases.--I am afraid I have

put it too much like a professor, and I am only a student, you know.

Pray, what set you--"

The next morning the lady-teacher took to asking me this? "Any strange

cases among the scholars?"

The meek teacher's blue eyes met the luminous glance that came with the

question. She, too, was of gentle blood,--not meaning by that that she

was of any noted lineage, but that she came of a cultivated stock, never

rich, but long trained to intellectual callings. A thousand decencies,

amenities, reticences, graces, which no one thinks of until he misses

them, are the traditional right of those who spring from such families.

And when two persons of this exceptional breeding meet in the midst of

the common multitude, they seek each other's company at once by the

natural law of elective affinity. It is wonderful how men and women know

their peers. If two stranger queens, sole survivors of two ship-wrecked

vessels, were cast, half-naked, on a rock together, each would at once

address the other as "Our Royal Sister."

Helen Darley looked into the dark eyes of Bernard Langdon glittering

with the light which flashed from them with his question. Not as those

foolish, innocent country-girls of the small village did she look into

them, to be fascinated and bewildered, but to sound them with a calm,

steadfast purpose. "A gentleman," she said to herself, as she read his

expression and his features with a woman's rapid, but exhausting glance.

"A lady," he said to himself, as he met her questioning look,--so brief,

so quiet, yet so assured, as of one whom necessity had taught to read

faces quickly without offence, as children read the faces of parents,

as wives read the faces of hard-souled husbands. All this was but a few

seconds' work, and yet the main point was settled. If there had been any

vulgar curiosity or coarseness of any kind lurking in his expression,

she would have detected it. If she had not lifted her eyes to his face

so softly and kept them there so calmly and withdrawn them so quietly,

he would not have said to himself, "She is a _lady_," for that word

meant a good deal to the descendant of the courtly Wentworths and the

scholarly Langdons.

"There are strange people everywhere, Mr. Langdon," she said, "and I

don't think our school-room is an exception. I am glad you believe in

the force of transmitted tendencies. It would break my heart, if I did

not think that there are faults beyond the reach of everything but

God's special grace. I should die, if I thought that my negligence or

incapacity was alone responsible for the errors and sins of those I have

charge of. Yet there, are mysteries I do not know how to account for."

She looked all round the school-room, and then said, in a whisper, "Mr.

Langdon, we had a girl that _stole_, in the school, not long ago. Worse

than that, we had a girl that tried to set us on fire. Children of good

people, both of them. And we have a girl now that frightens me so"----

The door opened, and three misses came in to take their seats: three

types, as it happened, of certain classes, into which it would not have

been difficult to distribute the greater number of the girls in

the school.--_Hannah Martin_. Fourteen years and three months old.

Short-necked, thick-waisted, round-cheeked, smooth, vacant forehead,

large, dull eyes. Looks good-natured, with little other expression.

Three buns in her bag, and a large apple. Has a habit of attacking her

provisions in school-hours.--_Rosa Milburn_. Sixteen. Brunette, with

a rare ripe flush in her cheeks. Color comes and goes easily. Eyes

wandering, apt to be downcast. Moody at times. Said to be passionate,

if irritated. Finished in high relief. Carries shoulders well back and

walks well, as if proud of her woman's life, with a slight rocking

movement, being one of the wide-flanged pattern, but seems restless,--a

hard girl to look after. Has a romance in her pocket, which she means to

read in school-time.--_Charlotte Ann Wood_. Fifteen. The poetess before

mentioned. Long, light ringlets, pallid complexion, blue eyes. Delicate

child, half unfolded. Gentle, but languid and despondent. Does not go

much with the other girls, but reads a good deal, especially poetry,

underscoring favorite passages. Writes a great many verses, very fast,

not very correctly; full of the usual human sentiments, expressed in the

accustomed phrases. Undervitalized. Sensibilities not covered with their

normal integuments. A negative condition, often confounded with genius,

and sometimes running into it. Young people that _fall_ out of line

through weakness of the active faculties are often confounded with those

that _step_ out of it through strength of the intellectual ones.

The girls kept coming in, one after another, or in pairs or groups,

until the school-room was nearly full. Then there was a little pause,

and a light step was heard in the passage. The lady-teacher's eyes

turned to the door, and the master's followed them in the same

direction.

A girl of about seventeen entered. She was tall and slender, but

rounded, with a peculiar undulation of movement, such as one sometimes

sees in perfectly untutored country-girls, whom Nature, the queen of

graces, has taken in hand, but more commonly in connection with the

very highest breeding of the most thoroughly trained society. She was a

splendid scowling beauty, black-browed, with a flash of white teeth that

was always like a surprise when her lips parted. She wore a checkered

dress, of a curious pattern, and a camel's-hair scarf twisted a little

fantastically about her. She went to her seat, which she had moved a

short distance apart from the rest, and, sitting down, began playing

listlessly with her gold chain, as was a common habit with her, coiling

it and uncoiling it about her slender wrist, and braiding it in with her

long, delicate fingers. Presently she looked up. Black, piercing eyes,

not large,--a low forehead, as low as that of Clytie in the Townley

bust,--black hair, twisted in heavy braids,--a face that one could not

help looking at for its beauty, yet that one wanted to look away from

for something in its expression, and could not for those diamond eyes.

They were fixed on the lady-teacher now. The latter turned her own away,

and let them wander over the other scholars. But they could not help

coming back again for a single glance at the wild beauty. The diamond

eyes were on her still. She turned the leaves of several of her books,

as if in search of some passage, and, when she thought she had waited

long enough to be safe, once more stole a quick look at the dark girl.

The diamond eyes were still upon her. She put her kerchief to her

forehead, which had grown slightly moist; she sighed once, almost

shivered, for she felt cold; then, following some ill-defined impulse,

which she could not resist, she left her place and went to the young

girl's desk.

_"What do you want of me, Elsie Venner?_" It was a strange question to

put, for the girl had not signified that she wished the teacher to come

to her.

"Nothing," she said. "I thought I could make you come." The girl spoke

in a low tone, a kind of half-whisper. She did not lisp, yet her

articulation of one or two consonants was not absolutely perfect.

"Where did you get that flower, Elsie?" said Miss Darley. It was a rare

alpine flower, which was found only in one spot among the rocks of The

Mountain.

"Where it grew," said Elsie Venner. "Take it." The teacher could not

refuse her. The girl's finger-tips touched hers as she took it. How cold

they were for a girl of such an organization!

The teacher went back to her seat. She made an excuse for quitting the

school-room soon afterwards. The first thing she did was to fling the

flower into her fireplace and rake the ashes over it. The second was to

wash the tips of her fingers, as if she had been another Lady Macbeth. A

poor, overtasked, nervous creature,--we must not think too much of her

fancies.

After school was done, she finished the talk with the master which had

been so suddenly interrupted. There were things spoken of which may

prove interesting by-and-by, but there are other matters we must first

attend to. IS THE RELIGIOUS WANT OF THE AGE MET?

To answer this question intelligently, we must first glance at the

characteristics of the age. It is an age of remarkable activity. There

have been industrious men in other days; there have been nations of whom

it might be truly said, They were an industrious people, they lost no

time in idleness: but their rate of speed was low. Such a people could

hardly be deemed enterprising. They might continue uncomplainingly in

their accustomed round of labors, but would lack impulse to attempt

anything new. Circumstances did not compel them to unwonted efforts,

and their capabilities lay dormant. The world was wide, the population

comparatively sparse, and the means of subsistence not difficult of

attainment.

Our age is very unlike to that. People begin to crowd one another. There

is competition. The more active and ingenious will have the advantage;

they do have the advantage; and this fact is a constant stimulus. It has

been operating for thirty years past with ever-increasing power. We seem

to be approaching a climax,--a point beyond which flesh and blood cannot

go. The enterprise of the more active spirits of our day is astounding;

we begin to ask, "Will they stop at anything? What will they not

undertake?" There are a great many unsuccessful attempts; but these are

not necessarily observed, they pass quietly into obscurity, while we

hasten to observe the successes, which are wonderful, and so numerous

as to keep us ever on tiptoe, looking for new wonders. Having seen the

railways, the magnetic telegraph, and Hoe's press, in full operation,

and having been brought to accept these as a common measure of time and

motion, we find ourselves indisposed for older usages. We find our

age an age of daring and of doing. We are ready to discard the word

_impossible_; from our vocabulary; we deny that anything is the less

probable because of being unprecedented. For doing new things we look

about for new means,--being full charged with the belief that for all

worthy or desirable ends there must be adequate and available means.

In this regard, it is an age of unprecedented faith, of expectation of

success; and we all know the natural and necessary influence of such

an expectation. Sanguine expectation lights up the fires of genius;

invention is quickened for the attainment of the highest speed and the

greatest momentum. In no former age has there been anything to compare

in rapidity and power of movement with the every-day achievements of

this age. The relation of books to men, and the sphere assigned to

books, are materially modified by the characteristics of the age. Books,

as books, are no longer a charm to conjure with. The few really superior

books have a wider and greater influence than ever before; while

the great mass of common books have less, and pass more easily into

oblivion. Good books may and must help us; but books cannot make us men

of the nineteenth century, and a power in it. A thorough knowledge of

the world within us, as it stands related to the world without us, is

something quite different from mere book-knowledge. This is an element

of influence not only not confined to the bookmen, but often possessed

in a transcendent degree by those whose devotion to books is altogether

subordinate to other avocations. Our common-school education may be said

to bring the entire people upon a common plane. We are no longer the

esoteric and the exoteric; we understand our rights in the common fund

of sense and truth very well. We are not very patient with those who

affect to know better than ourselves what we want and what we ought to

desire. Most men are exceedingly in earnest, and determined to be heard

in their own cause, and well able to make themselves understood. Scribes

and Pharisees compassing sea and land to make one proselyte are

a good and bad type of our activity in the pursuit of our own ends.

Innumerable and infinitely varied are the shifts employed to secure

attention, to effect the sale of merchandise, and to increase income.

Nor are the learned professions much behind the men of merchandise. The

contest of life thickens. Competition for the fruits of labor waxes

continually more fierce. Mother Earth is too moderate in her labors; the

ranks of the producers suffer from desertion; the plough is forsaken;

the patient ox is contemned; silence, seclusion, and meditation are a

memory of the past. The world's axis is changed; there is more heat in

the North. The world has advanced, in our age, from a speed of five

miles an hour, to twenty or thirty, or more.

Whatever may be thought of the advantages and disadvantages accruing

from these movements, there can be no question of the fact, that they

have greatly affected the position and the relations of speakers and

hearers. The million have been driven to do so much for themselves, that

they are in no little danger of jumping to the conclusion, that they no

longer need teachers of religion. A conclusion so fraught with mischief

to the race will not be arrested by a pertinacious adhesion to modes of

preaching which men under the old-time training could be made to endure,

but which latter-day contrasts have rendered intolerable.

It is just here, if anywhere, that a special backwardness on the part of

the clergy to meet the religious wants of the age may, without injustice

or unkindness, be alleged. It comes about very naturally; the training

of the clergy is not in harmony with the exigencies of the position they

are intended to occupy. The endeavors of the preparatory schools are

not to be depreciated. It is scarcely possible to say too much of the

fundamental importance of thoroughness and of minute accuracy in the

rudiments of learning. But that extreme zeal in this behalf has produced

an unnatural divorce of the practical from the critical, it is vain

to deny. The devotion to the latter, which is inaugurated in the

preparatory school, is by the college inflamed to the utmost, and

the young man reaches his climax when he receives the appointment of

valedictorian; that is his end; he reaches it, and we may say it is

the death of him. He may, indeed, enter the theological seminary,

industriously resolved on more of the same supremacy; but, in most

instances, the great practical ends of a Christ-like life of doing good

have been already lost from his view, and the ways and means by which

alone such ends can be reached have become offensive to him. The

student, as he delights in calling himself, has become greatly more

interested in knowledge than in the people for whom he is to use his

knowledge. A certain unknown God, an idol, in short, quite unsuspected,

whose name is _Critical Dignity_, is installed in his heart, in

the place of the Son of God. And the man endures the trials of his

ministerial life under the mistaken impression that he is a martyr for

Christ. He compels himself to be satisfied with a measure of attention

to his utterances, which would content no sane and sensible man in any

other department of teaching. He will tell you that it is one of the

inevitable infelicities of his vocation, that to nothing are men such

unwilling listeners as to religious truth; than which nothing can

be more untrue; for to nothing are men so prepared to listen as to

religious truth, properly presented.

In order to a more generally happy and successful prosecution of the

duties of a minister of Christ, a preliminary fact requires to be

considered. That a man is found or finds himself in any calling is no

evidence whatever that he is fitted for that calling. This is just as

true of the ministry as of any other vocation. Every man-of-business

knows this. The clergy seem to us behind the age in being astonishingly

blind to it. Men-of-business know that only a very small fraction of

their number can ever attain eminent success. They know, that, in a term

of twenty years, ninety-seven men in a hundred _fail_. Here and there

one develops a remarkable talent for the specific business in which he

is engaged. The ninety-and-nine discover that they have a weary contest

to maintain with manifold contingencies and combinations which no

foresight can preclude.

The application of this general truth to their profession the clergy are

backward to perceive. The consequences of this backwardness are very

hurtful to their interests. Because of this, we have an indefinite

amount of puerile and undignified complaint from disappointed men, of

disingenuous misrepresentation from incompetent men, who have entered

upon labors they were never fitted to accomplish. Such men undertake

their labors in ways that want and must want the Divine sanction; and

they are tempted to ward off a just verdict of unsuitableness and of

incompetency by bringing many and grievous charges against their

flocks. "A mania for church-extending"; "a hankering for architectural

splendor"; "or for discursive and satirical preaching"; "or for

something florid or profound": these and the like imputations have

been put forward, as a screen, by many an unsuccessful preacher, who

failed,--simply failed,--not in selling horns or hides, shirtings or

sugars,--but failed to recommend Christ and his gospel,--failed for want

of head, or heart, or industry, or all three.

The man who embarks his all in hardware, drugs, or law, runs the risk

of failure. If his neighbor can rise earlier, walk faster, talk faster,

work harder, and hold on longer, he will get the avails that might

suffice for both. This unalterable fact every business-man accepts.

Do you inquire, To what good purpose do you thrust the possibility of

failure upon the attention of the candidate for the ministry? Would you

utterly discourage those who are already more alive to the perils of

their undertaking than we could wish them?

We answer, It is no kindness to encourage men to enter a ministry whose

inexorable requirements and whose incidental possibilities they may

not look in the face. It is no kindness to represent to them that the

qualities which they possess _ought_ to engage attention; and that

their talents will command respect, or else it will be the fault of the

people.

Men go into business in the face of a possibility of failure through

uncontrollable circumstances; not in defiance of an ascertainable,

insufferable incompetency. They toil on, accepting adversity with such

equanimity as God gives them, so long as they are permitted to believe

that their misfortunes are not chargeable upon their incapacity or

self-indulgence. But when it is made apparent that they are not in their

proper sphere, they think it no shame to say so, to withdraw, and

to apply their energies to something suited to their tastes and

capabilities. And it should be with the ministry; but as things now are,

with the conceptions of the ministry now entertained, pride interposes

to forbid the rectification of the most serious mistakes. It is a

question of dignity and of scholarship; whereas it should be a question

of love to God and man, and of real ability and conscious power to bring

them together,--to reconcile man to God.

Our age is an age of great devotion to secular affairs,--of men who are

great in the conduct of such affairs,--in every department in life. To

counterbalance this, our ministry must be filled with an equally earnest

devotion to God and salvation. In real ability our ministers ought to be

not a whit behind. But ability is not necessarily scholarship; though it

may, and as far as possible should, include that, and a great deal more.

Let it be fully understood, once for all, that we have no disparaging

remark to make of scholarship; a man must be foolish beyond expression,

who pretends to argue that the highest scholarship is less than a most

important and almost indispensable auxiliary to the minister of Christ.

All our concern in the matter, just here, is, that it shall be fully

understood that piety and real ability make the minister of Christ,

and not scholarship; in the words of Augustine, "the heart makes the

minister";--but we may safely assume that he meant the heart of a really

able man; otherwise we can accord but a qualified respect to this

remark.

The prevailing impression among the ministry appears to be, that the man

who cannot write "an able doctrinal discourse" is but an inferior man,

fit only to preach in an inferior place; and that it would be a great

gain to the Church, if scholarship were only so general that the

standard of the universities could be applied, and only Phi-Beta-Kappa

men allowed to enter the ministry. No doubt, those who incline to this

view are quite honest, and not unkindly in it. But those who think this

grievously misunderstand the necessities of the age in which we live.

Reading men know where to find better reading than can possibly be

furnished by any man who is bound to write two sermons weekly, or

even one sermon a week; and to train any corps of young men in the

expectation that any considerable fraction of them will be able to win

and to maintain a commanding influence in their parishes mainly by the

weekly production of learned discourses is to do them the greatest

injury, by cherishing expectations which never can be realized. Why

do our educated men of other professions so seldom and so reluctantly

contribute to the addresses in our religious assemblies? Precisely

because they understand the difficulty of meeting the popular

expectation which is created by the prevailing theory; a theory which

demands that sermons, and not only that sermons, but also that all

religious addresses, should be chiefly characterized as learned, acute,

scholastic even. An Irish preacher is reported in an Edinburgh paper as

saying lately, that "he had been led to think of his own preaching and

of that of his brethren. He saw very few sermons in the New Testament

shaped after the forms and fashion in which they had been accustomed to

shape theirs. He was not aware of a sermon there, in which they had

a little motto selected, upon which a disquisition upon a particular

subject was hung. The sort of sermons which the people in his locality

were desirous to hear were sermons delivered on a large portion of the

Word of God, carrying through the ideas as the Spirit of God had done."

And it is, in part at least, because of the prevailing disregard of this

most reasonable desire, that parishes so soon weary of their ministers.

It need not discourage ministers to accept the fact that there will be

failures in the ministry,--and a great many failures among those who

rely for their success mainly upon the weekly production of learned

disquisitions. Discouragement is not in accepting a fact that accords

with all just theories of truth, but in adopting a theory which is sure

to be invalidated by the almost universal experience of men in, as well

as out of, the ministry. A right-minded minister _may_ have many falls

in struggling up his Hill of Difficulty; but the Lord will lift him

up, and will save him from adding to the temperate grief proper to any

measure of short-coming the intolerable poignancy that comes of cheating

by false pretences,--of assuming to do what he knows or should know that

he cannot do, namely, produce any considerable number of great sermons.

Let it, then, be frankly owned, that men, very good men, very capable

men, have failed in the ministry. A. failed, because he did not study;

B., because he did not visit his people; C., because he could not talk;

D., because he was too grave; E., because he was too frivolous; F. could

not, or would not, control his temper; G. alienated by exacting more

than he received; and all of them because of not having what Scougal

calls "the life of God in the soul of man."

It is not worth while for any man to go into the ministry who cannot

relish the Apostle's invitation, running thus:--"I beseech you,

therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your

bodies _a living sacrifice_, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your

reasonable service." If that seem not reasonable, ay, and exceedingly

inviting too, better let it alone. All men cannot do all things. Better

raise extraordinary potatoes than hammer out insignificant ideas. You do

not see the connection? you were a Phi-Beta-Kappa man in college, and

know that you can write better than many a man in a metropolitan pulpit?

Very likely; but we of the few go to church to be made better men, and

not by fine writing, but by significant ideas, which may come in a

homely garb, so they be only pervaded with affectionate piety, but which

can come to us only from one who has laid all ambitious self-seeking on

the altar of God. There is a power of persuasion in every minister who

follows God as a dear child, and who walks in love, as Christ loved

us, which the hardest heart cannot long resist,--which will win the

congregation, however an individual here and there may be able to harden

himself against it. You think that the great power of the pulpit is in

high doctrine, presented with metaphysical precision and acuteness. We

have no disparagement to offer of your doctrinal knowledge, nor of your

ability to state it with metaphysical precision and hair-splitting

acuteness. But we know, from much experience, that there is a divine

truth, and a fervor and power in imparting it, with which God inspires

the man who is wholly devoted to Him, in comparison with which the

higher achievements of the man who lacks these are trumpery and rubbish.

Many, _many_ men have failed in the ministry, are failing in the

ministry every day, because their principal reliance has been upon what

they deem their thorough mastery of the soundest theories of doctrine

and of duty. They were confident they could administer to minds and

hearts diseased the certain specific laid down in the book, admeasured

to the twentieth part of a scruple. Confident in their theoretical

acquisitions, they could not comprehend the indispensable necessity of a

large experience in actual cases of mental malady. And for the want of

such experience, it was absolutely impossible that they should be _en

rapport_ with the souls they honestly desired to benefit. Can you heal a

heart-ache with a syllogism? There is no dispensing with the precept and

prescription,--"Weep with those that weep!" "Be of the same mind one

toward another!"

Theories of doctrine and of practice are not without their value; but

the minister who is merely or chiefly a theorist, whether in doctrines

or in measures, is an adventurer; and the chances against him are as

many as the chances against the precise similarity of any two cases

presented to his attention,--as many as the chances against the

education of any two men of fifty years being precisely alike, in every

particular and in all their results. The soul's problems are not to be

solved by theories. Such was not the practice of the Great Physician;

"_surely, He hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows._" Theories

shirk that. "_In all their affliction, He was afflicted; in His love and

in His pity, He redeemed them._" And precisely in this way his ministers

are now to follow up his practice. Our age is growing less and less

tolerant of formality,--less and less willing to accept metaphysical

disquisition in place of a warm-hearted, loving, fervent expansion of

the Word of God, recommended to the understanding and to the sensibility

by lively illustrations of spiritual truth, derived from all the

experience of life, from all observation, from all analogies in the

natural world,--in short, from every manner of illumination, from the

heavens above, from the earth beneath, and from the waters which are

under the earth. God is surely everywhere, and hath made all things, and

all to testify of Him; and the innumerable voices all agree together.

And when this is both understood and felt, what rules shall be given to

guide and control the construction and the delivery of discourses? Shall

we say, The people must be brought back to the old-time endurance--ay,

_endurance_, that is the word--of long-drawn, laborious ratiocinations,

wherein the truth is diligently pursued for its own sake, with an

ultimate reference, indeed, to the needs and uses of the hearer, but so

remote as rarely to be noticed, except by that very small fraction of

any customary congregation who may chance to have an interest in

such doings,--some of whom watch the clergyman as they would the

entomologist, running down a truth that he may impale it, and add one

more specimen to his well-ordered collection of common and of uncommon

bugs? Our neighbors in the South do better than this; for they hunt with

the lasso, and never throw the noose except to capture something which

can be harnessed to the wheels of common life.

No, the people are not going back to the endurance of any such misery.

They have found out that still-born rhetoric is by no means the one

thing needful, and care far less for the _art_ of speech than for the

_nature_ of a holy heart. They want a man to speak less of what he

believes and more of what he feels. The expectation of bringing the

people again to endure prolonged metaphysical discriminations, spun out

of commonplace minds, cobwebs to cloak their own nakedness and universal

inaptitude, if indulged, is absurdly indulged. The whole Church is sick

of such trifling. She knows well that it has made her most unsavory to

those who might have found their way into the temples of God, or kept

their places there, but for the memory of an immense amount of wearisome

readings from the pulpit,--too often a vocabulary of words seldom or

never found out of sermons,--a manner of speech which, when tried by the

sure test of natural, animated conversation, must be pronounced absurd

and abominable. It is a wonder of wonders, that, in spite of such

drawbacks, an individual here and there has been reclaimed from

worldliness to the love and service of God.

The student-habits of the clergy most naturally lead them to prefer the

formal statement, the studied elaboration of ideas, which their own

training cannot but render facile and dear to them. And there is here

and there a man who, in virtue of extraordinary genius, can infuse new

life into worn-out phrases,--a man or two who can for a moment or for an

hour, by the very weight and excellence of their thoughts, and because

they truly and deeply feel them, arrest the age, and challenge and

secure attention, in spite of all the infelicities of an antiquated

style and an unearthly delivery. But in this age, more than ever before,

we are summoned to surrender our scholastic preferences and esoteric

honors to the exigencies of the million. And the men of this generation

have, without much conference, come with great unanimity to the

determination that they will not long endure, either in or out of the

pulpit, speakers who are dull and unaffecting, whether from want of

words, ideas, or method and wisdom in the arrangement of them, or

lack of sympathies,--and especially that they will not endure dull

declamation from the pulpit.

If any man really wish to know how he is preaching, let him imagine

himself conversing earnestly with an intelligent and highly gifted,

but uneducated man or woman, in his own parlor, or with his younger

children. Would any but an idiot keep on talking, when, with half an

eye, he might discern TEDIOUS, wrought by himself, upon the uncalloused

sensibilities of his hearers?

How long ought a sermon to be? As long as you can read in the eye of

seven-eighths of your audience, _Pray, go on_. If you cannot read that,

you have mistaken your vocation; you were never called to the ministry.

The secret of the persuasive power of our favorite orators is in their

constant recognition of the ebb and flow of the sensibilities they are

acting upon. Their speech is, in effect, an actual conversation,

in which they are speaking for as well as to the audience; and the

interlocutors are made almost as palpably such as at the "Breakfast-

Table" of our dramatic "Autocrat" In contrast with this, the dull

preacher, falling below the dignity and the privilege of his office,

addresses himself, not to living men, but to an imaginary sensibility

to abstract truth. The effect of this is obvious and inevitable; it

converts hearers into doubters as to whether in fact there be any such

thing as a religion worth recommending or possessing, and preachers into

complainers of the people as indifferent and insensible to the truth,--a

libel which ought to render them liable to fine and punishment. God's

truth, _fairly presented_, is never a matter of indifference or of

insensibility to an intelligent, nor even to an unintelligent audience.

However an individual here and there may contrive to withdraw himself

from the sphere of its influence, truth can no more lose her power than

the sun can lose his heat.

The people, under the quickening influences characteristic of our age,

are awaking to the consciousness, that, on the day which should be the

best of all the week, they have been defrauded of their right, in having

solemn dulness palmed upon them, in place of living, earnest, animated

truth. Let not ministers, unwisely overlooking this undeniable fact,

defame the people, by alleging a growing facility in dissolving the

pastoral relation,--a disregard of solemn contracts,--a willingness to

dismiss excellent, godly, and devoted men, without other reason than the

indisposition to retain them. Be it known to all such, that capable men

very department of life were never in such request as at this very hour;

and never, since the world began, was there an audience so large and so

attentive to truth, well wrought and fitted to its purpose, as now.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 05, No. 29, March, 1860 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 27 / 33 题