Chapter II

The Ancestral van Beethoven Family in Belgium--Removal

of the Grandfather to Bonn--His Activities as Singer and

Chapelmaster--Birth and Education of Johann van Beethoven--The

Parents of the Composer.

THE COMPOSER’S BELGIAN ANCESTRY

At the beginning of the seventeenth century a family named van

Beethoven lived in a village of Belgium near Louvain. A member of it

removed to and settled in Antwerp about 1650. A son of this Beethoven,

named William, a wine dealer, married, September 11, 1680, Catherine

Grandjean and had issue, eight children. One of them, baptized

September 8, 1683, in the parish of Notre Dame, now received the name

Henry Adelard, his sponsors being Henry van Beethoven, acting for

Adelard de Redincq, Baron de Rocquigny, and Jacqueline Grandjean. This

Henry Adelard Beethoven, having arrived at man’s estate, took to wife

Maria Catherine de Herdt, who bore him twelve children--the third named

Louis, the twelfth named Louis Joseph. The latter, baptized December 9,

1728, married, November 3, 1773, Maria Theresa Schuerweghs, and died

November 11, 1808, at Oosterwyck. The second daughter, named like her

mother Maria Theresa, married, September 6, 1808, Joseph Michael Jacobs

and became the mother of Jacob Jacobs, in the middle of the nineteenth

century a professor of painting in Antwerp, who supplied in part the

materials for these notices of the Antwerp Beethovens, although the

principal credit is due to M. Léon de Burbure of that city.[5]

The certificate of baptism of Louis van Beethoven, third son of Henry

Adelard, is to this effect:

Antwerp, December 23, 1712--_Baptizatus_, Ludovicus.

Parents: Henricus van Beethoven and Maria Catherine de Hert.

Sponsors: Petrus Bellmaert and Dymphona van Beethoven.

It is a family tradition--Prof. Jacobs heard it from his mother--that

this Louis van Beethoven, owing to some domestic difficulties

(according to M. Burbure they were financial), secretly left his

father’s house at an early age and never saw it again, although in

later years an epistolary correspondence seems to have been established

between the fugitive and his parents. Gifted with a good voice and

well educated musically, he went to Louvain and applied for a vacant

position as tenor to the chapter ad Sanctum Petrum, receiving it

on November 2, 1731.[6] A few days later the young man of 18 years

was appointed substitute for three months for the singing master

(_Phonascus_), who had fallen ill, as is attested by the minutes of the

Chapter, under date November 2, 1731.[7]

The young singer does not seem to have filled the place beyond the

prescribed time. By a decree of Elector Clemens August, dated March,

1733 (the month of Joseph Haydn’s birth), he became Court Musician

in Bonn with a salary of 400 florins, a large one for those days,

particularly in the case of a young man who only three months before

had completed his 20th year. Allowing the usual year of probation

to which candidates for the court chapel were subjected, Beethoven

must have come to Bonn in 1732. This corresponds to the time spent at

Louvain as well as to a petition of 1774, to be given hereafter, in

which Johann speaks of his father’s “42 years of service.” There is

another paper of date 1784 which makes the elder Beethoven to have

served about 46 years, but this is from another hand and of less

authority than that written by the son.

OTHER BEETHOVEN FAMILIES IN BONN

What it was that persuaded Ludwig van Beethoven to go to Bonn is

unknown. Gottfried Fischer, who owned the house in the Rheingasse in

which two generations of Beethovens lived, professed to know that

Elector Clemens August learned to know him as a good singer at Liège

and for that reason called him to Bonn. That is not impossible,

whether the Elector went to Louvain or Ludwig introduced himself to him

at Liège. But it is significant that another branch of the Beethoven

family was already represented at Bonn. Michael van Beethoven was born

in Malines in February, 1684. He was a son of Cornelius van Beethoven

and Catherine Leempoel, and beyond doubt, as the later associations

in Bonn prove, closely related to the Antwerp branch of the family.

Michael van Beethoven married Maria Ludovica Stuykers (or Stuykens)

on October 8, 1707. His eldest son also bore the name of Cornelius

(born in September, 1708, in Malines) and there were four other sons

born to him during his stay in Malines, among them two who were named

Louis, up to 1715. At a date which is uncertain, this family removed

to Bonn. There Cornelius, on February 20, 1734, married a widow named

Helena de la Porte (née Calem), in the church of St. Gangolph, Ludwig

van Beethoven, the young court singer, being one of the witnesses.

In August of the same year Cornelius was proxy for his father (who,

evidently, had not yet come to Bonn), as godfather for Ludwig’s first

child. Later, after his son had established a household, he removed to

Bonn, for Michael van Beethoven died in June, 1749, in Bonn, and in

December of the same year Maria Ludovica Stuykens (_sic_), “the Widow

van Beethoven.” Cornelius became a citizen of Bonn on January 17, 1736,

on the ground that he had married the widow of a citizen, and in 1738

he stands alone as representative of the name in the list of Bonn’s

citizens. He seems to have been a merchant, and is probably the man

who figures in the annual accounts of Clemens August as purveyor of

candles. He lost his wife, and for a second married Anna Barbara Marx,

_virgo_, on July 5, 1755, who bore him two daughters (1756 and 1759),

both of whom died young and for both of whom Ludwig van Beethoven was

sponsor. Cornelius died in 1764 and his wife in 1765, and with this

the Malines branch of the family ended. Which one of the two cousins

(for so we may in a general way consider them) came to Bonn, Ludwig

or Cornelius, must be left to conjecture. There is evidence in favor

of the former in the circumstance that Cornelius does not appear as

witness at the marriage of Ludwig in 1733. If Ludwig was the earlier

arrival, then the story of his call by the Elector may be true; he was

not disappointed in his hope of being able to make his way by reason of

his knowledge of music and singing.

The next recorded fact in his history may be seen in the ancient

register of the parish of St. Remigius, now preserved in the town

hall of Bonn. It is the marriage on September 7, 1733, of Ludwig van

Beethoven and Maria Josepha Poll, the husband not yet 21 years of age,

the wife 19. Then follows in the records of baptisms in the parish:

1734, August 8.

_Parents_:

Ludwig van Beethoven,

Maria Josepha Poll.

_Baptized_:

Maria

Bernardina

Ludovica.

_Sponsors_:

Maria Bernardina Menz,

Michael van Beethoven;

in his place Cornelius van

Beethoven.

The child Bernardina died in infancy, October 17, 1735. Her place was

soon filled by a son, Marcus Josephus, baptized April 15, 1736, of

whom the parents were doubtless early bereaved, for no other notice

whatever has been found of him. After the lapse of some four years

the childless pair again became parents, by the birth of a son, whose

baptismal record has not been discovered. It is supposed that this

child, Johann, was baptized in the Court Chapel, the records of which

are not preserved in the archives of the town and seem to be lost; or

that, possibly, he was born while the mother was absent from Bonn.

An official report upon the condition and characters of the court

musicians made in 1784, however, gives Johann van Beethoven _born in

Bonn_ and aged forty-four--thus fixing the date of his birth towards

the end of 1739 or the beginning of 1740.

The gradual improvement of the elder Beethoven’s condition in respect

of both emolument and social position, is creditable to him alike as

a musician and as a man. Poorly as the musicians were paid, he was

able in his last years to save a small portion of his earnings; his

rise in social position is indicated in the public records;--thus, the

first child is recorded as the son of L. v. Beethoven “musicus”; as

sponsor to the eldest daughter of Cornelius van Beethoven, he appears

as “Dominus” van Beethoven;--to the second as “Musicus Aulicus”; in

1761 he becomes “Herr Kapellmeister,” and his name appears in the

Court Calendar of the same year, third in a list of twenty-eight

“Hommes de chambre honoraires.” Of the elder Beethoven’s appointment

as head of the court music no other particulars have been obtained

than those to be found in his petition and the accompanying decree

printed in Chapter I. From these papers it appears that the bass singer

has had the promise of the place from Clemens August as successor to

Zudoli, but that the Elector, when the vacancy occurred, changed his

mind and gave it to his favorite young violinist Touchemoulin, who

held the position for so short a time, however, that his name never

appears as chapelmaster in the Court Calendar, he having resigned on

account of the reduction of his salary by Belderbusch, prime minister

of the new Elector who just at that period succeeded Clemens August.

The elevation of a singer to such a place was not a very uncommon

event in those days, but that a chapelmaster should still retain his

place as singer probably was. Hasse and Graun began their careers

as vocalists, but more to the point are the instances of Steffani,

Handel’s predecessor at the court of Hanover, and of Righini,

successively chapelmaster at Mayence and Berlin. In all these cases the

incumbents were distinguished and very successful composers. Beethoven

was not. Wegeler’s words, “the chapelmaster and bass singer had at an

earlier date produced operas at the National Theatre established by

the Elector,” have been rather interpreted than quoted by Schindler

and others thus: “it is thought that under the luxury-loving Elector

Clemens August, he produced operas of his own composition”--a

construction which is clearly forced and incorrect. Strange that so few

writers can content themselves with exact citations! Not only is there

no proof whatever, certainly none yet made public, that Chapelmaster

van Beethoven was an author of operatic works, but the words in his own

petition, “inasmuch as the Toxal must be sufficiently supplied with

_musique_,” can hardly be otherwise understood than as intended to

meet a possible objection to his appointment on the ground of his not

being a composer. Wegeler’s words, then, would simply mean that he put

upon the stage and conducted the operatic works produced, which were

neither numerous nor of a very high order during his time. His labors

were certainly onerous enough without adding musical composition. The

records of the electoral court which have been described and in part

reproduced in the preceding chapter, exhibit him conducting the music

of chapel, theatre and “Toxal,” examining candidates for admission

into the electoral musical service, reporting upon questions referred

to him by the privy council and the like, and all this in addition to

his services as bass singer, a position which gave him the principal

bass parts and solos to sing both in chapel and theatre. Wegeler

records a tradition that in Gassmann’s operetta “L’Amore Artigiano”

and Monsigny’s “Déserteur” he was “admirable and received the highest

applause.” If this be true it proves no small degree of enterprise on

his part as chapelmaster and of well-conserved powers as a singer; for

these two operas were first produced, the one in Vienna, the other in

Paris, in 1769, when Beethoven had already entered his fifty-eighth

year.

The words of Demmer in his petition of January 23, 1773, “the bass

singer van Beethoven is incapacitated and can no longer serve as such,”

naturally suggest the thought that the old gentleman’s appearance

as _Brunoro_ in Lucchesi’s “L’Inganno scoperto” in May, 1773, was a

final compliment to his master, the Elector, upon his birthday. He did

not live to celebrate another; the death of “Ludwig van Beethoven,

Hoffkapellmeister,” is recorded at Bonn under date of December 24,

1773--one day after the sixty-first anniversary of his baptism in

Antwerp.

CHAPELMASTER VAN BEETHOVEN’S TRIALS

At home the good man had his cross to bear. His wife, Josepha, who with

one exception had buried all her children, and possibly on that very

account, became addicted to the indulgence of an appetite for strong

drink, was at the date of her husband’s death living as a boarder in a

cloister at Cologne. How long she had been there does not appear, but

doubtless for a considerable period. The son, too, was married, but

though near was not in his father’s house. The separation was brought

about by his marriage, with which the father was not agreed. The house

in which the chapelmaster died, and which he occupied certainly as

early as 1765, was that next north of the so-called Gudenauer Hof,

later the post-office in the neighboring Bonngasse, and bore the number

386. The chapelmaster appears, upon pretty good evidence, to have

removed hither from the Fischer house in the Rheingasse, where he is

said to have lived many years and even to have carried on a trade in

wine, which change of dwelling may have taken place in 1767.

When one recalls the imposing style of dress at the era the short,

muscular man, with dark complexion and very bright eyes, as Wegeler

describes him[8] and as a painting by Courtpainter Radoux, still in

possession of his descendants in Vienna, depicts him, presents quite an

imposing picture to the imagination.

Of the early life of Johann van Beethoven there are no particulars

preserved except such as are directly or indirectly conveyed in the

official documents. Such of these papers as came from his own hand, if

judged by the standard of our time, show a want of ordinary education;

but it must not be forgotten that the orthography of the German

language was not then fixed; nor that many a contemporary of his, who

boasted a university education, or who belonged to the highest ranks

of society, wrote in a style no better than his. This is certain:

that after he had received an elementary education he was sent to the

_Gymnasium_, for as a member of the lowest class (_infima_) of that

institution he took part in September, 1750, as singer in the annual

school play which it was the custom of the _Musæ Bonnenses_ to give.

It would seem, therefore, that his good voice and musical gifts were

appreciated at an early period. Herein, probably, is also to be found

the reason why his stay at the gymnasium was not of long duration.

The father had set him apart for service in the court music, and

himself, as appears from the statements already printed, undertook his

instruction; he taught him singing and clavier playing. Whether or not

he also taught him violin playing, in which he was “capable,” remains

uncertain. In 1752, at the age of 12, as can be seen from his petition

of March, 1756, and his father’s of 1764, he entered the chapel as

soprano. According to Gottwald’s report of 1756 he had served “about

2 years”; the contradiction is probably explained by an interruption

caused by the mutation of his voice. At the age of 16, he received his

_decretum_ as “accessist” on the score of his skill in singing and his

experience already acquired, including his capability on the violin,

which was the basis of the decree of April 24, 1764, granting him a

salary of 100 rth. per annum.

So, at the age of 22, the young man received the promise of a salary,

and at 24 obtained one of 100 thalers. In 1769, he received an increase

of 25 fl., and 50 fl. more by the decree of April 3, 1772. He had,

moreover, an opportunity to gain something by teaching. Not only did

he give lessons in singing and clavier playing to the children of

prominent families of the city, but he also frequently was called on to

prepare young musicians for service in the chapel. Thus Demmer, says

the memorandum heretofore given, “paid 6 rth. to young Mr. Beethoven

for 3 months”; and a year later the following resolve of the privy

council was passed:

_Ad Suppl._ Joan Beethoven

The demands of the suppliant having been found to be correct, the

Electoral Treasury is commanded to satisfy the debt by the usual

withdrawal of the sum from the salary of the defendant.

Bonn, May 24, 1775.

Attest. P.

which probably refers to a debt contracted by one of the women of the

court chapel. A few years later, as we have seen, he seems to have

been intrusted with the training of Johanna Helena Averdonck, whom he

brought forward as his pupil in March, 1778, and the singer Gazzenello

was his pupil before she went elsewhere. It was largely his own fault

that the musically gifted man was unfortunate in both domestic and

official relations. His intemperance in drink, probably inherited from

his mother but attributed by old Fischer to the wine trade in which

his father embarked, made itself apparent at an early date, and by

yielding to it more and more as he grew older he undoubtedly impaired

his voice and did much to bring about his later condition of poverty.

How it finally led to a catastrophe we shall see later. According to

the testimony of the widow Karth, he was a tall, handsome man, and wore

powdered hair in his later years. Fischer does not wholly agree with

her: “of medium height, longish face, broad forehead, round nose, broad

shoulders, serious eyes, face somewhat scarred, thin pigtail.” Three

and a half years after obtaining his salary of 100 th. he ventured to

marry. Heinrich Kewerich, the father of his wife, was head cook in

that palace at Ehrenbreitstein in which Clemens danced himself out of

this world, but he died before that event took place.[9] His wife, as

the church records testify, was Anna Clara Daubach. Her daughter Maria

Magdalena, born December 19, 1746, married a certain Johann Laym,

valet of the Elector of Trèves, on January 30, 1763. On November 28,

1765, the husband died, and Maria Magdalena was a widow before she had

completed her 19th year. In a little less than two years the marriage

register of St. Remigius, at Bonn, was enriched by this entry:

THE PARENTS OF THE COMPOSER

_12ma 9bris. Praevia Dispensatione super 3bus denuntiationibus

copulavi D. Joannem van Beethoven, Dni. Ludovici van Beethoven

et Mariae Josephae Poll conjugum filium legitimum, et Mariam

Magdalenam Keferich viduam Leym ex Ehrenbreitstein, Henrici

Keferich et annae clarae Westorffs filiam legitimam. Coram

testibus Josepho clemente Belseroski et philippo Salomon._

That is, Johann van Beethoven has married the young widow Laym.

How it came that the marriage took place in Bonn instead of the home of

the bride we are told by Fischer. Chapelmaster van Beethoven was not

at all agreed that his son should marry a woman of a lower station in

life than his own. He did not continue his opposition against the fixed

determination of his son; but it is to be surmised that he would not

have attended a ceremony in Ehrenbreitstein, and hence the matter was

disposed of quickly in Bonn. After the wedding the young pair paid a

visit of a few days’ duration to Ehrenbreitstein.

CHARACTER OF MME. VAN BEETHOVEN

Fischer describes Madame van Beethoven as a “handsome, slender person”

and tells of her “rather tall, longish face, a nose somewhat bent

(_gehöffelt_, in the dialect of Bonn), spare, earnest eyes.” Cäcilia

Fischer could not recall that she had ever seen Madame van Beethoven

laugh; “she was always serious.” Her life’s vicissitudes may have

contributed to this disposition:--the early loss of her father, and of

her first husband, and the death of her mother scarcely more than a

year after her second marriage. It is difficult to form a conception

of her character because of the paucity of information about her.

Wegeler lays stress upon her piety and gentleness; her amiability

and kindliness towards her family appear from all the reports;

nevertheless, Fischer betrays the fact that she could be vehement

in controversies with the other occupants of the house. “Madame van

Beethoven,” Fischer continues, “was a clever woman; she could give

converse and reply aptly, politely and modestly to high and low, and

for this reason she was much liked and respected. She occupied herself

with sewing and knitting. They led a righteous and peaceful married

life, and paid their house-rent and baker’s bills promptly, quarterly,

and on the day. She[10] was a good, a domestic woman, she knew how to

give and also how to take in a manner that is becoming to all people

of honest thoughts.” From this it is fair to assume that she strove

to conduct her household judiciously and economically; whether or not

this was always possible in view of the limited income, old Fischer

does not seem to have been informed. She made the best she could of

the weaknesses of her husband without having been able to influence

him; her care for the children in externals was not wholly sufficient.

Young Ludwig clung to her with a tender love, more than to the father,

who was “only severe”; but there is nothing anywhere to indicate that

she exerted an influence upon the emotional life and development of

her son, and in respect of this no wrong will be done her if the

lower order of her culture be taken into consideration. Nor must it

be forgotten that in all probability she was naturally delicate and

that her health was still further weakened by her domestic troubles

and frequent accouchements. The “quiet, suffering woman,” as Madame

Karth calls her, died in 1787 of consumption at the age of 40 years.

Long years after in Vienna Beethoven was wont, when among his intimate

friends, to speak of his “excellent” (_vortreffliche_) mother.[11]

At the time when Johann van Beethoven married, there was quite a colony

of musicians, and other persons in the service of the court, in the

Bonngasse, as that street is in part named which extends from the

lower extremity of the market-place to the Cologne gate. Chapelmaster

van Beethoven had left the house in the Rheingasse and lived at No.

386. In the adjoining house, north, No. 387, lived the musical family

Ries. Farther down, the east house on that side of the way before the

street assumes the name Kölnerstrasse was the dwelling of the hornist,

afterward publisher, Simrock. Nearly opposite the chapelmaster’s the

second story of the house No. 515 was occupied (but not till after

1771) by the Salomons; the parterre and first floor by the owner of

the house, a lace-maker or dealer in laces, named Clasen. Of the two

adjoining houses the one No. 576 was the dwelling of Johann Baum, a

master locksmith, doubtless the Jean Courtin, “serrurier,” of the Court

Calendar for 1773. In No. 617 was the family Hertel, twelve or fifteen

years later living under the Beethovens in the Wenzelgasse, and not far

off a family, Poll, perhaps relations of Madame Beethoven the elder.

Conrad Poll’s name is found in the Court Calendars of the 1770’s as

one of the eight Electoral “Heiducken” (footmen). In 1767 in the rear

of the Clasen house, north[12] there was a lodging to let; and there

the newly married Beethovens began their humble housekeeping. Their

first child was a son, Ludwig Maria, baptized April 2, 1769, whose

sponsors, as may be read in the register of St. Remigius parish, were

the grandfather Beethoven and Anna Maria Lohe, wife of Jean Courtin,

the next-door neighbor. This child lived but six days. In two years the

loss of the parents was made up by the birth of him who is the subject

of this biography.

FOOTNOTES:

[5] In Fétis’ “Biographie universelle” (new ed.) several of these names

are misprinted. They are corrected here from Mr. Jacobs’ letter to A.

W. T.

[6] Thayer’s account of this period in the life of Beethoven’s

grandfather has here been extended from an article by the Chevalier

L. de Burbure, published in the “Biographie nationale publiée par

l’Académie Royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux arts de

Belgique.” Tome II. p. 105. (Brussels, 1868.) From this it further

appears that two other members of the Antwerp branch of the family were

devoted to the fine arts, viz.: Peter van Beethoven, painter, pupil

of Abr. Genoel, jr., and Gerhard van Beethoven, sculptor, accepted in

the guild of St. Luke about 1713, Director Vollmer, of Brussels, in a

communication to Dr. Deiters gave information of a branch of the family

in Mechlin and of still another in Brabant where, in the village of

Wambeke, there was a curé van Beethoven who must either have died or

been transferred between 1729 and 1732.

[7] The original entry is printed in full in the German edition of this

biography.

[8] “The grandfather was a man short of stature, muscular, with

extremely animated eyes, and was greatly respected as an artist.”

Fischer’s description is different, but Wegeler is the more trustworthy

witness of the two.

[9] The church records at Ehrenbreitstein say that he died August

2, 1759, in Molzberg, at the age of 58; his funeral took place

in Ehrenbreitstein. A Frau Eva Katharina Kewerich, who died at

Ehrenbreitstein on October 10, 1753, at the age of 89 years, was

probably his mother.

[10] Some notes by Fischer contain the characteristic addition: “Madame

van Beethoven once remarked that the most necessary things, such as

house-rent, the baker, shoemaker and tailor must first be paid, but she

would never pay drinking debts.”

[11] In the collection of Beethoven relics in the Beethoven House in

Bonn there is a portrait which is set down as that of Beethoven’s

mother. The designation, however, rests only on uncertain tradition and

lacks authoritative attestation. It is certainly difficult to see in it

the representation of a consumptive woman only 40 years old. Moreover,

it is strange that Beethoven should have sent from Vienna for the

portrait of his grandfather and not for that of his dearly loved mother

had one been in existence. It is only because of a resemblance between

this picture and another that the belief exists that portraits of both

of the parents of Beethoven are in existence. In 1890 two oil portraits

were found in a shed in Cologne and restored by the painter Kempen, who

recognized in them the handiwork of the painter Beckenkamp, who, like

Beethoven’s mother, was born in Ehrenbreitstein, was a visitor at the

Beethoven home in Bonn and died in Cologne in 1828. The female portrait

agrees with that in Bonn; they are life-size, finely executed pictures,

but they are certainly not Beethoven’s parents. Enough has been said

about the portrait of the mother. In the case of that of the father

the first objection is that it also lacks authentication. Fischer’s

description does not wholly fit the picture; the old man would not

have forgotten the protruding lower lip. But the entire expression of

the face, serious, it is true, but fleshy and vulgar, and the gray

perruque, do not conform to what we know of the easy-going musician. It

will be difficult, too, to trace any resemblance of expression between

it and the familiar one of Beethoven from which a conclusion might be

drawn. So long as proofs are wanting, scientific biography will have

no right to accept the portraits as those of Beethoven’s parents.

Reproductions of them may be found in the “Musical Times” of London,

December 15, 1892.

[12] The house is now owned by the Beethoven-Haus Verein, and

maintained as a Beethoven museum.

The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume I · 第 2 / 22 章