No. 78. [STEELE.[211]

From _Thursday, Oct. 6_, to _Saturday, Oct. 8, 1709_.

_From my own Apartment, October 7._

As your painters, who deal in history-pieces, often entertain

themselves upon broken sketches, and smaller flourishes of the pencil;

so I find some relief in striking out miscellaneous hints, and sudden

starts of fancy, without any order or connection, after having spent

myself on more regular and elaborate dissertations. I am at present

in this easy state of mind, sat down to my scrutoire; where, for

the better disposition of my correspondence, I have writ upon every

drawer the proper title of its contents, as hypocrisy, dice, patches,

politics, love, duels, and so forth. My various advices are ranged

under such several heads, saving only that I have a particular box

for Pacolet, and another for Monoculus.[212] I cannot but observe,

that my duel-box, which is filled by the lettered men of honour, is

so very ill-spelt, that it is hard to decipher their writings. My

love-box, though on a quite contrary subject, filled with the works

of the fairest hands in Great Britain, is almost as unintelligible.

The private drawer, which is sacred to politics, has in it some of the

most refined panegyrics and satires that any age has produced. I have

now before me several recommendations for places at my table of fame:

three of them are of an extraordinary nature, in which I find I am

misunderstood, and shall therefore beg leave to produce them. They are

from a Quaker, a courtier, and a citizen.

"ISAAC,

"Thy lucubrations, as thou lovest to call them, have been perused

by several of our friends, who have taken offence: forasmuch

as thou excludest out of the brotherhood all persons who are

praiseworthy for religion, we are afraid that thou wilt fill thy

table with none but heathens, and cannot hope to spy a brother

there; for there are none of us who can be placed among murdering

heroes, or ungodly wits; since we do not assail our enemies with

the arm of flesh, nor our gainsayers with the vanity of human

wisdom. If therefore thou wilt demean thyself on this occasion

with a right judgment, according to the gifts that are in thee, we

desire thou wilt place James Nayler[213] at the upper end of thy

table.

"EZEKIEL STIFFRUMP."

In answer to my good friend Ezekiel, I must stand to it, that I cannot

break my rule for the sake of James Nayler; not knowing, whether

Alexander the Great, who is a choleric hero, won't resent his sitting

at the upper end of the table with his hat on.

But to my courtier:

"SIR,

"I am surprised, that you lose your time in complimenting the

dead, when you may make your court to the living. Let me only tell

you in the ear, Alexander and Cæsar (as generous as they were

formerly) have not now a groat to dispose of. Fill your table with

good company: I know a person of quality that shall give you £100

for a place at it. Be secret, and be rich.

"Yours,

You know my hand."

This gentleman seems to have the true spirit, without the formality of

an under courtier; therefore I shall be plain with him, and let him

leave the name of his courtier, and £100 in Morphew's hands: if I can

take it, I will.

My citizen writes the following:

"Mr. ISAAC BICKERSTAFF,

"SIR,

"Your _Tatler_ of September 13,[214] am now reading, and in your

list of famous men, desire you not forget Alderman Whittington,

who began the world with a cat, and died worth three hundred

and fifty thousand pounds sterling, which he left to an only

daughter, three years after his Mayoralty. If you want any further

particulars of ditto Alderman, daughter, or cat, let me know, and

per first will advise the needful. Which concludes,

"Your loving Friend,

LEMUEL LEDGER."

I shall have all due regard to this gentleman's recommendation; but

cannot forbear observing, how wonderfully this sort of style is adapted

for the despatch of business, by leaving out insignificant particles:

besides that, the dropping of the first person is an artful way to

disengage a man from the guilt of rash words or promises. But I am to

consider, that a citizen's reputation is credit, not fame; and am to

leave these lofty subjects for a matter of private concern in the next

letter before me.

"SIR,

"I am just recovered out of a languishing sickness by the care

of Hippocrates,[215] who visited me throughout my whole illness,

and was so far from taking any fee, that he inquired into my

circumstances, and would have relieved me also that way, but I did

not want it. I know no method of thanking him, but recommending it

to you to celebrate so great humanity in the manner you think fit,

and to do it with the spirit and sentiments of a man just relieved

from grief, misery, and pain; to joy, satisfaction, and ease: in

which you will represent the grateful sense of

"Your obedient Servant,

T. B."

I think the writer of this letter has put the matter in as good a

dress as I can for him; yet I cannot but add my applause to what

this distressed man has said. There is not a more useful man in a

commonwealth than a good physician; and by consequence no worthier a

person than he that uses his skill with generosity, even to persons

of condition, and compassion to those who are in want: which is the

behaviour of Hippocrates, who shows as much liberality in his practice,

as he does wit in his conversation and skill in his profession. A

wealthy doctor, who can help a poor man, and will not without a fee,

has less sense of humanity than a poor ruffian, who kills a rich man to

supply his necessities. It is something monstrous to consider a man of

a liberal education tearing out the bowels of a poor family, by taking

for a visit what would keep them a week. Hippocrates needs not the

comparison of such extortion to set off his generosity; but I mention

his generosity to add shame to such extortion.

* * * * *

This is to give notice to all ingenious gentlemen in and about the

cities of London and Westminster, who have a mind to be instructed in

the noble sciences of music, poetry, and politics, that they repair

to the Smyrna Coffee-house[216] in Pall Mall, betwixt the hours of

eight and ten at night, where they may be instructed gratis, with

elaborate essays by word of mouth on all or any of the above-mentioned

arts. The disciples are to prepare their bodies with three dishes of

Bohea, and purge their brains with two pinches of snuff. If any young

student gives indication of parts, by listening attentively, or asking

a pertinent question, one of the professors shall distinguish him, by

taking snuff out of his box in the presence of the whole audience.

* * * * *

_N.B._--The seat of learning is now removed from the corner of the

chimney on the left-hand towards the window, to the round table in the

middle of the floor over against the fire; a revolution much lamented

by the porters and chairmen, who were much edified through a pane of

glass that remained broken all the last summer.

* * * * *

I cannot forbear advertising my correspondents, that I think myself

treated by some of them after too familiar a manner, and in phrases

that neither become them to give, or me to take. I shall therefore

desire for the future, that if any one returns me an answer to a

letter, he will not tell me he has received the favour of my letter;

but if he does not think fit to say, he has received the honour of it,

that he tell me in plain English, he has received my letter of such a

date. I must likewise insist, that he would conclude with, "I am with

great respect," or plainly, "I am," without further addition; and not

insult me, by an assurance of his being with "great truth" and "esteem"

my humble servant. There is likewise another mark of superiority which

I cannot bear, and therefore must inform my correspondents, that I

discard all "faithful" humble servants, and am resolved to read no

letters that are not subscribed, "Your most obedient," or "most humble

Servant," or both. These may appear niceties to vulgar minds, but they

are such as men of honour and distinction must have regard to. And I

very well remember a famous duel in France, where four were killed

of one side, and three of the other, occasioned by a gentleman's

subscribing himself a "most affectionate Friend."

_One in the Morning, of the 8th of Oct. 1709._

I was this night looking on the moon, and find by certain signs in

that luminary, that a certain person under her dominion, who has been

for many years distempered, will within few hours publish a pamphlet,

wherein he will pretend to give my lucubrations to a wrong person;[217]

and I require all sober-disposed persons to avoid meeting the said

lunatic, or giving him any credence any further than pity demands; and

to lock up the said person wherever they find him, keeping him from

pen, ink, and paper. And I hereby prohibit any person to take upon

him my writings, on pain of being sent by me into Lethe with the said

lunatic and all his works.

The Tatler, Volume 2 · 第 48 / 99 题