MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION OF SOME COMMERCIAL BRANDS.

In examining ketchup the color, odor, amount of discoloration,

presence of foreign tissue, foreign coloring matter, oil, and fungi

were determined. If no preservative was mentioned, some of the ketchup

was put in petri dishes and inoculated with Penicillium to determine

whether growth could take place. The following examinations are

reported, as they represent some of the best known brands on the market:

_No. 9._--Opened September 2, 1907; age unknown; pint bottle; no

preservative mentioned; not spoiled July 6 of following year.

This ketchup was guaranteed to be made from fresh, ripe, tomatoes

by a new process. The color is an unnatural red, has not faded,

and the odor is good. The microscope showed the presence of much

refuse, and large quantities of fungi, whole colonies of molds,

the filaments distorted, many yeast cells, and bacteria. The red

color was not confined to the red crystalline bodies, as is the

case in ripe tomatoes, but the whole of the protoplasm of the

cells, including the nucleus and nucleolus was red, as were also

most of the mold filaments and yeast, indicating the presence of

considerable artificial coloring matter. The structure indicated

that the stock had been manufactured from “trimmings,” and

further, that they were not fresh when used, but had fermented.

There was no oil present. The “new process” is a success in

keeping ketchup, as no preservative is mentioned. The price was 20

cents.

_No. 112._--Another bottle of the same brand of ketchup; examined

in April, 1908; presumably manufactured in 1907; one-twelfth of

1 per cent of sodium benzoate declared on label; a bright red;

guaranteed to be from fresh ripe tomatoes and uncolored. The

microscope showed no dyeing of the tissues, few fungi, and no

extraneous matter. The price was 20 cents.

_No. 17._--Opened September 28, 1907; age unknown; a pint bottle;

sodium benzoate declared on supplemental label, no amount being

stated; reddish brown color, badly discolored on top; greasy odor;

not spoiled July 6, 1908; refuse present; large amount of oil;

many fungi; the mold filaments enlarged and distorted. The price

was 15 cents.

_No. 109._--Another bottle of the same brand examined in April,

1908; presumably manufactured the preceding year; had one-tenth

of 1 per cent of sodium benzoate; not spoiled July 6, 1908;

reddish brown color, discolored near top; greasy odor. This was

practically the same as the first bottle examined, had fewer mold

filaments, but many bacteria.

_No. 18._--Opened September 28, 1907; age unknown; pint bottle;

no preservative mentioned; not spoiled July 6, 1908. A neck label

stated that it is made from sound ripe tomatoes and uncolored.

Color reddish brown; greasy odor; many oil globules; too many mold

filaments and bacteria for sound tomatoes. Price 20 cents.

_No. 113._--Another bottle of the same brand examined in April,

1908; said to have been manufactured in 1908; no preservative

mentioned; not spoiled after standing open for seventy days; same

as No. 18 in color and odor; oil and many fungi again present.

_No. 10._--Opened September 2, 1907; age unknown; half-pint

bottle; no preservative mentioned; not spoiled July 6, 1908. A

neck label 2 inches in height guaranteed the highest quality; an

extra label lower down on the neck stated the product to be the

natural color, and made from fresh, ripe tomatoes; the regular

label carried the brand, manufacturer’s name, etc. Color brown;

sweetish odor; colonies of mold; distorted filaments; many

bacteria; a few small oil globules. Price 25 cents.

_No. 106._--Same brand; pint bottle; examined in April, 1908; said

to be manufactured in 1907; color red, discolored near surface;

2-inch neck label in addition to regular label; no preservative

mentioned; did not spoil in seventy days; oil globules; particles

of red, amorphous matter; whole colonies of mold, as well as

fragments of filaments; teeming with bacteria.

_No. 77._--Different brand, but same manufacturer as Nos. 10 and

106; age unknown; pint bottle; one-twelfth of 1 per cent of sodium

benzoate declared; opened December 1; placed in incubator at 95°

F. for a month; not spoiled July 6; color reddish brown; greasy

odor; oil globules, many mold filaments, and bacteria present.

Price 20 cents.

_No. 107._--Third brand from same manufacturer as preceding; said

to be manufactured in 1907; half-pint bottle; one-twelfth of 1

per cent of benzoate of soda declared; layer of oil on surface;

sweet odor; reddish-brown color. Oil globules prominent feature

microscopically, whole colonies of distorted mold were present,

and sample contained many different forms of bacteria. Price 10

cents.

_No. 14._--Opened September 2, 1907; age unknown; no preservative

mentioned; not spoiled July 6, 1908; half-pint bottle; color red;

good odor; few bacteria; free from refuse. Price 25 cents.

_No. 108._--Same brand as No. 14; said to be manufactured in 1907;

pint bottle; one-tenth of 1 per cent of benzoate of soda declared;

color red; good odor; few fungi; clean and free from refuse.

_No. 33._--Opened October 24, 1907; age unknown; one-tenth of 1

per cent of benzoate of soda declared; spoiled November 1; pint

bottle (14 ounces); sweetish odor; brown color; many molds, yeast

and bacteria. Price 10 cents.

_No. 114._--Same brand as No. 33; said to be manufactured in 1907;

opened in April; not spoiled in seventy days; many molds, yeasts,

and bacteria; some green tissue, and filaments of algæ. The price

was 10 cents.

Experiments on the Spoilage of Tomato Ketchup · 第 54 / 56 题