CHAPTER XVI.

ABORTION AND THE ABORTIONISTS.

_The Career of Madame Restell--Rosensweig's Good Luck_.

"Such is the fate of artless maid.

Sweet flow'ret of the rural shade!

By love's simplicity betrayed,

And guileless trust.

Till she, like thee, all soiled, is laid

Low in the dust."

--Burns, "To a Mountain Daisy."

Love's young dream--the dream of the ages--has sometimes a fearful

awakening. In her "guileless trust" and unsuspecting ignorance, a young

woman weaves a light web of folly and vain hopes, which one day closes

around her like a poisoned garment, instantly changing all her

fluttering raptures into a wail of the deepest human anguish. All at

once the whole force of her nature is concentrated in the effort of

concealment, and she shrinks with irresistible dread from every course

that would tend to unveil her miserable secret. Overshadowed by a

misfortune that is worse than death, in her half-benumbed mental

condition, she hears of the professional abortionist, and braces herself

for one of those convulsive actions by which a betrayed woman will

sometimes leap from a temporary sorrow into the arms of Death.

The dark crime of abortion abounds in New York, as it does in all great

cities. Yet this crime is conducted with so much care that rarely a case

comes to light. Even when one of these ghouls is arrested and put on

trial it is but seldom that conviction follows, because it is an offense

extremely difficult to bring home to the perpetrator. Many indictments,

for inexplicable causes, from time to time have been pigeon-holed; but

as the transaction is committed in private, the victim is the only

witness, and she is naturally averse to exposure.

It is only when the remains of some beautiful victim are found packed in

a box, or jammed into a barrel, that the imagination realizes the

imminent peril dishonored women incur by trusting themselves to the

mercy of those sordid butchers. The author of her wrong usually makes

the arrangement, under cover. The wily practitioner talks blandly and

soothingly. If the operation succeeds, all is well; if not, the poor

victim's body is secretly disposed of. She is chronicled among the

mysterious disappearances, because every precaution had been taken that

her friends should know nothing whatever of her condition, or of her

whereabouts.

Naturally, the practice of child-murder hardens the hearts and petrifies

the feelings of those systematically engaged in it. The tortures

inflicted on the patient are, no doubt, in many cases unavoidable if the

end is to be achieved; but many of these operators are cruelly ignorant

and unscrupulous, and barbarously brutal and reckless. The mind shrinks

from contemplating the thrilling honors of some of the scenes enacted

within those deadened walls. Despite the tears and protestations of the

suffering woman, the operation will sometimes be repeated two or even

three times. But helpless and unprotected as she is, she is compelled to

submit, because she is terrorized by her inquisitor's threats to send

her to some hospital at once, to expose her condition to the world and

to die.

When death appears only too probable, the abortionist generally has the

victim either sent to a hospital or to some regular physician's

premises, and leaving her before her condition or their connection with

the case has been discovered. If the death occurs on their own premises,

a certificate from some doctor called in at the fast moment, and

deceived as to the cause of death, may enable a quiet little funeral to

take place. And again, the fact cannot be denied that from time to time

regular, diplomated physicians have been found who would not hesitate,

for a consideration, to give "crooked" certificates. Should it be found

impracticable to dispose of the body in such a convenient and regular

way, in some cases it is shipped by rail to a distant and fictitious

address, without any clue by which it can be traced back to the

"shipper."

The pitiable case of Miss Alice Augusta Bowlsby will occur to many

readers just here. The facts in her case were simply these: One Saturday

night towards the end of August, 1871, a trunk containing the remains of

a young and beautiful female was found at the depot of the Hudson River

Railroad, checked for Chicago. The remains were subsequently recognized

as those of Miss Bowlsby of Paterson, New Jersey, and the trunk was

traced, by means of the truckman employed to carry it, back to the

residence of Dr. Jacob Rosenzweig. It was soon discovered that the death

of the unhappy girl was caused by an operation tending to produce

abortion. Rosenzweig was a burly fellow, with a forbidding aspect, and a

bold, confident look. His large, bullet eyes looked defiantly from

behind the deep-intrenched line of wrinkles that care or conscience had

gradually drawn around them. He had, in fact, a forbidding aspect, and

when he was placed on trial before Recorder Hackett, according to a

newspaper reporter present,

"one eye was devoted to watching the Grecian bend of his vulture-hooked

nose, while the other was on duty over a precocious lock of his curling

red hair, which clung to the verandah of his left ear like a Virginia

creeper."

Rosenzweig was convicted of manslaughter while treating a woman for

abortion, and was sentenced to state prison for seven years--a sentence

so obviously out of proportion to the enormity of the crime that a howl

of public indignation went up to the skies. However, Recorder Hackett

had awarded the utmost penalty of the then existing law, and Rosenzweig

was sent to Sing Sing. Soon after, a law was enacted by the state

legislature, making the penalty of crimes like Rosenzweig's twenty years

in the state prison, with hard labor. After this law was passed, and

when the abortionist had served about a year of his sentence, another

charge of abortion was found against him, and he was brought down the

river, again put on trial and sentenced. Mr. Howe, for his defense, in

appeal, raised the natural objection that it was unfair and improper to

try Rosenzweig in two cases at once. Consequently, he got a new trial,

in which he was acquitted, because the old law under which he had been

previously convicted had been repealed. Here was a manifest miscarriage

of justice effected by a wise change in the laws. This prisoner escaped,

but such a result could hardly, within the range of possibility, occur

under the same law again.

In the majority of cases, the victims of abortion are gotten rid of by

the practitioner before they die. The operation once over, they are

hurried from the premises with all possible dispatch, even though the

fatigue and exposure may imperil their lives. Many die a few days after

reaching home, in which case the name of the abortionist is never known,

and many more linger for a few months or years, mere physical wrecks of

their former selves, till merciful Death folds them in his leaden arms.

Before the recent laws were passed, making it a punishable offense to

offer to produce abortions, either by medicine or instruments, there

were many nostrums, in the form of pills and powders, covertly

advertised for the alleged purpose of producing miscarriages. When a

person called on one of those quacks and explained the purpose for which

the medicine was needed, he was told that it was very dear--from five,

ten, to fifteen dollars a box. At the same time he would be assured that

his lady friend was merely suffering from "an obstruction arising from

cold." If he insisted on explaining, the hard face of the quack would

grow darker and harder, and a mysterious gleam of intelligence would

shoot from the speculative eye as he was told:

"I will not sell medicine for anything else but a cold; nor will I treat

any lady for anything else. Your young friend has only taken cold, and

if she is not relieved by these pills she had better come and see me

herself."

No doubt most of those medicines were deceptive, fraudulent and futile.

But they had the intended effect of advertising the person who sold

them, whose "professional" services were generally brought into request

when the pills proved inoperative. This was the secret of Madame

Restell's reputation and immense accumulated fortune. Her occupation was

that of a midwife, and in that assumed capacity she advertised her

"Female Pills." As all the world knows now, her real vocation was the

ante-natal destruction of unwelcome babies. To her gorgeous palace at

the corner of Fifth avenue and Fifty-second street went for years some

of the most wealthy and fashionable women of this metropolis. It is a

dreadful admission, and a sad commentary on our boasted civilization,

but the truth must be told. Some of her patrons were married ladies who,

finding themselves likely to become mothers, and being too heartless and

frivolous to desire the pains and cares of maternity, sought this

woman's aid and, in some instances, paid her fabulous sums to have their

innocent offspring destroyed before they saw the light. Others who

sought her services were unmarried girls, who, having sacrificed their

honor were prepared to pay any price to conceal their shame, by the

destruction of the little life which would blazon it to the world.

Madame Restell's clients were all, or nearly all women of the higher

orders of society, and of liberal means. Of this disgraceful fact there

can be no manner of doubt. Her scale of charges was so extravagant as to

positively prohibit her employment by any one unable to pay a handsome

fee for the gratification of their murderous project. Sometimes a poor

girl, ruined by some wealthy libertine, would be supplied by him with

funds to pay for the terrible operation which would conceal her folly;

but in the great majority of cases they were ladies of wealth and social

standing who went dressed in elegant apparel, loaded with jewelry, and

double veiled, to her palatial mansion to obtain her aid.

Madame Restell, whose name was a scandal and her Fifth-avenue house an

outrage upon New York for years, was a native of Painswick,

Gloucestershire. She was the daughter of a humble laborer named Trow,

and first saw the light in 1813. Her educational facilities--as indeed

were all those similarly or even better circumstanced in England seventy

years ago--were of the humblest kind. But she was made to work, taught

to use her needle, and "sent out to service" in her early teens. And so

it came to pass that, at the age of sixteeen, she was "maid of all work"

for a butcher in her native town. She was quite good-looking, with

piercing black eyes and thick, luxuriant black hair, and shapely form.

She had many candidates for her young affections among the young weavers

of the place, but a journeyman tailor named Henry Somers was the

successful wooer. A year or two after the wedding, Mr. and Mrs. Somers

emigrated and came to the city of New York, settling over on the east

side, about Oliver street. Somers was lazy, improvident and a tippler,

and after a short sojourn in America Mrs. Somers found herself a young

and blooming widow, with one child, a girl, to provide for. She had all

along industriously supplemented her husband's earnings by her needle.

She was now wholly dependent upon it for the subsistence of herself and

child.

It was while in these pinched circumstances that she made the

acquaintance of Charles R. Lohman, a printer poor as herself, and became

his wife. There was no immediate improvement in their condition. Both

were impatient of the pinchings of poverty. Neither was constitutionally

disposed to work hard and patiently for an honest competence. The

celebrated "Female Pills" formed the philosopher's stone which released

them from this condition of chafing discontent and brooding unrest. From

what source a knowledge of the ingredients requisite for the composition

of a pill for such a diabolical purpose was derived, or whether, indeed,

the pill was effective or diabolical at all, remains a mystery, inasmuch

as none of her medicine seems to have been subjected to chemical

analysis. Suffice to say that the couple rented a small room, and the

first advertisement of the female physician was printed in the old

_Sun_, and paid for with borrowed money.

Under such auspices the abortion business dawned upon this city, and in

more than one of the daily newspapers, between the years 1836 and 1840,

appeared glowing puffs of "the beautiful young female physician," as she

was termed, accompanied by elaborate advertisements setting forth her

specialty. No wonder this Upas tree flourished by the river of crime on

whose banks it was fed. No wonder that her brother Joseph, who had been

imported from madame's native English town, was kept busy in putting up

medicines and compounds for the ladies of New York. No wonder that the

Lohmans, _alias_ the Restells, waxed fat and insolent, or that, with

only thirty years actual existence, madame informed the public that she

had been for "thirty years physician in European hospitals"!

By and by her boldness attracted the attention of the Albany Solons, and

in 1846 a law was enacted which was intended to prevent the dark crime

which Madame Restell had helped to make so fashionable. In September,

1847, a minion of justice invaded her Gehenna, then at No. 146 Greenwich

street, and, upon an affidavit, she was arrested and put in prison. On

the tenth of that month she was arraigned and, pleading "Not guilty,"

was sent back to jail to await her trial. At this preliminary proceeding

it appeared that Dr. Samuel C. Smith had been called upon to attend

professionally a young woman of Orange County, by the name of Mary

Bodine, and, upon discovering evidences of foul play, communicated with

the Mayor of New York, and Madame Restell's arrest followed. Public

excitement rose to an intense pitch. A spasm of morality shook the city

to its foundations. Nothing was talked of but the hideous crimes of the

woman abortionist. People lost sight of the war, then raging in Mexico,

while listening to the stories of imaginative people about heaps of

babies' skulls supposed to be mouldering beneath the floors of the

Greenwich-street Golgotha. There were threats of mob violence, and of

incendiary proceedings. It was necessary to guard the premises, and

Lohman kept himself religiously secluded from public observation.

On the twentieth of October, 1847, the abortionist was placed in the

dock of the Court of General Sessions, before Recorder Scott and two

aldermen. For the prosecution there appeared Ogden Hoffman, John McKeon

and Jonas B. Phillips; for the defense, James T. Brady and David Graham,

Jr. The prisoner was charged in the indictment with manslaughter in the

second degree. Considerable difficulty was experienced in obtaining a

jury. Mary Bodine, herself, was the first witness. She described her

engagement as a servant with a person of the name of Cook; her seduction

three days after entering upon her duties, and the consequences that

followed her visit to Madame Restell's establishment; the conversation

that took place; her sojourn in an apartment of the dreadful den; her

diet and treatment, and all the revolting details were given with a

pre-Raphaelite sharpness of outline that carried the conviction of

truth. It was a long trial, and not before November 12th did the

Recorder sum up, when the jury, after a brief retirement, found the

prisoner "Guilty."

She was sent to the penitentiary on Blackwell's Island, and popular

excitement was allayed, while the spasm of public morality, with a soft

sigh, fell asleep. When Madame Restell's term of imprisonment expired

she came back to the city and, purchasing a new property on Chambers

street, hung out her "Midwife" shingle, and carried on her business with

nearly as much effrontery, and with quite as much success, as before her

prosecution and sentence.

A craving for pomp and ostentation was one of the peculiar phases of

Madame Restell's character. To gratify this kind of ambition, she

purchased, through a real estate agent, ten lots on Fifth avenue,

between Fifty-second and Fifty-third streets. They cost at that time

$1,000 each--$10,000 for the ten. When it became known that this woman

was the purchaser of the ten lots, a movement was at once made by

reputable citizens interested in the respectability of New York's

leading avenue to repurchase the property. Five thousand dollars were

offered for her bargain without avail. When, many years later, the

horrified residents of the fashionable thoroughfare beheld ground broken

and the abortionist's mansion gradually raising its brazen front, their

indignation knew no bounds. Large sums of money were offered the woman

to forego her intention, but she haughtily answered that "there was not

money enough in New York" to prevent her. No expense was spared, either

in the construction or decoration of this palace of infamy. The frescoed

ceilings were works of art. Two Italians worked at them for a

twelve-month, at an expense of twenty thousand dollars. The carpets and

upholstery, ordered through the house of A. T. Stewart & Co., were

manufactured specially in Paris. The paintings were selected from the

productions of the greatest artists of the period. Her stable was

erected at a cost of twenty-eight thousand dollars. The Osborne House,

another of her investments, erected on the ground adjoining her own

residence, cost about two hundred thousand dollars.

In February, 1878, evil days again fell upon Madame Restell. On the

eleventh of that month she was arrested by Anthony Comstock, of the

Society for the Prevention of Crime, and taken to Jefferson Market

Police Court, before Justice Kilbretli. She desired her release upon

bail, pending examination. The bail was fixed at $10,000, and although

she offered to deposit with the court that amount in government bonds,

Judge Kilbreth refused. Satisfactory bail not being forthcoming, she was

committed to the Tombs, and assigned to a cell on the second tier of the

women's prison. By and by, she was released on bail and, pending her

trial, some time early on the morning of April 1, 1878, she committed

suicide, by cutting her throat from ear to ear, in her bath-tub. The

scene was described in that morning's _Herald_, as follows:

"Mme. Restell's chambermaid, Maggie McGraw, went to her mistress' room

at about eight o'clock this morning, but not finding her there she went

to the bathroom, which is on the second floor. There, hanging on the

door, she saw her mistress' clothes. Thinking that she was taking a bath

the girl went down-stairs, but soon returned and, seeing the clothes

still there, she looked in. Not seeing the madame, she became alarmed. A

peculiar smell then attracted her attention and, looking in, she saw

that the bath-tub was filled with bloody water, and at the bottom of the

tub lay the body of her mistress, with her throat cut from ear to ear.

The instrument of death, a large carving-knife, was lying at her side.

The bath-room is fitted up with Oriental splendor, being frescoed and

decorated handsomely."

The suicide was buried next day, being conveyed from the Fifth-avenue

mansion to the Grand Central Depot, and thence to Tarrytown, the place

of interment. The funeral procession consisted merely of the hearse

carrying the body and one carriage. It is a strange, revolting story,

carrying its own warning and moral, besides furnishing an admirable

instance of the unexpected forms in which the great Nemesis manifests

herself.

Danger! A True History of a Great City's Wiles and Temptations The Veil Lifted, and Light Thrown on Crime and its Causes, and Criminals and their Haunts. Facts and Disclosures. · 第 16 / 23 章