CHAPTER II.

GHAZNI.

CONTENTS.

Tomb of Mahmúd--Gates of Somnath--Minars on the Plain.

CHRONOLOGY.

Sabuktagin, founder A.D. 975

Mahmúd 977

Masúd 1030

Abdul-rashid 1048

Ibrahim 1054

Shahab ud-dîn (first of Ghori dynasty) 1139

Towards the latter part of the 9th century the power of the Khalifs of

Bagdad was sinking into that state of rapid decline which is the fate of

all Eastern dynasties. During the reign of Al Motamed, A.D. 870-891,

Egypt became independent, and the northern province of Bokhara threw off

the yoke under the governor appointed by the Khalif, Nasr ben Ahmed, a

descendant of Saman, a robber chief, who declared and maintained his

independence, and so formed the Samanian dynasty. After the dynasty had

existed about a century, Sabuktagin, a Tûrkish slave belonging to a

general of one of the last of the Samanian kings, rendered himself also

independent of his master, and established himself in Ghazni, of which

he was governor, founding the well-known dynasty of Ghaznavides. His

successor, Mahmúd, A.D. 977-1030, is one of the best-known kings in

Indian history owing to his brilliant campaigns in India, and more

especially that in which he destroyed the celebrated temple of Somnath.

On his return from an earlier campaign, in which he had sacked the town

of Muttra, we learn from Ferishta that the king ordered a magnificent

mosque to be built of marble and granite, afterwards known by the name

of the Celestial Bride. Near it he founded a university. When the

nobility of Ghazni perceived the taste of their king in architecture,

they also endeavoured to vie with one another in the magnificence of

their palaces, as well as in the public buildings which were raised for

the embellishment of the city. “Thus,” continues the historian, “the

capital was in a short time ornamented with mosques, porches, fountains,

aqueducts, reservoirs, and cisterns, beyond any city in the East.”[484]

[Illustration: 275. Minar at Ghazni. (From a Drawing by G. T. Vigne,

Esq.)]

The plain of Ghazni still shows the remains of this splendour; and, in

the dearth of information regarding Persian art of that age, an account

of it would be one of the most interesting and valuable pieces of

information we could receive. These ruins, however, have not been as yet

either examined or described;[485] and even the tomb of the Great

Mahmúd is unknown to us except by name,[486] notwithstanding the

celebrity it acquired from the removal of its gates to India at the

termination of our disastrous campaigns in that country.

The gates are of Deodar pine,[487] and the carved ornaments on them are

so similar to those found at Cairo, on the mosque of Ebn Touloun and

other buildings of that age, as not only to prove that they are of the

same date, but also to show how similar were the modes of decoration at

these two extremities of the Moslem empire at the time of their

execution.

[Illustration: 276. Ornaments from the Tomb of Mahmúd at Ghazni.]

At the same time there is nothing in their style of ornamentation that

at all resembles anything found in any Hindu temple, either of their age

or at any other time. There is, in fact, no reason for doubting that

these gates were made for the place where they were found.[488] If any

other parts of the tomb are ornamented in the same style, it would be of

great interest to have them drawn. It probably is, however, from the

Jumma Musjid that we shall obtain the best picture of the arts of that

day, when any one will take the trouble of examining it.

Two minars still adorn the plain outside the city, and form, if not the

most striking, at least the most prominent of the ruins of that city.

Neither of them was ever attached to a mosque; they are, indeed, pillars

of victory, or _Jaya Stambhas_, like those at Chittore and elsewhere in

India, and are such as we might expect to find in a country so long

Buddhist. One of them was erected by Mahmúd himself; the other was

built, or at least finished, by Masúd, one of his immediate

successors.[489]

The lower part of these towers is of a star-like form--the plan being

apparently formed by placing two squares diagonally the one over the

other. The upper part, rising to the height of about 140 ft. from the

ground, is circular; both are of brickwork, covered with ornaments of

terra-cotta of extreme elaboration and beauty, and retaining their

sharpness to the present day.

Several other minars of the same class are found further west, even as

far as the roots of the Caucasus,[490] which, like these, were pillars

of victory, erected by the conquerors on their battle-fields. None of

them have the same architectural merit as those of Ghazni, at least in

their present state, though it may be that their ornaments, having been

in stucco or some perishable material, have disappeared, leaving us now

only the skeleton of what they were.

The weakness of Mahmúd’s successors left the Indians in repose for more

than a century and a half; and, like all Eastern dynasties, the

Ghaznavides were gradually sinking to inevitable decay, when their fall

was precipitated by the crimes of one of them, which were fearfully

avenged by the destruction of their empire and capital by Ala ud-dîn,

and their race was at length superseded by that of the Ghori, in the

person of Shahab ud-dîn, in the year 1183.

Though centuries of misrule have weighed on this country since the time

of the Ghaznavides, it is scarcely probable that all traces of their

magnificence have passed away; but till their cities are examined by

some one competent to discriminate between what is good or bad, or old

or new, we must be content merely to indicate the position of the style,

leaving this chapter to be written hereafter when the requisite

information shall have been obtained. In the meanwhile it is

satisfactory to know that between Herat and the Indus there do exist a

sufficient number of monuments to enable us to connect the styles of the

West with those in the East. They have been casually described by

travellers, but not in such a manner as to render them available for our

purposes; and in the present unsettled state of the country it may be

some time yet before their elucidation can be accomplished.

History of Indian and Eastern Architecture · 第 2 / 14 章