281. _The Observed Planet not the Predicted One._--Professor Peirce

always maintained that the planet found by observation was not the one

whose existence had been predicted by Leverrier and Adams, though its

action would completely explain all the irregularities in the motion of

Uranus. His last statement on this point is as follows: "My position is,

that there were _two possible planets_, either of which might have

caused the observed irregular motions of Uranus. Each planet excluded

the other; so that, if one was, the other was not. They coincided in

direction from the earth at certain epochs, once in six hundred and

fifty years. It was at one of these epochs that the prediction was made,

and at no other time for six centuries could the prediction of the one

planet have revealed the other. The observed planet was not the

predicted one."

282. _Bode's Law Disproved._--The following table gives the distances of

the planets according to Bode's law, their actual distances, and the

error of the law in each case:--

Planet. Numbers of Actual Errors.

Bode. Distances.

Mercury 0 + 4 = 4 3.9 0.1

Venus 3 + 4 = 7 7.2 0.2

Earth 6 + 4 = 10 10.0 0.0

Mars 12 + 4 = 16 15.2 0.8

Minor 24 + 4 = 28 20 to 35

planets

Jupiter 48 + 4 = 52 52.0 0.0

Saturn 96 + 4 = 100 95.4 4.6

Uranus 192 + 4 = 196 191.9 4.1

Neptune 384 + 4 = 388 300.6 87.4

It will be seen, that, before the discovery of Neptune, the agreement

was so close as to indicate that this was an actual law of the

distances; but the discovery of this planet completely disproved its

existence.

[Illustration: Fig. 304.]

283. _The Satellite of Neptune._--Neptune is accompanied by at least one

moon, whose orbit is shown in Fig. 304. The orbit of this satellite is

inclined about thirty degrees to the plane of the ecliptic, and the

motion of the satellite is retrograde, or from east to west.

VII. COMETS AND METEORS.

I. COMETS.

General Phenomena of Comets.

284. _General Appearance of a Bright Comet._--Comets bright enough to be

seen with the naked eye are composed of three parts, which run into each

other by insensible gradations. These are the _nucleus_, the _coma_, and

the _tail_.

The _nucleus_ is the bright centre of the comet, and appears to the eye

as a star or planet.

The _coma_ is a nebulous mass surrounding the nucleus on all sides.

Close to the nucleus it is almost as bright as the nucleus itself; but

it gradually shades off in every direction. The nucleus and coma

combined appear like a star shining through a small patch of fog; and

these two together form what is called the _head_ of the comet.

The _tail_ is a continuation of the coma, and consists of a stream of

milky light, growing wider and fainter as it recedes from the head, till

the eye is unable to trace it.

[Illustration: Fig. 305.]

The general appearance of one of the smaller of the brilliant comets is

shown in Fig. 305.

[Illustration: Fig. 306.]

[Illustration: Fig. 307.]

285. _General Appearance of a Telescopic Comet._--The great majority of

comets are too faint to be visible with the naked eye, and are called

_telescopic_ comets. In these comets there seems to be a development of

coma at the expense of nucleus and tail. In some cases the telescope

fails to reveal any nucleus at all in one of these comets; at other

times the nucleus is so faint and ill-defined as to be barely

distinguishable. Fig. 306 shows a telescopic comet without any nucleus

at all, and another with a slight condensation at the centre. In these

comets it is generally impossible to distinguish the coma from the tail,

the latter being either entirely invisible, as in Fig. 306, or else only

an elongation of the coma, as shown in Fig. 307. Many comets appear

simply as patches of foggy light of more or less irregular form.

[Illustration: Fig. 308.]

286. _The Development of Telescopic Comets on their Approach to the

Sun._--As a rule, all comets look nearly alike when they first come

within the reach of the telescope. They appear at first as little foggy

patches, without any tail, and often without any visible nucleus. As

they approach the sun their peculiarities are rapidly developed. Fig.

308 shows such a comet as first seen, and the gradual development of its

nucleus, head, and tail, as it approaches the sun.

[Illustration: Fig. 309.]

[Illustration: Fig. 310.]

[Illustration: Fig. 311.]

If the comet is only a small one, the tail developed is small; but these

small appendages have a great variety of form in different comets. Fig.

309 shows the singular form into which _Encke's_ comet was developed in

1871. Figs. 310 and 311 show other peculiar developments of telescopic

comets.

287. _Development of Brilliant Comets on their Approach to the

Sun._--Brilliant comets, as well as telescopic comets, appear nearly

alike when they come into the view of the telescope; and it is only on

their approach to the sun that their distinctive features are developed.

Not only do these comets, when they first come into view, resemble each

other, but they also bear a close resemblance to telescopic comets.

As the comet approaches the sun, bright vaporous jets, two or three in

number, are emitted from the nucleus on the side of the sun and in the

direction of the sun. These jets, though directed towards the sun, are

soon more or less carried backward, as if repelled by the sun. Fig. 312

shows a succession of views of these jets as they were developed in the

case of _Halley's_ comet in 1835.

[Illustration: Fig. 312.]

The jets in this case seemed to have an oscillatory motion. At 1 and 2

they seemed to be attracted towards the sun, and in 3 to be repelled by

him. In 4 and 5 they seemed to be again attracted, and in 6 to be

repelled, but in a reverse direction to that in 3. In 7 they appeared to

be again attracted. Bessel likened this oscillation of the jets to the

vibration of a magnetic needle when presented to the pole of a magnet.

In the case of larger comets these luminous jets are surrounded by one

or more envelops, which are thrown off in succession as the comet

approaches the sun. The formation of these envelops was a conspicuous

feature of _Donati's_ comet of 1858. A rough view of the jets and the

surrounding envelops is given in Fig. 313. Fig. 314 gives a view of the

envelops without the jets.

[Illustration: Fig. 313.]

[Illustration: Fig. 314.]

288. _The Tails of Comets._--The _tails_ of brilliant comets are rapidly

formed as the comet approaches the sun, their increase in length often

being at the rate of several million miles a day. These appendages seem

to be formed entirely out of the matter which is emitted from the

nucleus in the luminous jets which are at first directed towards the

sun. The tails of comets are, however, always directed away from the

sun, as shown in Fig. 315.

[Illustration: Fig. 315.]

It will be seen that the comet, as it approaches the sun, travels head

foremost; but as it leaves the sun it goes tail foremost.

The apparent length of the tail of a comet depends partly upon its real

length, partly upon the distance of the comet, and partly upon the

direction of the axis of the tail with reference to the line of vision.

The longer the tail, the nearer the comet; and the more nearly at right

angles to the line of vision is the axis of the tail, the greater is the

apparent length of the tail. In the majority of cases the tails of

comets measure only a few degrees; but, in the case of many comets

recorded in history, the tail has extended half way across the heavens.

The tail of a comet, when seen at all, is usually several million miles

in length; and in some instances the tail is long enough to reach across

the orbit of the earth, or twice as far as from the earth to the sun.

The tails of comets are apparently hollow, and are sometimes a million

of miles in diameter. So great, however, is the tenuity of the matter in

them, that the faintest stars are seen through it without any apparent

obscuration. See Fig. 316, which is a view of the great comet of 1264.

[Illustration: Fig. 316.]

[Illustration: Fig. 317.]

[Illustration: Fig. 318.]

[Illustration: Fig. 319.]

[Illustration: Fig. 320.]

The tails of comets are sometimes straight, as in Fig. 316, but usually

more or less curved, as in Fig. 317, which is a view of _Donati's_ comet

as it appeared at one time. The tail of a comet is occasionally divided

into a number of streamers, as in Figs. 318 and 319. Fig. 318 is a view

of the great comet of 1744, and Fig. 319 of the great comet of 1861. No.

1, in Fig. 320, is a view of the comet of 1577; No. 2, of the comet of

1680; and No. 3, of the comet of 1769.

[Illustration: Fig. 321.]

Fig. 321 shows some of the forms which the imagination of a

superstitious age saw depicted in comets, when these heavenly visitants

were thought to be the forerunners of wars, pestilence, famine, and

other dire calamities.

289. _Visibility of Comets._--Even the brightest comets are visible only

a short time near their perihelion passage. When near the sun, they

sometimes become very brilliant, and on rare occasions have been visible

even at mid-day. It is seldom that a comet can be seen, even with a

powerful telescope, during its perihelion passage, unless its perihelion

is either inside of the earth's orbit, or but little outside of it.

Motion and Origin of Comets.

290. _Recognition of a Telescopic Comet._--It is impossible to

distinguish telescopic comets by their appearance from another class of

heavenly bodies known as _nebulæ_. Such comets can be recognized only by

their motion. Thus, in Fig. 322, the upper and lower bodies look exactly

alike; but the upper one is found to remain stationary, while the lower

one moves across the field of view. The upper one is thus shown to be a

nebula, and the lower one a comet.

[Illustration: Fig. 322.]

291. _Orbits of Comets._--All comets are found to move in _very

eccentric ellipses_, in _parabolas_, or in _hyperbolas_.

Since an ellipse is a _closed_ curve (48), all comets that move in

ellipses, no matter how eccentric, are permanent members of the solar

system, and will return to the sun at intervals of greater or less

length, according to the size of the ellipses and the rate of the

comet's motion.

Parabolas and hyperbolas being _open_ curves (48), comets that move in

either of these orbits are only temporary members of our solar system.

After passing the sun, they move off into space, never to return, unless

deflected hither by the action of some heavenly body which they pass in

their journey.

[Illustration: Fig. 323.]

Since a comet is visible only while it is near the sun, it is

impossible to tell, by the form of the portion of the orbit which it

describes during the period of its visibility, whether it is a part

of a very elongated ellipse, a parabola, or a hyperbola. Thus in

Fig. 323 are shown two orbits, one of which is a very elongated

ellipse, and the other a parabola. The part _ab_, in each case, is

the portion of the orbit described by the comet during its

visibility. While describing the dotted portions of the orbit, the

comet is invisible. Now it is impossible to distinguish the form of

the visible portion in the two orbits. The same would be true were

one of the orbits a hyperbola.

Whether a comet will describe an ellipse, a parabola, or a

hyperbola, can be determined only by its _velocity_, taken in

connection with its _distance from the sun_. Were a comet ninety-two

and a half million miles from the sun, moving away from the sun at

the rate of twenty-six miles a second, it would have just the

velocity necessary to describe a _parabola_. Were it moving with a

greater velocity, it would necessarily describe a _hyperbola_, and,

with a less velocity, an _ellipse_. So, at any distance from the

sun, there is a certain velocity which would cause a comet to

describe a parabola; while a greater velocity would cause it to

describe a hyperbola, and a less velocity to describe an ellipse. If

the comet is moving in an ellipse, the less its velocity, the less

the eccentricity of its orbit: hence, in order to determine the form

of the orbit of any comet, it is only necessary to ascertain its

distance from the sun, and its velocity at any given time.

Comets move in every direction in their orbits, and these orbits

have every conceivable inclination to the ecliptic.

292. _Periodic Comets._--There are quite a number of comets which are

known to be _periodic_, returning to the sun at regular intervals in

elliptic orbits. Some of these have been observed at several returns, so

that their period has been determined with great certainty. In the case

of others the periodicity is inferred from the fact that the velocity

fell so far short of the parabolic limit that the comet must move in an

ellipse. The number of known periodic comets is increasing every year,

three having been added to the list in 1881.

The velocity of most comets is so near the parabolic limit that it is

not possible to decide, from observations, whether it falls short of it,

or exceeds it. In the case of a few comets the observations indicate a

minute excess of velocity; but this cannot be confidently asserted. It

is not, therefore, absolutely certain that any known comet revolves in a

hyperbolic orbit; and thus it is possible that all comets belong to our

system, and will ultimately return to it. It is, however, certain, that,

in the majority of cases, the return will be delayed for many centuries,

and perhaps for many thousand years.

293. _Origin of Comets._--It is now generally believed that the original

home of the comets is in the stellar spaces outside of our solar system,

and that they are drawn towards the sun, one by one, in the long lapse

of ages. Were the sun unaccompanied by planets, or were the planets

immovable, a comet thus drawn in would whirl around the sun in a

parabolic orbit, and leave it again never to return, unless its path

were again deflected by its approach to some star. But, when a comet is

moving in a parabola, the slightest _retardation_ would change its orbit

to an ellipse, and the slightest _acceleration_ into a hyperbola. Owing

to the motion of the several planets in their orbits, the velocity of a

comet would be changed on passing each of them. Whether its velocity

would be accelerated or retarded, would depend upon the way in which it

passed. Were the comet accelerated by the action of the planets, on its

passage through our system, more than it was retarded by them, it would

leave the system with a more than parabolic orbit, and would therefore

move in a hyperbola. Were it, on the contrary, retarded more than

accelerated by the action of the planets, its velocity would be reduced,

so that the comet would move in a more or less elongated ellipse, and

thus become a permanent member of the solar system.

In the majority of cases the retardation would be so slight that it

could not be detected by the most delicate observation, and the comet

would return to the sun only after the expiration of tens or hundreds of

thousands of years; but, were the comet to pass very near one of the

larger planets, the retardation might be sufficient to cause the comet

to revolve in an elliptical orbit of quite a short period. The orbit of

a comet thus captured by a planet would have its aphelion point near the

orbit of the planet which captured it. Now, it happens that each of the

larger planets has a family of comets whose aphelia are about its own

distance from the sun. It is therefore probable that these comets have

been captured by the action of these planets. As might be expected from

the gigantic size of Jupiter, the Jovian family of comets is the

largest. The orbits of several of the comets of this group are shown in

Fig. 324.

[Illustration: Fig. 324.]

294. _Number of Comets._--The number of comets recorded as visible to

the naked eye since the birth of Christ is about five hundred, while

about two hundred telescopic comets have been observed since the

invention of the telescope. The total number of comets observed since

the Christian era is therefore about seven hundred. It is certain,

however, that only an insignificant fraction of all existing comets have

ever been observed. Since they can be seen only when near their

perihelion, and since it is probable that the period of most of those

which have been observed is reckoned by thousands of years (if, indeed,

they ever return at all), our observations must be continued for many

thousand years before we have seen all which come within range of our

telescopes. Besides, as already stated (289), a comet can seldom be seen

unless its perihelion is either inside the orbit of the earth, or but

little outside of it; and it is probable that the perihelia of the great

majority of comets are beyond this limit of visibility.

Remarkable Comets.

295. _The Comet of 1680._--The great comet of 1680, shown in Fig. 320,

is one of the most celebrated on record. It was by his study of its

motions that Newton proved the orbit of a comet to be one of the conic

sections, and therefore that these bodies move under the influence of

gravity. This comet descended almost in a direct line to the sun,

passing nearer to that luminary than any comet before known. Newton

estimated, that, at its perihelion point, it was exposed to a

temperature two thousand times that of red-hot iron. During its

perihelion passage it was exceedingly brilliant. Halley suspected that

this comet had a period of five hundred and seventy-five years, and that

its first recorded appearance was in 43 B.C., its third in 1106, and its

fourth in 1680. If this is its real period, it will return in 2255. The

comet of 43 B.C. made its appearance just after the assassination of

Julius Cæsar. The Romans called it the _Julian Star_, and regarded it as

a celestial chariot sent to convey the soul of Cæsar to the skies. It

was seen two or three hours before sunset, and continued visible for

eight successive days. The great comet of 1106 was described as an

object of terrific splendor, and was visible in close proximity to the

sun. The comet of 1680 has become celebrated, not only on account of its

great brilliance, and on account of Newton's investigation of its orbit,

but also on account of the speculation of the theologian Whiston in

regard to it. He accepted five hundred and seventy-five years as its

period, and calculated that one of its earlier apparitions must have

occurred at the date of the flood, which he supposed to have been caused

by its near approach to the earth; and he imagined that the earth is

doomed to be destroyed by fire on some future encounter with this comet.

[Illustration: Fig. 325.]

296. _The Comet of 1811._--The great comet of 1811, a view of which is

given in Fig. 325, is, perhaps, the most remarkable comet on record. It

was visible for nearly seventeen months, and was very brilliant,

although at its perihelion passage it was over a hundred million miles

from the sun. Its tail was a hundred and twenty million miles in length,

and several million miles through. It has been calculated that its

aphelion point is about two hundred times as far from the sun as its

perihelion point, or some seven times the distance of Neptune from the

sun. Its period is estimated at about three thousand years. It was an

object of superstitious terror, especially in the East. The Russians

regarded it as presaging Napoleon's great and fatal war with Russia.

[Illustration: Fig. 326.]

[Illustration: Fig. 327.]

297. _Halley's Comet._--Halley's comet has become one of the most

celebrated of modern times. It is the first comet whose return was both

predicted and observed. It made its appearance in 1682. Halley computed

its orbit, and compared it with those of previous comets, whose orbits

he also computed from recorded observations. He found that it coincided

so exactly with that of the comet observed by Kepler in 1607, that there

could be no doubt of the identity of the two orbits. So close were they

together, that, were they both drawn in the heavens, the naked eye would

almost see them joined into one line. There could therefore be no doubt

that the comet of 1682 was the same that had appeared in 1607, and that

it moved in an elliptic orbit, with a period of about seventy-five

years. He found that this comet had previously appeared in 1531 and in

1456; and he predicted that it would return about 1758. Its actual

return was retarded somewhat by the action of the planets on it in its

passage through the solar system. It, however, appeared again in 1759,

and a third time in 1835. Its next appearance will be about 1911. The

orbit of this comet is shown in Fig. 326. Fig. 327 shows the comet as it

appeared to the naked eye, and in a telescope of moderate power, in

1835. This comet appears to be growing less brilliant. In 1456 it

appeared as a comet of great splendor; and coming as it did in a very

superstitious age, soon after the fall of Constantinople, and during the

threatened invasion of Europe by the Turks, it caused great alarm. Fig.

328 shows the changes undergone by the nucleus of this comet during its

perihelion passage in 1835.

[Illustration: Fig. 328.]

[Illustration: Fig. 329.]

[Illustration: Fig. 330.]

298. _Encke's Comet._--This telescopic comet, two views of which are

given in Figs. 329 and 330, appeared in 1818. Encke computed its orbit,

and found it to lie wholly within the orbit of Jupiter (Fig. 324), and

the period to be about three years and a third. By comparing the

intervals between the successive returns of this comet, it has been

ascertained that its orbit is continually growing smaller and smaller.

To account for the retardation of this comet, Olbers announced his

celebrated hypothesis, that the celestial spaces are filled with a

subtile _resisting medium_. This hypothesis was adopted by Encke, and

has been accepted by certain other astronomers; but it has by no means

gained universal assent.

299. _Biela's Comet._--This comet appeared in 1826, and was found to

have a period of about six years and two thirds. On its return in 1845,

it met with a singular, and as yet unexplained, accident, which has

rendered the otherwise rather insignificant comet famous. In November

and December of that year it was observed as usual, without any thing

remarkable about it; but, in January of the following year, it was found

to have been divided into two distinct parts, so as to appear as two

comets instead of one. The two parts were at first of very unequal

brightness; but, during the following month, the smaller of the two

increased in brilliancy until it equalled its companion; it then grew

fainter till it entirely disappeared, a month before its companion. The

two parts were about two hundred thousand miles apart. Fig. 331 shows

these two parts as they appeared on the 19th of February, and Fig. 332

as they appeared on the 21st of February. On its return in 1852, the

comets were found still to be double; but the two components were now

about a million and a half miles apart. They are shown in Fig. 333 as

they appeared at this time. Sometimes one of the parts appeared the

brighter, and sometimes the other; so that it was impossible to decide

which was really the principal comet. The two portions passed out of

view in September, and have not been seen since; although in 1872 the

position of the comet would have been especially favorable for

observation. The comet appears to have become completely broken up.

[Illustration: Fig. 331.]

[Illustration: Fig. 332.]

[Illustration: Fig. 333.]

[Illustration: Fig. 334.]

300. _The Comet of 1843._--The great comet of 1843, a view of which is

given in Fig. 334, was favorably situated for observation only in

southern latitudes. It was exceedingly brilliant, and was easily seen in

full daylight, in close proximity to the sun. The apparent length of its

tail was sixty-five degrees, and its real length a hundred and fifty

million miles, or nearly twice the distance from the earth to the sun.

This comet is especially remarkable on account of its near approach to

the sun. At the time of its perihelion passage the distance of the comet

from the photosphere of the sun was less than one-fourteenth of the

diameter of the sun. This distance was only one-half that of the comet

of 1680 when at its perihelion. When at perihelion, this comet was

plunging through the sun's outer atmosphere at the rate of one million,

two hundred and eighty thousand miles an hour. It passed half way round

the sun in the space of _two hours_, and its tail was whirled round

through a hundred and eighty degrees in that brief time. As the tail

extended almost double the earth's distance from the sun, the end of the

tail must have traversed in two hours a space nearly equal to the

circumference of the earth's orbit,--a distance which the earth, moving

at the rate of about twenty miles a second, is a _whole year_ in

passing. It is almost impossible to suppose that the matter forming this

tail remained the same throughout this tremendous sweep.

The Heavens Above: A Popular Handbook of Astronomy · 第 14 / 19 段