Act 1900, s. 25. Section 27 of the Companies Act 1907 (s. 188 of the

Consolidation Act 1908) further provides for the liquidator under a

voluntary winding-up summoning a meeting of creditors to determine on

the choice of a liquidator. A creditor may also in a proper case obtain

an order for continuing the voluntary winding-up under the supervision

of the court. Such an order has the advantage of operating as a stay of

any actions or executions pending against the company. Except in these

respects, the winding-up remains a voluntary one. The court does not

actively intervene unless set in motion; but it requires the liquidator

to bring his accounts into chambers every quarter, so that it may be

informed how the liquidation is proceeding. When the affairs of the

company are fully wound up, the liquidator calls a meeting, lays his

accounts before the shareholders, and the company is dissolved by

operation of law three months after the date of the meeting (C.A. 1862,

ss. 142, 143).

By the court.

Irrespective of voluntary winding-up, the legislature has defined

certain events in which a company formed under the Companies Act 1862

may be wound up by the court. These events are: (1) when the company has

passed a resolution requiring the company to be wound up by the court;

(2) when the company does not commence its business within a year or

suspends it for a year; (3) when the members are reduced to less than

seven; (4) when the company is unable to pay its debts, and (5) whenever

the court is of opinion that it is just and equitable that the company

should be wound up (C.A. 1862, s. 79; s. 129 of the Consolidation Act

1908). A petition for the purpose may be presented either by a creditor,

a contributory or the company itself. Where the petition is presented by

a creditor who cannot obtain payment of his debt, a winding-up order is

_ex debito justitiae_ as against the company or shareholders, but not as

against the wishes of a majority of creditors. A winding-up order is not

to be refused because the company's assets are over mortgaged (Companies

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Columbus" to "Condottiere" Volume 6, Slice 7 · 第 6 / 11 章