XXIV.

In the beginning of the year 1866 Ludvig David died suddenly in Rome,

of typhoid fever. His sorrowing parents founded in memory of him an

exhibition for law-students which bears and perpetuates his name. The

first executors of the fund were, in addition to his most intimate

friend, two young lawyers named Emil Petersen and Emil Bruun, who had

both been friends of his. The latter, who has not previously been

mentioned in these pages, was a strikingly handsome and clever young

man, remarkable for his calm and superior humour, and exceedingly

self-confident and virile. His attitude towards Ludvig David in his

early youth had been somewhat that of a protector. Unfortunately he was

seriously wounded during the first storming of the Dybböl redoubts by

the Germans; a bullet crushed one of the spinal vertebrae; gradually

the wound brought on consumption of the lungs and he died young.

Ludvig David's death was a great loss to his friends. It was not only

that he took such an affectionate interest in their welfare and

happiness, but he had a considerable gift for Mathematics and History,

and, from his home training, an understanding of affairs of state which

was considerably above that of most people. Peculiarly his own was a

combination of keen, disintegrating intelligence, and a tendency

towards comprehensive, rounded off, summarising. He had strong public

antipathies. In his opinion the years of peace that had followed the

first war in Slesvig had had an enervating effect; public speakers and

journalists had taken the places of brave men; many a solution of a

difficulty, announced at first with enthusiasm, had in course of time

petrified into a mere set phrase. He thought many of the leading men

among the Liberals superficial and devoid of character, and accused

them, with the pitilessness of youth, of mere verbiage. Influenced as

he was by Kierkegaard, such a man as Bille was naturally his aversion.

He considered--not altogether justly--that Bille cloaked himself in

false earnestness.

He himself was profoundly and actively philanthropic, with an

impulse--by no means universal--to relieve and help. Society life he

hated; to him it was waste of time and a torture to be obliged to

figure in a ballroom; he cared very little for his appearance, and was

by no means elegant in his dress. He was happy, however, in the

unconstrained society of the comrades he cared about, enjoyed a merry

chat or a frolicsome party, and in intimate conversation he would

reveal his inmost nature with modest unpretension, with good-natured

wit, directed against himself as much as against others, and with an

understanding and sympathetic eye for his surroundings. His warmest

outburst had generally a little touch of mockery or teasing about it,

as though he were repeating, half roguishly, the feelings of another,

rather than unreservedly expressing his own. But a heartfelt, steadfast

look would often come into his beautiful dark eyes.

Recollections of My Childhood and Youth · 第 112 / 205 题