IV.

The theory, the intimation of which roused Vilsing to such a degree,

bore in its form witness to such immaturity that it could only have

made an impression on a youth whose immaturity, in spite of his age,

was greater still. To present it with any degree of clearness is

scarcely possible; it was not sufficiently clear in itself for that.

But this was about what it amounted to:

The introspection and energetic self-absorption to which I had given

myself up during my last few years at school became even more

persistent on my release from the restraint of school and my free

admission to the society of grown-up people.

I took advantage of my spare time in Copenhagen, and on the restricted

travels that I was allowed to take, to slake my passionate thirst for

life; firstly, by pondering ever and anon over past sensations, and

secondly, by plunging into eager and careful reading of the light

literature of all different countries and periods that I had heard

about, but did not yet myself know at first hand.

Through all that I experienced and read, observed and made my own, my

attitude towards myself was, that before all, I sought to become clear

as to what manner of man I really, in my inmost being, was. I asked

myself who I was. I endeavoured to discover the mysterious word that

would break the charm of the mists in which I found myself and would

answer my fundamental question, _What_ was I? And then at last, my

ponderings and my readings resulted in my finding the word that seemed

to fit, although nowadays one can hardly hear it without a smile, the

word _Daemonic_.

I was daemonic in giving myself this reply it seemed to me that I had

solved the riddle of my nature. I meant thereby, as I then explained it

to myself, that the choice between good and evil did not present itself

to me, as to others, since evil did not interest me. For me, it was not

a question of a choice, but of an unfolding of my ego, which had its

justification in itself.

That which I called the _daemonic_ I had encountered for the first time

outside my own mind in Lermontof's hero. Petsjórin was compelled to act

in pursuance of his natural bent, as though possessed by his own being.

I felt myself in a similar manner possessed. I had met with the word

_Daimon_ and _Daimones_ in Plato; Socrates urges that by _daemons_ the

Gods, or the children of the Gods, were meant. I felt as though I, too,

were one of the children of the Gods. In all the great legendary

figures of the middle ages I detected the feature of divine possession,

especially in the two who had completely fascinated the poets of the

nineteenth century, Don Juan and Faust. The first was the symbol of

magic power over women, the second of the thirst for knowledge giving

dominion over humanity and Nature. Among my comrades, in Vilsing, even

in the hunch-backed fellow with the unsuccessful moustache, I had seen

how the Don Juan type which had turned their heads still held sway over

the minds of young people; I myself could quite well understand the

magic which this beautiful ideal of elementary irresistibility must

have; but the Faust type appealed to me, with my thirst for knowledge,

very much more. Still, the main thing for me was that in the first

great and wholly modern poets that I made acquaintance with, Byron and

his intellectual successors, Lermontof and Heine, I recognised again

the very fundamental trait that I termed _daemonic_, the worship of

one's own originality, under the guise of an uncompromising love of

liberty.

I was always brooding over this idea of the _daemonic_ with which my

mind was filled. I recorded my thoughts on the subject in my first long

essay (lost, for that matter), _On the Daemonic, as it Reveals Itself

in the Human Character_.

When a shrewdly intelligent young fellow of my own age criticised my

work from the assumption that the _daemonic_ did not exist, I thought

him ridiculous. I little dreamt that twenty-five years later Relling,

in _The Wild Duck_, would show himself to be on my friend's side in the

emphatic words: "What the Devil does it mean to be daemonic! It's sheer

nonsense."

Recollections of My Childhood and Youth · 第 68 / 205 题