CHAPTER IV.

THE ATLAS MOUNTAINS AND THE BERBERS.

Although the Atlas range is said to extend from the Atlantic Ocean to

the Gulf of Syrtis, it is my intention to deal here with only such

a portion of it as is found in Morocco, and of that but briefly,

for in my journey to Tafilet I crossed the range at the same spot

on my going and return, and was therefore unable to gather much of

its nature beyond the portion I absolutely came in contact with. On

two previous occasions, however, I had visited this portion of the

Atlas, and on both followed it from due south of Marakesh to near

the Atlantic—to the point, in fact, where the mountains decrease

in altitude and spread out, forming the watershed between the rivers

Sus on the south and the Tensift on the north.

Although geographers claim for the many ranges that occur between

Morocco and Tripoli the name of Atlas, it must not be thought that a

continuous line of peaks extends from one point to the other; for,

speaking of the Moroccan portion, it ends more or less abruptly

where the plains of Beni Mgil occur, to the western side of the

Wad Muluya, the river which runs into the Mediterranean near the

frontier of Algeria and Morocco. In fact, it is not far to the

east of Fez that the peaks decrease in altitude, falling away to

the long plains which succeed. From this point, however, south and

westward they extend in unbroken line to near the ocean, taking a

general direction of south-west and then west. The entire portion

from Fez, from which the snow-peaks inhabited by the Beni Mgild

and Aït Yussi are visible, to but a little way beyond Demnat,

some fifty odd miles to the due east of Marakesh, is unexplored,

the nature of the succession of Berber tribes inhabiting its

slopes rendering it inaccessible to the traveller. From Demnat to

the Atlantic the tribes are less wild, and live in greater fear

of punishment from the Government in the case of molestation of

Europeans, with the result that not only the explorer but even the

most casual globe-trotter can travel in safety, and enjoy the grand

scenery which presents itself. Yet how few Europeans ever go!

I have already described the appearance of the Atlas Mountains from

the north, and farther on in the narrative of my journey more than

one allusion

[Illustration: _The Atlas Mountains from the South._]

will be found to the barren scene they present from the south. It may

be here added, however, as a general remark on this portion of the

range, that while the northern slopes contain fine wooded valleys,

their lower parts rich in olive and fruit trees, the south stretches

away, a dreary waste of stone and shales, presenting no feature of

beauty beyond its gloomy grandeur. The reason is not far to find,

for the desert wind in summer blows in terrific gusts, drying up

what soil does exist, while little or no rain ever falls. This very

scorching wind it is that renders so fertile the northern valleys and

the plain beyond, in which Marakesh lies, for, following the slope

of the mountains to the altitude of their highest peaks—and the

range must hereabout average nearly 11,000 feet above the sea—the

wind is transformed by the change of temperature into cloud, and

falls in heavy showers. The difference as one ascends the luxuriant

northern slopes, where fine vegetation is found to the altitude of

some 5000 to 7000 feet, to the scene that meets the eye when the

summit is crossed, is a most extraordinary one, and from the Tizi

n’Glawi, the pass over which I crossed, one could obtain the two

views at the same time—north, down the deep valley of the Ghadat,

with its woods and forests; south, over range beyond range of bare

limestone and shale mountains.

The main range at this part forms in reality but one of four parallel

chains. To the north of Marakesh the hills are known as Jibeelet,

and extend from near the Atlantic beyond the eastern end of the

tribe-land of Rahamna, terminating a few miles beyond Kalá. South

of this some twenty miles, and parallel with it, is the principal

range, beyond which, at an average distance of some twenty-five

miles, is Jibel Saghru, or the Anti-Atlas. However, although

the first two mentioned run directly east and west, Jibel Saghru

forms a large district of broken chains of mountains, the valleys

of which lead in every direction, for it empties such streams as

flow in rainy seasons east into the Wad Gheris, west to the Draa,

north to the Dads, and south to the desert. Yet in spite of this

the system takes an easterly and westerly direction, the same being

more apparent after the spot where the Wad Draa divides the range

into two portions. The natives call only the eastern portion Saghru,

not connecting it with the hills to the west of the Draa, which form

eventually the southern side of the Wad Sus. There is yet another

line of hills still farther to the south, Jibel Bani, which rise

near the Draa south of the _zauia_ of Tamgrut and continue to the

west. It has always been a question as to where they terminate;

but I was pointed out at Tafilet, from above the hill at Dar el

baida, the end of a chain of mountains to the south, which sink

gradually to the valley of the now united course of the Wad Gheris

and Wad Ziz. Beyond there appeared to be nothing but desert sand,

and this, I was informed, was the western extremity of Jibel Bani.

It is difficult to hazard an opinion as to where the highest peak of

the Moroccan Atlas will be found to exist, for at present but very

few observations of the high altitudes have been taken, though both

Sir Joseph Hooker and Mr Joseph Thomson reached to about 12,000

feet. In the native opinion Jibel Ayashi, in which most of the

large rivers of Morocco rise, surpasses the other peaks in altitude;

but, as far as I know, no European has ever seen it, much less been

there. Some geographers are of the opinion that the highest point

will be found amongst the mountains almost due south of Morocco

City. So equal are the summits in this direction that it will take

many ascents before any definite result can be arrived at, though,

with the exception of the obstruction of the native officials,

no great difficulties ought to arise, as the snow in summer and

early autumn almost altogether disappears, and no glaciers are

found throughout the whole range; nor do the mountain-tops rise in

precipitous peaks, but, as a rule, are flat and undulating.

But little game is to be found in this portion of the Atlas. The

Barbary wild sheep (_muflon_), it is true, exists, but is by no

means easy to obtain, as every native carries a gun, and should

chance give him the opportunity, fires at them whenever he may catch

a glimpse. The Berbers, too, are sportsmen; and the Kaid of Glawa,

and other governors, are in the habit of organising large hunts,

that have done much to kill off this fine beast and drive the

remainder into the most inaccessible parts. The lion is unknown,

and the leopard very rare, though farther to the north, in the

forests of Beni Mgild, both are said to be common, and I have

often seen the skins for sale, and captured lions in the Sultan’s

palace at Fez. Hyenas seem to be found throughout the entire range,

and foxes and jackals abound. Bird-life seems most noticeable for

its absence, and I have never seen, though I have spent several

months at different times in and near the Atlas, either a vulture

or an eagle. Smaller hawks and one or two varieties of kites are

common. Amongst game-birds I have seen only the red-legged Barbary

partridge and the pintail sand-grouse, and the latter only in the

foot-hills. A guinea-fowl is said to exist, and I have seen in the

possession of the Shereefs of Wazan specimens brought from Zimmour,

to the west of Rabat on the Atlantic coast. It is a small variety,

dark in colour, with a blue head and dark crest, and not half

the size of the fine plump bird of which I have shot so many in

Somaliland and around Harrar. A pretty grey-striped rock-squirrel

is common in the mountains, and much prized by the Berbers for his

meat, which is said to possess medicinal properties.

The commoner vegetation of the Atlas, which differs according

to altitude, are pine, _arar_ or calitris, evergreen oak, cork,

white poplar, wild olive, arbutus, laurustinus, lentiscus, palmeto,

oleanders in the riverbeds, and juniper, while at places the gum

cistus is found in large quantities.

The principal rivers of Morocco all rise in the Atlas Mountains, with

the exception of the Wergha, the large tributary of the Sebu, which

has its source in the hills to the south of the Riff country. The

Draa, Sus, the Gheris, and the Ziz are the principal rivers to the

south of the range; while to the north the Tensift, Um er Ribía,

Bu Regreg, and Sebu are all fed by the Atlas snows; and on the west

the Muluya, which empties itself into the Mediterranean.

Brief as these notes on the Atlas are, they will suffice for the

objects of this book. Those who desire to know more of their geology

and botany will find two works upon the subject, the results of

the explorations of Sir Joseph Hooker and Mr Joseph Thomson.

With regard to the inhabitants of the Atlas, they

[Illustration: _Approaching Marakesh from the North._]

are Berbers, and the following notes upon that race in general,

together with the constant mention of their customs and habits which

crop up in the succeeding chapters of my narrative, will, I trust,

not only bring before the reader a tolerably clear picture of these

people, but add possibly to the scanty information that exists as

to this trans-Atlas branch of the Hamitic people.

It would be out of place in a book which professes to be no more

than a narrative of exploration to enter at length into the subject

of the Berber race, and interesting though such would be, the

slight description of the people here appended must suffice. Nor

have I even collected into this chapter all the notes I was able

personally to make upon my travels, but have preferred in many

cases, such as in the descriptions of their dwellings, costumes,

&c., to make mention of these details when I come across them,

rather than drag them out of the context and place them all in one

chapter. This I have thought best to do for more than one reason,

but mainly because remarks _àpropos_ of the Berbers of Dads are

not equally applicable to those of Aït Atta for instance, though

these two tribes are neighbours. So rather than cause confusion

by mentioning peculiarities noticed in only one spot in a chapter

which deals with the race as a whole, I have spread my notes over

the entire journey, and included them at the points at which I

find them jotted down in my original diary—that is to say, at

such portions of my journey as I first noticed them.

Nor can mention at any length be made even of the race as a whole,

for though the country through which I passed was almost entirely

inhabited by this strange people, their territory is vastly more

extensive, and they may be said to inhabit districts along the

entire northern portion of Africa, from Egypt to the Atlantic

Ocean. Therefore it will be seen how impossible a task it would be

to enter at any length into the peculiarities of a race which at

different points presents such vastly different characteristics,

both in the physical aspect of the country they inhabit and in

their manners and customs. For this reason it is the safest course

to mention only what can refer to that portion of the Berber tribes

amongst which I found myself, with but a few general remarks that

apply equally to the entire race.

As to the derivation of the name considerable doubt exists,

nor was I able to trace any tradition amongst the people as to

its origin. Barth asserts that it sprang from the name of their

traditional ancestor Ber, but it seems more probable, at least a

safer surmise, to connect it with the Greek and Roman term Barbari,

for, I believe, without exception the name is not applied by the

Berbers to themselves, though in this respect the Arabs use it. The

general name by which they call themselves in Morocco is “Shloh,”

a word meaning “noble,” and thus the same as the more classical

term “Amazigh,” which, though well known all through tribes

inhabiting the districts south of the Atlas, I heard only once

or twice used. Amazigh is certainly the older name of the two,

and was known to both the Greeks and the Romans, and seems to-day,

though rarely used in Southern Morocco, to be the classical title

of the race.

Although to-day found all through North Africa, from beyond Tripoli

to the Atlantic Ocean, the Berbers seem to be entirely cut off from

one another, and to have no great intertribal feeling of patriotism,

or to be connected by any ties. Yet there can be no doubt that,

divided as the tribes are, they have a common origin, being the

Hamitic and original inhabitants of North Africa.

Yet even in so small a space of country as that through which I

travelled one finds the Berber tribes not only split up into minute

clans and factions, but so strangely differing from one another that

they might almost be the descendants of different races. Nothing more

unlike could be imagined than four typical Berbers, for instance, of

four portions of Morocco—the Riff, and the natives of Aït Yussi,

Dads, and the Sus—and yet there can be no doubt that they are of

the same family, and the language, though split up into dialects,

is practically the same. Yet in appearance the type is absolutely

different in these above-mentioned portions of Morocco, and no

feature in common, even to the dressing or shaving of the head,

or costume, is to be found amongst them, though one and all are

proud of their aboriginal origin.

But one tradition did I hear amongst the Berbers as to their

antiquity, and this tradition seems to be general amongst their

tribes, for we came across it on several occasions on our journey. It

is difficult to perceive how it could have sprung up, as it seems

to hint at an entirely different origin to that which history,

and even other traditions of their own, has set down to them. It

runs as follows. A certain maiden of the original Berber people, at

the time when the race lived in a far-away country swept by strong

east winds, once, in passing a strange king, had the misfortune

to expose more of her person than was decent, owing to her attire

having been raised by the gale. On the king laughing at the girl’s

misfortune, the tribe in very shame departed by night, and wandered

to the country that they now inhabit. So the story runs, and I

leave it to those more versed than myself in sifting traditions and

folk-lore to find the signification and value of the tale, which,

it may again be said, is not only common throughout the Berbers of

the trans-Atlas Sahara, but is known and repeated amongst the Riffis,

and between these two districts hundreds of miles of country exist,

while no communication takes place one with the other.

No doubt the fact that the Berbers have been many times conquered

has done not a little to account for their difference of type,

for the Phœnicians, Romans, Vandals, and Arabs have each in turn

invaded their country. But from whatever reason it may be, the fact

remains that a more divided and subdivided race could not be found,

and marriage, or even cordiality, between the tribes is unknown;

while they exist, in Morocco at least, in a state of perpetual

warfare with any one they can get to fight with them. Not only

are their hostilities levelled against the Arabs, for whom their

hatred is most deep, but whose religion they have adopted with

extraordinary fervour, but also against every other tribe, and

failing these, village against village, and even household against

household. Mention will be found more than once in the ensuing

pages of cases of this, in which it was the custom for neighbours

to fire at one another from their windows and roofs whenever the

opportunity presented itself. Yet in spite of this the stranger

passes in safety through them, for with him they bear no quarrel.

A few words must be said as to the manner in which native travellers

proceed in safety through districts in which bloodshed and murder

are of everyday occurrence. The system under which immunity from

murder and robbery is accorded to the stranger is known by two

names, _mzareg_ or _zitat_. _Mzareg_ originally means a spear,

and the term was thus applied from the fact that in old days a

spear was given by one of the tribe to the traveller, which, being

recognised as the property of one of their number, accorded him

safety in his journey. However, spears have long ago disappeared from

these districts, though the name _mzareg_ still remains. Nowadays

the common custom is for a member of the tribe, in consideration

of a small fee, to conduct the traveller in person, both being

sacred from attack while passing through the land over which the

tribe in question holds jurisdiction. As soon as the limits are

reached, a new _mzareg_ or _zitat_ has to be obtained. Sometimes,

especially in the case of the Jews living and trading in the Sahara,

some mark or token is given, such as a turban or handkerchief,

which is considered sufficient; but in cases of caravans and

total strangers a man invariably is employed, who answers the

double purpose of guide and protector. From Dads to Tafilet I was

accompanied on my journey by a _zitat_, without whom I could never

have reached my destination, as amongst the many Berber tribes we

passed through his presence afforded me immunity from inquisition

and annoyance. Here again I was fortunate, for I was not obliged

to change my _zitat_, the fact being that members of the tribe

of Dads can travel in safety amongst nearly all the other Berber

tribes, by a reciprocal arrangement by which the caravans of the

others are allowed to pass through their district without fear of

plunder. Dads has gained this unique privilege from its situation,

blocking as it does the entire road from east and west.

With regard to the Jews living amongst the Berbers a similar

practice exists to the _mzareg_, only in their case it is known as

_debeha_, or sacrifice. This name has been applied from the fact

that the system first arose from Jews seeking the protection of

the Berbers by sacrificing an ox or a sheep to them: nowadays the

native Jews no longer need to perform this, the patronage of the

Berbers being hereditary, the vassalage descending in both families

from father to son. Any injury suffered by the Jew is revenged by

the protecting Berber as though it had been committed to a member

of his own family. In this manner the Israelites are able to live

in tolerable security from murder and theft; in fact, they are

the only people who do, as the Berber is never happy unless he has

some one to kill, or is running a risk of being shot himself from

behind some stone. As may be expected, the Berbers do not allow

their influence to be used for nothing; but so poor are the Jews,

and also the entire country in which this state of things exists,

that it is little or nothing that the “lord” can screw out of

his vassal.

In the same way the tribe of Aït Atta, one of the most powerful of

the Berber tribes of the Sahara, recently added a large district to

the south of Mesgita, on the Wad Draa, to their already extensive

territory. However, the inhabitants—Haratin—could not be enrolled

as are the Jews, as they are Moslems; and though exactly the same

principle is carried on, the term implied is _neïba_—agents

or representatives. They, as in the other case, are protected by

their conquerors from attack from elsewhere, in return for which

they pay an annual tribute.

With regard to the language of the Berbers. Generally speaking,

it is known in Southern Morocco as Shelha, but as a matter of fact

it consists of many different dialects. Although along most of

the road we travelled over the dialect was much the same, I was

told that in the heights of the Atlas, as again in the districts

of the Draa, it was very different, and that it was no easy matter

for natives of each place to render themselves comprehended by each

other. The Berber language as spoken in Morocco may be divided into

four distinct dialects, which are again much subdivided: (i.) Shelha

proper, as spoken generally throughout the Atlas, from the tribes

of Ghiata, Aït Yussi, and Beni Mgild, to the south-east of Fez, as

far along the Atlas as about due south of Marakesh; (ii.) Riffía,

spoken by the Riffis inhabiting the mountains of the north coast,

from the south-west of Tetuan to the French frontier of the province

of Oran; (iii.) Susía, spoken from along the Atlas and the Sus

valley to the south, from where Shelha proper terminates, about

due south of Marakesh, to the Atlantic coast; and (iv.) Drauía,

the common tongue all along the valley of the Wad Draa from Mesgita,

where the junction of the Dads and Idermi form that river to where

it flows into the Atlantic. So various are these dialects that,

although my Riffi servant could catch the gist of the remarks

of the Shloh amongst whom we travelled, and was with difficulty

understood in return, he found it impossible to comprehend the

Haratin of the Draa, who speak Drauía, though the Shloh of Dads

and the intermediate _oases_ can do so.

I was able only to learn of one feast celebrated amongst the

Berbers which had not been adopted from the Arab calendar, so

completely have they embraced the religion of the latter. This

feast appears to be a kind of harvest-home, and is known as the

_Ayur Nûgûrûmûn_, the meaning of which not even the Berbers seem

to know. Curiously enough, it is held in the Shahr el Fukra, which

points out that it is annual only according to Arab ideas—that is

to say, counted by lunar months—whereas one would have expected,

if it were a survival of great antiquity, that it would have been

at a fixed period in the solar year. The programme of the feast

is simple. Guns are fired during the day, and great dishes of food

are brought into the streets and there partaken of, the poor being

asked to join. One other custom only differing from the Arabs was

I able to hear of—namely, that the bride remains three days in

her husband’s house before the marriage is consummated.

That some civilisation had reached the Berbers long before the Arab

invasion is certain, but, as far as we know, the Romans never crossed

the Atlas. Yet, curiously enough, all foreigners are known to-day

amongst them as _Rumin_ (sing. _Rumi_), though this may be owing not

a little to the fact that it was not until the Arab invasion that

the Berbers were driven to the remote districts they now inhabit, but

were spread all over the country; for it was principally through the

prowess of these men, whose desire for booty the Arabs stirred up,

that Spain was invaded and conquered. Therefore it must be certain

that the Berbers of Morocco knew the Romans as well as the Romans

knew them, and that they carried away with them into the Atlas and

the districts beyond the traditions of the forefathers who had been

in actual contact with the Roman colonists. Yet there is no doubt

that remains of even pre-Roman date exist in the Atlas and the

Sahara, and I think it is risking but little to suppose that they

were erected by Phœnician colonists. That the Phœnicians were

strong in Morocco at one time is shown by the ruins of the great

colony of Lixus, on the river Kûs, near El Araish, and I can see no

reason why they should not have pushed much farther afield. And to

them, I think, may be put down the workings of former mines in the

Atlas and Anti-Atlas, and the building of the stone remains which

are found in more than one spot—and invariably without mortar—in

those ranges. One may go even further, and ask the question, whence

the Berbers obtained their existing architecture; for the great

_ksor_, with their many towers, have no resemblance to any Arab

architecture that I have ever seen, either in Arabia or Africa,

while they do most strangely resemble the elevations given in such

works as those of Messieurs Perrot and Chipiez of Phœnician castles.

The change on passing from Arab Morocco into Berber trans-Atlas

Morocco is in no way more marked than in the architecture. One leaves

behind one the mud huts and tents to enter an immense district,

every habitable portion of which is thick with great castles, often

over 50 feet in height, and with richly decorated towers, unlike

anything else I have seen elsewhere in the world, either with my own

eyes or in the works of other travellers; and I see no reason why

one should not at least surmise that the style of building in vogue

to-day amongst the Berbers of trans-Atlas Morocco is not a remnant of

their conquest by the Phœnicians. Another instance, slight though

it may be, may help to form a link in the chain, that at Dads I saw

children modelling in clay little figures of men on horseback, the

very image of the Phœnician figures, which no Arab or Moor either

could or would do. Excellently modelled they were too. I asked a

native, and he laughingly replied, “We all did that when we were

small.” Yet in all my travels in Morocco, and in the inquiries I

subsequently made, I have never seen or heard of modelling of human

figures or animals amongst the Moors. An idea of the artistic talent

of the Arab youth, in comparison to that of these young Berbers,

can be gathered from the drawings they have learned to make in

Tangier on the walls of the houses, &c.; and this only from seeing

artists at work. However, they confine themselves to ships, which

are just recognisable and nothing more, whereas my Dads friends’

models of men and their steeds were excellent in every feature,

even the bits and reins and stirrups being represented. In short,

it is my belief that when the regions I passed through come to be

diligently explored and excavated, remains will be found of a large

former civilisation which will be proved to have been Phœnician. In

the case of the one ruin I was able to take any notes about at all,

it corresponds almost exactly, so far as the general idea, to some

of the plans of buildings given in books upon Phœnicia and its

colonies; but unfortunately, travelling in disguise as I was, it

was impossible for me to take measurements, or anything, in fact,

more than the most scanty notes of this curious ruin.

As to the general character of the Berbers, their manner of living

and their looks, I have retained my remarks upon these subjects in

the places in which they were originally jotted down, for reasons

already given in this chapter, that there is such great divergence

of appearance and costume in the different parts of the question. It

is for that reason that I have given at this spot only such notes

as can be safely applied to the tribes in general amongst which I

travelled during my journey.

Tafilet · 第 4 / 13 章