Chapter VIII

The Cantatas and the Chorale

[Sidenote: _Characteristics of Bach’s Music_]

The prevailing characteristics in Bach’s compositions are intense

earnestness of purpose, and, in his church music, a deep religious

feeling, too deep for the ordinary everyday person to appreciate; an

absolute absence of anything extraneous, such as concessions to singers

and performers, or to the fashion of the day. When Bach writes florid

or highly ornamental passages, they are not intended merely to exhibit

the skill of the performer--their most important purpose is the exact

expression of the words or emotions in hand. In this he and Beethoven

were at one. Their difficulties of execution arise from the necessities

of artistic expression, and such difficulties will be found in all the

truest and best art, the art that lives beyond the fashion of the hour.

Bach, like Beethoven, suffered from the influx of a superficial kind of

music which so easily captivates an unthinking public.

The proximity of the Dresden Court, with its Italian Opera Company

and the opening of an opera-house in Leipsic itself, had much the

same effect in attracting the Leipsic public away from the solidity

and severity of the cantor (whom, all the same, they never ceased to

respect) as the Rossini fever had in the beginning of the nineteenth

century at Vienna with regard to Beethoven’s music. Bach, however,

was in a worse position than Beethoven, for he lived and worked in a

small circle of German towns, and only in the domain of church music.

Teutonic to the backbone, he expressed his thoughts in his own way

without swerving to the right or left. He never had occasion to try and

please any but a North German public, and he mostly endeavoured only

to please himself, and promote the “glory of God” in his own way, by

adhering strictly to what his genius told him was right; and posterity

has endorsed his views.

Beethoven, on the other hand, lived at a time when communications

between countries were beginning to be more rapid and frequent. The

French Revolution, and the constant wars brought about by the ambition

of Napoleon, though temporarily hostile to the actual practice of art,

had the effect of making whatever art was produced more cosmopolitan,

and therefore more easily appreciated outside the artist’s country.

Thus Beethoven’s music soon became known in England: and at the very

time when the Rossini fever was causing him to be forgotten in Vienna

(the town of his adoption) the English Philharmonic Society was

negotiating with the great composer for the composition of a symphony,

and these negotiations, as is well known, resulted in the production of

the greatest symphony the world has yet seen.

[Sidenote: _Bach and Handel_]

It is customary to compare the two musical giants of the first half

of the eighteenth century, Handel and Bach. Both were born in the

same year, 1685, Handel being the senior by one month only: both were

natives of small German towns, within a few miles of each other. Both

received their earliest musical education in Germany, but with the

difference that Bach, coming of a family of professional musicians,

there was never any thought of bringing him up to any other profession,

while Handel’s father, a surgeon, had all the prejudices of his time

and profession against music, and did his best to stifle his son’s

proclivities, till they became too strong for him to longer withstand.

After early childhood the ways of the composers were widely different.

While Bach was painfully acquiring the technique of his art, by making

long journeys on foot to hear and get instruction from eminent German

organists, by practising assiduously day and night, and by copying all

the best music he could lay hands on, Handel was playing the violin and

harpsichord in the German opera conducted by Keiser at Hamburg.

At the age of twenty-one Handel went to Italy and remained there three

years studying, and successfully composing operas for the Italians, who

called him “Il caro Sassone,”--“the dear Saxon.” At twenty-one Bach

was organist of a small and unimportant German town, still working

hard to improve his technical powers in every direction. Everyone

knows that Handel made his first reputation as a composer of Italian

operas which are completely forgotten, and not till he was fifty-five

years old did he begin that series of oratorios or sacred dramas by

which he is immortalised. Bach, on the other hand, making the organ

and the chorale his starting point, continued all his life to compose

sacred music--“church music” as it was called, and never wrote for the

theatre. Handel, domiciled in England, knew his public and knew them

so well that he wrote works which not only became popular at once, but

have never ceased to be popular. Bach either did not know, or did not

care to please his public, and wrote far above their heads, so that for

a time after his death he was forgotten entirely: only when Mozart,

and afterwards Mendelssohn, became acquainted with the wonders of his

genius did the public, almost against their will, begin to appreciate

what a giant had been on the earth in those days.[56]

[Sidenote: _Ein feste Burg_]

Bach’s place in Lutheran Church history is very important. He is

connected directly with the Reformation through the chorale, which

Luther so much encouraged as a means of spreading the new views of

religion. Bach was a strict Lutheran; and the chorale, or hymn to be

sung by the congregation, was perhaps the most important expression of

Lutheran religious feeling. The words will explain this perhaps better

than anything else, if we take an example at random from the Leipziger

Gesangbuch, in literal prose translation--_e.g._ No. 171: “A strong

castle is our God; a good defence and weapon; he freely helps us in all

trouble that can meet us. The ancient wicked enemy is in earnest; his

cruel armour is great power and much deceit: there is none like him on

the earth.

“We can do nothing of our own power, we are soon lost: but there

fights for us the right man, whom God himself has chosen. Dost thou ask

his name? Jesus Christ is his name, the Lord of Sabaoth. There is no

other God; he is bound to win the day.

“And if the world were full of devils, who would devour us, we need not

fear much, for we shall conquer. The prince of this world, however sour

he may appear, can do nothing against us: a word is able to slay him,”

&c.

[Sidenote: A Notable Chorale]

This is one of the chorales assigned to the Festival of the

Reformation, and one can imagine with what force it would appeal

to those disposed towards Luther’s teaching. Its well-known melody

was composed by Luther, and it was used by Bach as the foundation

of a cantata which is considered by Zelter to have been composed in

celebration of the 200th anniversary of the Reformation in 1717, but

the composer re-arranged it in 1730. The orchestra contains three

trumpets, one flute, two oboes, one oboe di caccia, two violins, viola,

violoncello, organ and figured bass.

The first chorus set to the words of the first verse has the following

vigorous opening, the orchestra playing an independent accompaniment.

(For convenience of English readers we quote from Novello’s octavo

edition.)

[Music: A stronghold sure our God re-]

[Music:

A stronghold sure our God remains,

A shield and hope unfailing

][57]

This is worked in bold fugato (both chorus and orchestra taking the

subject or the counter-subject), for thirty-six bars, which are then

repeated, note for note, to the words: “In need His help our freedom

gains, o’er all we fear prevailing.”

A short quotation may serve to give some idea of the fulness of the

writing and the boldness of the counterpoint, of which the effect, when

sung with proper energy, is overwhelming.

[Music: In need his help our freedom gains]

The words “our old malignant foe” follow, with the new fugue subject

[Music: Our old malignant foe]

occupying twenty-four bars.

Then

[Music:

Would fain work us woe

would fain]

&c. treated fugato for twenty bars; and each line is worked in the same

way.

[Sidenote: A Massive Chorus]

The whole chorus is 221 bars in length, and is a masterpiece of massive

choral and orchestral writing, in keeping with the sentiment of the

words. It opens with three trumpets, drums, violoncello, and organ

manual, the pedal being silent for the first twenty-three bars. At

the twenty-fourth bar (the first quoted on page 97) the pedal enters

with the 16 feet Posaune, and makes a bold canon of eight bars, with

the melody played in the highest register of the trumpet. The canon

concludes with a drum passage on the dominant; and fresh canons between

trumpet and pedal occur at bars 49, 88, 122, 147, 178 and 200.

These seven canons are all formed on the musical phrases of the

tune: and one might almost look upon the chorus as a gigantic

“choral-vorspiel” with long vocal and instrumental interludes between

the phrases given out by the trumpets and pedal.

[Sidenote: A Florid Duet]

The second verse is set as a duet for treble and bass, still in the key

of D. After a ritornello, the bass enters with the words “all men born

of God our Father, at the last will Jesus gather,” set to exceedingly

florid passages, above which floats the melody in the treble voice.

[Music:

Our utmost might is all in men,

All men born of God our]

A bass recitative, commenting on the preceding sentiments follows, and

then a treble aria, “Within my heart of hearts, Lord Jesus, make thy

dwelling.” In the fifth number the whole chorus sings the melody in

unison, now changed to 6/8 time, and with a very florid accompaniment.

[Music: If all the world with fiends were filled.]

This is followed by a tenor recitative, “Then close beside Thy

Saviour’s blood-besprinkled banner, my soul remain,” &c., a duet for

alto and tenor, “How blessed then are they, who still on God are

calling;” and the cantata concludes with the chorale simply harmonised

in four parts, “That word shall still in strength abide,” in the form

familiar to English congregations.

[Sidenote: _Fertility of Invention_]

We have given a fairly full description of this fine cantata in order

to show our readers what is meant when it is said that Bach based

his church music essentially on chorale. Most of the cantatas are

constructed in the same kind of way, _i.e._ a chorale is used as the

chief subject. But that Bach did not merely work on a fixed model is

shown by the fact that no two of the one hundred and ninety cantatas

published by the Bachgesellschaft are alike. Nothing astonishes us

more than the enormous fertility of invention shown in these wonderful

works, the variety of detail, and yet the unity of purpose. The one

idea of the composer was the religious effect to be obtained by the

highest efforts of art devoted to the service of God. Except in

Germany, they are rarely heard in their proper place as part of the

church service: but the mere reading through of the scores produces

a most profound effect, and creates a perpetual astonishment in the

reader at the enormous resources of the composer.

Bach is generally considered as the greatest composer for the organ,

but his organ works, wonderful as they are, seem small in comparison

with these marvellous cantatas, all different and yet all connected, as

it were, by an underlying unity of purpose.

[Sidenote: _The Choral-vorspiel_]

Bach took the melody of “Ein feste Burg” for one of his finest

choral-vorspiele (Peters, 245, No. 22). This is a particularly

interesting composition, since it is the only chorale in which we

obtain any clue to Bach’s methods of registering. In Walther’s MS. are

given a few indications “a 3 clav.” for three manuals. The left hand is

to begin with the fagott, sixteen feet, and the right hand on the choir

with the “sesquialtera.” The piece was doubtless intended for the organ

at Mühlhausen which was renovated and enlarged under Bach’s directions,

and which had three manuals, containing on one a sixteen feet “fagott,”

and on another a combination producing a “good sesquialtera tone.” It

is one of the larger choral-vorspiele, containing fifty-eight bars.

It is worth while noticing how Bach, in this, and all other

choral-vorspiele, does not adhere literally to the notes of the melody,

but introduces ornamental passages, or lengthens and shortens notes

to serve his purpose, or introduces the subject in augmentation and

diminution. This was the regular custom amongst German organists. The

choral-vorspiel is, in its simplest form, merely intended to prepare

the congregation for the melody that is to be sung, but instead of a

mere bald playing through of the tune, as is usual in English churches,

the organist was expected to use his art in elaborating it.

[Sidenote: ‘Surprising Variations’]

Bach, in his younger days, was accused of over-elaborating, not only

the vorspiele, but the accompaniment. It was a fault of youth, and

hardly called for the official censure that the Council at Arnstadt

thought fit to administer. He was practically his own teacher. If he

had been under the guidance of an older and more experienced organist,

he would undoubtedly have curbed his zeal for “surprising variations.”

At that time he seems to have lost sight of the fact that he was

expected to accompany the congregation. He forgot all about them,

and gave free rein to his imagination so that the “congregation were

confounded.” And well they might be, by the following example of his

accompaniment.

[Music: “WER NUR DEN LIEBEN GOTT LÄSST WALTEN.”

_From the Leipziger Gesangbuch. As sung._

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

und hoffet auf ihn allezeit.]

[Music: BACH’S METHOD OF ACCOMPANYING WHEN AT ARNSTADT.

_Peters 244, Variante zu No. 52._

Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten

und hoffet auf ihn allezeit]

He was in reality not suited to be a mere accompanist--his genius was

too great to be tied down to the formal notes sung by the congregation,

and a far lesser man would have suited this kind of work better. His

choral-vorspiele are masterpieces of organ work; his extemporised or

written accompaniments are artistic, but quite impracticable.

But when he harmonises a chorale in vocal parts for his choir to sing

with the congregation, his genius shines forth in the most exquisite

harmonic combinations possible. Examples abound, and a volume might

be written on this subject alone. We can only indicate here a few

instances of various treatments of the chorale.

Every one knows the opening double chorus in the _Matthew Passion_.

After an instrumental introduction full of dignity and solemnity, built

chiefly on tonic and dominant pedals (E minor), the first chorus sings,

“Come ye daughters, weep with me, behold the Lamb as a bridegroom.”

The second chorus exclaims, “Whom? How?” while the first continues its

course, and a “Soprano ripieno” chorus enters with the chorale--

[Music:

O thou begotten son of God.

Who on the cross wast slain.]

The work is now performed every Good Friday in the Thomas Church at

Leipsic. The organ gallery occupies the whole of the west end of the

nave and two side aisles. On each side are placed the singers, the

soprano and alto parts being sung by women. This chorale is sung by the

boys of the Thomas Schule, some forty in number, and the effect of the

contrast of tone bringing it in is overwhelming. Poor Bach, with his

miserable little rabble of a choir with three voices to a part, can

hardly have realised how his music would sound many years after his

death, when performed by a large body of enthusiastic and intelligent

musicians.

The next chorale in the work is

[Music: O Holy Jesu how hast thou offended,]

harmonised for four voices, and accompanied by violins, flutes, oboes,

violas and basses, in unison with the respective voices and figured

bass organ part. This accompaniment is used for all the succeeding

chorales, and we may remark that the melody is given to the two flutes

and two oboes as well as the first violins, that it may be made

prominent.

All the other chorales in this work, six in number, are thus arranged

and accompanied. The well-known Phrygian melody

[Music: Herzlich thut mir verlangen.]

occurs no less than five times, sometimes harmonised in the Ionian,

sometimes in the Phrygian mode, and he has arranged it in the latter

mode as a very beautiful vorspiel for the organ (Peters 244, No. 27).

We may here remark that in playing the organ choral-vorspiele no notice

is to be taken of the _fermata_, which are only used when the melodies

are sung.[58]

[Sidenote: Uses of the Chorale]

Besides the choral-vorspiele, and the introduction of the melody in

conjunction with a chorus, and the harmonisation in four parts, with

orchestra doubling the voice parts, Bach makes many other uses of the

chorale. In the _Christmas Oratorio_, for example, he combines it

with recitative, the melody being freely accompanied by the orchestra,

and interspersed with recitative passages of the nature of interludes

between the lines. Or he harmonises it in four parts, with free

orchestral interludes.

The above quoted melody appears in the _Christmas Oratorio_ with

brilliant orchestral accompaniment and interludes, three trumpets,

drums and two oboes being used besides the strings and organ.

Erk has collected 319 chorales in two volumes (Peters), extracted

from the church cantatas, &c., and has given full particulars of

the sources. Sometimes they are worked up as fugues. Thus, the tune

composed by Kugelmann about 1540, and generally known in England as the

“Old Hundredth,” appears in the cantata “Gottlob! nun geht das Jahr zu

Ende” in the following form, the voice parts being doubled by strings,

cornet, two oboes, three trombones and organ.

[Music: Nun lob mein Seel.]

The choral-vorspiele published in the Peters’ edition number about

143--besides several sets of partitas or variations on chorales, and

many “Varianten,” or different workings of the same vorspiel.

Although this eminently national German and Lutheran form of religious

art sank deeply into Bach’s soul, and more or less influenced and

coloured all his compositions for the Church, he was accused at Leipsic

of being too proud to demean himself to conducting or accompanying a

mere chorale!

What he did was to allow his genius full play on a form which intensely

interested him, and to exhibit it in new and original aspects.

[Sidenote: _Orchestration_]

The orchestration of the cantatas is of great interest. It is generally

known that Bach did not usually employ the orchestral instruments in

the modern manner, but made each play an independent counterpoint.

Thus there were as many contrapuntal parts as there were voices

and instruments combined; and a cantata was described as being,

for example, “in nine parts, for one oboe, two violins, one viola,

one violoncello, soprano, alto, tenor, and bass voices with organ

continuo,” or as a “concerto for four voices, two oboes, viola and

continuo.” Sometimes, as in “Erforsche mich Gott,” there is a violin

obbligato above the voice parts in the final four-part chorale. In

other cantatas it is noted that the “cantus firmus (the chorale-melody)

is in the soprano,” or other voice. In the opening chorus of “Herr Gott

dich loben wir,” the cantus firmus is in the soprano, the other voices

sing throughout, making the interludes which are usually allotted to

the instruments.

Bach was fond of dividing his violas. Thus, part of “Gleichwie der

Regen und Schnee” is scored for four voices, two flutes, two violins,

_four violas_, fagotto, violoncello and continuo.

Or parts are written for a viola and a taille (the tenor viol). In “O

Ewigkeit, du Donnerwort,” the scoring is for three oboes, two violins,

viola and continuo, with a tromba da tirarsi (slide trumpet) in unison

with the soprano throughout. The cantata “Ich hatte viel Bekümmerniss,”

known in England as “My spirit was in heaviness,” was composed and

performed at Weimar on the third Sunday after Trinity, 1714, on his

being made Concertmeister there. It is labelled “Per ogni tempi,”

“suitable for any season.” It has one oboe and one fagotto, besides the

usual strings.

[Sidenote: A Mannerism]

“Es ist nichts gesundes” is scored for three flutes, cornet, three

trombones, two oboes, the usual strings and four voices. Here the

cantus firmus is given out by the organ in the bass with figures,

[Music]

and there is no further reference to it until long after the chorus

have entered, and have been singing contrapuntal passages, when,

without any warning as it were, the three flutes, cornet, and three

trombones, which have hitherto been silent, bring in the chorale in

four parts, the voices and strings continuing their contrapuntal

course. The effect is so peculiarly Bach-like that we cannot refrain

from quoting a few bars.

[Music: FROM THE CANTATA “ES IST NICHTS GESUNDES AN MEINEM LEIBE.” NO.

25.

_Bars 14 to 17._

Es ist nichts Gesundes an meinem]

[Music: meinem Leibe]

The above quotation is only a specimen of what is found throughout

a long chorus, all the sections of the chorale being introduced in

turn, with a never-ceasing flow of counterpoint in the voice parts,

accompanied in the same way by strings.

If we examine the voice parts we shall find that they practically

amount to a double canon, the tenor imitating the bass, the treble

imitating the alto. But the canon is not carried out with an iron-bound

rule which would crush all beauty out of the music; on the contrary,

the imitations are quite free and unconstrained. Each voice must have

its melody, even if collisions occur now and then, such as between

alto and tenor bar 15, last quaver: alto and bass just previously to

this: the consecutive sevenths in the treble and alto bar 16, third

and fourth quavers, or the entry of the tenor on F♮ bar 17, against

the F♯ in the bass. This rough and healthy vigour is thoroughly

characteristic; the parts must express themselves by their melody; if

they happen occasionally to collide, this is of much less importance

than that their vigorous melody should be sacrificed in order to

sweeten the harmony.

[Sidenote: Technical Skill]

The string accompaniment must also take its part. The instruments

are all treated as individuals, not merely as filling up harmonies.

Therefore they do not reiterate one note in each chord, but move about.

The wind instruments play in four part harmony which is complete in

itself. It might perhaps appear that this is merely a display of

learning and contrapuntal skill, but a close examination of Bach’s

most elaborate works will reveal the fact that the greater the

contrapuntal task he sets himself, the more expressive is the music.

Such choruses exhibit the highest possible technical skill, but all

this is as nothing compared to the wonderfully artistic effect that

the composition as a whole produces.

In some cases Bach writes an organ obbligato part in addition to the

“continuo,” or figured bass. Thus the opening symphony of “Wir danken

dir, Gott, wir danken dir,” composed for the election of the Town

Council at Leipsic in 1737, consists of the “Prelude” of the violin

solo suite No. 6 transposed to D,

[Music]

on the obbligato organ, with accompaniments for three trumpets, drums,

two oboes, strings and continuo (to be played on another organ[59]).

Bach seems to have tried every kind of experiment with his orchestra.

For instance in “Freue dich erlöste Schaar” an aria is accompanied by

a flute, a muted violin, the rest of the strings pizzicato, and the

organ part to be played staccato. One peculiarity, however, of his

orchestration is that the combination of instruments he chooses for a

particular movement remains the same throughout. Rests occur in the

parts, but there is no variety of treatment within the movement. Thus

in the above-mentioned aria the lower strings having begun pizzicato

play pizzicato throughout, the first violins remain muted throughout,

and the organ plays staccato throughout. Again, in the opening chorus

of “Es ist nichts gesundes,” referred to above, the wind never plays

anything but the chorale in four parts. Of variety there is plenty, but

it is not produced by modern methods.

Bach was just as careful in the choice of instruments for his

particular effects as in the choice of stops in organ playing. Many of

the instruments he used are now obsolete, and their intonation must

have been very faulty. Yet if they had the particular tone colour

he considered fitting he would not hesitate to employ them, to the

exclusion of, or together with, the more manageable instruments such

as the violin, viola, oboe, &c. Amongst the obsolete instruments he

employed to accompany the voices in his cantatas and Passion music

were violoncello piccolo,[60] viola da gamba,[60] taille,[61] viola

d’amore,[60] cornet,[60] oboe d’amore,[62] oboe da caccia,[60]

lituus,[60] violetta,[60] violino piccolo.[60]

[Sidenote: Cantatas]

Some of the cantatas are called solo cantatas; they consist of a series

of movements usually founded on a chorale, for one or more solo voices,

and contain no choruses, though occasionally a chorale is to be sung by

the congregation.

The cantatas are often called by Bach “Concertos.” Thus “Bereitet die

Wege” for fourth Sunday in Advent is entitled “Concerto à 9, 1 oboe, 2

violini, 1 viola, 1 violoncello, soprano, alto, tenor, bass, col basso

per organo di J. S. Bach.”

FOOTNOTES:

[56] Burney devotes nearly a whole volume to Handel, and only one

paragraph to Bach.

[57] The original tune would be, with the above words--

[Music: A stronghold sure our God remains]

[58] See Griepenkerl’s Introduction to Peters, vol. 244.

[59] According to Gesner the keyboard of the Rück-positiv (back choir)

of the St Thomas’ organ stood apart from the chief organ, and was used

by Bach to conduct from (see the frontispiece of Walther’s Lexicon,

1732). If there was an organ obbligato part, it would be played on this

manual, while another person played the _continuo_ on the chief organ.

[60] See Glossary.

[61] See p. 108.

[62] A minor third below the oboe, and of more pathetic tone.

Bach · 第 8 / 14 章