J. S. WARDEN.

_Richard I._ (Vol. viii., p. 72.).--I presume that the Richard I. of the

"Tablet" is the "Richard, King of England," who figures in the Roman

Calendar on the 7th February, but who, if he ever existed, was not even

monarch of any of the petty kingdoms of the Heptarchy, much less of all

England. However, not to go farther with a subject which might lead to

polemical controversy, surely MR. LUCAS is aware that a new series of kings

began to be reckoned from the Conquest, and that three Edwards, who had

much more right to be styled kings of England than Richard could have

possibly had, are not counted in the number of kings of that name; the

reason was, I believe, that these princes, although the paramount rulers of

the country, styled themselves much more frequently Kings of the West

Saxons than Kings of England.

Notes and Queries, Number 220, January 14, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 121 / 153 题