ERRATUM

_p. ♦396, line 1, et seq._

♦ “398” replaced with “396”

Since this paragraph was printed, I have heard from Mr. Marsh that the

facts are not quite as I have stated them, and that there is not really

any “Rupert Brooke Fund” administered by Mr. Marsh. I much regret this

error which arose from an imperfect recollection. R. G.

Good-bye to all that · 第 74 / 77 题