VI

About Charterhouse. Let me begin by recalling my feelings on the day

that I left, about a week before the outbreak of war. I discussed them

with a friend who felt much as I did. First we said that there were

perhaps even more typical public schools than Charterhouse at the

time, but that this was difficult to believe. Next, that there was no

possible remedy, because tradition was so strong that if one wished

to break it one would have to dismiss the whole school and staff and

start all over again. But that even this would not be enough, for the

school buildings were so impregnated with what was called the public

school spirit, but what we felt as fundamental badness, that they

would have to be demolished and the school rebuilt elsewhere and its

name changed. Next, that our only regret at leaving the place was that

for the last year we had been in a position as members of Sixth Form

to do more or less what we pleased. Now we were both going on to St.

John’s College, Oxford, which seemed by reputation to be merely a more

boisterous repetition of Charterhouse. We would be freshmen there, and

would naturally refuse to be hearty and public school-ish, and there

would be all the stupidity of having our rooms raided and being forced

to lose our temper and hurt somebody and be hurt ourselves. And there

would be no peace probably until we got into our third year, when we

would be back again in the same sort of position as now, and in the

same sort of position as in our last year at our preparatory school.

‘In 1917,’ said Nevill, ‘the official seal will be out on all this

dreariness. We’ll get our degrees, and then we’ll have to start as new

boys again in some dreary profession. My God,’ he said, turning to

me suddenly, ‘I can’t stand the idea of it. I must put something

in between me and Oxford. I must at least go abroad for the whole

vacation.’ I did not feel that three months was long enough. I had a

vague intention of running away to sea. ‘Do you realize,’ he said to

me, ‘that we have spent fourteen years of our life principally at Latin

and Greek, not even competently taught, and that we are going to start

another three years of the same thing?’ But, when we had said our very

worst of Charterhouse, I said to him or he said to me, I forget which:

‘Of course, the trouble is that in the school at any given time there

are always at least two really decent masters among the forty or fifty,

and ten really decent fellows among ♦the five or six hundred. We

will remember them, and have Lot’s feeling about not damning Sodom for

the sake of ten just persons. And in another twenty years’ time we’ll

forget this conversation and think that we were mistaken, and that

perhaps everybody, with a few criminal exceptions, was fairly average

decent, and we’ll say “I was a young fool then, insisting on impossible

perfection,” and we’ll send our sons to Charterhouse sentimentally,

and they’ll go through all we did.’ I do not wish this to be construed

as an attack on my old school, but merely as a record of my feelings

at the time. No doubt I was unappreciative of the hard knocks and

character-training that public schools are supposed to provide, and as

a typical Old Carthusian remarked to me recently: ‘The whole moral tone

of the school has improved out of all recognition since those days.’

♦ “the the” replaced with “the”

As a matter of fact I did not go up to Oxford until five years later,

in 1919, when my brother, four years younger than myself, was already

in residence, and I did not take my degree until 1926, at the same time

as the brother who was eight years younger than myself. Oxford was

extraordinarily kind to me. I did no Latin or Greek there, though

I had a Classical Exhibition. I did not sit for a single examination.

I never had rooms at St. John’s, though I used to go there to draw

a Government grant for tuition fees. I lived outside the University

three-mile radius. For my last two undergraduate years I did not even

have a tutor. I have a warm feeling for Oxford. Its rules and statutes,

though apparently cast-iron, are ready for emergencies. In my case, at

any rate, a poet was an emergency.

Whenever I come to the word ‘Charterhouse’ in this story I find myself

escaping into digressions, but I suppose that I must get through with

it. From the moment I arrived at the school I suffered an oppression

of spirit that I hesitate now to recall in its full intensity. It

was something like being in that chilly cellar at Laufzorn among the

potatoes, but being a potato out of a different bag from the rest.

The school consisted of about six hundred boys. The chief interests

were games and romantic friendships. School-work was despised by every

one; the scholars, of whom there were about fifty in the school at

any given time, were not concentrated in a single dormitory-house as

at Winchester, but divided among ten. They were known as ‘pro’s,’ and

unless they were good at games and willing to pretend that they hated

work as much as or more than the non-scholars, and ready whenever

called on to help these with their work, they usually had a bad

time. I was a scholar and really liked work, and I was surprised and

disappointed at the apathy of the class-rooms. My first term I was

left alone more or less, it being a school convention that new boys

should be neither encouraged nor baited. The other boys seldom spoke

to them except to send them on errands, or to inform them of breaches

of school convention. But my second term the trouble began. There

were a number of things that naturally made for my unpopularity.

Besides being a scholar and not outstandingly good at games, I was

always short of pocket-money. I could not conform to the social custom

of treating my contemporaries to food at the school shop, and because

I could not treat them I could not accept their treating. My clothes

were all wrong; they conformed outwardly to the school pattern, but

they were ready-made and not of the best-quality cloth that the other

boys all wore. Even so, I had not been taught how to make the best of

them. Neither my mother nor my father had any regard for the niceties

of modern dress, and my elder brothers were abroad by this time. The

other boys in my house, except for five scholars, were nearly all the

sons of business men; it was a class of whose interests and prejudices

I knew nothing, having hitherto only met boys of the professional

class. And I talked too much for their liking. A further disability was

that I was as prudishly innocent as my mother had planned I should be.

I knew nothing about simple sex, let alone the many refinements of sex

constantly referred to in school conversation. My immediate reaction

was one of disgust. I wanted to run away.

The most unfortunate disability of all was that my name appeared on the

school list as ‘R. von R. Graves.’ I had only known hitherto that my

second name was Ranke; the ‘von,’ discovered on my birth certificate,

was disconcerting. Carthusians were secretive about their second names;

if these were fancy ones they usually managed to conceal them. Ranke,

without the ‘von’ I could no doubt have passed off as monosyllabic and

English, but ‘von Ranke’ was glaring. The business class to which most

of the boys belonged was strongly feeling at this time the threat and

even the necessity of a trade war; ‘German’ meant ‘dirty German.’ It

meant ‘cheap shoddy goods competing with our sterling industries,’

and it also meant military menace, Prussianism, sabre-rattling. There

was another boy in my house with a German name, but English by birth

and upbringing. He was treated much as I was. On the other hand a

French boy in the house was very popular, though he was not much good

at games; King Edward VII had done his _entente_ work very thoroughly.

There was also considerable anti-Jewish feeling (the business prejudice

again) and the legend was put about that I was not only a German but a

German-Jew.

Of course I always maintained that I was Irish. This claim was resented

by an Irish boy who had been in the house about a year and a half

longer than myself. He went out of his way to hurt me, not only by

physical acts of spite, like throwing ink over my school-books, hiding

my games-clothes, setting on me suddenly from behind corners, pouring

water over me at night, but by continually forcing his bawdy humour

on my prudishness and inviting everybody to laugh at my disgust; he

also built up a sort of humorous legend of my hypocrisy and concealed

depravity. I came near a nervous breakdown. School morality prevented

me from informing the house-master of my troubles. The house-monitors

were supposed to keep order and preserve the moral tone of the house,

but at this time they were not the sort to interfere in any case of

bullying among the juniors. I tried violent resistance, but as the odds

were always heavily against me this merely encouraged the ragging.

Complete passive resistance would probably have been better. I only got

accustomed to bawdy-talk in my last two years at Charterhouse, and it

was not until I had been some time in the army that I got hardened to

it and could reply in kind to insults.

A former headmaster of Charterhouse, an innocent man, is reported

to have said at a Headmasters’ Conference: ‘My boys are amorous but

seldom erotic.’ Few cases of eroticism indeed ever came to his notice;

there were not more than five or six big rows all the time I was at

Charterhouse and expulsions were rare. But the house-masters knew

little about what went on in their houses; their living quarters

were removed from the boys’. There was a true distinction between

‘amorousness,’ by which the headmaster meant a sentimental falling

in love with younger boys, and eroticism, which was adolescent lust.

The intimacy, as the newspapers call it, that frequently took place

was practically never between an elder boy and the object of his

affection, for that would have spoilt the romantic illusion, which was

heterosexually cast. It was between boys of the same age who were not

in love, but used each other coldly as convenient sex-instruments. So

the atmosphere was always heavy with romance of a very conventional

early-Victorian type, yet complicated by cynicism and foulness.

Good-bye to all that · 第 24 / 77 题