I gave a sigh of desperation and leant back in my chair.

"Well, really!" I protested. "Surely the man himself--everybody--I

mean--his--his eye-glass--his bulldog--of course only a few of us fully

appreciate the extent of his actual research work--but still--"

"All right, I'll get it," she replied.

That finished off Araminta easily enough, but the situation none the less

was serious. Paragraphs exactly like this had been meeting my eye in almost

every popular paper for month after month, and, though I use two memory

systems and have an electric scalp shampoo each week, I find them

increasingly difficult to cope with. _Who's Which_ already transgresses the

established canons of literary art. It is almost as tall lying down as

standing up, and fellows like Poppington are not even in _Who's Which_. He

had not, you observed, even obtained an O.B.E. What would happen if I met

him at some public gathering or dinner and by some awful mischance forgot

those salient facts?

It appeared to me that a process for reproducing short biographies of this

nature in a slightly larger type on the shirt-fronts of eminent personages

was badly needed; it should be coupled, I felt, with an arrangement of

periscopes to help one when sitting beside the great man or standing behind

his back. Or he might perhaps wear upon his sleeve something like the

divisional signs which were so useful in France. Old Poppington, for

instance, might have a--might wear an--I mean there might be something or

other on his coat in red or green or blue to indicate the nature and scope

of his secretarial activities and give a fellow the right lead. And to

think that every week dozens and dozens of new Poppingtons are springing up

like crocuses about me! It was a bewildering thought. They were becoming

perhaps the most numerous and influential class in the community. I had

visions of mass meetings of "well-known" men--"well-known" men marching in

procession with flags to Downing Street to demand State recognition,

statues and pensions, and insisting that it should be made a penal offence

not to recognise their well-known features in the street. I made a great

resolve. Why should I be left out of it? I determined to join the crowd.

I had got rather out of touch with old _Marchand_ for some time, and had

indeed forgotten exactly what he looked like, but I persuaded a mutual

friend to point him out to me, and, selecting the psychological moment,

cannoned into him heavily in the street. His spectacles dropped off and his

note-book fell out of his hand.

"Why, if it isn't _Du Beurre_!" I shouted, feigning an ecstatic surprise.

"I am sorry," he said rather stiffly, when he had recovered his breath,

"but I am afraid I haven't the pleasure--"

"I am John Smith," I said.

"I am afraid I still--"

"Allow me to tell you all about myself," I said. And I did.

I was a little nervous as to how he would take it, but the event justified

me. When I opened my paper next evening I found the following words:--

"Ran across John Smith of Ravenscourt Park yesterday afternoon. Chatting

with him about one thing and another, he told me something of the methods

he has employed to bring about his present celebrity in that salubrious

suburb. He has never, it appears, written a book, collaborated in a review,

appeared in a night-club, lunched at the Bitz, sat on a committee, or been

summoned as a witness in a sensational divorce case. His record, I fancy,

must be one of the most thoroughly unique in Greater London."

There was no photograph of John Smith, but, biting partly into this

paragraph and partly into another on the opposite side of the column, was

one of Mortimer Despenser, the new film star, featured in _Scented Sin_,

which really did almost as well. Dear old _Du Beurre_!

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 158, March 3rd, 1920 · 第 31 / 35 题