Mr. STATMAN. That's G.A.T.B. in Fort Worth, June 1962, so that
indicates that he had had this complete G.A.T.B. given in Fort Worth in
1962, and maybe in order not to be redundant, they might have sent and
gotten; yes, in fact, I know they did because you see--you don't have
any indication here of the make-up, so these scores and patterns were
obtained from the Fort Worth office.
Mr. JENNER. The date, October 10, 1962, appearing on the reverse of the
card lettered "individual aptitude tests" would, I take it, in view
of what you have now said, be the date on which the information was
obtained from the Fort Worth office?
Mr. STATMAN. Well, no; the G.A.T.B. in Fort Worth, June 1962--that's
when he took it.
Mr. JENNER. There is another date below that.
Mr. STATMAN. No; you see, all this dealings has been in 1963, hasn't
it? This 1962 would probably indicate the Fort Worth action, wouldn't
it?
Mr. JENNER. Well, what I was trying to attempt to do was bring it out.
Mr. STATMAN. Well, everything else we have done is in 1963, so we would
have to ascertain here or assume that this 10-10-62 was the date that
the G.A.T.B. was administered to him in Fort Worth. No; that couldn't
be right either, because June wouldn't be 1962.
Mr. JENNER. He came to this country on June 12, 1962.
Mr. STATMAN. Well, maybe this is a mistake and it should have been
10-10-63. That would be more than likely the dates, wouldn't it?
Mr. JENNER. Possibly.
Mr. STATMAN. You see, everything else we have on the application
that indicates 10-10-63, wouldn't it? In other words, we have had no
dealings with him back in 1962, have we?
Mr. JENNER. Not in the Dallas office.
Mr. STATMAN. No, no; again, I guess you would have to postulate that
that should be 10-10-63. In other words, on 10-10-63, they recorded
this information from the Fort Worth records.
Mr. JENNER. Taking you back to the previous exhibit, I direct your
attention to a date of 10-10-62, appearing----
Mr. STATMAN. No; you are right--okay--they contacted Fort Worth on
10-10-62, and received this information from them.
Mr. JENNER. This aptitude information from them?
Mr. STATMAN. Right. In other words, the test was not administered in
the Dallas office, it was administered in Fort Worth. Have I got you
confused, finally?
Mr. JENNER. No; you don't have me confused; you are doing splendidly.
You are very helpful.
Mr. STATMAN. Now, this document [Cunningham Exhibit No. 3] is a claim
document, B-3(a).
Mr. JENNER. Excuse me, may I have this described a little more for the
record?
Mr. STATMAN. Well, I want you to note that there is an original date on
there indicating a New Orleans address and then a Dallas address.
Mr. JENNER. You are going to explain that--all I'm going to do at the
moment is to identify the document for the record.
Mr. STATMAN. It is a B-3(a), Cunningham Exhibit No. 3.
Mr. JENNER. It is a document in typing opposite the printed
designation--the name is "L. H. Oswald" and to the right of that in
printing is "SS Number," which I take it is his social security number?
Mr. STATMAN. Right.
Mr. JENNER. It is 433-54-3937. In longhand above that line, I have just
read, appears P.O. Box 30061.
Mr. STATMAN. All right--now, to go on with that and also in longhand is
the Irving address, 2515 West Fifth, Irving.
Mr. JENNER. I see there are some strike-outs.
Mr. STATMAN. Right. Now, the original document was typed giving L. H.
Oswald, 757 France Street, New Orleans, La.
Mr. JENNER. Is it French?
Mr. STATMAN. France--it looks like France.
Mr. JENNER. French, F-r-e-n-c-h [spelling].
Mr. STATMAN. It looks like "a" to me.
Mr. JENNER. F-r-a-n-c-e [spelling]. We'll let Mr. Davis look at it.
Mr. DAVIS. I think it is French, F-r-e-n-c-h [spelling]. It's French in
the writing.