TESTIMONY OF R. L. ADAMS

The testimony of R. L. Adams was taken at 1:55 p.m., on April 1, 1964,

in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building, Bryan and

Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex., by Mr. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., assistant

counsel of the President's Commission. Robert T. Davis, Assistant

Attorney General of Texas, was present.

Mr. JENNER. Mr. Adams, would you rise and be sworn, please?

Mr. ADAMS. Surely.

Mr. JENNER. Do you solemnly swear in the testimony which you are about

to give on deposition that you will tell the truth, the whole truth,

and nothing but the truth?

Mr. ADAMS. I do.

Mr. JENNER. For the record, I am Albert E. Jenner, Jr., one of the

members of the legal staff on the President's Commission, which, as

I believe you know, was authorized to be created by Senate Joint

Resolution 137, and President Johnson added to that legislative

authority by an Executive Order 11130 appointing the Commission and

fixed its powers and duties. In general its duties are directed towards

investigating all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the

tragic event of November 22, 1963, the assassination of President John

Fitzgerald Kennedy.

This has brought us as members of the staff and the Commission itself

to inquire into a rather wide range of circumstances, including running

down a lot of things that have arisen by way of rumor and otherwise, to

sort out the wheat from the chaff.

One of the people towards whom our particular inquiries have been

directed is Lee Harvey Oswald, and we have testimony from a host of

people who had some contact with him during his lifetime.

The particular assignment of our division, Mr. Liebeler and I and

others helping us, is of Mr. Oswald's life from the day he came on this

earth until his death on the 24th of November 1963.

If I may ask you some questions--I understand you had some contact with

him or in your official capacity in the Texas Employment Commission,

you in turn have people under your supervision and direction at least

who had contact with him?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. You are Mr. R. L. Adams of the Texas Employment Commission,

and is that located at 1025 Elm Street?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. If you would, would you state your official position with

the Texas Employment Commission, please?

Mr. ADAMS. I am employed as a placement interviewer.

Mr. JENNER. And do you have persons under your supervision and

direction?

Mr. ADAMS. No; I do not.

Mr. JENNER. Tell me what is the Texas Employment Commission?

Mr. ADAMS. The Texas Employment Commission is the Texas version of

the Federal-State Employment Service. As such, it is operated and

jointly federal-state funded, and seeks to assist those people who are

unemployed primarily through finding employment for them and in the

event that we are unable to do so, to provide them with unemployment

compensation for such time as they may be eligible.

Mr. JENNER. I happen to be an Illinoian myself. I practice law in

Chicago--it's tied in with the Unemployment Compensation Commission?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. And those who had suffered unemployment seek the assistance

of the Texas Employment Commission to obtain for them new employment?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. How does that operate, do you--do the employers register

with you or they call you up--I would like to have you give me a normal

operation so that we can compare that background on normalcy against

what might have occurred with respect to Lee Harvey Oswald.

Mr. ADAMS. Normally, employers in all categories of business and

industry will use many avenues to obtain suitable employees. One

of them, hopefully used by most of them, is the Texas Employment

Commission.

Mr. JENNER. I said to you that my impression from the depositions we

have taken is that your commission does have and is held in reasonably

high regard by employers and the ones I have interviewed have indicated

that they may resort to the commission rather frequently.

Mr. ADAMS. I am delighted to hear it. It is a selling job--this is not

your main thing, but because it is a State-Federal organization, it

has been subjected to a lot of unpleasant publicity which was formerly

known as the Texas Unemployment Commission, which did nothing to

enhance it.

I worked on the street for a while calling on businesses and more

often than not I ran into people who were very dissatisfied with the

commission because of previous poor service, or alleged poor service,

and in the time that I have been with the commission, 2 years, I think

we have striven to improve the quality of service, both to employers

and to applicants and so employers do call us. Some of them have

standing orders with us. Some of them use us once and they don't get

what they want and that's the last we hear from them, but by the same

token we hope that all people unemployed would come to us in the course

of their efforts to find jobs. I think many people mistakenly assume

that TEC exists to find them jobs. This is not true. TEC exists to help

them find jobs and in the course of their job seeking, they, I suspect

75 percent of them, will register with TEC and with other agencies.

Mr. JENNER. Other like agencies or private employment agencies?

Mr. ADAMS. Private agencies and, of course, we have the continuing

battle of the public versus private activities.

Mr. JENNER. The scope of employment, that is the work, is of great

variety, is it, the jobs that are being served?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; all the way from laborers up through doctors of

philosophy in varying fields.

Mr. JENNER. Do you ever seek, for example, let's use a hypothetical

day--you mention a doctor of philosophy--let's say he had a Ph. D. in

geology, and he came to the commission. You do not have at the moment,

let us say, with respect to this hypothetical Ph. D., an inquiry from a

prospective employer. Do you mean that the TEC would in that kind of an

incident--a man of quite high education, would you seek a position for

him by calling possible employers?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; we would do this and we refer to it either as job

development or the projection of a highly qualified applicant to

selected employers who might be in need of such a man.

Mr. JENNER. When did you become employed by or connected with the TEC,

as you call it?

Mr. ADAMS. Well, I retired from the United States Air Force in January

of 1960, and attempted to be a salesman for about a year and thereby

losing my hat and shirt, and I decided I had misused the talents that I

had mastered in the service and returned to Government service.

Mr. JENNER. That was when?

Mr. ADAMS. I joined TEC on March 9, 1962.

Mr. JENNER. Are you a native of this area?

Mr. ADAMS. No, I am a Chicagoan.

Mr. JENNER. You are--so am I. I think I mentioned that. How old are you?

Mr. ADAMS. I am 47, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Was there an occasion when in your position with TEC you

had some contact with Lee Harvey Oswald?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes.

Mr. JENNER. Would you relate that and give all the circumstances as you

now recall, in the chronology that you recall?

Mr. ADAMS. I can't, except that my memory was refreshed by my office

manager subsequent to the events of November 22.

Mr. JENNER. Having refreshed your recollection, do you now have a

recollection?

Mr. ADAMS. Vaguely.

Mr. JENNER. Well, give us your best recollection--your best present

recollection of this event and relate it.

Mr. ADAMS. At the time that I--in September, beginning the second

week in September of 1963, I was brought in from employment service

representative duties, which is going out and calling on businesses to

gain some experience on a placement desk.

After I had been there, well, when November the 22d rolled around and a

couple of months--when this happened, the following Monday morning when

I came to work, I said, "I'll bet that boy is in my files."

I went to check and I couldn't find any record of it and the office

manager said, "What are you looking for?" And I said, "You know what I

am looking for." And he said, "I've found it."

Mr. JENNER. Who is the office manager?

Mr. ADAMS. Mr. A. K. Sayre [spelling] S-a-y-r-e.

Mr. JENNER. Is he still with the TEC?

Mr. ADAMS. He is still the office manager--yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. By the way, then, is there a lady there by the name of

Louise Latham?

Mr. ADAMS. She resigned from the Texas Employment Commission effective

yesterday, but she lives in the local area.

Mr. JENNER. That is Mrs. Louise Latham?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; but in any event, I was concerned, quite frankly, that

I might have referred him on a job, Mr. Oswald, on a job with the Texas

Depository and my office manager assured me that I had not, but he

said, "You did talk to him several times, what do you remember about

it?" "Did I make any written comments, good or bad about him?" And he

said, "No, you didn't." And I said, "Then my only recollection about

him was he was a nonentity, just another applicant who was neither

outstanding or, I mean--inadequate."

Mr. JENNER. He made no impression on you?

Mr. ADAMS. No.

Mr. JENNER. What kind of records are kept with respect to job

applicants, those who are seeking positions, and they are placed or not

placed, what kind of record would I expect to find if I looked?

Mr. ADAMS. Well, there are several--one a Lindex strip is at the

receptionist which purportedly has a listing of all of the applicants

who are currently registered with our office. Then, for each applicant

there are one or more application cards covering a primary code, an

occupational code which is that code in which we feel he is best

qualified, the additional cards being for secondary codes for other

jobs for which he might be qualified for or which he may have

performed in the past, so that there would be one or more application

cards, a Lindex strip, and the counseling records if the individual had

been counseled.

Mr. JENNER. Now, assuming Mrs. Latham assisted Lee Oswald in obtaining

a position, a record of some kind--some kind of a recordation of that

fact would be made?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, on the application--on the individual's application

card, the face gives essential information as to names, address,

telephone number, birthdate, height, weight, education, the job code to

which he has been assigned, the high school from which he graduated,

the college which he attended and/or which he graduated, special

skills which he may possess in the use of business machines, and any

hobbies which might be job oriented, such as skin diving and things of

that sort, and the back side shows the jobs the individual has held,

beginning with the most recent and going back to the most significant

job he has held.

Inside the folded card, one-half of the upper half is for comments

concerning availability of public or private transportation, the

minimum salary the individual is willing to accept, any restrictions or

qualifications the individual may place on employment.

The other half of the upper portion indicates whether or not the

individual has been counseled. It may include pertinent information

such as the individual has been under psychiatric care, has a Police

record, anything which might be necessary in discussing this individual

intelligently with an employer.

The bottom half lists the referrals or attempted referrals of this

individual for employment.

Each time an attempt is made to contact the individual, an entry will

be made indicating the date when the contact is attempted, the method,

that is, whether by telephone, by telephone message or by mail, the

date on which he was referred, if he was referred, or if he was not

referred, whether he refused the job or whether he was found not

qualified; if he was referred, whether or not he was hired; if he was a

claimant, whether or not--if he rejected the job--that information was

sent to the claims office indicating that he had rejected employment or

rejected an offer of employment, anything pertaining to this particular

job offer is shown on a given line or lines, as it might be.

Mr. JENNER. And are they now in the possession of TEC, records of that

character relating to Lee Harvey Oswald?

Mr. ADAMS. I don't know from my own knowledge, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Would Mr. Sayre know that?

Mr. ADAMS. It is my belief that these records are in the hands of the

FBI or Secret Service, but he would know.

Mr. JENNER. Were photostatic copies made, do you know?

Mr. ADAMS. That, I don't know, sir. Apparently, I did talk to him on

the phone several times, because the card indicates that I had done so

and I do not recall.

Mr. JENNER. Well, do you recall when you were interviewed by Mr. Odum

of the FBI on the 27th of November 1963?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. JENNER. At that time you appeared to have a recollection of a

telephone call from Oswald on October 8, in response to a message of

your own of October 7, 1963. Do you recall that incident?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir; I couldn't say that I positively do. If the record

says I did, I did.

Mr. JENNER. Then, I take it, that a record of the transaction was made?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes.

Mr. JENNER. If it occurred?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes.

Mr. JENNER. And you have no recollection independent of that record?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir--if I might clarify that, sir, by saying that in

the case of an applicant with whom one has repeated dealings, whether

good or bad, these would stick. Otherwise, one talks to anywhere to

10 to 30 applicants a day, day in and day out, personally and by

telephone and with the exception of those applicants with whom I have

had extensive dealings either because they are problem cases or because

they are really outstanding good applicants, I don't remember that. If

confronted by one, I could be able to say, "Yes; I have talked to that

man," but otherwise I couldn't.

Mr. JENNER. You apparently indicated to Mr. Odum, a reference on your

part on October 8, to Solid State Electronics Co. of Texas, do you

recall referring him to the Solid State Electronics Co. on or about the

8th of October 1963?

Mr. ADAMS. I can recall having had that order because it was unusual

in the sense that I had not dealt with an order of that type before

from a company engaged in the sale of electronics parts who wanted an

individual who had had some knowledge of electronics or electronics

parts. Presumably, if I referred to--Mr. Oswald, it was because his

military or civilian background indicated he had had training in this

field.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall any more about that incident?

Mr. ADAMS. No; I can't say I do, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall what the nature of the job was?

Mr. ADAMS. As best I can recall, it was where--it was loosely what we

called a parts counterman.

Mr. JENNER. Parts counterman?

Mr. ADAMS. A sales clerk.

Mr. JENNER. A sales clerk?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; in sales.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall what the salary was?

Mr. ADAMS. It seems to me it was quite good for the Dallas area. I

would guess it was in the neighborhood of in excess of $75 a week, it

seems.

Mr. JENNER. I take it that that reference was made to Oswald then by

telephone rather than his coming into your office?

Mr. ADAMS. My policy as a placement interviewer, sir, is this: If I

have once met an applicant and then there is not a long lapse until

such time as I have an opening to discuss with him, or on which to

refer him, I will refer him by telephone if I think he is otherwise

qualified.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall his coming into the office the 8th or the 9th

of October?

Mr. ADAMS. I couldn't honestly say that I do; no, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Would this registration card have some entry in that

respect, if he came in?

Mr. ADAMS. Well, possibly. The policy in our office is that each month

an individual should be contacted either by phone or in person. If a

person is contacted more than once, either by phone or in person, only

the initial date for that month is shown. It is repetitive and takes up

a lot of unnecessary space.

Mr. JENNER. Does Burton-Dixie Co. awaken or refresh your recollection

in this connection?

Mr. ADAMS. Only to the extent that they are one of the employers with

whom I have dealt.

Mr. JENNER. Yes?

Mr. ADAMS. And, in making these referrals, I have found in my short

time with the Commission that it is not too wise to be bound entirely

by the employer's stated requirements. I can best explain this by

saying that as recently as yesterday I referred a young man on an order

which I had had for a week and on which I had made prior referrals of

individuals who, in my opinion, were at least as well-qualified and

certainly made a better appearance and yet this last individual was

the man who was hired. So, when I first determined this, I decided

that I would not certainly make wholesale referrals without regard to

the employer's requirements, but on the other hand, in any case where

I thought the individual was such that the employer might see in him

something that I did not see, I wouldn't take a chance. I would refer

him if I felt he met any or many of the employer's basic requirements.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall any incidents of any others in the agency who

sought to assist Oswald, of which you have any knowledge?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir; subsequent to these incidents, I am aware that

other people in the Commission had talked to Mr. Oswald prior to

November 22d.

Mr. JENNER. But what you have stated is the extent of your contact with

him?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir; to the best of my knowledge.

Mr. JENNER. I take it, and am I correct, that he was not employed or

hired by the Solid State Electronics Co. of Texas on your reference?

Mr. ADAMS. To the best of my knowledge he was not hired on any of the

jobs to which I referred him.

Mr. JENNER. And does the name Trans-Texas stimulate your recollection

as to any possible reference?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir; about--in late October or early November,

Trans-Texas Airways called Mr. Roy----

Mr. JENNER. Who is Mr. Roy?

Mr. ADAMS. He is not the station manager, he is the--I really don't

know what his title is, but anyway, he deals with the people who are

more concerned with servicing the aircraft than with passengers.

Anyway, he advised me that the company was contemplating expansion and

he would need possibly as many as 12 or 14 ramp agents and--as they are

called by the airline industry--we call them baggage, cargo handlers,

and he gave me qualifications, minimum qualifications, to send out

those who met the qualifications.

Mr. JENNER. Was Lee Harvey Oswald one of those you sent out?

Mr. ADAMS. If the record indicates, he was.

Mr. JENNER. But here again you have no recollection beyond what the

record shows?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Do you have any recollection as to salary, for example, as

compared with that that you mentioned--you mentioned some kind of a

figure, with respect to Solid State Electronics Co?

Mr. ADAMS. I think that the going rate of Trans-Texas then was $210 a

month plus overtime.

Mr. JENNER. Did Oswald report on that reference?

Mr. ADAMS. I don't know, sir.

Mr. JENNER. Would it refresh your recollection if I told you that he

did not, and that he became employed by the Texas State Book Depository

on the 16th of October 1963?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir.

Mr. JENNER. The incident to which you refer occurred the latter part of

October or the first part of November, that is with Trans-Texas?

Mr. ADAMS. As best I recall it; yes.

Mr. JENNER. I would like to talk to Mr. Sayre--what is the telephone

number over there?

Mr. ADAMS. It is Riverside 7-2071.

The unfortunate thing about it, as I said, about being a placement

interviewer is that unless there is something outstanding about the

individual or something appears in the record it is just another

applicant.

Mr. JENNER. You interview a good many people every day, day after day,

and unless something strikes you out of the ordinary with respect to a

particular job applicant or unemployed person, that makes it stand out

in your mind, you are unable to sort out or recall specifically?

Mr. ADAMS. Right. I could rattle off the names of half a dozen

applicants who are ex-convicts, alcoholics, or either recovered from

psychiatric treatment or who are presently undergoing psychiatric

treatment, or when I look at their record I see consistent "No hire" or

"Failed to accept employment," but these people will stick with me, but

if I recall, Mr. Oswald had not been registered too long or, beginning

with my contact--my contact with him renewed his relationship with our

placement office. In other words, as I try to visualize his card, I

don't see a whole card full of entries--just a few up at the top.

Mr. JENNER. There is one card for each job applicant?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir; at least.

Mr. JENNER. And if he has been back and forth a couple, of times there

might be more than one card?

Mr. ADAMS. If he was coded. For instance, suppose he said, "I have been

a truck driver for 2 years." I will say, "Fine, you get an additional

code for truck driving," which is a 7 code, and this card, we would

either send with him to the industrial office for placing in their

files, or we would send it--he might say, "I will accept labor work,"

and we would say, "Fine, we will send a card up to Forrest Avenue or

to Irving," whichever is the closest to where he lives or to Dallas

West.

Or, he might say, "I have a degree in Economics," and we would say,

"Good, we will give you an "0" code and send it upstairs to the

professional office." So, conceivably, depending on the individual, he

could have a half a dozen cards.

In addition, if he had been job counseled, they would have a counseling

record.

Fortunately, or unfortunately, the employment commission, the Texas

Employment Commission, and presumably, the other 49 states, is not

in position to do any checking on people. The only way we get any

information, derogatory information, is either through the individual's

disclosing it voluntarily, or through an employer saying, "I sent this

man down for a truth verification test, and he busted it," and then we

would say, "Would you mind telling us what the information was, so that

we may not use this against the individual and try to find out what his

problem is and see if we can't help him with it." He might say, "No; I

don't care to do that," and then we would say, "Does it involve felony

or is it a matter of personality, or what?" And they might say, "There

is something odd about his personality," and we would say, "Thank you."

This is the only way we get any information and, of course, it

sometimes backfires unfortunately. Employers will assume mistakenly

that anybody we send is as pure as the driven snow, and they may or may

not be.

Mr. JENNER. Do you think of anything else at this time that might be

helpful to the Commission in this connection--what I am anxious to get

is the history of this man at the Texas Employment Commission.

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; I believe Mrs. Helen Cunningham counseled him. I

believed she counseled Mr. Oswald.

Mr. JENNER. Is she still employed by the Commission?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes. Mr. Sayre is also her boss.

Mr. JENNER. Maybe I can get both of them over here this afternoon and

take their deposition.

Mr. ADAMS. It is my personal opinion that Mrs. Marguerite Oswald is

more to be pitied than censored, because if she had only taken the kid

to the psychiatrist when they asked her to--of course, this might still

have happened, but then again it might not.

Mr. JENNER. And, of course, in a situation like this, Mr. Adams, there

are all kinds of "ifs": if somebody had done this, if only this had

been done.

Mr. ADAMS. Well, even the little contact that I had with him, I

thought--was there something there I should have noticed and if I start

letting this get on my back, I will start examining every applicant who

comes in--he may be a potential fiend, "I'll have to watch you," and

pretty soon I'll be talking to myself.

Mr. JENNER. Yes; you are always subject to the accusation of being a

meddler. It is pretty hard to say just where the scope of your probing

should go--a reasonable amount of probing should go and where you have

to hold down the gate.

Mr. ADAMS. The first I knew about it was when it came out in the paper

that he had been a claimant.

Mr. JENNER. Yes; for unemployment compensation?

Mr. ADAMS. Right, from this district or Fort Worth, I don't know which

one exactly.

Mr. JENNER. By the way, do you have an office over in Fort Worth?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes.

Mr. JENNER. Do you have an office similar to this one, that is, that

aids persons to obtain employment?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; the State is divided into districts. The Dallas

district is unique in that it encompasses only Dallas County. Out in

West Texas, I guess, the districts encompass maybe 20 or 30 counties.

Mr. JENNER. But Fort Worth's district--who is the general manager there?

Mr. ADAMS. I don't know, sir. I have heard his name, but I can't recall

it.

Mr. JENNER. Do you recall the telephone number?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir; I sure don't. Whenever we have dealings with them

at my level it is simply paperwork. You send a notice to them that we

have these jobs available and employers ask us to start signing out

from Dallas to find--to try to find someone, we'll say, in a 50-mile

radius, or in a 100-mile radius, as the case may be--it's all done by

paper, you see. I'm sure Mr. Sayre would know the people to contact

with them.

Whenever we do uncover any derogatory information, well, anything

which leads us to believe that the applicant is not--does not appear

to be the type of person that we should refer, we have no way--we are

precluded from making any written comment. I would just say, "See Adams

before it is turned over."

Mr. JENNER. And that means if an occasion arises to refer this man

or he makes an inquiry subsequently, then anybody reading the card

realizes that there might be something derogatory or at least something

special, and they should come to you and talk to you about it?

Mr. ADAMS. That's right; for instance, an employer will report that

he thinks an individual is a sex deviate or something of that sort.

Now, in the naivete of the Texas Employment Commission, I have made

an entry, "Employer reports that this individual appears to have

undesirable traits of character," and they say, "Oh, you can't put that

in."

Mr. JENNER. Off the record.

(At this point Counsel Jenner conversed by telephone to Mr. Sayre of

the Texas Employment office.)

Mr. JENNER. He said he turned over those records to the district office

and he is going to run them down for me this afternoon and call me back.

Mr. ADAMS. I remember reading the paper that on account of his having

applied for unemployment compensation, he made a trip to Corpus and

then to Mexico and came back--it was none of my business and I never

did pursue it with the Commission, but if he had nothing to draw on, he

would certainly have applied for his unemployment compensation and it

would have been recorded, whether here, Corpus Christi, or Fort Worth

or where--the Lord only knows--I don't know.

Mr. JENNER. That's all that occurs to me, sir, and I appreciate your

coming in and your help.

Mr. ADAMS. I'm sorry I couldn't be more helpful.

Mr. JENNER. Well, sometimes you people think you are not more helpful,

to use your expression, when, as a fact you are.

Mr. ADAMS. I hope so.

Mr. JENNER. It's hard to tell from your vantage point whether you are

or aren't, but the fact you appear here and tell us what you know is

always helpful. I appreciate it very much.

Mr. ADAMS. I know it is like the intelligence business in the service,

you take all the little pieces and piece them together, and you make a

picture.

Mr. JENNER. You have a right to read your deposition and to sign it, if

you see fit, and you also have the right to waive that privilege if you

wish.

Mr. ADAMS. I would like to see it and I will sign it.

Mr. JENNER. We will have it ready toward the end of this week or early

next week, and if you will call the U.S. attorney, Barefoot Sanders, he

will know whether it is ready for you to read and sign. Thank you very

much, sir.

Mr. ADAMS. Thank you.

Warren Commission (10 of 26): Hearings Vol. X (of 15) · 第 76 / 217 题