CHAPTER II

_THE BORN CRIMINAL AND HIS RELATION TO MORAL INSANITY AND EPILEPSY_

No one, before my father, had ever recognised in the criminal an

abnormal being driven by an irresistible atavistic impulse to commit

anti-social acts, but many had observed (cases of the kind were too

frequent to escape notice) the existence of certain individuals, nearly

always members of degenerate families, who seemed from their earliest

infancy to be prompted by some fatal impulse to do evil to their

fellow-men. They differed from ordinary people, because they hated the

very persons who to normal beings are the nearest and dearest, parents,

husbands, wives, and children, and because their inhuman deeds seemed to

cause them no remorse. These individuals, who were sometimes treated as

lunatics, sometimes as diseased persons, and sometimes as criminals,

were said by the earliest observers to be afflicted with moral

insanity.

_Analogy._ Those who are familiar with all that Pinel, Morel, Richard

Connon, and other great alienists have written on the morally insane

cannot help remarking the analogy, nay identity, of the physical,

intellectual, and moral characteristics of this type of lunatic and

those of the born criminal.

The same physical anomalies already observed in criminals, as described

in the first chapter (cranial deformities, asymmetry, physical and

functional left-handedness, anomalies in the teeth, hands, and feet),

are described by these older writers as being characteristic of the

morally insane, as are also those mental and moral qualities already

noted in the born criminal--vanity, want of affection, cruelty,

idleness, and love of orgies.

Only the analogy of the origin and early manifestations was lacking to

complete the proof of the identity of the two forms. It is true that

moral insanity is more often found in the descendants of insane,

neurotic, or dipsomaniac forebears than in those of criminals, and that

the characteristics are manifested at an earlier age than is the case

with born criminals, but these differences are not of fundamental

importance.

_Cases._ During many years of observation, my father was able to follow

innumerable cases of moral insanity in which perversity was manifested

literally from the cradle, and in which the victims of this disease grew

up into delinquents in no wise distinguishable from born criminals.

A typical instance is that of a certain Rizz... who was brought to him

by the mother because, while still at the breast, he bit his nurse so

viciously that bottle-feeding had to be substituted. At the age of two

years, careful training and medical treatment notwithstanding, this

child was separated from his brothers, because he stuck pins into their

pillows and played dangerous tricks on them. Two years later, he broke

open his father's cash-box and stole money to buy sweets; at six,

although decidedly intelligent, he was expelled from every private

school in the town, because he instigated the others to mischief or

ill-treated them. At fourteen, he seduced a servant and ran away, and at

twenty he killed his fiancee by throwing her out of a window. Thanks to

the testimony of a great many doctors, Rizz... was declared to be

morally insane, but if the family had been poor instead of well-to-do,

and the mother had neglected to have her child examined in infancy by a

medical man, thus obtaining ample proof of the pathological nature of

his perversity, Rizz... would have been condemned as an ordinary

criminal, because, like all morally insane persons, he was very

intelligent and able to reason clearly, like a normal individual.

Another typical case is that of a child named Rav... (see Fig. 12) a

native of the Romagna, who was brought to my father at the age of eight,

because his parents were convinced that his conduct was due to a morbid

condition. Unlike the above-mentioned case, his evil acts were always

carried out in an underhand way. He showed great spite towards his

brothers and sisters, especially the smaller ones, whom he attempted to

strangle on several occasions, and was expelled from school on account

of the bad influence he exercised over his schoolfellows. He delighted

above everything in robbing his parents, employers, and the neighbours

and in falsely accusing others, and so cleverly did he manage this that

he caused a great deal of mischief before his double-dealing was

discovered. When only eight, on leaving home early every morning to go

to work, he would secretly throw all the milk left at the neighbours'

doors into the dust-bin, then he accused the janitor of stealing it and

got him dismissed. A year later, he nearly succeeded in causing the

arrest of a pawnbroker, whom he accused of having lent him money on a

cloak, it being illegal in Italy to accept anything in pawn from a

minor. The cloak, however, was discovered by his mother hidden in the

cellar. At ten years of age, he alleged that his father had brutally

ill-treated him, and as severe marks and bruises on his body gave colour

to the accusation, the poor man was arrested. The marks, however, were

self-inflicted.

Another boy, a certain Man..., a peasant from the Val d'Aosta, an

Alpine valley in Piedmont, where cretinism is indigenous, exhibited

perverse tendencies from his earliest infancy. When twelve years old, he

killed his companion in a squabble over an egg. (See Fig. 13.)

In the above-mentioned cases, the subjects all belonged to well-to-do or

honest families and the pathological heredity was therefore exclusively

nervous, not criminal. For this reason, the parents were struck by the

abnormal depravity of their sons and had them medically examined and

treated, thus discovering that they were morally insane. If, on the

other hand, the parents had been criminals and had, themselves, set a

bad example, nobody would have supposed that these depraved tendencies

were innate in the children or had developed precociously. The fact of

the prevalence of moral insanity in neurotic families (with frequent

cases of lunacy, alcoholism, etc.) rather than in those of criminal

tendencies appears at first sight strange, but according to the new

theory advanced by my father, the criminal is a mentally diseased

person; and we shall see in a later chapter that the heredity of insane,

neurotic, and dipsomaniac parents is completely equivalent to a criminal

heredity.

=FIG. 12

BOY MORALLY INSANE

(see page 55)=

=FIG. 13

BOY MORALLY INSANE

(see page 56)=

_Proofs of Analogy._ Thus the genesis and early manifestations, which

might have been diverse, really constitute a counter-proof. Careful

anamnesis shows that both born criminals and the morally insane begin at

a very early age to exhibit symptoms of the morbid tendencies which make

them such a danger to society, and if the general public and the police,

when such cases are brought to their notice, usually fail to realise

that they arise from precocious perversity, it is because atrocious

actions are excused on the ground of extreme youth and attributed to

this cause rather than to vicious propensities. In many cases, indeed,

they are revealed only to the physician.

A counter-proof is likewise furnished by investigations of the origin of

these pathological cases, since the study of born criminals shows that

they, as well as the morally insane, are as frequently the offspring of

insane, epileptic, neurotic, and drunken parents as of criminals, but in

the latter case, the morbid origin of their perversity is seldom brought

to light owing to the criminality of the parents, who naturally view

with indifference symptoms of vice in their children.

EPILEPTICS, AND THEIR RELATION TO BORN CRIMINALS AND THE MORALLY INSANE

We have already stated that the physical and psychic characteristics of

born criminals coincide with those of the morally insane. Both are

identical with those of another class of degenerates, known to the world

as epileptics.

The term epilepsy was applied to a malady frequently studied but little

understood by the ancient medical world, the chief symptoms of which

were repeated tonic and clonic fits, preceded by the so-called

"epileptic aura" and followed by a deep sleep. It was called _morbus

sacer_ and believed to be of divine origin.

Careful examination of epileptics by clinical and mental experts, showed

that in addition to the characteristic seizure, these unfortunate beings

were subject to other phenomena, which sometimes took the place of the

convulsive fit and in other cases preceded or followed it. These were

_pavor nocturnus_, sudden sweats, heat, neuralgia, sialorrhea,

periodical cephalalgia and, above all, vertigo; and these symptoms were

not always accompanied by unconsciousness nor followed by coma.

Sometimes the seizure was only manifested by paroxysms of rage or

ferocious and brutal impulses (devouring animals alive), which, if

consciously committed, would be considered criminal. This fact led

doctors and mental experts to examine other patients, and they were able

to advance positive proof that a certain number of epileptics never

experience the typical seizure, the disease being manifested in this

milder form with cephalalgia, sialorrhea, delirious ferocity, and above

all, giddiness.

The multiformity of epilepsy has been fully confirmed by the experiments

of Luciani, Zehen, and others, who produced various forms of epilepsy by

submitting different cerebral zones to varying degrees of irritation. By

graduating the electric current, Rosenbach was able to provoke the whole

series of epileptic phenomena described above, from the mildest to the

most serious manifestations. A slight irritation of the motor areas gave

rise to tetanic contractions and clonic convulsions in a given joint; an

increase in the strength of the current produced more violent movements

which spread over the whole limb, and by intensifying the current still

further, to half the body. Finally, on the application of a very strong

current, the typical fit was produced with clonic spasms in all the

body, unconsciousness, nystagmus, and rigidity of the pupils.

By irritating the frontal lobes of dogs, Richet and Bernard produced

vertigo and certain physical phenomena (snuffing, barking, and biting).

Taking these investigations as a basis, Jackson came to the conclusion

that epileptic fits are due to a rapid and excessive explosion of the

grey matter, which, instead of developing its force gradually, develops

it all of a sudden because it is irritated. And as it has been shown

conclusively that the disease can be manifested in such varied

forms--vertigo, twitching of the muscles, sialorrhea, cephalalgia, fits

of rage, and ferocious actions--which appear to be the equivalent of the

typical seizure, individuals subject to these forms of neurosis should

be classed as epileptics, even if they never experience the typical

motor attack.

It is in this category, which may be called attenuated epilepsy, that we

should place criminals, who in addition to the psychic and physical

characteristics of the epileptic, possess others peculiar to themselves.

Physical anomalies (plagiocephaly, microcephaly, macrocephaly,

strabismus, facial and cranial asymmetry, prominent frontal sinuses,

median occipital fossa, receding forehead, projecting ears,

progeneismus, and badly shaped teeth) are characteristic both of

criminals and epileptics, as was demonstrated in certain epileptics

treated by my father (Figs. 14 and 15), and the same holds good of

functional and histological anomalies. The histological anomaly

discovered by Roncoroni in the frontal lobe of born criminals,

consisting of the atrophy of the deep granular layer, the inversion of

the pyramidal layers and small cells with enlargement and rarefaction of

the pyramidal cells, and the existence of nervous cells in the white

substance, is found in about the same proportion in cases of

non-criminal epileptics. We find also in the same proportion in the

field of vision of epileptics, as of born criminals, the anomaly

discovered by Ottolenghi, consisting of peripheral scotoma intersecting

the nearly uniform line of varying size common to normal eyes.

=FIG. 14

AN EPILEPTIC BOY

(see page 60)=

_Psychological Characteristics._ The complete identity of epileptics,

born criminals and the morally insane becomes evident as soon as we

study their psychology.

Epilepsy, congenital criminality, and moral insanity alone are capable

of comprising in one clinical form intellectual divergencies which range

from genius to imbecility. In epileptics, this divergence is sometimes

manifested in one and the same person in the space of twenty-four hours.

An individual at one time afflicted with loss of will-power and amnesia,

and incapable of formulating the simplest notion, will shortly

afterwards give expression to original ideas and reason logically.

Contradictions and exaggerations of sentiment are salient

characteristics of epileptics as of born criminals and the morally

insane. Quarrelsome, suspicious, and cynical individuals suddenly become

gentle, respectful, and affectionate. The cynic expresses religious

sentiments, and the man who has brutally ill-treated his first wife,

kneels before the second. An epileptic observed by Tonnini fancied

himself at times to be Napoleon; at others, he would lick the ground

like the humblest slave.

The extreme excitability manifested by born criminals is shared by

epileptics. Distrustful, intolerant, and incapable of sincere

attachment, a gesture or a look is sufficient to infuriate them and

incite them to the most atrocious deeds.

Epilepsy has a disastrous effect on the character. It destroys the moral

sense, causes irritability, alters the sensations through constant

hallucinations and delusions, deadens the natural feelings or leads them

into morbid channels.

_Affection for Animals._ The hatred frequently manifested by criminals

and epileptics towards the members of their own families is in many

cases accompanied by an extraordinary fondness for animals as is shown

by the cases of Caligula, Commodus, Lacenaire, Rosas, Dr. Francia, and

La Sola,--who preferred kittens to her own children. A morally insane

individual known to my father would spend months in training dogs,

horses, birds, geese, and other fowls. He was wont to remark that all

animals were friendly to him as though they recognised in him one of

their own kind. Dostoyevsky's fellow-convicts showed great fondness for

a horse, an eagle, and a number of geese. They were so attached to a

goat that they wanted to gild its horns.

=FIG. 15

FERNANDO

Epileptic

(see page 60)=

_Somnambulism._ This is a frequent characteristic of epileptics.

Krafft-Ebing says:

"The seizure is often followed by a condition approaching

somnambulism. The patient appears to have recovered consciousness,

talks coherently, behaves in an orderly manner, and resumes his

ordinary occupations. Yet he is not really conscious as is shown by

the fact that, later he is entirely ignorant of what he has been

doing during this stage. This peculiar state of mental daze may

last a long time, sometimes during the whole interval between two

seizures."

Many of the criminals observed by Dostoyevsky were given to

gesticulating and talking agitatedly in their sleep.

Obscenity is a common characteristic. Kowalewsky (_Archivio di

Psichiatria_, 1885) notes the resemblance between the reproductive act

and the epileptic seizure, the tonic tension of the muscles, loss of

consciousness and mydriasis in both cases, and remarks also on the

frequency with which epileptic attacks are accompanied by sexual

propensities.

The desire for sexual indulgence, like the taste for alcohol, is

distinguished by the precocity peculiar to criminals and the morally

insane. Precocious sexual instincts have been observed in children of

four years, and in one case obscenity was manifested by an infant of one

year.

Marro (_Annali di Freniatria_, 1890) describes a child of three years

and ten months, who had exhibited signs of epilepsy from birth and was

of a jealous, irascible disposition. He was in the habit of scratching

and biting his brothers and sisters, knocking over the furniture, hiding

things, and tearing his clothes, and when unable to hurt or annoy

others, would vent his rage upon himself. If punished, he would continue

his misdeeds in an underhand way.

Another child had been afflicted with convulsions from his earliest

infancy, in consequence of which his character deteriorated, and while

still a mere infant, he behaved with the utmost violence. He killed a

cat, attempted to strangle his brother, and to set fire to the house.

Invulnerability, another characteristic common to criminals, has been

observed by Tonnini in epileptics, whose wounds and injuries heal with

astonishing rapidity, and he is inclined to regard this peculiarity in

the light of a reversion to a stage of evolution, at which animals like

lizards and salamanders were able to replace severed joints by new

growths. This invulnerability is shared by all degenerates: epileptics,

imbeciles, and the morally insane.

"One of these latter," says Tonnini, "tore out his moustache bodily and

with it a large piece of skin. In a few days the wound was nearly

healed."

Very characteristic is the almost automatic tendency to destroy animate

and inanimate objects, which results in frequent wounding, suicides, and

homicides. This desire to destroy is also common to children. Fernando P.

(Fig. 15), an epileptic treated by my father, when enraged was in the

habit of smashing all the furniture within his reach and throwing the

pieces over a wall some twenty-five feet high.

Misdea, a regimental barber, to whom we shall refer later, roused to

fury by dismissal from his post, broke four razors into small pieces

with his teeth. Another epileptic, Piz... used to break all the

crockery in his cell regularly every other day, "just to give vent to

his feelings."

This tendency to destroy everything in the cell is common also to

ordinary criminals.

_Cases of Moral Insanity with Latent Epileptic Phenomena._ The following

cases, which were treated by my father and which were subject to

careful observation and study, will serve to give a clear idea of the

criminal form of epilepsy.

Subject: Giuliano Celestino, age 16. Yellow skin abundantly tattooed,

absence of hair on face or body. Cranium: plagiocephaly on the left

frontal and right parietal regions, obliquely-placed eyes, narrow

forehead, prominent orbital arches, line of the mouth horizontal as in

apes, lateral incisors of upper jaw resembling the canines with rugged

margins, excessive zygomatic and maxillary development, tactile

sensibility very obtuse, dolorific sensibility non-existent on the

right, very obtuse on the left, rotular reflex action exaggerated on the

right, very feeble on the left. Devoid of natural feeling. When asked if

he was fond of his mother, he replied: "When she brings me cigars and

money." When questioned concerning his crimes he showed neither shame

nor confusion. On the contrary, he confessed with a smile that when only

ten he had tried to kill his youngest brother, who was then an infant in

the cradle, and when hindered by his mother, had struck and bitten her.

His father was a drunkard afflicted with syphilis, and Giuliano had

suffered from epilepsy from the age of seven. At this age he began to

indulge in alcohol and self-abuse, and stole from his parents in order

to buy sweets. He appears to have been subject to an ambulatory mania,

which caused him to wander aimlessly about the country, and if kept

within doors he would let himself down from the windows, climb up the

chimney, or, failing in these attempts to escape, would break the

furniture and attract the attention of the neighbours by his terrific

yells. From the age of eight, despite his parents' efforts to apprentice

him, he was always immediately dismissed by his employers. He ran away

with a strolling company of acrobats, and later apprenticed himself to a

butcher in order to revel in the horrors of the slaughter-house. At

fifteen he was confined in a reformatory, where he twice attempted to

escape and to set fire to the building, and was sentenced to two years'

imprisonment. For the space of a few days, he appears to have suffered

from epileptic attacks, although in a masked form, accompanied by

various attempts at suicide. These were renewed every other month for a

whole year. When asked what he would do for a living when released, he

would reply laughingly that there was plenty of money in other people's

pockets.

L... a morally insane subject, age 16, native of Turin, the son of an

aged, but extremely respectable man. Height 1.50 m., weight, 46.2 kg.,

with abundant hair, and down on the forehead, incisors crowded

together, excessive development of the canines, and exaggerated orbital

angle of the frontal bone. He was entirely devoid of affection for his

family, remarking cynically that he was fond of his father when he gave

him money and did not worry him. Sometimes he kicked the poor old man

and otherwise abused him. When unable to obtain money, he would smash

all the furniture in the house, until, for the sake of economy, his

family gave him what he wanted. In order to get a five-pound note from

money-lenders he would sign promissory notes for ten times that amount.

He changed his ideas from one hour to another. Sometimes he wanted to

enter the army, at others to emigrate to France, etc. When only fourteen

he frequented houses of ill-fame, where he played the bully.

Although this case may be regarded as a typical instance of moral

insanity, there were apparently no symptoms of vertigo or convulsions.

At the age of sixteen, however, while suffering from rheumatism, this

subject tried to throw himself from the balcony of his bedroom at the

same hour three nights running. After this he seems to have suffered

from amnesia.

These frenzied attempts at self-destruction, which seem to have taken

the place of the epileptic seizure, were related to my father casually

by the boy's mother; but in other cases, similar incidents, although of

the utmost importance to the criminologist, often pass unnoticed.

In the _Actes du Congres d'Anthropologie_, Angelucci describes another

typical case of epileptic moral insanity. E. G. (brother a criminal

epileptic, father a sufferer from cancer) was sentenced several times

for assaulting people often without motive. Tattooed with the figure of

a naked woman, microcephalous (39.2 cubic inches = 589 c.c.), having

cranial and facial asymmetry, he was vain, deceitful, and violent, and

made great show of scepticism although he wore a great many medals of

the Virgin. This subject was over twenty-five when the first epileptic

seizure took place.

The connection between epilepsy and crime is one of derivation rather

than identity. Epilepsy represents the genus of which criminality and

moral insanity are the species.

The born criminal is an epileptic, inasmuch as he possesses the

anatomical, skeletal, physiognomical, psychological, and moral

characteristics peculiar to the recognised form of epilepsy, and

sometimes also its motorial phenomena, although at rare intervals. More

frequently he exhibits its substitutes (vertigo, twitching, sialorrhea,

emotional attacks). But the criminal epileptic possesses other

characteristics peculiar to himself; in particular, that desire of evil

for its own sake, which is unknown to ordinary epileptics. In view of

this fact this form of epilepsy must be considered apart from the purely

nervous anomaly, both in the clinical diagnosis and the methods of cure

and social prophylaxis.

Moreover, the nervous anomaly, which in the case of criminals appears on

the scene from time to time, accentuating the criminal tendency till it

reaches the atavistic form and producing morbid complications which

sometimes prove fatal, serves to point out the true nature of the

disease and to emphasise the fact that while it is attenuated so far as

motor attacks are concerned, it is aggravated on the other hand by

criminal impulses, which render the patient semi-immune and permit him a

longer and less troubled existence, but provoke a constant brain

irritation, which clouds and disturbs his intellectual and moral nature.

In order better to understand these two forms of epilepsy, we must

recall two analogous forms of another and equally multiform disease,

tuberculosis in its forms of quick consumption and scrofula. The

etiology is identical and the symptoms frequently alike, but while the

latter proceeds very slowly and allows the patient a long life, the

former is rapid and severs life in its prime.

In motory epilepsy, the irritation is manifested on a sudden, but leaves

the mind healthy in the interval, although the attacks may lead to rapid

dementia. In criminal epilepsy this irritation does not break out in

violent seizures and is compatible with a long life, but it changes the

whole physical and psychic complexion of the individual.

The epileptic origin of criminality explains many characteristics of the

criminal, the genesis of which was previously obscure. Many of the moral

and physical peculiarities of born criminals and the morally insane may

be classed as professional characteristics acquired through the habit of

evil-doing, especially the naso-labial and zygomatic wrinkles, cynical

expression, tapering fingers, etc. Many anomalies also in the bones,

hair, ears, eyes, and the monstrous development of the jaws and teeth,

must be explained by arrested development in the fifth or sixth month of

ultra-uterine existence, corresponding to the characteristics of

inferior races by the usual law of ontogeny which recapitulates

phylogeny. But there is a final series of anomalies, the origin of which

was formerly wrapped in mystery: plagiocephaly, sclerosis, the

thickening of the meninges, cranial asymmetry, and other changes in the

cerebral layers, which can be explained only by a disease altering

precociously the whole cerebral conformation, as is exactly the case in

epilepsy.

The born criminal is an epileptic, not however afflicted with the common

form of this disease, but with a special kind. The pathological basis,

the etiology, and the anatomical and psychological characteristics are

identical, but there are many differences. While in the ordinary form

motor anomalies are very common, in the criminal form they are very

rare, while in ordinary epilepsy the mental explosions are accompanied

by unconsciousness, in the other form they are weakened and spread over

the whole existence, and consciousness is, relatively speaking,

preserved; and while, finally, the ordinary epileptic has not always the

tendency to do evil for its own sake--nay, may even achieve holiness--in

the hidden form the bent towards evil endures from birth to death. The

perversity concentrated in one second in the motor attack, is attenuated

in the second form, but spread over the whole existence. We have

therefore an epilepsy _sui generis_, a variety of epilepsy which may be

called criminal.

Thus the primitive idea of crime has become organic and complete. The

criminal is only a diseased person, an epileptic, in whom the cerebral

malady, begun in some cases during prenatal existence, or later, in

consequence of some infection or cerebral poisoning, produces, together

with certain signs of physical degeneration in the skull, face, teeth,

and brain, a return to the early brutal egotism natural to primitive

races, which manifests itself in homicide, theft, and other crimes.

Criminal Man, According to the Classification of Cesare Lombroso · 第 2 / 6 章