The hardness of the Jesuits therefore surpasses that of the Jews,

since those refused to believe Jesus Christ innocent only because

they doubted if his miracles were of God. But on the contrary, though

the Jesuits cannot doubt that the Port Royal miracles were of God,

they still continue to doubt the innocency of that house.

Men never commit evil so fully and so gaily as when they do so for

conscience sake.

Experience shows us a vast difference between devoutness and goodness.

The two contrary reasons. We must begin with that; without that we

understand nothing and all is heretical; in the same way we must

even add at the close of each truth that the opposite truth is to be

remembered.

If there was ever a time in which it were necessary to make

profession of two contraries, it is when we are reproached for

omitting one. Therefore the Jesuits and the Jansenists are wrong in

concealing them, but the Jansenists most, for the Jesuits have better

made profession of the two.

M. de Condran. There is, he says, no comparison between the union

of the saints and that of the Holy Trinity. Jesus Christ says the

opposite.

That we have treated them as kindly as is possible while keeping

ourselves in the mean, between the love of truth and the duty of

charity.

That piety does not consist in never opposing our brethren, it would

be very easy, etc.

It is false piety to keep peace to the prejudice of the truth. It is

also false zeal to keep truth and wound charity.

Neither have they complained.

Their maxims have their time and place.

He will be condemned indeed who is so by Escobar.

Their vanity tends to grow out of their errors.

Conformed to the fathers by their faults, and to the martyrs by their

sufferings.

Moreover they do not disavow any of....

They had only to take the passage, and disavow it.

_Sanctificavi prælium._

M. Bourseys. At least they cannot disavow that they are opposed to

the condemnation.

I have re-read them since, for I had not known them....

The world must be blind indeed if it believe you.

If men knew themselves, God would heal and pardon. _Ne convertantur,

et sanem eos, et dimittantur eis peccata._ Isaiah. Matt. xiii.

Truth is so obscure in these days, and falsehood so established, that

unless we love the truth we shall be unable to know it.

As Jesus Christ remained unknown among men, so his truth remains

among ordinary opinions without external difference. Thus the

Eucharist among ordinary bread. All faith consists in Jesus Christ

and in Adam, and all morals in lust and in grace.

"I have reserved me seven thousand." I love the worshippers unknown

to the world and even to the prophets.

To trust in forms is superstition, but to refuse to submit to forms

is pride.

As peace in States has for its sole object the safe preservation

of the property of the people, so the peace of the Church has for

its sole object the safe preservation of truth, her property and

the treasure where her heart is. And as to allow the enemy to enter

into a State, and pillage without opposition, for fear of troubling

repose, would be to work against the good of peace, because peace,

being only just and useful for the security of property, it becomes

unjust and harmful when it suffers property to be destroyed, while

war in the defence of property becomes just and necessary. So in the

Church, when truth is assailed by the enemies of faith, when men

would tear it from the heart of the faithful, and cause error to

reign there, to remain in peace is rather to betray than to serve

the Church, to ruin rather than defend. And as it is plainly a crime

to trouble peace where truth reigns, so is it also a crime to rest

in peace when truth is destroyed. There is then a time when peace is

just, and another when it is unjust. And it is written that there

is a time for peace and a time for war, and it is the interest of

truth to discern them. But there is not a time for truth and a time

for error, and it is written, on the contrary, that the truth of God

abideth for ever; and this is why Jesus Christ, who said that he came

to bring peace, said also that he came to bring war. But he did not

say that he came to bring both truth and falsehood. Truth is then the

first rule and the ultimate end of things.

As the two principal interests of the Church are the preservation

of the piety of the faithful and the conversion of heretics, we are

overwhelmed with grief at the sight of factions now arising, to

introduce those errors which more than any others may close for ever

against heretics the entrance into our communion, and fatally corrupt

those pious and catholic persons who remain to us. This enterprise,

made at the present day so openly against those truths of Religion

most important for salvation, fills us not only with displeasure, but

also with fear and even terror, because, besides the feeling which

every Christian must have of these disorders, we have further an

obligation to remedy them, and to employ the authority which God has

given, to cause that the peoples which he has committed to us, etc.

We must let heretics know, who gain advantage from the doctrine of

the Jesuits, that it is not that of the Church ... the doctrine of

the Church, and that our divisions separate us not from the altar.

They hide themselves in the crowd, and call numbers to their aid.

Tumult.

In corrupting the bishops and the Sorbonne, if they have not had the

advantage of making their judgment just, they have had that of making

their judges unjust. And thus, when in future they are condemned,

they will say _ad hominem_ that they are unjust, and thus will refute

their judgment. But that does no good. For as they cannot conclude

that the Jansenists are rightly condemned because they are condemned,

so they cannot conclude then that they themselves will be wrongly

condemned because they will be so by corruptible judges. For their

condemnation will be just, not because it will be given by judges

always just, but by judges just in that particular, which will be

shown by other proofs.

These are the effects of the sins of the peoples and of the Jesuits,

great men have wished to be flattered, the Jesuits have wished to be

loved by the great. They have all been worthy to be given up to the

spirit of lying, the one party to deceive, the others to be deceived.

They have been greedy, ambitious, pleasure loving: _Coacervabunt tibi

magistros_.

_The Jesuits._

The Jesuits have wished to unite God and the world, and have gained

only the scorn of God and the world. For, on the side of conscience

this is plain, and on the side of the world they are not good

partisans. They have power, as I have often said, but that is in

regard to other religious. They will have interest enough to get a

chapel built, and to have a jubilee station, not to make appointments

to bishoprics and government offices. The position of a monk in

the world is a most foolish one, and that they hold by their own

declaration.--Father Brisacier, the Benedictines.--Yet ... you yield

to those more powerful than yourselves, and oppress with all your

little credit those who have less power for intrigue in the world

than you.

_Venice._--What advantage will you draw from it, except the princes'

need of it, and the horror the nations have had of it. If these had

asked you and, in order to obtain it, had implored the assistance of

all Christian princes, you might have boasted of this importunity.

But not that during fifty years all the princes have exerted

themselves for it in vain, and that it required such a pressing need

to obtain it

If by differing we condemned, you would be right. Uniformity without

diversity is useless to others, diversity without uniformity is

ruinous for us. The one injures us without; the other within.

We ought to hear both parties, and on this point I have been careful.

When we have heard only one party we are always on that side, but

the adverse party makes us change, whereas in this case the Jesuit

confirms us.

Not what they do, but what they say.

They cry out against me only. I am content I know whom to blame for

it.

Jesus Christ was a stone of stumbling.

Condemnable, condemned.

Jesus Christ never condemned without a bearing. To Judas: _Amice, ad

quid venisti_? To him who had not on the wedding garment, the same.

Unless they give up probability their good maxims are as little holy

as the bad. For they are founded on human authority, and thus if they

are more just they will be more reasonable, but not more holy, they

take after the wild stock on which they are graffed.

If what I say serves not to enlighten you, it will aid the

people.--If these hold their peace, the stones will cry out.

Silence is the greatest persecution; the saints never held their

peace. It is true that a vocation is needed, it is not from the

decrees of the Council that we must learn whether we are called, but

from the compulsion to speak. Now after Rome has spoken, and we

think that she has condemned the truth, and they have written it,

and the books which have said the contrary are censured; we must cry

so much the louder the more unjustly we are censured, and the more

violently they try to stifle speech, until there come a pope who

listens to both sides, and who consults antiquity to do justice.

So good popes will find the Church still in an uproar.

The Inquisition and the Society are the two scourges of the truth.

Why do you not accuse them of Arianism? For if they have said that

Jesus Christ is God, perhaps it is not with a natural meaning, but as

it is said: _Dii estis_.

If my Letters are condemned at Rome, what I condemn in them is

condemned in heaven.

_Ad tuum, Domine Jesu, tribunal appello._

You are yourselves corruptible.

I feared that I had written ill when I saw myself condemned, but the

example of so many pious writings makes me believe the contrary.

Good writing is no longer permitted, so corrupt or ignorant is the

Inquisition.

It is better to obey God than men.

I have neither fear nor hope. Not so the bishops. Port Royal fears,

and it is a bad policy to dissolve the community, for they will fear

no longer and will inspire greater fear.

I fear not even your censures, ... if they be not founded on those of

tradition.

Do you censure all? What, even my respect?--No.--Say then, what it

is, or you will do nothing, since you do not point out the evil, and

why it is evil. And this is what they will have some trouble to do.

Unjust persecutors of those whom God visibly protects.

If they reproach you with your excesses they speak as do the heretics.

If they say that the grace of Jesus Christ separates us, they are

heretics.

If miracles are wrought, it is the mark of their heresy.

Ezekiel,

They say, these are the people of God who thus speak.

Hezekiah,

My reverend father, all this was done in figures. Other religions

perish, this one perishes not.

Miracles are more important than you think, they have served for the

foundation, and will serve for the continuance of the Church till the

coming of Antichrist, till the end.

The two witnesses.

In the Old Testament and the New, miracles are wrought in connection

with types. Salvation or an useless thing, if not to show that we

must submit to the creature.--Figure of the sacraments.

The synagogue was a figure and so it perished not, and it was only

the figure and so it has perished. It was a figure which contained

the truth, and so it subsisted till it contained the truth no longer.

The exaggerated notion which you have of the importance of your

society has made you establish these horrible ways. It is very plain

that it has made you follow the way of slander, since you blame in

me as horrible the same impostures which you excuse in yourselves,

because you regard me as a private person, and yourselves as _imago_.

It plainly appears that your praises are follies, by those which are

crazy, as the privilege of the uncondemned.

Is this giving courage to your children to condemn them when they

serve the Church?

It is an artifice of the devil to turn in another direction the arms

with which these people used to combat heresies.

You are bad politicians.

The history of the man born blind.

What says Saint Paul? Does he constantly speak of the bearing of

prophecies? No, but of his miracles.

What says Jesus Christ? Does he expound the bearing of the

prophecies? No, his death had not fulfilled them; but he says, si non

fecissem: believe the works.

_Si non fecissem quæ alius non fecit._

These wretches who have obliged us to speak of miracles!

Abraham and Gideon confirmed faith by miracles.

There are two supernatural foundations of our wholly supernatural

Religion, the one visible, the other invisible.

Miracles with grace, miracles without grace.

The synagogue, which has been treated with love as a figure of the

Church, and with hatred because it was only the figure, has been

restored, being about to fall when it was well with God, and thus a

figure.

The miracles prove the power which God has over hearts by that which

he exercises over the body.

The Church has never approved a miracle among heretics.

Miracles are a support of religion. They have been the test of Jews,

of Christians, of saints, of innocents, and of true believers.

A miracle among schismatics is not much to be feared, for schism

which is more evident than miracle, evidently marks their error; but

when there is no schism, and error is in question, miracle is the

test.

Judith. God speaks at length in their extreme oppression.

If because charity has grown cold the Church is left almost without

true worshippers, miracles will raise them up.

This is one of the last effects of grace.

If only a miracle were wrought among the Jesuits!

When a miracle deceives the expectation of those in whose presence

it occurs, and when there is a disproportion between the state of

their faith and the instrument of the miracle it must lead them to

change; but with you it is the opposite. There would be as much

reason in saying that if the Eucharist raised a dead man one ought

to turn Calvinist rather than remain a Catholic. But when he crowns

the expectation, and those who have hoped that God would bless the

remedies see themselves cured without remedies....

_The wicked._--No sign was ever given on the part of the devil

without a stronger sign on the part of God, at least unless it were

foretold that this would be so.

These nuns, amazed at what is said, that they are in the way of

perdition, that their confessors are leading them to Geneva, and

teach them Jesus Christ is not in the Eucharist, nor on the right

hand of the Father, know all this to be false, and offer then

themselves to God in that state. _Vide si via iniquitatis in me est._

What happens thereupon? The place, which is said to be the temple of

the devil, God makes his own temple. It is said that the children

must be taken away, God heals them there. It is said to be hell's

arsenal, God makes of it the sanctuary of his graces. Lastly, they

are threatened with all the furies and all the vengeance of heaven,

and God loads them with favours. Those must have lost their senses,

who therefore believe them in the way of perdition.--_We have,

without doubt, the same tokens as Saint Athanasius._--

The five propositions were equivocal; they are so no longer.

With so many other signs of piety they have that of persecution also,

which is the best mark of piety.

By showing the truth we gain belief for it, but by showing the

injustice of ministers, we do not correct it. Conscience is made

secure by a demonstration of falsehood; our purse is not made secure

by the demonstration of injustice.

Miracles and truth are both needful, as we have to convince the whole

man, body and soul alike.

It is good that their deeds should be unjust, for fear it should not

appear that the Molinists have acted justly. Thus there is no need to

spare them, they are worthy to commit them.

_The Church, the Pope._--Unity, plurality. Considering the Church as

unity, the pope its head, is as the whole; considered as plurality,

the pope is only a part of it. The Fathers have considered the Church

now in this way, now in that, and thus they have spoken in divers

ways of the pope.

Saint Cyprian, _sacerdos Dei_.

But in establishing one of these two truths, they have not excluded

the other.

Plurality which cannot be reduced to unity is confusion. Unity which

depends not on plurality is tyranny.

There is scarce any where left but France in which it is allowable to

say that a council is below the pope.

We may not judge of what the pope is by some words of the Fathers--as

the Greeks said in a council, important rules--but by the acts of the

Church and the Fathers, and by the canons.

Unity and plurality: _Duo aut tres in unum_. It is an error to

exclude one of the two, as the papists do who exclude plurality, or

the Huguenots who exclude unity.

The pope is chief, who else is known of all, who else is recognised

by all? Having power to insinuate himself into all the body, because

he holds the leading shoot, which extends itself everywhere.

How easy to cause this to degenerate into tyranny. This is why Jesus

Christ has laid down for them this precept: _Vos autem non sic_.

God works not miracles in the ordinary conduct of his Church. It

would be a strange miracle, did infallibility reside in one, but that

it should dwell in a multitude appears so natural that the ways of

God are concealed under nature, as all his other works.

Men desire certainty, they like the pope to be infallible in faith,

grave doctors to be infallible in morals, in order to have certainty.

The pope hates and fears men of science, who are not at once

submissive to him.

Kings are masters of their own power, not so the popes.

Whenever the Jesuits take the pope unawares, they will make all

Christendom perjured.

It is very easy to take the pope unawares, because of his

occupations, and the trust which he has in the Jesuits, and the

Jesuits are very capable of taking him unawares by means of calumny.

The five propositions condemned, yet no miracle, for truth was not

attacked, but the Sorbonne and the bull.

It is impossible that those who love God with all their heart, should

misunderstand the Church, which is so evident.

It is impossible that those who love not God should be convinced of

the Church.

Let us look to the discourses on the 2nd, 4th, and 5th of the

Jansenist. They are lofty and grave.

We would not make a friend of either.

The ear only is consulted because the heart is wanting.

Beauty of omission, of judgment.

The rule is that of honourable conduct.

Poet and not honourable man.

These men want heart.

We would not make a friend of him.

For this name of honourable man.

_Canonical._--The heretical books in the early age of the Church

serve to prove the canonical.

_Heretics._--Ezekiel. All the heathens spake evil of Israel, and the

Prophet did the same, yet the Israelites were so far from having a

right to say to him, "You speak as the heathen," that he made it his

strongest point that the heathens said the same as he.

Those are feeble souls who know the truth, and uphold it only so far

as their interest is concerned, but beyond that abandon it.

Annat. He makes the disciple without ignorance, and the master

without presumption.

There is such great disproportion between the merit which he thinks

he has and his stupidity, that it is hard to believe he mistakes

himself so completely.

And will this one scorn the other?

Who should scorn? Yet he scorns not the other, but pities him.

Port Royal is surely as good as Voltigerod.

So far as your proceeding is just according to this bias, so far is

it unjust on the side of Christian piety.

_Montalte._--Lax opinions are so pleasing to men, that it is strange

that theirs displease. It is because they have exceeded all bounds;

and more, there are many persons who see the truth, yet cannot attain

to it; but there are few who do not know that the purity of religion

is contrary to our corruptions. It is absurd to say that eternal

reward is offered to the morals of Escobar.

But is it _probable_ that _probability_ gives certainty?--Difference

between rest and security of conscience. Nothing but truth gives

certainty. Nothing gives rest but a sincere search after truth.

_Probability._ They have oddly explained certainty, for after having

established that all their ways are sure, they no longer call that

sure which leads to heaven without danger of not arriving thereby,

but that which leads there without danger of going out of the road.

Now probability is necessary for the other maxims, as for that of the

friend and the slanderer.

_A fructibus eorum_, judge of their faith by their morals.

Probability is little without corrupt means, and means are nothing

without probability.

There is pleasure in being able to do good, and in knowing how to do

good, _scire et posse_. Grace and probability give this pleasure, for

we can render our account to God in reliance upon their authors.

_Probability._

Everyone can impose it, none can take it away.

_Probable._--If as bad reasons as these are probable, all would be so.

1. Reason. _Dominus actuum conjugalium._ Molina.

2. Reason. _Non potest compensari._ Lessius.

To oppose not with holy, but with abominable maxims.

They reason as those who prove that it is night at midday.

Bauny, the burner of barns.

... The Council of Trent for priests in mortal sin: _quam primum_....

_Probable._--Let us see if we seek God sincerely, by the comparison

of things we love.

It is probable that this meat will not poison me.

It is probable that I shall not lose my law suit if I do not bring it.

If it were true that grave authors and reasons would suffice, I say

that they are neither grave nor reasonable. What! a husband may

make profit of his wife according to Molina. Is the reason he gives

reasonable, and the contrary one of Lessius reasonable also?

Would you dare thus to trifle with the edicts of the King, as by

saying that to go for a walk in a field and wait for a man is not to

fight a duel;

That the Church has indeed forbidden duelling, but not taking a walk?

And usury too, but not....

And simony, but not....

And vengeance, but not....

And unnatural crime, but not....

And _quam primum_, but not....

Take away _probability_, and you can no longer please the world, give

_probability_, and you can no longer displease it.

_Universal._--Morals and language are special but universal sciences.

_Probability._--The zeal of the saints to seek the truth, was useless

if the probable is certain.

The fear of the saints who have always followed the surest way.

Saint Theresa having always followed her confessor.

_Probability._--They have some true principles, but they abuse them.

Now the abuse of truth should be as much punished as the introduction

of falsehood.

As if there were two hells, one for sins against charity, the other

for sins against justice.

Men who do not keep their word, without faith, without honour,

without truth, double hearted, double tongued, like the reproach once

flung at that amphibious creature in the fable, who kept itself in a

doubtful position between the fish and the birds.

It is of importance to kings and princes to be supposed pious, and

therefore they must take you for their confessors.

_State super vias et interrogate de semitis antiquis, et ambulate

in eis. Et dixerunt: Non ambulabimus, sed post cogitationem nostram

ibimus._ They have said to the nations: Come to us, we will follow

the opinions of the new authors, reason shall be our guide, we

will be as the other nations who follow each their natural light.

Philosophers have....

All religions and sects in the world have had natural reason for a

guide. Christians alone have been obliged to take their rules from

without themselves, and to acquaint themselves with those which Jesus

Christ left to men of old time to be transmitted to the faithful.

This constraint is wearisome to these good fathers. They desire like

the rest of the world to have liberty to follow their imaginations.

In vain we cry to them, as the prophets to the Jews of old: "Enter

into the Church, enquire of the ways which men of old have left to

her, and follow those paths." They have answered, as did the Jews,

"We will not walk in them, but we will follow the thoughts of our

hearts;" and they have said, "We will be as the nations round about

us."

Can it be any thing but the desire to please the world which makes

you find things probable? Will you make us believe that it is truth,

and that if duelling were not the fashion, you would find it probable

they might fight, looking at the matter in itself?

The Thoughts of Blaise Pascal · 第 20 / 26 段