Schlegel, the most eloquent of critics, concludes his remarks on King

Lear with these words: "Of the heavenly beauty of soul of Cordelia, I

will not venture to speak." Now if I attempt what Schlegel and others

have left undone, it is because I feel that this general acknowledgment

of her excellence can neither satisfy those who have studied the

character, nor convey a just conception of it to the mere reader. Amid

the awful, the overpowering interest of the story, amid the terrible

convulsions of passion and suffering, and pictures of moral and physical

wretchedness which harrow up the soul, the tender influence of Cordelia,

like that of a celestial visitant, is felt and acknowledged without

being quite understood. Like a soft star that shines for a moment from

behind a stormy cloud and the next is swallowed up in tempest and

darkness, the impression it leaves is beautiful and deep,--but vague.

Speak of Cordelia to a critic or to a general reader, all agree in the

beauty of the portrait, for all must feel it; but when we come to

details, I have heard more various and opposite opinions relative to her

than any other of Shakspeare's characters--a proof of what I have

advanced in the first instance, that from the simplicity with which the

character is dramatically treated, and the small space it occupies, few

are aware of its internal power, or its wonderful depth of purpose.

It appears to me that the whole character rests upon the two sublimest

principles of human action, the love of truth and the sense of duty; but

these, when they stand alone, (as in the Antigone,) are apt to strike us

as severe and cold. Shakspeare has, therefore, wreathed them round with

the dearest attributes of our feminine nature, the power of feeling and

inspiring affection. The first part of the play shows us how Cordelia is

loved, the second part how she can love. To her father she is the object

of a secret preference, his agony at her supposed unkindness draws from

him the confession, that he had loved her most, and "thought to set his

rest on her kind nursery." Till then she had been "his best object, the

argument of his praise, balm of his age, most best, most dearest!" The

faithful and worthy Kent is ready to brave death and exile in her

defence: and afterwards a farther impression of her benign sweetness is

conveyed in a simple and beautiful manner, when we are told that "since

the lady Cordelia went to France, her father's poor fool had much pined

away." We have her sensibility "when patience and sorrow strove which

should express her goodliest:" and all her filial tenderness when she

commits her poor father to the care of the physician, when she hangs

over him as he is sleeping, and kisses him as she contemplates the wreck

of grief and majesty.

O my dear father! restoration hang

Its medicine on my lips: and let this kiss

Repair those violent harms that my two sisters

Have in thy reverence made!

Had you not been their father, these white flakes

Had challenged pity of them! Was this a face

To be exposed against the warring winds,

To stand against the deep dread-bolted thunder

In the most terrible and nimble stroke

Of quick cross lightning? to watch, (poor perdu!)

With thin helm? mine enemy's dog,

Though he had bit me, should have stood that night

Against my fire.

Her mild magnanimity shines out in her farewell to her sisters, of whose

real character she is perfectly aware:--

Ye jewels of our father! with washed eyes

Cordelia leaves you! I know ye what ye are,

And like a sister, am most loath to call

Your faults as they are nam'd. Use well our father,

To your professed bosoms I commit him.

But yet, alas! stood I within his grace,

I would commend him to a better place;

So farewell to you both.

GONERIL.

Prescribe not us our duties!

The modest pride with which she replies to the Duke of Burgundy is

admirable; this whole passage is too illustrative of the peculiar

character of Cordelia, as well as too exquisite, to be mutilated

I yet beseech your majesty,

(If, for I want that glib and oily heart,

To speak and purpose not, since what I well intend

I'll do't before I speak,) that you make known,

It is no vicious blot, murder, or foulness,

No unchaste action, or dishonored step

That hath deprived me of your grace and favor;

But even for want of that, for which I am richer;

A still soliciting eye, and such a tongue

I am glad I have not, tho' not to have it

Hath lost me in your liking.

LEAR.

Better thou

Hadst not been born, than not to have pleased me better.

FRANCE.

Is it but this? a tardiness of nature,

That often leaves the history unspoke

Which it intends to do?--My lord of Burgundy,

What say you to the lady? love is not love

When it is mingled with respects that stand

Aloof from the entire point. Will you have her?

She is herself a dowry.

BURGUNDY.

Royal Lear,

Give but that portion which yourself proposed,

And here I take Cordelia by the hand

Duchess of Burgundy.

LEAR.

Nothing: I have sworn; I am firm.

BURGUNDY.

I am sorry, then, you have lost a father

That you must lose a husband.

CORDELIA.

Peace be with Burgundy!

Since that respects of fortune are his love,

I shall not be his wife.

FRANCE.

Fairest Cordelia! thou art more rich, being poor,

Most choice, forsaken, and most lov'd, despised!

Thee and thy virtues here I seize upon.

She takes up arms, "not for ambition, but a dear father's right." In her

speech after her defeat, we have a calm fortitude and elevation of soul,

arising from the consciousness of duty, and lifting her above all

consideration of self. She observes,--

We are not the first

Who with best meaning have incurred the worst!

She thinks and fears only for her father.

For thee, oppressed king, am I cast down;

Myself would else out-frown false fortune's frown.

To complete the picture, her very voice is characteristic, "ever soft,

gentle, and low; an excellent thing in woman."

But it will be said, that the qualities here exemplified--as

sensibility, gentleness, magnanimity, fortitude, generous affection--are

qualities which belong, in their perfection, to others of Shakspeare's

characters--to Imogen, for instance, who unites them all; and yet Imogen

and Cordelia are wholly unlike each other. Even though we should reverse

their situations, and give to Imogen the filial devotion of Cordelia,

and to Cordelia the conjugal virtues of Imogen, still they would remain

perfectly distinct as women. What is it, then, which lends to Cordelia

that peculiar and individual truth of character, which distinguishes her

from every other human being?

It is a natural reserve, a tardiness of disposition, "which often leaves

the history unspoke which it intends to do;" a subdued quietness of

deportment and expression, a veiled shyness thrown over all her

emotions, her language and her manner; making the outward demonstration

invariably fall short of what we know to be the feeling within. Not only

is the portrait singularly beautiful and interesting in itself, but the

conduct of Cordelia, and the part which she bears in the beginning of

the story, is rendered consistent and natural by the wonderful truth and

delicacy with which this peculiar disposition is sustained throughout

the play.

In early youth, and more particularly if we are gifted with a lively

imagination, such a character as that of Cordelia is calculated above

every other to impress and captivate us. Any thing like mystery, any

thing withheld or withdrawn from our notice, seizes on our fancy by

awakening our curiosity. Then we are won more by what we half perceive

and half create, than by what is openly expressed and freely bestowed.

But this feeling is a part of our young life: when time and years have

chilled us, when we can no longer afford to send our souls abroad, nor

from our own superfluity of life and sensibility spare the materials out

of which we build a shrine for our idol--then do we seek, we ask, we

thirst for that warmth of frank, confiding tenderness, which revives in

us the withered affections and feelings, buried but not dead. Then the

excess of love is welcomed, not repelled: it is gracious to us as the

sun and dew to the seared and riven trunk, with its few green leaves.

Lear is old--"fourscore and upward"--but we see what he has been in

former days: the ardent passions of youth have turned to rashness and

wilfulness: he is long passed that age when we are more blessed in what

we bestow than in what we receive. When he says to his daughters, "I

gave ye all!" we feel that he requires all in return, with a jealous,

restless, exacting affection which defeats its own wishes. How many such

are there in the world! How many to sympathize with the fiery, fond old

man, when he shrinks as if petrified from Cordelia's quiet calm reply!

LEAR.

Now our joy,

Although the last not least--

What can you say to draw

A third more opulent than your sisters'? Speak!

CORDELIA.

Nothing, my lord.

LEAR.

Nothing!

CORDELIA.

Nothing.

LEAR.

Nothing can come of nothing: speak again!

CORDELIA.

Unhappy that I am! I cannot heave

My heart into my mouth: I love your majesty

According to my bond; nor more, nor less.

Now this is perfectly natural. Cordelia has penetrated the vile

characters of her sisters. Is it not obvious, that, in proportion as her

own mind is pure and guileless, she must be disgusted with their gross

hypocrisy and exaggeration, their empty protestations, their "plaited

cunning;" and would retire from all competition with what she so

disdains and abhors,--even into the opposite extreme? In such a case, as

she says herself--

What should Cordelia do?--love and be silent?

For the very expressions of Lear--

What can you say to draw

A third more opulent than your sisters'?

are enough to strike dumb forever a generous, delicate, but shy

disposition, such as Cordelia's, by holding out a bribe for professions.

If Cordelia were not thus portrayed, this deliberate coolness would

strike us as verging on harshness or obstinacy; but it is beautifully

represented as a certain modification of character, the necessary result

of feelings habitually, if not naturally, repressed: and through the

whole play we trace the same peculiar and individual disposition--the

same absence of all display--the same sobriety of speech veiling the

most profound affections--the same quiet steadiness of purpose--the same

shrinking from all exhibition of emotion.

"Tous les sentimens naturels ont leur pudeur," was a _viva voce_

observation of Madame de Stael, when disgusted by the sentimental

affectation of her imitators. This "pudeur," carried to an excess,

appears to me the peculiar characteristic of Cordelia. Thus, in the

description of her deportment when she receives the letter of the Earl

of Kent, informing her of the cruelty of her sisters and the wretched

condition of Lear, we seem to have her before us:--

KENT.

Did your letters pierce the queen to any demonstration of grief?

GENTLEMAN.

Ay, sir, she took them, and read them in my presence

And now and then an ample tear stole down

Her delicate cheek. It seemed she was a queen

Over her passion; who, most rebel-like

Sought to be king over her.

KENT.

O then it moved her!

GENTLEMAN.

Not to a rage.

Faith, once or twice she heaved the name of father

Pantingly forth, as if it pressed her heart,

Cried, _Sisters! sisters! Shame of ladies! Sisters!

What, i' the storm? i' the night?

Let pity not be believed._ Then she shook

The holy water from her heavenly eyes;

* * * *

Then away she started,

To deal with grief alone.

Here the last line--the image brought before us of Cordelia starting

away from observation, "to deal with grief alone," is as exquisitely

beautiful as it is characteristic.

But all the passages hitherto quoted must yield in beauty and power to

that scene, in which her poor father recognizes her, and in the

intervals of distraction asks forgiveness of his wronged child. The

subdued pathos and simplicity of Cordelia's character, her quiet but

intense feeling, the misery and humiliation of the bewildered old man,

are brought before us in so few words, and at the same time sustained

with such a deep intuitive knowledge of the innermost workings of the

human heart, that as there is nothing surpassing this scene in

Shakspeare himself, so there is nothing that can be compared to it in

any other writer.

CORDELIA.

How does my royal lord? How fares your majesty?

LEAR.

You do me wrong to take me out of the grave.

Thou art a soul in bliss; but I am bound

Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears

Do scald like molten lead.

CORDELIA.

Sir, do you know me?

LEAR.

You are a spirit, I know: when did you die?

CORDELIA.

Still, still far wide!

PHYSICIAN.

He's scarce awake: let him alone awhile.

LEAR.

Where have I been? Where am I? Fair daylight!

I am mightily abused. I should even die with pity

To see another thus. I know not what to say.

I will not swear these are my hands: Let's see.

I feel this pin prick. Would I were assured

Of my condition.

CORDELIA.

O look upon me, sir,

And hold your hands in benediction o'er me--

No, sir, you must not kneel.

LEAR.

Pray, do not mock me:

I am a very foolish, fond old man,

Fourscore and upwards; and to deal plainly with you,

I fear I am not in my perfect mind.

Methinks I should know you, and know this man,

Yet I am doubtful: for I am mainly ignorant

What place this is; and all the skill I have

Remembers not these garments; nor I know not

Where I did lodge last night. Do not laugh at me;

For as I am a man, I think this lady

To be my child Cordelia.

CORDELIA.

And so I am, I am.

LEAR.

Be your tears wet? Yes, faith. I pray you weep not

If you have poison for me I will drink it.

I know you do not love me; for your sisters

Have, as I do remember, done me wrong:

You have some cause, they have not.

CORDELIA.

No cause, no cause!

As we do not estimate Cordelia's affection for her father by the

coldness of her language, so neither should we measure her indignation

against her sisters by the mildness of her expressions. What, in fact,

can be more eloquently significant, and at the same time more

characteristic of Cordelia, than the single line when she and her father

are conveyed to their prison:--

Shall we not see these _daughters_ and these _sisters_?

The irony here is so bitter and intense, and at the same time so quiet,

so feminine, so dignified in the expression, that who but Cordelia would

have uttered it in the same manner, or would have condensed such ample

meaning into so few and simple words?

We lose sight of Cordelia during the whole of the second and third, and

great part of the fourth act; but towards the conclusion she reappears.

Just as our sense of human misery and wickedness being carried to its

extreme height, becomes nearly intolerable, "like an engine wrenching

our frame of nature from its fixed place," then, like a redeeming angel,

she descends to mingle in the scene, "loosening the springs of pity in

our eyes," and relieving the impressions of pain and terror by those of

admiration and a tender pleasure. For the catastrophe, it is indeed

terrible! wondrous terrible! When Lear enters with Cordelia dead in his

arms, compassion and awe so seize on all our faculties, that we are left

only to silence and to tears. But if I might judge from my own

sensations, the catastrophe of Lear is not so overwhelming as the

catastrophe of Othello. We do not turn away with the same feeling of

absolute unmitigated despair. Cordelia is a saint ready prepared for

heaven--our earth is not good enough for her: and Lear!--O who, after

sufferings and tortures such as his, would wish to see his life

prolonged? What replace a sceptre in that shaking hand?--a crown upon

that old gray head, on which the tempest had poured in its wrath?--on

which the deep dread bolted thunders and the winged lightnings had spent

their fury? O never, never!

Let him pass! he hates him

That would upon the rack of this rough world

Stretch him out longer.

In the story of King Lear and his three daughters, as it is related in

the "delectable and mellifluous" romance of Perceforest, and in the

Chronicle of Geoffrey of Monmouth, the conclusion is fortunate. Cordelia

defeats her sisters, and replaces her father on his throne. Spenser, in

his version of the story, has followed these authorities. Shakspeare has

preferred the catastrophe of the old ballad, founded apparently on some

lost tradition. I suppose it is by way of amending his errors, and

bringing back this daring innovator to sober history, that it has been

thought fit to alter the play of Lear for the stage, as they have

altered Romeo and Juliet: they have converted the seraph-like Cordelia

into a puling love heroine, and sent her off victorious at the end of

the play--exit with drums and colors flying--to be married to Edgar. Now

any thing more absurd, more discordant with all our previous

impressions, and with the characters as unfolded to us, can hardly be

imagined. "I cannot conceive," says Schlegel, "what ideas of art and

dramatic connection those persons have, who suppose we can at pleasure

tack a double conclusion to a tragedy--a melancholy one for hard-hearted

spectators, and a merry one for those of softer mould." The fierce

manners depicted in this play, the extremes of virtue and vice in the

persons, belong to the remote period of the story.[64] There is no

attempt at character in the old narratives; Regan and Goneril are

monsters of ingratitude, and Cordelia merely distinguished by her filial

piety; whereas, in Shakspeare, this filial piety is an affection quite

distinct from the qualities which serve to individualize the human

being; we have a perception of innate character apart from all

accidental circumstance: we see that if Cordelia had never known her

father, had never been rejected from his love, had never been a born

princess or a crowned queen, she would not have been less Cordelia; less

distinctly _herself_; that is, a woman of a steady mind, of calm but

deep affections, of inflexible truth, of few words, and of reserved

deportment.

As to Regan and Goneril--"tigers, not daughters"--we might wish to

regard them as mere hateful chimeras, impossible as they are detestable;

but fortunately there was once a Tullia. I know not where to look for

the prototype of Cordelia: there was a Julia Alpinula, the young

priestess of Aventicum,[65] who, unable to save her father's life by the

sacrifice of her own, died with him--"_infelix patris, infelix

proles_"--but this is all we know of her. There was the Roman daughter,

too. I remember seeing at Genoa, Guido's "Pieta Romana," in which the

expression of the female bending over the aged parent, who feeds from

her bosom, is perfect,--but it is not a Cordelia: only Raffaelle could

have painted Cordelia.

But the character which at once suggests itself in comparison with

Cordelia, as the heroine of filial tenderness and piety, is certainly

the Antigone of Sophocles. As poetical conceptions, they rest on the

same basis: they are both pure abstractions of truth, piety, and natural

affection; and in both, love, as a passion, is kept entirely out of

sight: for though the womanly character is sustained, by making them the

objects of devoted attachment, yet to have portrayed them as influenced

by passion, would have destroyed that unity of purpose and feeling which

is one source of power; and, besides, have disturbed that serene purity

and grandeur of soul, which equally distinguishes both heroines. The

spirit, however, in which the two characters are conceived, is as

different as possible; and we must not fail to remark, that Antigone,

who plays a principal part in two fine tragedies, and is distinctly and

completely made out, is considered as a masterpiece, the very triumph of

the ancient classical drama; whereas, there are many among Shakspeare's

characters which are equal to Cordelia as dramatic conceptions, and

superior to her in finishing of outline, as well as in the richness of

the poetical coloring.

When Oedipus, pursued by the vengeance of the gods, deprived of sight

by his own mad act, and driven from Thebes by his subjects and his sons,

wanders forth, abject and forlorn, he is supported by his daughter

Antigone; who leads him from city to city, begs for him, and pleads for

him against the harsh, rude men, who, struck more by his guilt than his

misery, would drive him from his last asylum. In the opening of the

"Oedipus Coloneus," where the wretched old man appears leaning on his

child, and seats himself in the consecrated Grove of the Furies, the

picture presented to us is wonderfully solemn and beautiful. The

patient, duteous tenderness of Antigone; the scene in which she pleads

for her brother Polynices, and supplicates her father to receive his

offending son; her remonstrance to Polynices, when she entreats him not

to carry the threatened war into his native country, are finely and

powerfully delineated; and in her lamentation over Oedipus, when he

perishes in the mysterious grove, there is a pathetic beauty, apparent

even through the stiffness of the translation.

Alas! I only wished I might have died

With my poor father; wherefore should I ask

For longer life?

O I was fond of misery with him;

E'en what was most unlovely grew beloved

When he was with me. O my dearest father,

Beneath the earth now in deep darkness hid,

Worn as thou wert with age, to me thou still

Wert dear, and shalt be ever.

--Even as he wished he died,

In a strange land--for such was his desire--

A shady turf covered his lifeless limbs,

Nor unlamented fell! for O these eyes,

My father, still shall weep for thee, nor time

E'er blot thee from my memory.

The filial piety of Antigone is the most affecting part of the tragedy

of "Oedipus Coloneus:" her sisterly affection, and her heroic

self-devotion to a religious duty, form the plot of the tragedy called

by her name. When her two brothers, Eteocles and Polynices, had slain

each other before the walls of Thebes, Creon issued an edict forbidding

the rites of sepulture to Polynices, (as the invader of his country,)

and awarding instant death to those who should dare to bury him. We know

the importance which the ancients attached to the funeral obsequies, as

alone securing their admission into the Elysian fields. Antigone, upon

hearing the law of Creon, which thus carried vengeance beyond the grave,

enters in the first scene, announcing her fixed resolution to brave the

threatened punishment: her sister Ismene shrinks from sharing the peril

of such an undertaking, and endeavors to dissuade her from it, on which

Antigone replies:--

Wert thou to proffer what I do not ask--

Thy poor assistance--I would scorn it now;

Act as thou wilt, I'll bury him myself:

Let me perform but that, and death is welcome.

I'll do the pious deed, and lay me down

By my dear brother; loving and beloved,

We'll rest together.

She proceeds to execute her generous purpose; she covers with earth the

mangled corse of Polynices, pours over it the accustomed libations, is

detected in her pious office, and after nobly defending her conduct, is

led to death by command of the tyrant: her sister Ismene, struck with

shame and remorse, now comes forward to accuse herself as a partaker in

the offence, and share her sister's punishment; but Antigone sternly and

scornfully rejects her; and after pouring forth a beautiful lamentation

on the misery of perishing "without the nuptial song--a virgin and a

slave," she dies _a l'antique_--she strangles herself to avoid a

lingering death.

Hemon, the son of Creon, unable to save her life, kills himself upon her

grave: but throughout the whole tragedy we are left in doubt whether

Antigone does or does not return the affection of this devoted lover.

Thus it will be seen that in the Antigone there is a great deal of what

may be called the effect of situation, as well as a great deal of poetry

and character: she says the most beautiful things in the world, performs

the most heroic actions, and all her words and actions are so placed

before us as to _command_ our admiration. According to the classical

ideas of virtue and heroism, the character is sublime, and in the

delineation there is a severe simplicity mingled with its Grecian grace,

a unity, a grandeur, an elegance, which appeal to our taste and our

understanding, while they fill and exalt the imagination: but in

Cordelia it is not the external coloring or form, it is not what she

says or does, but what she is in herself, what she feels, thinks, and

suffers, which continually awaken our sympathy and interest. The heroism

of Cordelia is more passive and tender--it melts into our heart; and in

the veiled loveliness and unostentatious delicacy of her character,

there is an effect more profound and artless, if it be less striking and

less elaborate than in the Grecian heroine. To Antigone we give our

admiration, to Cordelia our tears. Antigone stands before us in her

austere and statue-like beauty, like one of the marbles of the

Parthenon. If Cordelia reminds us of any thing on earth, it is of one of

the Madonnas in the old Italian pictures, "with downcast eyes beneath

th' almighty dove?" and as that heavenly form is connected with our

human sympathies only by the expression of maternal tenderness or

maternal sorrow, even so Cordelia would be almost too angelic, were she

not linked to our earthly feelings, bound to our very hearts, by her

filial love, her wrongs, her sufferings, and her tears.

FOOTNOTES:

[48]

----The gods approve

The depth, and not the tumult of the soul.

WORDSWORTH.

Characteristics of Women: Moral, Poetical, and Historical · 第 15 / 25 段