I. EQUIPMENT OF THE PAINTER

Where our painters have chosen wood or canvas as a ground, the Chinese

have employed silk or paper. While our art recognizes that drawing itself,

quite apart from painting, is a sufficient objective, drawing and painting

have always been closely intermingled in the Far East. While the mediums

used in Europe for painting in color, distemper, tempera and oil, led to

an exact study of form, the colors employed by the Orientals--at times

brilliant, at times subdued with an almost studied restraint--preserved a

singular fluidity and lent themselves to undefined evanescences which gave

them a surprising charm.

The early paintings were generally done on cotton, coarse silk or paper.

In the eighth century, under the T'ang dynasty, the use of finer silk

began. The dressing was removed with boiling water, the silk was then

sized and smoothed with a paddle. The use of silken fabric of the finest

weave, prepared with a thick sizing, became general during the Sung

dynasty. Papers were made of vegetable fibres, principally of bamboo.

Being prepared, as was the silk, with a sizing of alum, they became

practically indestructible. Upon these silks and papers the painter

worked with brush and Chinese ink,[1] color being introduced with more

or less freedom or restraint.

The brushes are of different types. Each position of the brush conforms

to a specific quality of the line, either sharp and precise or broad and

quivering, the ink spreading in strong touches or thinning to delicate

shades.

The colors are simple, of mineral or vegetable origin. Chinese painters

have always avoided mixing colors so far as possible. From malachite they

obtained several shades of green, from cinnabar or sulphide of mercury, a

number of reds. They knew also how to combine mercury, sulphur and potash

to produce vermilion. From peroxide of mercury they drew coloring powders

which furnished shades ranging from brick red to orange yellow. During the

T'ang dynasty coral was ground to secure a special red, while white was

extracted from burnt oyster shells. White lead was later substituted for

this lime white. Carmine lake they obtained from madder, yellows from

the sap of the rattan, blues from indigo. To these must be added the

different shades of Chinese ink and lastly, gold in leaf and in powder.

[1] Chinese ink is a very different composition from the ink of

Western countries. It is a solid made of soot obtained by burning

certain plants, which is then combined with glue or oil and moulded

into a cake and dried. Other ingredients may be added to produce sheen

or a dead finish. It improves with age if properly kept. The cake is

moistened and rubbed on a slab, and the ink thus obtained must be used

in a special way and with special care to produce the full

effect.--TRANSLATOR.

[Illustration: PLATE I. SCULPTURED STONES OF THE HAN DYNASTY

Second to Third Centuries. Rubbings taken by the Chavannes Expedition.]

The brush-stroke in the painting of the Far East is of supreme importance.

We know that this could not be otherwise if we recall that the characters

in Chinese writing are ideographs, not actually _written_, but rather

_drawn_. The stroke is not a mere formal, lifeless sign. It is an

expression in which is reflected the beauty of the thought that inspired

it as well as the quality of the soul of him who gives it form. In

writing, as in painting, it reveals to us the character and the conception

of its author. Placed at the service of certain philosophical ideas, which

will be set forth later on, this technique was bound to lead to a special

code of Aesthetics. The painter seeks to suggest with an unbroken line the

fundamental character of a form. His endeavor, in this respect, is to

simplify the objective images of the world to the extreme, replacing them

with ideal images, which prolonged meditation shall have freed from every

non-essential. It may therefore be readily understood how the brush-stroke

becomes so personal a thing, that in itself it serves to reveal the hand

of the master. There is no Chinese book treating of painting which does

not discuss and lay stress upon the value of its aesthetic code.

Chinese Painters: A Critical Study · 第 31 / 56 题