Chapter XXV

Bredon’s Account of It All

“God bless my soul!” cried the Bishop, “you don’t mean to say you’re

preparing to hush it up! Why, your moral theology must be as bad as

poor Mottram’s.”

“It isn’t a question of theology,” replied Bredon, “it’s a question of

fact. I am going to write to the Indescribable Company and tell them

that Mottram died by accident, because that happens to be the truth.”

“Ah—h-h!” said Angela.

“Indeed?” said Mr. Eames.

“Not another mental perspective!” groaned Mr. Pulteney.

“That’s exactly what it is. I’m not a detective really; I can’t sit

down and think things out. I see everything just as other people do, I

share all their bewilderment. But suddenly, when I’m thinking of

something quite different, a game of patience, for example, I see the

whole thing in a new mental perspective. It’s like the optical

illusion of the tumbling cubes—you know, the pattern of cubes which

looks concave to the eye, and then, by a readjustment of your mental

focus, you suddenly see them as convex instead. What produces that

change? Why, you catch sight of one particular angle in a new light,

and from that you get your new mental picture of the whole pattern.

Just so, one can stumble upon a new mental perspective about a problem

like this by suddenly seeing one single fact in a new light. And then

the whole problem rearranges itself.”

“I am indebted to you for your lucid exposition,” said Mr. Pulteney,

“but even now the events of the past week are not quite clear to me.”

“Miles, don’t be tiresome,” said Angela. “Start right from the

beginning, and don’t let’s have any mystery-making.”

“All right. It would make a better story the other way, but

still—well, first you want to get some picture of Mottram. I can only

do it by guesswork, but I should say this: He had an enormous amount

of money, and no heir whom he cared for. He was a shrewd, rather

grasping man, and he came to think that everybody else was after his

money. It’s not uncommon with rich people—what you might call the

Chuzzlewit-complex. Am I right so far?”

“Absolutely right,” said the Bishop.

“Again, he was a man who loved a mystery for its own sake, surprises,

almost practical jokes. And again, he was a vain man in some ways,

caring intensely what other people thought of him, and very anxious to

know what they thought of him. Also, he had a high respect for the

Catholic Church, or at least for its representatives in Pullford.”

“All that’s true,” said Eames.

“Well, I think he really did mean to leave some money to the Pullford

Diocese. No, don’t interrupt; that’s not as obvious as it sounds. He

really did mean to endow the diocese, and he disclosed his intention

to Brinkman. Brinkman, as we know, was a real anti-clerical, and he

protested violently. Catholics were alike, he said, all the world

over; the apparent honesty of a man like Your Lordship was only a

blind. In reality Catholics, and especially Catholic priests, were

always hunting for money and would do anything to get it—anything. At

last Mottram determined that he must settle the point for himself.

First of all, he went round to the Cathedral house and defended the

proposition that it was lawful to do evil in order that good might

come. He wanted to see whether he would get any support for that view

in the abstract; he got none. Then he decided, with Brinkman’s

collaboration, on a practical test. He would put Your Lordship’s

honesty to the proof.

“He went up to London, saw his solicitors, and added a codicil to his

will, leaving the benefits of the Euthanasia policy to the Bishop of

Pullford. I am afraid it must be admitted that he did not, at the

time, mean that codicil to become operative. It was part of his

mystery. Then he went on to our people at the Indescribable, and spun

a cock-and-bull yarn about seeing a specialist, who had told him that

he had only two more years to live. Actually he was in robust health;

he only invented this story and told it to the Indescribable in order

that, when it came to the point, it might be reasonable (though not

necessary) to explain his death as suicide. Then he came, back here

and made preparations for his holiday. He was going to take his

holiday at Chilthorpe—to be more accurate, he meant to start his

holiday at Chilthorpe. He strongly urged Your Lordship to come down

and share part of it with him; it was essential to his plan.”

“And that,” suggested the Bishop, “explains his intense eagerness that

I should come down?”

“Precisely. He made certain, as best he could, that you would arrive

here on the morning after him; that you would be told he had gone out

to fish the Long Pool, and that you would be asked to follow him.

This would ensure that you would be the first witness of his

disappearance.”

“His what?”

“His disappearance. He meant to disappear. Not only for the sake of

the test, I imagine; he wanted to disappear for the fun of the thing;

to see what happened. He wanted to be a celebrity in the newspapers.

He wanted to read his own obituaries. That was why he wrote, or rather

got Brinkman to write, a letter to the _Pullford Examiner_, calling

him all sorts of names—the letter was signed, of course, with a

pseudonym. You found that out, didn’t you, Leyland?”

“Yes, confound it all, I heard only this morning that ‘Brutus’ was

really Brinkman. But I never saw the point.”

“Then he sat down and wrote an unfinished letter in answer to these

charges. That letter, of course, was to be found after his

disappearance, and would be published in thick type by the _Pullford

Examiner_. That would set everybody talking about him, and his

obituary notices would be lively reading. He wanted to read them

himself. But in order to do that he must disappear.

“The Chilthorpe gorge is a good place to disappear from. Leave your

hat on the edge of it, and go and hide somewhere—you will be reported

the next morning as a tragic accident. Mottram had made all

arrangements for hiding. He was going to spend his holiday incognito

somewhere; I think in Ireland, but it may have been on the Continent.

He was going to take Brinkman with him. He would disappear, of course,

in his car. He had victualled it before he left Pullford. On his

arrival at Chilthorpe his first act was to paint out its number-plate.

He hid some notes in the cushions of the car—that, I think, was a mere

instinct of secretiveness; there was no need to do so.

“The plan, then, was this. On Tuesday morning, early, Mottram was to

set out for the gorge. Almost immediately afterward, Brinkman was to

take out the motor, as if to go to Pullford. He was to pick up

Mottram, who would hide under the seat or disguise himself or smuggle

himself away somehow, and drive like mad for the coast. Later, you, My

Lord, would come to the _Load of Mischief_, and would get the message

about going out to join Mottram at the Long Pool. In passing through

the gorge, you would (I fancy) have found some traces there—Mottram’s

hat, for example, or his fishing-rod; and your first thought would

have been that the poor fellow had slipped in. Then, looking round,

you would find this letter half-concealed on a high ledge. You would

read it, and you would think that Mottram had committed suicide.

“And then—then you would either make the contents of this letter

public or you wouldn’t. If Brinkman was right in his estimate, you

would keep the letter dark; the death, before long, would be presumed.

The Indescribable Company would have been on the point of paying out

the half-million when—Mottram would have reappeared, and Your Lordship

would have been in a delicate position. If Mottram was right in his

view of your character, then you would produce the letter; Mottram’s

death would be regarded as suicide, and the Indescribable would refuse

all claims. Then Mottram would have reappeared, and would have seen to

it that, in one way or another, the Pullford Diocese should be

rewarded for the honesty of its Bishop.

“He was not really a very complete conspirator, poor Mottram. He made

three bad mistakes, as it proved. Though indeed they would not have

mattered, or two of them would not have mattered, if events had

proceeded according to plan.

“In the first place, he went and wrote his name in the visitors’ book

immediately on arrival. He wanted to leave no doubt that it was

Jephthah Mottram in person who arrived at the _Load of Mischief_ on

Monday night. He wanted journalists to come down here and look

reverently at the great man’s signature. Of course, in reality, it is

a thing nobody ever does on the night of arrival. It has made me

suspicious from the very first, as my wife will tell you.

“In the second place, when he took the precaution of drawing up a new

will he neglected to sign it overnight. Brinkman, I suppose, pointed

out to him that if any fatal accident occurred—say a motor

accident—the codicil leaving the half-million to the Bishop would be

perfectly valid. To avoid this danger they must have drawn up a new

will, and if Mottram had signed this overnight his death would have

made it valid. As it was, for some reason—probably because Brinkman

himself was drawing it up (I think the writing is Brinkman’s) late on

Monday night—the will was never signed and was useless.

“In the third place, he did something overnight which he ought to have

left till the next morning. He not only wrote his confidential letter

to the Bishop but he went out with Brinkman to the gorge and posted

it—put it on the ledge ready for the Bishop to find next morning. He

did not mean to go into the gorge at all the next morning. He would

start out on the way to it, say, at eight, and at ten minutes past

eight Brinkman, driving the car, would pick him up on the road. From

the side of the road they could throw over Mottram’s hat, possibly,

and they could slide his rod down the rocks, so as to make it appear

that he had been there. (Brinkman, in this way, would establish an

alibi; he could not be supposed to have murdered Mottram in the

gorge.) But it was not safe to let the letter drop in this casual way;

therefore the letter must be planted out overnight. There was no great

danger of its premature discovery; in any case, Mottram put it rather

out of sight on a ledge so high up that only a tall man would see it,

and only if he was looking about him carefully.

“That is the complicated part of this business; the rest of it depends

on two simple accidents. Mottram went to bed rather early; he was in

an excited frame of mind, and determined to steady himself with a

sleeping draught. The watch, the studs, were only symptoms of that

fussiness we all feel on the eve of a great adventure. I suppose he

borrowed a match from Brinkman to light his gas with. But it was a

clear night; there was no need of light to go to bed by. But just at

the last moment—a fateful moment for himself—he did light the gas;

perhaps he wanted to read a page or two of his novel before turning

in.

“The rest of the story could be more easily told upstairs. I wonder if

you would mind all coming up into the actual room? It makes it so much

easier to construct the scene if you are on the spot.”

The whole party applauded this decision. “This is what is called an

object-lesson, in the education of the young,” observed Mr. Pulteney.

“The young like it; they are in a position to hack one another’s shins

when the teacher’s back is turned.”

When they reached the bedroom, Bredon found himself falling into the

attitude of a lecturer. “The guide,” murmured Angela, “taking a party

round the ruins of the old dungeon. Scene of the ’orrible crime.

Please pay attention, gentlemen!”

“You see how the gas works in here,” began Bredon. “There’s the main

tap, we’ll call it A, which controls the whole supply. Tap B is for

the bracket; tap C leads through the tube to the standard lamp. It

doesn’t matter leaving tap B or tap C on as long as tap A is turned

off.

“When Mottram went up to bed, tap B and tap C were both open, but tap

A was properly turned off. Mottram took no particular notice of the

disposition of taps; he turned on one tap at random, tap A. Then he

lit his match, and put it to the bracket, which naturally lit. He then

immediately threw the match away. We know that, because we found the

match, and it was hardly burned down the stalk at all. Meanwhile, of

course, he had also allowed the gas to escape through the tube into

the standard lamp; it never occurred to him to light this. The

standard was at the other end of the room, close to the open window;

the slight escape of gas did not, unfortunately for him, offend his

nostrils. Brinkman told me, and it is probably true, that Mottram had

not a very keen sense of smell. After a minute or two, feeling ready

to go to sleep, he went up to the taps again, and forgot to reverse

the process he had gone through before. Instead of turning off the

main tap, A, he carelessly turned off tap B. And the light on the

bracket obediently went out.

“That is the lesson of a finger-print. Tap A was stiff, and Mottram

left a mark when he turned it on; he would have left another if he had

turned it off. He did not; he turned off tap B, which works at a mere

touch, and of course he left no mark in doing so. There, then, lies

Mottram; the sleeping draught has already taken effect; the wind gets

up, and blows the window to; tap A is still open, and tap C is still

open; and through the burner of the standard lamp the acetylene is

pouring into the room.

“Brinkman is not a late sleeper. The Boots, who is the earliest riser

in this establishment, tells me that Brinkman was always awake when he

went round for the shoes. On Tuesday morning Brinkman must have woken

early, to be greeted by a smell of gas. It may have crept in through

his window, or even come up through the floor, for the floors here are

full of cracks. Once he had satisfied himself that the escape was not

in his own room, he must have thought of the room below. When he

reached the lower passage, the increasing smell of gas left him in no

doubt. He knocked at Mottram’s door, got no answer, and rushed in,

going straight across and opening the window so as to get some air.

Then he had time to turn round and see what was on the bed. There was

no doubt that he was too late to help.”

[Illustration: The Three Taps as Brinkman Found Them. A diagram of a

horizontal gas pipe with three taps. Tap A is located where the pipe

meets the wall. Its handle is vertical, and it is labelled “turned

on.” Tap B is located on the far side of where the pipe turns upwards.

Its handle is horizontal, and it is labelled “turned off.” Between the

two, a flexible tube connects to the pipe and leads away to a lamp.

Tap C is located on this branch. Its handle is horizontal, and it is

labelled “turned on.”]

“Did he know it was accident?” asked Eames. “Or did he think it was

suicide?”

“I think he must have known it was accident. And now, consider his

position. Here was Mottram, dead by accident. There up in London was

Mottram’s codicil, willing half a million to the Diocese of Pullford.

And that codicil had not been meant to become operative. It had been

made only for the purposes of the test. And now, through this

accident, the codicil, which did not represent Mottram’s real wishes,

had suddenly become valid. It would certainly be judged valid,

unless—unless the claim were dismissed owing to a verdict of suicide.

Brinkman may or may not have been a good man; he was certainly a good

secretary. Put yourself in his position, Mr. Eames. He could only give

effect to his dead master’s real wishes by pretending that his dead

master had committed suicide.

“You remember the remark in ‘The Importance of Being Earnest,’ that to

lose one parent may be an accident, to lose both looks like

carelessness? So it was with Mottram and the taps. Two taps turned on

meant, and would be understood to mean, an accident. But, and this is

worth remembering, if all three taps were found on, it would look like

suicide. Brinkman acted on the spur of the moment; he was in a hurry,

for the atmosphere of the room was still deadly. He wrapped his

handkerchief round his fingers, so as to leave no mark, then, in his

confusion, he turned the wrong tap! He meant to turn tap B on;

instead, he turned tap A off. That sounds impossible, I know. But you

will notice that whereas tap A and tap B are turned off when they are

at the horizontal, tap C is turned off when it is at the vertical,

When Brinkman, then, saw the three taps, B and C were both horizontal,

and A was vertical, it was natural, in the flurry of the moment, for

him to imagine that if all three taps were in the same position (that

is, all horizontal) they would all be turned on. Instinctively, then,

he turned tap A from the vertical to the horizontal. And in doing so

he left the whole three in the same position in which they were before

Mottram lit his match. No gas was escaping at all. The result of

Brinkman’s action was not to corroborate the theory of suicide, but to

introduce a quite new theory—that of murder. Half-stifled, he rushed

from the room, locked the door on the outside, and took the key away

with him up to his room.”

[Illustration: The Three Taps as They Were Found in the Morning. A

diagram of the same gas pipe as previously, the only difference being

that the handle of tap A is now horizontal also, and is labelled

“turned off.”]

“Steady on,” put in Angela, “why did he lock the door?”

“It may have been only so as to keep the room private till he had

thought the thing out, and the Boots may have come round too soon for

him. Or, more probably, it was another deliberate effort to encourage

the idea of suicide. Anyhow, his actions from that moment onward were

perfectly clear-headed. He helped to break down the door, and, while

Ferrers was examining the gas, while the Boots was lighting a match,

he thrust the key in on the inner side of the door. It was only when

he had done this, when he thought that he had made the suicide theory

an absolute certainty, that he was suddenly confronted with the

horrible mistake he had made in turning the wrong tap. It was a bad

moment for him, but fortunately one which excused a certain display of

emotion.”

“And he thought he would be run in for the murder?” asked Leyland.

“Not necessarily. But your arrival worried him badly; you got hold of

the murder idea from the start.”

“Why didn’t he skip, then? There was the car, all ready provisioned.”

“The trouble is that Brinkman is, according to his lights, an honest

man. And he hated the idea of the Euthanasia money going to the

Bishop. I was a godsend to him; here was a nice, stupid man, briefed

to defend the thesis of suicide. As soon as I came, he tried to take

me out for a walk in the gorge.”

“Why in the gorge?” asked the Bishop.

“So that I should find the letter. Yesterday he did manage to take me

to the gorge, and actually drew my attention to the ledge. I saw a bit

of paper there, but it never occurred to me to wonder what it was.

Poor Brinkman! He must have thought me an ass!”

“But why didn’t he get the letter himself, and bring it to us? Or

leave it lying about?”

“That was the maddening thing, the poor little man just couldn’t reach

it. The wind of Monday night had blown it a bit further away, I

suspect. Of course, he could have gone out with a step-ladder, or

rolled stones up to stand on. But, you see, you were watching him, and

I’m pretty sure he knew you were watching him. He thought it best to

lead us on, lead me on rather, and make me find out the envelope for

myself. When he’d drawn me right across the trail of it, and I’d

failed to see it, he was in despair. He decided that he must bolt

after all. It was too horrible a position to be here under

observation, and fearing arrest at any moment. If he were arrested,

you see, he must either tell a lie, and land himself in suspicion, or

tell the truth, and see the Euthanasia money fall into Catholic hands.

“He ordered a car from the garage to meet the train which arrives at

Chilthorpe at 8.40. He determined to meet it on the way to the

station. I don’t think the thought of the car lying at the garage,

with the ‘sangwiches’—I mean the sandwiches—and the whisky on board,

occurred to him for a moment. He is an honest man. But on his way to

meet the car he would go through the gorge, and make sure that he was

followed; he would draw attention to the document, and then disappear

from the scene. He had not much luggage; he had only to clear up a few

papers, mostly belonging to Mottram. Among these was the unsigned will

which had been drawn up, ready for Mottram’s signature, on the Monday

night. This he burned; it could be no use to anybody now. He burned it

standing at the window, and the last, unburnt piece escaped from his

fingers, and fluttered down through a second window into the room

below—this room, which had been Mottram’s. That was your find,

Leyland. And the odd thing is that it was through this absurd detail

that I got onto the track of the whole thing; because one of my

patience cards fluttered down through a ground-floor window; and as I

was carrying it upstairs I realized that was how the scrap of paper

came to be lying about in Mottram’s room. Then I began wondering what

the will was, and why Brinkman should have been burning it, and

suddenly the whole truth began to sketch itself in my mind, just as

I’ve been telling it you.

“Brinkman had bad luck to the last. I dropped that card just after he

started out with his despatch-box; he saw that I’d disappeared from

the window, and supposed, with delight, that I was following him. With

delight, for of course I was the one man who was interested in proving

the death to be suicide. He went back to the cache in the gorge,

leading me (as he supposed) all the way; then he waited for a flash of

lightning, and jumped up so as to draw attention to the envelope. As

he came down again he looked round, and, in the last rays of the

lightning flash, saw that it was Eames, not I, who was following him.

Eames—the one man who would certainly make away with the precious

document! But there was no time to be lost; he could hear the taxi

already on the hill. He ran round to the road, leaped on board the

taxi, and, in desperation, sent a note to me by the taxi-man telling

me to make Eames shew me what he had found. I don’t know where

Brinkman is now, but I rather hope he gets clear.”

“Amen to that,” said Leyland; “it would be uncommonly awkward for us

if we found him. What on earth could we charge him with? You can’t

hang a man for turning the wrong gas-tap by mistake.”

“Poor Mr. Simmonds will be relieved about this,” said Angela.

“By the way,” said the Bishop, “I hear that Mottram did leave some

unsettled estate after all, and that, I suppose, will go to Simmonds.

Not a great deal, but it’s enough for him to marry on.”

Angela swears that at this point she heard, on the other side of the

door, a scuffle and the rustle of departing footsteps. She says you

can’t cure maids of their bad habits, really.

“My own difficulty,” said the Bishop, “is about my moral claim to this

money. For it was left to me, it seems, by a will which the testator

did not mean to take effect.”

“On the other hand, you’ve earned it, My Lord,” suggested Bredon.

“After all, poor Mottram was only waiting to find out whether you

would prove to be an honest man or not. And I think you’ve come out of

the test very well. Besides, you can’t refuse the legacy; it’s in

trust for the diocese. I hope Pullford will see a lot of Catholic

activity now.”

“The church collections will be beginning to fall off almost at once,”

said Eames, with a melancholy face.

“I wish I had scrutinized those motor-cushions more closely,” said Mr.

Pulteney. “It seems to me that I get nothing out of all this.”

“Which reminds me,” said Leyland, “I suppose the bet’s off.”

“And Mr. Bredon,” added the Bishop, “will get no thanks from his

company. I’m afraid, Mr. Bredon, you will have carried nothing away

with you from your visit to these parts.”

“Oh, I don’t know about that,” said Bredon.

Transcriber’s Note

This transcription follows the text of the edition published in 1927

by Jacobsen Publishing Company, Inc. The following changes have been

made to correct what are believed to be printer’s errors (based in

part on corrections made in later editions).

* “injunctions” has been changed to “injections” (Ch. II).

* “he ever left” has been changed to “he never left” (Ch. II).

* “motion in her voice” has been changed to “emotion in her voice”

(Ch. IV).

* “swerving to” has been changed to “serving to” (Ch. IV).

* “trace it had” has been changed to “trace where it had” (Ch. IV).

* “constitutency” has been changed to “constituency” (Ch. VII).

* “verybody” has been changed to “everybody” (Ch. XVI).

* “put my car in” has been changed to “put my oar in” (Ch. XVIII).

* “on the other hand” has been changed to “on the one hand”

(Ch. XX, first instance).

* “Dr. Ferers” has been changed to “Dr. Ferrers” (Ch. XXIII).

The three taps · 第 25 / 25 章