CHAPTER XI

The Last Love-Tryst of the Prince de Ligne--A Glance at the Past

--Z----or the Consequences of Gaming--Gambling in Poland

and in Russia--The Biter Bit--Masked Ball--The Prince

de Ligne and a Domino--More Living Pictures--The Pasha of

Surêne--Two Masked Ladies--Recollections of the Prince de

Talleyrand.

I had spent the evening at the theatre of the Carinthian Gate, and

was returning home by way of the ramparts, confident of meeting no

one whom I knew; for on that night, in spite of the many strangers in

Vienna and the multitude of fêtes, everything was unusually quiet long

before midnight. It was magnificent weather for the time of the year.

In the recess of a bastion jutting over the dry moat, I noticed a lank

figure wrapped in a white cloak, which might easily have passed for

that of Hamlet. Impelled by curiosity, I drew nearer, and to my utter

astonishment recognised the Prince de Ligne.

‘What in Heaven’s name are you doing here, prince, at this hour of the

night and in the biting cold?’

‘In love affairs the beginning only is delightful; consequently, I

always find great delight in recommencing. At your age, though, it was

I who kept them waiting; at mine they keep me waiting; and, what’s

worse, they don’t come.

‘I am keeping an appointment, but as you can see for yourself, I am

keeping it alone. Well, people forgive hunchbacks the exuberance of

their dorsal excrescence; why, at my age, should not people forgive my

exuberance?’

‘If it be true that woman’s happiness consists in the reflection of a

man’s glory, where is the woman who would not be proud to owe hers to

you?’

The prince shook his head, and declaimed mock-tragically:

‘“No, no; all things flee as age approaches,

All things go, illusion too:

Nature would have done much better

To keep that until the last.”’

‘I’ll leave you to your appointment, prince,’ I said.

‘No, I’ll wait no longer; lend me your arm and take me home.’

We slowly went in the direction of his house, and on the way his

conversation betrayed the feeling of slighted pride; his words were

marked by a tinge of melancholy which was new to me.

‘I am inclined to believe that in life reflection comes as a last

misfortune,’ he said. ‘Up to the present I have not been among those

who think that growing old is in itself a merit. At the dawn of life

love’s dream balances its illusions on the spring within us. One

carries the cup of pleasure to one’s lips; one imagines it’s going to

last for ever, but years come, time flies and delivers its Parthian

darts; from that moment disenchantment attends everything, the colours

fade out of one’s existence. Ah me, I must get used to the idea.’

‘But, prince, you attach too much importance to a trifling

disappointment. You must put it down to the exactions of society, which

those who are in it cannot always disregard.’

‘No, no, there’s an end of my illusions; everything warns me of the

years accumulating behind me. I am no longer considered good for

anything. In days gone by, at Versailles, I was consulted on this,

that, and the other, on balls, fêtes, theatres, and so forth. At

present my advice is dispensed with. My time is past, _my world_ is

dead. You’ll tell me that no man is a prophet in his own country. A

company of comedians has invaded the stage to drive me from it, or to

hiss should I persist in remaining. My prophecies miss fire on account

of the prophet’s age. Tell me honestly, what is the worth of young men

nowadays to justify the world in lavishing its favours on them? Envy

has never entered my heart until this moment.’ Then he harked back to

his past, impelled by the kind of melancholy pleasure we all experience

in retracing our road through life, even if it is beset with thorns.

‘I had an intense admiration and passionate love for the science of

warfare,’ he added, ‘and I may safely say that from the day I joined

the regiment of dragoons from Ligne, I have won all my grades at the

point of my sword. That science has been the occupation of my life; my

labours have gained me many sterling friends. As a soldier and as a

general I have done my duty.’

‘History will forget neither the taking of Belgrade nor the battle

of Maxen, and your glorious share in both. It will also remember the

brilliant welcome you received at Versailles when Maria-Theresa sent

you thither bearing the news.’

‘Yes, these are memories of which no one will be able to deprive me,

and henceforth I’ll exclusively wrap myself up in them. When the body

threatens ruin, memory alone supports the structure, but merely as a

hint of our being still alive. To my last moments, as a compensation

for the vicissitudes of my own existence I shall be proud of having

been on terms of intimate friendship with men upon whom the eyes of

the universe were fixed. I may confess to having always been fond of

glory; indifference to it is a mere pretence. Well, every succeeding

day I become more and more convinced of the emptiness of what people

conventionally call celebrity.’ Then he drifted to the happy moments of

his life.

‘I have also passed through that delicious period of life when youth

gets intoxicated with all kinds of flattering promises, which a riper

age rarely keeps, and which old age altogether disperses. At that

period, days fly like moments, and the moments are worth centuries.

Happy he who knows how to profit by them! Life is a limpid cup which

becomes troubled while one drinks from it; the first drops are like

ambrosia; but the lees are at the bottom; the more agitated one’s life

is, the more bitter does the draught become at last. The loss, when all

is said and done, is perhaps not so great. Man gets to his grave as the

absent-minded get to their house. Here’s the door of mine. Good-night,

my dear lad. You, who are beginning your career, take care to employ

every minute to the greatest advantage, and don’t forget that the

saddest days of our lives are counted in the tale of our years just as

much as the happiest. Delille was right when he said, “Our best days go

first.”’

And I took my leave of this excellent prince, of this extraordinary

man, whose only weakness consisted in not making his pleasures fit in

with his age, and in persisting in keeping up a struggle with time,

that invincible athlete whom, as yet, no one has conquered. Alas, he

believed in the fable of Anacreon, whose love-affairs still provided

wreaths of roses for his hoary locks at eighty.

This love-tryst of the Prince de Ligne was to be his last. When he

talked thus of man’s arriving at the brink of the grave without

thinking of it, he was far from perceiving that he himself already had

one foot therein. Since then I have often reflected on the melancholy

sadness of all his words, but the Prince de Ligne never seriously

considered the idea of death. Not that he was afraid of it. At no time

of his life did fear approach within an arm’s length of him. If now and

again he spoke of old age with a kind of melancholy, it was because he

dreaded the idea of not being in unison with the new generations around

him, as he had been in unison with the friends of his youth. Thinking

of all this, I continued my nocturnal stroll by myself, repeating the

verses the prince had improvised on the subject, and I reached the

hotel, the ‘Roman Emperor,’ just as the Comte Z---- was going in. To

dispel the sad thoughts induced by the prince’s remarks, I accepted

Count Z----‘s offer of a glass of punch and accompanied him to his

apartments.

Z----,[87] the son of a favourite minister of Catherine II., had

recently lost his father, who left him a considerable fortune,

estimated at more than thirty thousand serfs. I had seen a great deal

of him while I was in St. Petersburg, where his birth, his gentle

disposition, and his extensive attainments, much beyond his years, had

made him a favourite in the highest circles. Having been appointed

only a short time before a ‘gentleman of the chambers,’ he proposed

to improve his education by travel, and he began at Vienna. It was

starting with a most interesting preface the book of life, which, as he

said, he wished to read from the first page to the last.

‘I have spent the evening at Prince Razumowski’s, who, as you know, is

a relative. His palace is still littered with furniture, draperies,

and flowers, the remains of the brilliant fête. Truly, the ruins of a

ball are as interesting to contemplate as the ruins of monuments and

empires.’

I, in my turn, told him of my meeting, and, the punch gradually

dissipating my fit of melancholy, we began, like the selfish and

unthinking young men we were, to joke about old men who, with the

snows of many winters upon them, pretend to melt them in the sunny

rays of love. I told him the adventure of the Comte de Maurepas which

had so highly diverted the Court of Versailles at the period of his

last ministry. Like the Prince de Ligne, M. de Maurepas, at eighty,

had preserved the habits of extreme attentiveness to the fair sex

which ought only to be indulged in by young men. The witty and handsome

Marquise de ---- was the object of those octogenarian attentions.

Worried by Maurepas’ assiduities, to which there could be no possible

sequel, she determined to put an end to them. The superannuated

Lovelace was seated one day near her in her boudoir, and was commenting

upon his unhappiness, caused by the want of feeling of the woman

he adored. The marquise appeared touched by the recital; the lover

became more pressing, the marquise apparently more yielding. At last

she murmured a faint consent, adding, however, ‘First go and bolt the

door.’ Maurepas went to bolt it, not on the inside, but on the outside,

and stole away on tiptoe without saying good-bye to the malicious fair

one. The _dénouement_ met with our full approval.

I was expecting next morning two Hungarian horses, which I had been

assured were the best trotters in Vienna. Being anxious to try them at

once, I asked Z---- if he would come with me to the Prater to do so. He

promised. While talking about trotters, none of which in Europe come

up, to my thinking, to those harnessed to the sledges at Moscow for the

runs on the frozen Moskowa, the comte got into bed, being tired by the

mazurkas in which he had the night before been compelled to initiate

some German ladies, who experienced great difficulties in their

transition from the stiff German minuet to the graceful elasticity of

the Polish dance.

‘Good-night, comte, I’ll leave you to your well-earned rest. I’ll put

the lights out, and give one candle to your servant, I hope you’ll

have a good sleep, so that you may be ready to-morrow at twelve.’ With

this I left him. Next morning at twelve the horses were put to the

cabriolet, and I went upstairs to fetch Z----; but when I got to his

door, his servant told me he was asleep. ‘What! asleep at twelve, when

he went to bed before midnight. I think I’ll wake him,’ I said, and

made my way into the room, where the curtains were drawn to exclude the

daylight.

‘Up, up!’ I shouted, ‘the horses are waiting for us. Or are you ill?’

He woke up, sat upright in bed, and began to rub his eyes, as if to

suppress his tears. ‘My dear father; why have I lost my father?’ he

exclaimed.

‘Have you had a nightmare, dear comte? What has the memory of your

father to do with the horses we are going to try?’

‘Alas, my friend, it’s not a dream, but a horrible reality. I lost two

millions of roubles last night.’

‘Are you mad or joking? You are in bed as I left you when I put out the

lights. Do you walk in your sleep, or are you not awake?’

‘No, friend, but I’m awaking from a sleep which I wish had been my last

one. S---- and the Comte B---- entered the room immediately after you

left it. They relighted the candles which you extinguished: we played

all night, and I have lost two millions of roubles, for which I gave

them my bills. Here, look for yourself.’

I stepped to the window and drew the curtains aside: the floor was

littered with cards, which they must have got in the hotel, and the

ruin of the young fellow had been accomplished before daylight.

‘This can only be a joke on their part, dear comte; make your mind

easy. They could not possibly harbour the thought of despoiling a

friend in that manner. They are also my friends, although I should

certainly cease to consider them as such if they hesitated for a moment

to destroy every trace of such a disgraceful night.’ Having said this,

I immediately left him, to go to S----, to whom I submitted the same

argument in order to persuade him to waive his claim. I said much more;

I pointed out the consequences to himself if such a story came to the

ears of the Emperor Alexander. Referring to the sovereign’s well-known

dislike of any kind of gaming, I did not disguise from him the

possibility of the emperor taking up the matter personally, with a view

of preventing such deplorable transactions in the future, and that he,

S----, might be selected, not without some justification, as an example

for the sake of enforcing the lesson. All my efforts to bring him to

reason and to arouse a feeling of equity were in vain. He positively

derided what he was pleased to call my sentimental pathos, and ended

up by proposing a game for my cabriolet and horses, so that I might be

enabled to preach from experience. I felt disgusted, and left him.

From the military man I proceeded to the diplomatist, who proved to

be much more frigid than the other. With many fine phrases he tried

to convince me that it was not disloyal or dishonourable to wake up

a young man of twenty-one at midnight in order to despoil him of his

fortune in a couple of hours.

‘Is it worth while to make so much ado about the loss of a few

_boumashkis-boumashkis?_‘--being the name of Russian paper money--he

said. ‘We have only to look around us to find the same thing going on

every day in another shape. You have merely to count the claimants to

thrones they lost because the game went against them. Do you think

people pay any heed to them? You may have noticed a gentleman who left

when you came in. That’s the Marquis de Brignoli. He came to Vienna to

claim the independence of Genoa. The ambassador of a republic which

is at its last gasp, he has treated the Congress to a most energetic

protest, which you may read if you like, for I have it here. In spite

of his logic, M. de Metternich politely bowed him out, and Genoa is to

be given to Piedmont, which has won it, and means to keep it. Venice

disappears in spite of its ancient wisdom. Is it being swallowed up

by the Adriatic? Not at all. It’s Austria that has won it, and means

to keep it. Malta only claims from the Congress its rock and arms to

defend itself against all comers: England, it is told, has won it, and

means to keep it. Prussia gains Saxony; Sweden gains Norway; Russia

gains Poland. Europe in Vienna sits round a table covered with a green

cloth; she is gambling for states, and a cast of the diplomatic dice

involves the loss or the gain of a hundred thousand, nay, of a million,

of heads.[88] Why should not I win a few bits of paper when luck

favours me?’

‘But from your friend, Monsieur le Comte?’

‘They are very scrupulous about relatives here, not to say about

friends, when it comes to the appropriation of thrones, aren’t they.

No, no, all this is so much nonsense. Figaro resolved the problem long

ago: “What’s worth taking, is worth keeping.”’

What answer could I make to such maxims, except to treat them with

contempt? I left him and went back to Z---- to inform him of the

failure of my efforts.

‘I felt certain it would be so,’ he said. ‘The sting of a serpent is

less cruel than the ingratitude of a friend. There is but one way with

people like this, and I’ll employ it.’

He was quite himself now; he dressed and went out to call upon the

grand-chamberlain, Narischkine, who was his superior in virtue of

his Court charge. He intended to inform him of the disaster that had

befallen him, and the means he meant to use for redress. He would not

allow me to go with him; and I tried my horses by myself. I could have

wished them, in their rapid course, to carry me right away from the

painful impressions of the last few hours.

Such episodes were by no means rare in Russia and in Poland. The fatal

passion of gambling was carried to excess. It had become a frenzy, a

positive madness. Russian and Polish society teemed with victims, the

whole of whose fortunes had been lost at the gaming table in a dozen

hours.

I remember that after Potocki’s death at Tulczim, the children of his

first marriage came into possession of his immense fortune. Two of

these, educated at Leipzig, received during the life of their father

only a few ducats per week for pocket-money. The moment they were the

masters of their inheritance, they went headlong into all the excesses

of gaming, and the elder of the two lost thirty millions of florins in

three years by playing at faro with his own land-stewards. A short time

after that his friend, M. de Fontenay, who had clung to him through

good and evil fortune, had to borrow a hundred louis to have him buried

at Aix-la-Chapelle, where he died.

Sometimes the incidents of those terrible gaming parties presented the

most wonderful reversals of luck. Here is an instance. Prince Galitzin,

one of the richest of Russian nobles, was playing on one occasion with

the most persistent bad luck. Estates, serfs, revenues, town-houses,

furniture, jewels, everything had been swallowed up. He had nothing

left but his carriage. That was waiting for him outside; he staked it,

and lost that in a few throws of the dice. A few minutes afterwards the

horses were also gone. ‘I did not stake the harness,’ he said; ‘it is

all in silver, and has just come from St. Petersburg.’

His adversary nodded, and a game was begun for the harness. At

that moment, though, the luck turned as completely in the Prince’s

favour as a few moments previously it had been against him. In a few

hours he not only won back the horses, the carriage, and the family

jewels, but everything else he had lost so rapidly, and that, thanks

to the harness, which literally seemed to be attached to the wheel

of fortune. It is absolutely astounding to find that men are not

positively shattered by those shocks of fortune. Galitzin was not

ungrateful in his worship of the harness. In his palace at Moscow I

have looked at it--in fact, it was pointed out to me, suspended in the

most conspicuous spot of the building, and protected from the tiniest

speck of dust by a framework of glass, like a precious relic, and as a

tangible proof of the strange vicissitudes of gaming.

During my stay in Russia, that same Prince Galitzin was the victim

of probably the cleverest piece of fraud ever perpetrated, in which

his luck forsook him. He was a great amateur of diamonds and precious

stones, and also claimed to be a judge. One day, in the card-room of

the English club at Moscow, he noticed an Italian wearing a ring with a

diamond of the first water, and of extraordinary size. The prince went

up to the wearer of this magnificent jewel, and asked to be allowed to

look at it. ‘And you also, prince, are taken in by it,’ replied the

Italian. ‘What looks to you like a diamond is only a bit of paste, very

beautiful paste, but after all, paste.’

The prince shook his head. ‘No paste ever sparkled like that. Will you

mind confiding it to me for a few hours?’ he asked. ‘I wish to show it

to the emperor’s jeweller, in order to prove to him the rare degree of

perfection imitation can attain.’

The Italian made not the least difficulty in granting the request. The

prince ran to the jeweller to ask him the value of the magnificent

single stone. The dealer examined, weighed, and tested the thing,

admitting that he had rarely seen so perfect a specimen of petrified

carbon. ‘But it’s a bit of paste,’ exclaimed the prince with glee. The

dealer examined and weighed again, subjected the stone to more tests,

and finally pronounced the gem to be a diamond, a diamond of the first

water, which in the trade would fetch at the lowest estimate a hundred

thousand roubles, and for which he, if it was to be disposed of, would

be willing to give eighty thousand. Galitzin makes the dealer repeat

his words again and again, and finally returns to the card-room, where

the Italian is engaged in a quiet game of piquet. The prince gives him

his ring, asking him to sell it; to which the Italian replies that he

is not in want of money, and that in any case the ring has not the

slightest value. Galitzin will not take no for an answer, but cannot

get the Italian to budge. He sets great store by the bauble, not

because of its worth, because it has none, but for the associations

attached to it, inasmuch as his mother gave it to him, exacting his

promise never to part with it. Seduced by the prospect of an enormous

bargain, Galitzin would take no refusal, offered ten thousand roubles,

increased his offer to thirty thousand, and finally proposed fifty

thousand.’

‘Very well, prince,’ said the Italian, as if weary of the struggle,

‘fifty thousand be it then; and you, gentlemen--’ this, turning to the

lookers-on--‘you can bear witness that the prince compels me to sell

him for fifty thousand roubles a mere bit of paste.’

‘Never mind, give me the ring,’ exclaimed Galitzin impatiently; ‘I know

what I am doing.’ Thereupon the Italian took the ring off his finger

and handed it to the prince, who, delighted with his purchase, gave

him there and then a voucher for fifty thousand roubles, to be paid at

sight by his business-manager. An hour afterwards the money was in the

Italian’s pocket, and the next morning Galitzin repaired once more to

the jeweller’s, telling him of his success in obtaining the diamond,

and holding it up for his inspection.

‘But this is only a bit of paste,’ exclaims the dealer; ‘a splendid bit

of paste, but after all, paste. It’s wonderful, though, how closely it

resembles the single stone you showed me yesterday. It’s the same size,

the same cut, the same shape. It’s calculated to deceive better judges

than your excellency.’

His consternation notwithstanding, Galitzin soon perceived that he had

been duped by an adroit scoundrel, who at the moment of handing him the

ring had cleverly substituted a paste imitation of it, but an imitation

calculated to impose upon all but the most expert. A hue-and-cry was

raised after the Italian in Moscow, but immediately after securing the

amount of his voucher, he had left. As for the prince, in addition to

the loss of his money, he had the mortification of being pitied by no

one; he was simply looked upon as ‘the biter bit.’

The affair of Z---- made a great noise in Vienna. The enormous amount

of his loss, the circumstances under which it was sustained, the

place itself of the gambling transaction, everything pointed to a

diabolically conceived combination, scarcely to be reconciled with the

age of the gamblers, the oldest of whom was only three-and-twenty.

The sequel fully confirmed my prediction to S----. Alexander had the

deepest aversion to gamblers and gambling. From that moment he withdrew

his favour from S----, and eight months afterwards in Paris, in the

private room of the Emperor at the Elysée Bourbon, S---- was forced

to admit that he would willingly part with half of his fortune if the

affair had never occurred, or if he had taken my advice about hushing

it up.

Z---- and the Comte B---- fought a duel with swords, in which the

latter was worsted, and the sum paid in settlement of his winnings was

comparatively a modest one. The Emperor Alexander would neither forgive

nor forget the affair. A few years later the young comte, knowing

that in Russia it is not sufficient to be somebody, but that it is

necessary to be also something, wrote to the emperor to be attached to

the legation at Florence; but Alexander sent a refusal in the following

terms:

‘In consideration of the services rendered to our august mother by the

Comte B----, your father, I excuse the glaring presumption of your

request.’

Under the painful impression of that scene in the morning, I spent a

sad day, full of depressing thoughts. The rapid ruin of Z----, the

callousness of his two adversaries, the inevitable consequences of such

a startling affair, did not make me feel disposed to enjoy any of the

daily gaieties of the Congress. The arrival of Ypsilanti put an end to

my serious mood. He came to take me to the masked ball given by the

Court in the small hall set apart for routs, which was to be preceded

by ‘living pictures.’ I at first refused, but was finally persuaded to

accompany him.

The entertainment differed but little from similar ones that had gone

before; at that period there was one almost every week. After a few

turns through the magnificent rooms, which, as usual, afforded the most

complete and animated example of everything that wealth could procure

and the constant craving for pleasure could relish, we went into

the room arranged for ‘the living pictures.’ In the front rows, the

emperors, the sovereigns, and queens, had already taken their seats;

behind them were the political celebrities of the Congress. In a few

minutes the curtain rose.

The first picture was ‘la Conversation Espagnole,’ and the second

‘la Famille de Darius aux pieds d’Alexandre,’ after the handsome

painting of Lebrun. The Comte de Schönfeldt represented Alexander,

and the charming Sophie Zichy impersonated Statira. The features

of the male character were stamped with the gentle pride of the

victor, still further tempered by the kindness and modesty of the

hero; the comtesse, even more beautiful than the figure of Lebrun’s

painting, expressed both admiration and grief. The youngest and most

charming women of the Court represented the daughters of Darius and

the attendants of Statira. The heroic and touching expression of the

principal personages, the numerous delightful figures, the fidelity

of the attitudes, the arrangement of the light--in short, everything

gave to the picture a completeness both elevated and sensuous, and it

was not surprising to hear it unanimously applauded. It was followed

by a performance of the sparkling comedy _Le Pacha de Surêne_, by M.

Etienne. The principal parts were played by the Comtesses Zichy and

Marassi, the Princesses Marie de Metternich and Thérèse Esterhazy,

the Comte de Wallstein, the Prince Antoine Radziwill, and a few other

distinguished personages. This pretty piece, interpreted with the

ability of experienced actors, was greatly applauded.

After that we went to the ball-room. One of the first persons that

caught my eye on entering was the Prince de Ligne. He was beaming with

happiness, and his step was as elastic and graceful as that of any

young man. It was not the same man who had confided his griefs to me

on the previous night. On his arm hung a woman in a blue domino. Her

figure, her voice, and the whole of her bearing fully explained the

disappointment and regret of the prince at finding himself alone at the

love-tryst. I brushed gently past him, and whispered in his ear: ‘It

appears that you were lacking in patience last night.’ ‘You are right,’

was the answer. ‘The great art of life is the exercise of patience.’

I went away, but I fancied I recognised the prince’s companion. It

was, unless I made a mistake, Mme. A---- P----, the young and charming

Greek, who was attracting so much attention in Vienna. An unhappy

love affair, of which the Prince de C---- was the hero, had aroused

the interest of the fair and most impressionable half of the Austrian

aristocracy; her great beauty had easily obtained for her many friends

among the other half of the European celebrities. Her romantic story,

which was told in whispers, was simple and touching. Having fallen a

victim to the Prince de C----‘s blandishments when she was still very

young, she almost immediately became a mother. Both her existence

and her heart were broken by desertion. There was no lack of would-be

consolers; but doubtless her experience had taught her that a first

lapse is only condoned on condition of its not being repeated. Unable

to dispense with a protector, she judiciously chose the Prince de

Ligne, whose great age, she probably thought, would silence all adverse

comment. The liaison, it was said, remained strictly within the limits

of a platonic correspondence; the young Greek contributing her share

by epistles such as all women of all countries and conditions know how

to write; the illustrious old man replying with effusions of which he

alone had preserved the secret. The latter contained the expression of

a sentiment more intense, perhaps, than that of mere friendship, but

tempered by the gentle logic of a wholly paternal affection.

Contrary to the invariable etiquette prevailing at state balls, where

only the polonaise was danced, quadrilles were speedily organised. A

few moments later I caught sight once more of the Prince de Ligne, but

this time he was alone. As a matter of course, I went up to him. ‘Just

watch that pretty bayadère figuring in the quadrille close to us,’ he

said. ‘Would you not take her for one of the most tantalizing girls

at the ball? Well, before she had spoken three words I guessed her

identity. It’s young Alfred, the Comte de Woyna’s brother.’

‘A young man, prince?’

‘A young man dressed as a girl. There’s nothing surprising in that.

Your celebrated dancer Duport came all the way from Paris to Vienna in

woman’s clothes. He alighted from his post-chaise at the Princesse Jean

de Lichtenstein’s, where he danced the whole of the evening, still in

woman’s clothes, and to the admiration of that circle of admirers, all

of whom went to applaud him next evening at the theatre at the Court,

where, still in female attire, he danced in the ballet of _Achille à

Scyros_. Look you here, my boy: there are disguises elsewhere than at

routs, and inasmuch as you have taken to collect the trifles I wrote

during the spring of my life, as well as in its fall, I’ll read you

to-morrow one of the transgressions of my youth, entitled, _Le Roman

d’une Nuit_. Only my extreme youth can be the excuse for that.’

He referred once more to society; to the society he had bitterly

stigmatised as ungrateful. ‘I shall always consider myself fortunate

in having been a witness of that unique spectacle, the Congress. In

that varied crowd I look upon each individual as a separate page of the

great book of society. Believe me, man is not as bad as he is painted.

Woe to the misanthropic moralists who care to look only at the sombre

side of him. They are the painters who only study nature at night.’

Amidst this boisterous, bustling throng, where people looked for their

friends without finding them, though they might be elbowing each other,

two female dominos came up to me and drew me away from the prince. One

took my hand. ‘Why were you in such a hurry to leave us?’ she asked.

The voice, which sounded altogether natural, was entirely unfamiliar

to me. ‘When a man addresses verses to a woman,’ she went on, ‘he

assuredly does not expect her to travel three hundred leagues for the

sake of thanking the author.’

‘Gentle mask, Vienna is three hundred leagues from Paris, an equal

distance from Naples, and as much from St. Petersburg, and in all

these places I have unfortunately addressed verses to ladies. I must

therefore ask you to be more explicit, for unless you are, I shall be

travelling a long while in search of my unknown heroine.’

‘Very well, let us say it was at St. Petersburg, and that Lafont set

them to music.’

‘In that case I should not be sufficiently conceited to aspire to

thanks from the object of my poetry.’

‘Why not, if the verses bestowed caused pleasure?’

‘Or,’ added her companion, who had hitherto been silent, ‘if the proof

of the pleasure is the thanks offered.’

It has been said with truth that the whole destiny of a life is decided

in an instant. I immediately recognised the voice, which I had only

heard once before. The strange and brilliant dream of a night was about

to be reproduced a second time with all its former illusions. I did not

know what to say; the liberty of speech, tacitly admitted under cover

of a mask, only added to my confusion. ‘Have you nothing to say?’ asked

the same voice. ‘Sweet mask,’ I replied, ‘the timid bird may sing at

sunrise, only the eagle dare fixedly look at the sun in its zenith.’

Thereupon I endeavoured to get my two interlocutors out of the crowd,

in order to be more free in the interview, which I felt was to decide

the whole of my life, but Grand-Chamberlain Narischkine came up to

us, recognised the ladies, took their arms and led them away. I had

no longer any doubt. I had met once more the angel of a dream the

realisation of which would not occur on earth.

I remained rooted to the spot, then rushed after the dominos like a

madman. I saw nothing, I heard nothing except the magic words that had

gone to the core of my heart. My pursuit was in vain, the crowd had

parted us for evermore.

In one of the quadrangular rooms I came upon the Prince Cariati talking

very animatedly to a lady disguised as a gipsy, who immediately

revealed her _incognita_. It was the Comtesse Zamoyska, our neighbour

on the Jaeger Zeill.

‘I wish you to join our plot,’ she said; ‘it ‘s a complicated piece of

mystification, the sequel to an intrigue begun at one of these balls,

which has lasted now for several weeks. The personage I wish to mystify

is worthy of my attempt.’ Without knowing or caring much what I did, I

fell in with the wish of the comtesse, who left us, laughing.

I was getting weary of it all, when I noticed my friend M. Achille

Rouen occupying a rout seat all by himself, and apparently as bored as

I was. I asked him if he had seen the dominos of whom I was in search.

‘If you mean the two who were with Narischkine,’ he replied, giving me

an exact description of them, ‘they left the ball a quarter of an hour

ago.’

From that moment the charm of the evening seemed to have vanished, as

far as I was concerned. We began chatting about the Congress and the

current news, and as a matter of course the name of M. de Talleyrand

cropped up. No other name was so often mentioned in people’s comments

on the difficult and critical questions of the moment. Achille Rouen,

who never missed a day without seeing him, was sincerely attached to

him.

‘It’s impossible to know M. de Talleyrand thoroughly without liking

him,’ he said. ‘All those who have come in close contact with him judge

him as I do. He is an inexplicable, I might say indefinable, amalgam

of simplicity and lofty thoughts, of grace and logic, of critical

faculty and courteous tolerance. In one’s intercourse with him, one

learns almost unconsciously the history and politics of all times, and

thousands of stories in connection with every Court; his company is

practically a guide through an enormous gallery, where events are as

instructively depicted as personages.’

‘And in spite of this, my dear Achille, how people have rent him to

pieces! Is mediocrity always to exact such a heavy toll from talent for

the latter’s success? For, if such be the case, the only happy people

are those whose obscurity does not breed envy in others.’

‘History will reward M. de Talleyrand for the evil his contemporaries

have said of him. When, in the course of a long and difficult career, a

statesman has preserved a great number of faithful friends, and counts

but few enemies, one feels bound to credit him with having been wise

and moderate, honourable and thoroughly able. In the prince’s case, the

heart is even better than the ability. Not long ago, M. de R---- came

to borrow twenty thousand francs of him. M. de Talleyrand lent them. A

month later the news came that in consequence of business reverses, M.

de R---- had blown his brains out. “I am glad I did not refuse him the

money,” exclaimed M. de Talleyrand, and one sentence like this suffices

to paint the man.

‘But,’ Rouen went on, ‘what is the circumstance to which he lately

referred during a conversation, and which he said might have

considerably influenced your life?’

‘That circumstance, my dear Achille, never presents itself to my mind

without reviving my regret at having allowed to escape one of the rare

opportunities which offered themselves in one’s young days. Everything

in the way of creating for oneself a career, of making a friend, even

a female friend, depends upon a moment. The goddess of chance must be

caught by the forelock as she rushes past; our regrets have no effect

upon her when we have neglected her momentary proximity to us, I shall

tell you how it happened. I had been living for something like two

months at Raincy, where M. Ouvrard,[89] then at the height of his

fortune, had offered me a couple of rooms in the building belonging

to the fire engine. I was only seventeen; you are acquainted with

the circumstances which at that period brought me into contact at

such a youthful age with the whole of the society of what I must call

“rejuvenated France.” I had received an invitation to a dinner given

by M. Davencourt, the newly appointed “Captain-General of the Hunt,”

in honour of his new functions. It took place in a kind of Russian hut

built in the park, and at the end of a hunt. The other guests were MM.

de Talleyrand, de Montrond,[90] Ouvrard; Admiral Bruix; Generals Lannes

and Berthier. The only woman present was Mme. Grant, who subsequently

married the Prince de Talleyrand. In spite of the many elements of

interest and the clever guests, the conversation slackened; to give it

a fillip, Ouvrard asked me how I had managed on the previous day to get

back to Paris, my horse having got hurt while out hunting, and there

being by a strange coincidence no other animal left in the stable.

* * * * *

‘In a very simple way,’ I replied. ‘As you said just now, there was

not a horse to be had for love or money, and I had to be in Paris at

three to meet Mme. Récamier, whom I would not have missed for anything,

inasmuch as she was about to leave the capital immediately. When

there is no chance of a horse or a carriage, the simplest means is to

walk, so I made up my mind to foot it. It was very hot, but at twelve

o’clock I got into the plain about midway between Bondy and Pantin. I

felt thoroughly knocked up, and, moreover, literally as hungry as a

hunter; I stopped at a mill near the high road, and asked them to get

me some breakfast. While it was being prepared, I began to think of

my second want, and asked the miller if there was no means of getting

a horse. “There is mine,” he replied, “and for a crown of six francs

it’s at your service. It will take you very comfortably, and to-morrow,

when I get to Paris, I’ll come and fetch it from your house.” The

courser was brought to the door; it was about as high as an ass, and

in fact performed the duties of one; it had no other equipment than a

pack-saddle.

‘“How am I to get on to that?” I said to the miller. “Haven’t you got a

riding-saddle? But there is one hanging on the wall.”

‘“Oh, that’s my own saddle, my brand-new English saddle, and I don’t

let it out for hire, monsieur.”

‘In vain did I insist, and beg, and persuade. The miller was obstinate,

and I might have saved my breath. I beheld myself riding through the

streets of Paris perched on that lamentable pack-saddle, which had

never carried anything but flour or manure. Assuredly the horse was of

no use to me without the saddle. “Now, gentlemen,” I said, interrupting

my story and addressing my fellow-guests, “what would you have done in

view of the miller’s obstinacy?” Then I appealed to each in particular.

“You, Monsieur Ouvrard, who, in virtue of your administrative

capacities, admired by everybody, sustain our military glory by looking

to the inner comforts of our soldiers? You, Davencourt, who, in spite

of all the ruses of the fox, put on its scent a dozen packs after they

have lost it? You, Monsieur l’Amiral, who brave both the storm and the

guns of the enemy? You, Generals Berthier and Lannes, who in Italy and

in Egypt proved yourselves the Parmenios of the new Alexander? And

finally you, Monsieur de Talleyrand, who as our Minister of Foreign

Affairs have shown and continue to show your profound observation of

men and things:--what would you have done to get hold of the saddle

the miller refused to lend at any price?” There was no answer, they

only laughed. “May I remind you,” I said, “that laughter scarcely

contributes a reply. I have, however, already discovered the master of

all of you,” I went on, turning to Mme. Grant. “Her smile shows me that

she has guessed my last resource. Yes, madame, you guessed rightly; I

appealed to the miller’s wife, and with a few carefully chosen words,

managed to enlist her sympathy. The new saddle, the horse, and the mill

if I had been in need of it, were finally at my disposal. Such, in the

cottage as in the palace, is the power of feminine influence.”

* * * * *

‘No sooner had I finished my break-neck story than loud applause broke

forth, followed by the drinking of my health and to the result of my

negotiation. Encouraged by everybody’s approval, I began to talk, like

the boy I was, right and left, and my remarks were evidently relished

by Mme. Grant. M. de Talleyrand, who at that period was very much in

love with her, because, as he said, she had everything that completed

the charm of a woman, namely, a soft skin, a sweet breath, and a sweet

temper--M. de Talleyrand seemed equally pleased with me. The rest

of the guests followed his lead, considering it easier to adopt the

opinion of a clever man than to go to the trouble of making one for

themselves.

‘When we left the table, M. de Talleyrand beckoned me to a corner of

the room and talked to me for a considerable time. He seemed to enjoy

the account of my travels in Sweden and in Denmark. The description of

the shelling of Copenhagen, at which I was present, interested him. My

remarks on all those countries, on the _émigrés_ in Hamburg, and on

Hamburg itself, he qualified as exceedingly just. “Come and see me in

Paris to-morrow,” he said. “I’ll expect you. But you are very young,

and perhaps you’ll forget. Promise me that you’ll not fail to come.”

Saying which he grasped my hands very affectionately. Mme. Grant, who

had joined us, was equally pressing. I promised, and I ought to have

kept my promise, for it was one of those lucky opportunities which

often decide the whole of a man’s life and which the great Frederick

called “His Majesty, Accident.”

‘But, my dear Achille, happiness is a ball after which we constantly

run and then push with our feet when we have come up with it. I did

not keep my appointment with M. de Talleyrand. That unfortunate

shyness which too often paralyses youth had once more got the upper

hand. I’ll not go as far as to say that I was practically frightened

at the possible consequences of this good-will towards me. But I did

ask myself what people could offer me in exchange for that constant

succession of happiness, of maddening joys which at that moment made up

my existence? I dreaded the end of a dream which my thoughtlessness,

my ignorance of all serious things, sought to prolong. The contact

with, the goodwill of, such a man, his influence, would have given a

different direction to my ideas and to my career; in short, would have

finally created for me a different life. Yes, friend, the goddess of

chance absolutely stood in my path, and I was foolish enough not to

catch hold of her. I learnt too late that her favour has wings, as

desire is said to have.’

‘I am not surprised at the prince’s recollection of the incident. His

memory is excellent.’

‘Since then I have often thought the matter over, and always regretted

my neglect to let M. de Talleyrand know the causes of my apparent lack

of gratitude.’

‘Your story reminds me of one I heard recently in Rome in connection

with the banker Torlonia, whose enormous fortune is, again, a

consequence of one of those inspirations that decide the fate of a man.

‘Torlonia, who sprang from very humble people, began by a small

traffic of jewellery between Paris and Rome. A short time afterwards

he established himself as a banker, and then an unhoped-for and

altogether unexpected circumstance brought him in contact in a very

strange manner with Cardinal Chiaramonti. At the death of Pius VI. the

conclave for the election of a new Pope was obliged to assemble at

Venice. Chiaramonti positively had not the money to pay his travelling

expenses, and Torlonia advanced him three or four hundred crowns

without much thought as to the small risk involved, and certainly

without foreseeing the consequences. Chiaramonti proceeded to Venice,

where, in the church of St. George’s (?), he was elected to the papacy.

As a proof of his gratitude, the new Sovereign Pontiff appointed

him Court Banker, then made him a marquis and finally a duke.

To-day, thanks to that small loan, Torlonia is one of the wealthiest

capitalists of Europe.’

These last words had just been spoken when Ypsilanti, Tettenborn, and

some other friends came to tell us that supper was being served. We

followed them to the supper-room, where the conversation turned once

more on the subject of M. de Talleyrand and his remarkable influence

on the deliberations of the Congress. Everybody was agreed that

this preponderance was not due either to mere chance or to the just

appreciation of his political knowledge, but to his character, which

had laid it down as a principle that the first and foremost essential

of all diplomatic negotiations was an impenetrable discretion; and

to the fact of his having imbued all those whom he employed with the

same reserve. In connection with this, some one cited the recent reply

of M. D---- in a gathering of friends where M. de Talleyrand and the

particulars of his life were being discussed.

M. D----, who had been with M. de Talleyrand for twenty years,

accompanied him to the Congress. People naturally concluded that this

long intimacy had made M. D---- familiar with a number of particulars

of the minister’s life, and bearing also upon the events with which he

had been mixed up. Worried with questions, M. D---- invariably replied

that he knew nothing; but the questioners would not be satisfied, and

returned to the charge. ‘Very well,’ finally said M. D----, ‘I’ll

tell you a peculiar and altogether unknown fact in connection with

M. de Talleyrand. Since Louis XV. he’s the only man who can open a

soft-boiled egg with one backward stroke of his knife without spilling

a drop of the contents of the shell. That’s the only peculiarity I know

in connection with him.’ Discretion had scored a decisive victory. From

that moment the questions ceased.

The topic of M. de Talleyrand seemed really inexhaustible. More stories

about him were told, and then the Prince de Reuss came up to our

table, said a few words to M. Rouen, and once more left us.

‘It was his father, the reigning prince,’ said one of our friends,

‘who at the time of the Directory began an official despatch in the

following terms: “The Prince de Reuss begs to acknowledge the existence

of the French Republic.” M. de Talleyrand, who in his capacity of

Minister of Foreign Affairs had to reply to the missive, began his

document with: “The French Republic feels most flattered at making the

acquaintance of the Prince de Reuss.”’

On leaving my friends, I could not help reflecting with regret upon

my adventure at Raincy, the recollection of which had so unexpectedly

cropped up a few hours previously. I kept thinking of the chance

offered to me by M. de Talleyrand, which my lack of foresight had

caused me to disdain.

Anecdotal Recollections of the Congress of Vienna · 第 11 / 21 章