_CONCLUSION OF THE CIVIL WAR._
2 SAMUEL iii. 1-21.
The victory at the pool of Gibeon was far from ending the opposition
to David. In vain, for many a day, weary eyes looked out for the dove
with the olive leaf. "There was long war between the house of Saul
and the house of David." The war does not seem to have been carried
on by pitched battles, but rather by a long series of those fretting
and worrying little skirmishes which a state of civil war breeds, even
when the volcano is comparatively quiet. But the drift of things was
manifest. "David waxed stronger and stronger; but the house of Saul
waxed weaker and weaker." The cause of the house of Saul was weak in
its invisible support because God was against it; it was weak in its
champion Ishbosheth, a feeble man, with little or no power to attract
people to his standard; its only element of strength was Abner, and
even he could not make head against such odds. Good and evil so often
seem to balance each other, existing side by side in a kind of feeble
stagnation, and giving rise to such a dull feeling on the part of
onlookers, that we cannot but think with something like envy of the
followers of David even under the pain of a civil war, cheered as they
were by constant proofs that their cause was advancing to victory.
And now we get a glimpse of David's domestic mode of life, which,
indeed, is far from satisfactory. His wives were now six in number; of
some of them we know nothing; of the rest what we do know is not always
in their favour. The earliest of all was "Ahinoam, the Jezreelitess."
Her native place, or the home of her family, was Jezreel, that part
of the plain of Esdraelon where the Philistines encamped before Saul
was defeated (1 Sam. xxix. 12), and afterwards, in the days of Ahab,
a royal residence of the kings of Israel (1 Kings xviii. 46) and the
abode of Naboth, who refused to part with his vineyard in Jezreel to
the king (1 Kings xxi.). Of Ahinoam we find absolutely no mention in
the history; if her son Amnon, the oldest of David's family, reflected
her character, we have no reason to regret the silence (2 Sam. xiii.).
The next of his wives was Abigail, the widow of Nabal the Carmelite,
of whose smartness and excellent management we have a full account in
a former part of the history. Her son is called Chileab, but in the
parallel passage in Chronicles Daniel; we can only guess the reason
of the change; but whether it was another name for the same son, or
the name of another son, the history is silent concerning him, and
the most probable conjecture is that he died early. His third wife
was Maachah, the daughter of Talmai the Geshurite. This was not, as
some have rather foolishly supposed, a member of those Geshurites in
the south against whom David led his troop (1 Sam. xxvii. 8), for it
is expressly stated that of that tribe "he left neither man nor woman
alive." It was of Geshur in Syria that Talmai was king (2 Sam. xv.
8); it formed one of several little principalities lying between
Mount Hermon and Damascus: but we cannot commend the alliance; for
these kingdoms were idolatrous, and unless Maachah was an exception,
she must have introduced idolatrous practices into David's house. Of
the other three wives we have no information. And in regard to the
household which he thus established at Hebron, we can only regret that
the king of Israel did not imitate the example that had been set there
by Abraham, and followed in the same neighbourhood by Isaac. What a
different complexion would have been given to David's character and
history if he had shown the self-control in this matter that he showed
in his treatment of Saul! Of how many grievous sins and sorrows did
he sow the seed when he thus multiplied wives to himself! How many a
man, from his own day down to the days of Mormonism, did he silently
encourage in licentious conduct, and furnish with a respectable example
and a plausible excuse for it! How difficult did he make it for many
who cannot but acknowledge the bright aspect of his spiritual life
to believe that even in that it was all good and genuine! We do not
hesitate to ascribe to the life of David an influence on successive
generations on the whole pure and elevating; but it is impossible not
to own that by many, a justification of relaxed principle and unchaste
living has been drawn from his example.
We have already said that polygamy was not imputed to David as a sin
in the sense that it deprived him of the favour of God. But we cannot
allow that this permission was of the nature of a boon. We cannot but
feel how much better it would have been if the seventh commandment
had been read by David with the same absolute, unbending limitation
with which it is read by us. It would have been better for him and
better for his house. Puritan strictness of morals is, after all, a
right wholesome and most blessed thing. Who shall say that the sum of
a man's enjoyment is not far greatest in the end of life when he has
kept with unflinching steadfastness his early vow of faithfulness,
and, as his reward, has never lost the freshness and the flavour
of his first love, nor ceased to find in his ever-faithful partner
that which fills and satisfies his heart? Compared to this, the life
of him who has flitted from one attachment to another, heedless of
the soured feelings or, it may be, the broken hearts he has left
behind, and whose children, instead of breathing the sweet spirit of
brotherly and sisterly love, scowl at one another with the bitter
feelings of envy, jealousy, and hatred, is like an existence of wild
fever compared to the pure tranquil life of a child.
In such a household as David's, occasions of estrangement must
have been perpetually arising among the various branches, and it
would require all his wisdom and gentleness to keep these quarrels
within moderate bounds. In his own breast, that sense of delicacy,
that instinct of purity, which exercises such an influence on a
godly family, could not have existed; the necessity of reining in
his inclinations in that respect was not acknowledged; and it is
remarkable that in the confessions of the fifty-first Psalm, while
he specifies the sins of blood-guiltiness and seems to have been
overwhelmed by a sense of his meanness, injustice, and selfishness,
there is no special allusion to the sin of adultery, and no
indication of that sin pressing very heavily upon his conscience.
Whether it be by design or not, it is an instructive circumstance
that it is immediately after this glimpse of David's domestic life
that we meet with a sample of the kind of evils which the system of
royal harems is ever apt to produce. Saul too had had his harem; and
it was a rule of succession in the East that the harem went with the
throne. To take possession of the one was regarded as equivalent to
setting up a claim to the other. When therefore Ishbosheth heard that
Abner had taken one of his father's concubines, he looked on it as a
proof that Abner had an eye to the throne for himself. He accordingly
demanded an explanation from Abner, but instead of explanation or
apology, he received a volley of rudeness and defiance. Abner knew
well that without him Ishbosheth was but a figure-head, and he was
enraged by treatment that seemed to overlook all the service he had
rendered him and to treat him as if he were some second or third-rate
officer of a firm and settled kingdom. Perhaps Abner had begun to see
that the cause of Ishbosheth was hopeless, and was even glad in his
secret heart of an excuse for abandoning an undertaking which could
bring neither success nor honour. "Am I a dog's head, which against
Judah do show kindness this day unto the house of Saul thy father,
to his brethren, and to his friends, and have not delivered thee
into the hand of David, that thou chargest me to-day with a fault
concerning this woman? So do God to Abner, and more also, except, as
the Lord hath sworn to David, even so I do to him, to translate the
kingdom from the house of Saul, and to set up the throne of David
over Israel and over Judah from Dan even to Beersheba."
The proverb says, "When rogues fall out, honest men get their own."
How utterly unprincipled the effort of Abner and Ishbosheth was is
evident from the confession of the former that God had sworn to
David to establish his throne over the whole land. Their enterprise
therefore bore impiety on its very face; and we can only account for
their setting their hands to it on the principle that keen thirst
for worldly advantage will drive ungodly men into virtual atheism,
as if God were no factor in the affairs of men, as if it mattered
not that He was against them, and that it is only when their schemes
show signs of coming to ruin that they awake to the consciousness
that there is a God after all! And how often we see that godless men
banded together have no firm bond of union; the very passions which
they are united to gratify begin to rage against one another; they
fall into the pit which they digged for others; they are hanged on
the gallows which they erected for their foes.
The next step in the narrative brings us to Abner's offer to David to
make a league with him for the undisputed possession of the throne.
Things had changed now very materially from that day when, in the
wilderness of Judah, David reproached Abner for his careless custody
of the king's person (1 Sam. xxvi. 14). What a picture of feebleness
David had seemed then, while Saul commanded the whole resources of
the kingdom! Yet in that day of weakness David had done a noble
deed, a deed made nobler by his very weakness, and he had thereby
shown to any that had eyes to see which party it was that had God
on its side. And now this truth concerning him, against which Abner
had kicked and struggled in vain, was asserting itself in a way not
to be resisted. Yet even now there is no trace of humility in the
language of Abner. He plays the great man still. "Behold, my hand
shall be with thee, to bring about all Israel to thee." He approaches
King David, not as one who has done him a great wrong, but as one
who offers to do him a great favour. There is no word of regret for
his having opposed what he knew to be God's purpose and promise, no
apology for the disturbance he had wrought in Israel, no excuse for
all the distress which he had caused to David by keeping the kingdom
and the people at war. He does not come as a rebel to his sovereign,
but as one independent man to another. Make a league with me. Secure
me from punishment; promise me a reward. For this he simply offers to
place at David's disposal that powerful hand of his that had been so
mighty for evil. If he expected that David would leap into his arms
at the mention of such an offer, he was mistaken. This was not the
way for a rebel to come to his king. David was too much dissatisfied
with his past conduct, and saw too clearly that it was only stress
of weather that was driving him into harbour now, to show any great
enthusiasm about his offer. On the contrary, he laid down a stiff
preliminary condition; and with the air of one who knew his place and
his power, he let Abner know that if that condition were not complied
with, he should not see his face. We cannot but admire the firmness
shown in this mode of meeting Abner's advances; but we are somewhat
disappointed when we find what the condition was--that Michal,
Saul's daughter, whom he had espoused for a hundred foreskins of the
Philistines, should be restored to him as his wife. The demand was
no doubt a righteous one, and it was reasonable that David should be
vindicated from the great slur cast on him when his wife was given to
another; moreover, it was fitted to test the genuineness of Abner's
advances, to show whether he really meant to acknowledge the royal
rights of David; but we wonder that, with six wives already about
him, he should be so eager for another, and we shrink from the reason
given for the restoration--not that the marriage tie was inviolable,
but that he had paid for her a very extraordinary dowry. And most
readers, too, will feel some sympathy with the second husband, who
seems to have had a strong affection for Michal, and who followed her
weeping, until the stern military voice of Abner compelled him to
return. All we can say about him is, that his sin lay in receiving
another man's wife and treating her as his own; the beginning of the
connection was unlawful, although the manner of its ending on his
part was creditable. Connections formed in sin must sooner or later
end in suffering; and the tears of Phaltiel would not have flowed now
if that unfortunate man had acted firmly and honourably when Michal
was taken from David.
But it is not likely that in this demand for the restoration of
Michal David acted on purely personal considerations. He does not
seem to have been above the prevalent feeling of the East which
measured the authority and dignity of the monarch by the rank and
connections of his wives. Moreover, as David laid stress on the way
in which he got Michal as his wife, it is likely that he desired to
recall attention to his early exploits against the Philistines. He
had probably found that his recent alliance with King Achish had
brought him into suspicion; he wished to remind the people therefore
of his ancient services against those bitter and implacable enemies
of Israel, and to encourage the expectation of similar exploits in
the future. The purpose which he thus seems to have had in view was
successful. For when Abner soon after made a representation to the
elders of Israel in favour of King David and reminded them of the
promise which God had made regarding him, it was to this effect: "By
the hand of My servant David I will save My people Israel out of the
hand of the Philistines and out of the hand of all their enemies." It
seems to have been a great step towards David's recognition by the
whole nation that they came to have confidence in him in leading them
against the Philistines. Thus he received a fresh proof of the folly
of his distrustful conclusion, "There is nothing better for me than
that I should escape into the land of the Philistines." It became
more and more apparent that nothing could have been worse.
One is tempted to wonder if David ever sat down to consider what would
probably have happened if, instead of going over to the Philistines, he
had continued to abide in the wilderness of Judah, braving the dangers
of the place and trusting in the protection of his God. Some sixteen
months after, the terrible invasion of the Philistines took place, and
Saul, overwhelmed with terror and despair, was at his wits' end for
help. How natural it would have been for him in that hour of despair to
send for David if he had been still in the country and ask his aid! How
much more in his own place would David have appeared bravely fronting
the Philistines in battle, than hovering in the rear of Achish and
pretending to feel himself treated ill because the Philistine lords had
required him to be sent away! Might he not have been the instrument of
saving his country from defeat and disgrace? And if Saul and Jonathan
had fallen in the battle, would not the whole nation have turned as
one man to him, and would not that long and cruel civil war have been
entirely averted? It is needless to go back on the past and think how
much better we could have acted if unavailing regret is to be the only
result of the process; but it is a salutary and blessed exercise if it
tends to fix in our minds--what we doubt not it fixed in David's--how
infinitely better for us it is to follow the course marked out for us
by our heavenly Father, with all its difficulties and dangers, than to
walk in the light of our own fire and in the sparks of our own kindling.
It appears that Abner set himself with great vigour to fulfil
the promise made by him in his league with David. First, he held
communication with the representatives of the whole nation, "the
elders of Israel," and showed to them, as we have seen--no doubt to
his own confusion and self-condemnation--how God had designated David
as the king through whom deliverance would be granted to Israel from
the Philistines and all their other enemies. Next, remembering that
Saul was a member of the tribe of Benjamin, and believing that the
feeling in favour of his family would be eminently strong in that
tribe, he took special pains to attach them to David, and as he was
himself likewise a Benjamite, he must have been eminently useful in
this service. Thirdly, he went in person to Hebron, David's seat,
"to speak in the ears of David all that seemed good to Israel and
to the whole house of Benjamin." Finally, after being entertained
by David at a great feast, he set out to bring about a meeting of
the whole congregation of Israel, that they might solemnly ratify
the appointment of David as king, in the same way as, in the early
days of Saul, Samuel had convened the representatives of the nation
at Gilgal (1 Sam. xi. 15). That in all this Abner was rendering a
great service both to David and the nation cannot be doubted. He was
doing what no other man in Israel could have done at the time for
establishing the throne of David and ending the civil war. Having
once made overtures to David, he showed an honourable promptitude
in fulfilling the promise under which he had come. No man can atone
for past sin by doing his duty at a future time; but if anything
could have blotted out from David's memory the remembrance of Abner's
great injury to him and to the nation, it was the zeal with which he
exerted himself now to establish David's claims over all the country,
and especially where his cause was feeblest--in the tribe of Benjamin.
It must have been a happy day in David's history when Abner set out
from Hebron to convene the assembly of the tribes that was to call
him with one voice to the throne. It was the day long looked for come
at last. The dove had at length come with the olive leaf, and peace
would now reign among all the tribes of Israel. And we may readily
conceive him, with this prospect so near, expressing his feelings,
if not in the very words of the thirty-seventh Psalm, at any rate in
language of similar import:--
"Fret not thyself because of evil-doers,
Neither be thou envious against them that work
unrighteousness
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass,
And wither as the green herb.
Trust in the Lord and do good;
Dwell in the land, and follow after faithfulness.
Delight thyself also in the Lord,
And He shall give thee the desires of thine heart.
Commit thy way unto the Lord,
Trust also in Him, and He shall bring it to pass.
And He shall make thy righteousness to go forth as the light,
And thy judgment as the noonday.
Rest in the Lord and wait patiently for Him;
Fret not thyself because of him that prospereth in his way,
Because of the man who bringeth wicked devices to pass.
For evil-doers shall be cut off;
But those that wait on the Lord, they shall inherit the
land."
But a crime was now on the eve of being perpetrated destined for the
time to scatter all King David's pleasing expectations and plunge him
anew into the depths of distress.