[Illustration: RHESUS MONKEY.
(Macacus rhesus.)]
THE RHESUS MONKEY.
(_Macacus rhesus._)
It was in Simla that we first encountered the Rhesus Monkey. We had gone
up to Simla to escape the intense heat of Bombay, and, refreshed by the
cool air of the “hill country,” we were soon ready to make the
expedition to the hill called Jako. This hill is indeed the hill of the
monkeys. It is eight or nine thousand feet above the level of the sea,
and here lives a fakir, who feeds the monkeys as they troop down the
mountainside at his call.
Undoubtedly there is no more mischievous monkey than the Rhesus, but,
after all, he is not altogether to blame, for the blame may belong to
the Hindoos. Some tell us that the Rhesus Monkey is sacred; others think
not. But, however that may be, it is a fact that the Hindoos protect the
monkeys in every possible way, willingly sharing their food with the
bands which are found almost everywhere, and permitting no one to kill
them.
This fosters every mischievous trait in these monkeys, and they fear
nothing from man. They will devastate every plantation and garden near
them. They belong to that genus of the ape family called Macaque, and as
this variety, with their near relations, the other macaques, are found
all over Southeastern Asia, besides one branch in Western Africa, one
can readily see that their mischievousness becomes a serious drawback.
The natives of Baka are said to leave one-tenth of their harvests in
heaps for the monkeys, which come down in great numbers and carry away
all that is left for them. And this they can readily do on account of
their well-developed cheek pouches. These pockets in the cheeks are
assuredly most convenient, but are never found on American monkeys. The
Old World monkeys are the narrow-nosed variety, while the American
monkeys have the broad nose bone.
Our Rhesus Monkeys had, of course, the narrow nose bone. They averaged
about twenty inches long, and the tail was half as long. Like all the
macaque monkeys, they were of sturdy build, with legs of moderate
length. In color the fur was grayish or greenish on the upper part,
yellowish over the hips and white below. The tail was greenish above and
gray under. The face, ears and hands were of a light copper color.
The mother monkeys were most assiduous in the care of their young, but
in educating them one of the most important lessons was to teach them to
steal successfully. This the pupils learned with ease, and to find a
Rhesus Monkey which could not steal would be a curiosity indeed.
While in Simla we were told the oft-repeated story of Lady Barker’s
dinner. Lady Barker, desiring to give a dinner to a large number of
guests, took unusual pains in the preparation of the feast. With her own
hands she arranged the flowers, and in the most attractive manner were
placed upon the table all the delicacies possible to procure, far and
near. When everything was arranged to her entire satisfaction, she
retired to array herself for the reception of her guests. The servants
were left in charge of the rooms, but instead of watching the tables,
they deserted their posts to amuse themselves in a more congenial way.
Imagine the surprise and consternation when, upon descending to the
dining room, she found it filled with guests, but not those whom she had
invited. A large band of monkeys had entered through the windows and
were enjoying themselves without restraint. Poor Lady Barker had nothing
left to offer her invited guests but the spoiled remains of her
sumptuous feast. Her little lap-dog “Fury” met with an untimely death by
the hands of probably this same band of monkeys. The dog waged war on
the creatures at every opportunity, but one day a large monkey managed
to catch him and carry him along to its tree-top. There the dog was
tormented by all the monkeys, being passed from hand to hand and finally
thrown down a precipice.
While the Rhesus is an intelligent creature and easily taught while
young, it it a question whether one really wishes this monkey for a pet,
for when old, they become vicious and spiteful and can bite and scratch
in a dangerous manner.
In addition to the fruit and seeds which they eat, they are also fond of
insects and spiders, and frequently large parties may be seen searching
the ground for these delicacies.
Professor Ball relates an interesting anecdote of these monkeys. He said
that when at Malwa Tal, a lake where he spent a day, he was warned that
when passing under a certain landslip which slopes to the lake, he would
be liable to have stones thrown at him by the monkeys. As he thought
this might be only a traveler’s tale, he took pains to go to the spot in
order to see what had given rise to the story. As he approached the base
of the landslip, he saw a number of Rhesus monkeys rush to the sides and
across the top, and presently pieces of loosened stone and shale came
tumbling down where he stood. He soon satisfied himself that this was
not accidental, for he distinctly saw one monkey, industriously with
both forepaws, push the loose shingle off a shoulder of rock. He then
tried the effect of throwing stones at them, but this made them quite
angry and the amount of fragments which they set rolling was speedily
doubled. This adventure caused Professor Ball to believe that there may
be some truth in the stories related in regard to monkeys throwing fruit
at people from the tree tops, and yet even about monkeys it is not
always best to credit all one hears.
John Ainslie.