CHAPTER VIII.

CHRONOLOGY, THIRTEENTH TO FIFTEENTH CENTURIES—STURBRIDGE.

1278. The Commissioners of Edward I. (already referred to) returned upon

inquest that King John had granted this Fair for the benefit of the

Hospital for Lepers which stood there. “To the said Hospital belongs a

certain Fair, held at the Feast of the raising and exaltation of the

Cross, which continues to this eve of Holy Cross, within the meadow

belonging to the said Hospital, which Fair our sovereign Lord King

John, the predecessor of our present Lord the King, granted to the said

Hospital, for the use and subsistence of the Lepers dwelling therein.”

1351. A writ was on 3rd Oct. directed to the Sheriff of Cambridgeshire

requiring him to convey to the Keeper of the King’s Wardrobe in the Tower

of London, thirty-seven strait cloths, and one cloth of colour, lately

seized in the Fair of Steresbrigge to the King’s use, by his deputy

Alnager, as not being of the assize and which were then in the custody of

the Mayor of Cambridge.

1376. This year the Corporation of Cambridge made an Ordinance,

prohibiting any burgess to take Sturbridge Chapel to farm, except to

the use of the mayor and bailiffs, or to keep market there, under the

penalty of 10 marks, or to make any booth there, or let any place for

the building of a booth, under the penalty of 10s.; and any burgesses

convicted of a breach of this Ordinance before the twenty-four [members

of the Common Council] was to be deprived of his freedom at their

discretion.

1382. The King being informed that many false weights and measures had

been theretofore used in Steresbrigge Fair, to the deception of his

subjects resorting thereto, issued a Writ on 3rd Sept. requiring the

Chancellor of the University to be vigilant in exercising in that fair

the powers conferred on him by the late Charter [1381] respecting weights

and measures.

Two years later a dispute arose between the Corporation and the

University regarding the exercise of this right. The King confirmed the

privilege of the University.

1395. Richard II. made order that the sheriff was to apprehend all

persons who broke the peace in Bernwell Fair, whether scholars or

townsmen.

1397. On Hoch Tuesday the commonalty of Cambridge made Ordinances to the

following effect: ...

ii. That all burgesses having any booths at the Fair of Sterebrigge, and

who should let them to farm to any outcomers or foreigners for certain

sum agreed upon between them, should pay to the mayor and bailiffs the

third part of the sum for which the same should be so let.

iii. That no freeman should occupy two booths of one art.

1403. The Corporate Ordinances made by Cambridge this year contain

(_inter alia_) the following:

_Item_ ... Every man burgess of the town of Cambridge, may freely

have one booth in the fair of Stirbridge, without rendering any thing

therefore to the mayor and bailiffs for the time being, whether he occupy

it or let it to farm. And that no burgess have in the fair aforesaid more

than one booth, unless he render therefore to the mayor and bailiffs for

the time being, toll and custom as others do who are not burgesses.

_Item._ It is ordained on the same day, that if any bailiff or other

burgess of the town aforesaid, in future, lease or lend to any Citizens

of London, the place for the booth called the Tolbooth, in the fair

aforesaid, that the bailiffs pay to the commonalty of the Town of

Cambridge £10, and the burgesses 100s. for every default, namely _tociens

quociens_, to lose their freedom.

_Item._ The same day it is ordained that no burgess of the town aforesaid

prosecute against any one by writ or plaint, before the Chancellor nor

elsewhere, for any contract which can be determined before the mayor

and bailiffs [in the Piepowder Court?] nor summon a defendant to the

Chancellor, &c., under the pain of every one &c. 40_s._ to be paid to

the commonalty of the town aforesaid, and the loss of his freedom (see

1427-8).

_Item._ The same day it is ordained, that no serjeant of the town

aforesaid for the future shall be attorney or of counsel, _with any

foreigner, against any burgess of the same town_, in the Court of the

Town aforesaid, under the pain of 40_d._, to be paid to the commonalty of

the town aforesaid, _tociens quociens_. See 1575.

1405. The Corporation of Cambridge enacted the following Ordinances:

Be it remembered, that on the day of election of mayor and bailiffs for

the town of Cambridge in the 6th year of the reign of Henry IV., it is

ordained that every burgess within the town aforesaid having a booth or

booths in the fair of Sterbrige, may well and lawfully give, sell and

surrender the said booth to the use of any other burgess of the same

town, before the Mayor and one of the Aldermen of the same town, in the

Court there holden on every Tuesday in the year, and on every Monday in

the Court of the Liberty: Provided always that the said booth or booths

be surrendered freely, quietly and wholly, without condition, annexed or

expressed, for him and his, according to the custom of the borough. And

this under the pain or forfeiture of the same booths to the burgesses of

the town aforesaid.

1411. On 15 Nov. John Arondell, custos of the free chapel of St. Mary

Magdalene, otherwise called Sturbridge chapel near Barnwell, exhibited

his bill in the Exchequer against John Essex, sadler, John Warwyk,

skinner, John Chaucer and William Bush, late bailiffs, then present in

Court on their account. In this bill plaintiff averred that he and his

predecessors, had immemorially had stallage of all persons merchandising

upon the Chapel-yard, parcel of his chapel, where part of the fair of

Sturbridge was accustomed to be held, and where merchants were accustomed

to erect their shops during the fair-time. That one Thomas Spryggy

merchant and Clothier, and other merchants to the number of 20, would

have made their shops there at the fair holden at Sturbridge on Monday

the feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross then preceding, and would

have paid the stallage 6_s._ 8_d._ each but that the late bailiffs

unjustly and by colour of their office would not permit the merchants

to build their shops in the Chapel-yard by which he lost his stallage

amounting to 10 marks, to the disherison of the chapel, and to his damage

of £10. The defendants by their plea, after protesting that the chapel

was founded within the time of memory and that the bailiffs of Cambridge

were seized of stallage of merchandize brought to the fair, denied that

the custos or his predecessors were seized of such stallage. On this plea

issue was joined, and a verdict returned in favor of the custos whose

damages were assessed at 5 marks with £10 costs. The proceedings in this

cause were exemplified by letters under the Exchequer seal, tested by

John Cokayn Chief Baron, on the 4th March 1412-13.

1419. At this time there was a suit pending before the King’s Council

between the Chancellor and Scholars of the University, and the mayor,

aldermen and citizens of London, each of whom claimed the Custody of

Assize and assay of Bread, wine and beer, and the supervision of the

measures and weights of the citizens of London coming to Sturbridge fair.

On the 14th July the King (Henry V.) directed letters patent to sir Wm.

Asenhull, knt. sheriff of the County, commanding him to exercise the

beforementioned custody and supervision over the citizens of London in

the fair of Sturbridge, till the matter was decided, and requiring the

litigating parties to assist the Sheriff.

From the accounts of the Priories of Maxtoke (Warwickshire) and of

Bicester (Oxon) during the reign of Henry VI. it is seen that the monks

laid in yearly stores of various common necessaries, at this fair—distant

at least one hundred miles from either monastery. Wharton (“Hist. of

English Poetry”) commenting on this fact says: “It may seem surprising

that their own neighbourhood, including the Cities of Oxford and

Coventry could not supply them with commodities neither rare nor costly,

which they thus fetched at a considerable expense of carriage.” But he

remembers that it was a rubric in some of the monastic rules _De Euntibus

ad Nundinas_.

1423. In the parliament of Henry VI., this year, the following petition

was presented:

Prien the wise and worthi Communes, that for as muchell as in the Citee

of London, and in the Suburbes ther of, diverses persones occupying the

craft of Brauderie, maken divers werkes of Brauderie of unsuffisaunt

stuff, and unduely wrought, as well upon Velowet, and Cloth of Gold, as

upon all other Clothes of Silk wrought with Gold or Silver of Cipre, and

Gold of Luk, or Spaynyssh laton togedre, and swich warkes, so untrewely

made by swiche persones aforesaid, dredyng the serche of the wardens of

Brauderie in the said Citee of London, kepen and senden unto the fayres

of Steresbrugg, Ely, Oxenford and Salesbury, and ther thei outre hem,

to greet deseit of our soverain Lord the Kyng, and al his peple. That

it like oure soverain Lord the Kyng, wyth his Lordes spirituell and

Temporell, in this present Parlement, to ordeyne by statute, that all

the werk of Brauderie so undwely made as above is declared, be forfait

to oure soverain Lord the Kyng. And that the Wardeins of Brauderes of

the said Citee of London, for that tyme beyng may, by auctorite of this

present parlement, have warant by patent to make serche of all werk of

Braderie put to selle at the said faires of Steresbrugg, Ely, Oxenford

and Salesbury, and thoo werkes of Brouderie there founden unsuffisant, to

forfaite and arreste to the use of our soverain Lord the Kyng, as ofte

tymes as such werk be founde.

To which answer was made:

Be it enacted that all works and stuff with gold and silver broidery of

Cyprus or Gold of Luke, or with laton of Spain, and sold to the deceit

of the subjects of the King, be forfeited to the King, or to the Lords

and to others having franchises of such forfeitures, in which franchise

such works be found. And that this enactment endure only until the next

parliament.

The valuable commodities sold at this fair are here in part indicated.

Same year the commonalty of Cambridge, on the Thursday after the Nativity

of the Virgin made an Ordinance to this effect:

That the bailiff of the Bridge should not take toll for carriage, nor

stall-pence nor custom, from the bridge, nor elsewhere (except in the

fair) for merchandise coming to the fair of Sterbrigg, from the vigil of

the nativity of the blessed Mary until the fair was ended.

1425. The accounts of Richard Parentyn prior of Burchester, in

Oxfordshire, and Richard Albon canon and bursar of that house, for the

year ending Michaelmas, contain several items which shew the varied and

extensive trade of Sturbridge fair about this time: For the expense of

Albon in going to and from Sterisbrugge fair for five days with three

horses to buy victuals &c. 12_s._ 6_d._ is charged. The following

articles are also stated to have been purchased here: “Three collars, one

basse [a rush collar for cart-horses] and three headstalls 5_s_ 10½_d_;”

“a bolt [long narrow piece] of red say [silk] for making a cope 4_s_

8_d_”; “Six estregbords [Eastern boards] viz Waynscots 2_s_ 3_d_”; “100

halfwax-fyche [dried fish?] 21_s._;” “324 lbs of Spanish iron, with the

portage of the same 18_s_ 5_d_”.

1459. Richard Andrewe, _alias_ Spycer, burgess of Cambridge by his will

dated 30 Aug. bequeathed to the mayor and bailiffs of that town 80 marks

to be kept in a chest there provided, and portions thereof lent on loans

from time to time in sums not exceeding 26_s._ 8_d._ To the keepers of

this Chest he gave, three booths and certain booth-ground in Sturbridge

Fair, and a house in St. Andrew’s parish abutting on Preachers’ lane,

the profits to be applied to the celebration of his anniversary in Great

St. Mary’s Church, to be distributed in various small charities there

specified. See Cooper’s “Annals,” i., p. 210.

1464. By 4th Edward IV. c. 8 power is given to the Wardens of the Company

of Horners to search for defective wares in London and twenty-four miles

round, also in the fairs of Sturbridge and Ely, and to seize defective

manufactures and bring the same before the Mayor of London or the Mayors

or Bailiffs of the aforesaid fairs, for the time being. In 1609 this act

was revived by 7 James I. c. 14, sec. 2. The act was repealed in 1856.

1487. The Corporation of London made an Ordinance prohibiting the

freemen of that City to go to any fair out of the City with any manner

of merchandise to sell or barter. This Ordinance was repealed by act of

parliament in the preamble of which it is recited that there “be many

fairs for the common Weal of your said liege people, as at Salisbury,

Bristol, Oxenford, Cambridge &c.” If this order of enumeration had any

reference to the relative importance of the fairs (which I suspect it had

not) it puts this fair only fourth. This act has already been set out in

detail in Chapter V.

This year Sir Wm. Littlebury alias Horn, citizen and salter, and also

Lord Mayor of London, gave 500 marks towards repairing the highways

between London and Cambridge. This was probably in view of benefiting

those attending the fairs.

1496. On 20th July Katherine Cooke widow of John Cooke some time mayor,

granted to the mayor, bailiffs, treasurers, and burgesses and their

successors, to the use of the Treasury of the Town of Cambridge, three

booths situate in the Soper’s lane, the Chepe, and the Petimercerye, in

Sterbrigge fair. To the intent that the Treasurers should perpetually

uphold yearly on the 25 Feby., a special dirge and mass in the parish

Church of St. Mary the Virgin next the market for the souls of John Cooke

and William Colles, and Katherine, Joan, and Lucy their wives, and pay to

the bell-man for going about the town for the said souls 3_d_; with other

small bequests to the poor &c. Cooper’s “Annals,” i., p. 246.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

Fairs, past and present · 第 8 / 24 章