ANTI-STOIC POLEMIC, AGAINST THE CORPOREITY OF MATTER AND QUANTITY.

9. It may be objected that it would be impossible to conceive of

something without magnitude. The fact is that not everything is

identical with quantity. Essence is distinct from quantity; for many

other things beside it exist. Consequently no incorporeal nature has

any quantity. Matter, therefore, is incorporeal. Besides, even quantity

itself is not quantative, which characterizes only what participates

in quantity (in general); a further proof that quantity is a form,

as an object becomes white by the presence of whiteness; and as that

which, in the animal, produces whiteness and the different colors, is

not a varied color, but a varied reason; likewise that which produces a

quantity is not a definite quantity, but either quantity in itself, or

quantity as such, or the reason of quantity. Does quantity, on entering

into matter extend matter, so as to give it magnitude? By no means, for

matter had not been condensed. Form therefore imparts to matter the

magnitude which it did not possess, just as form impresses on matter

the quality it lacked.[297]

BY ABSTRACTION, THE SOUL CAN FIND AND DESCRY THE QUALITY-LESS

THING-IN-ITSELF: THIS PROCESS IS CALLED "BASTARD REASONING."

10. (Some objector) might ask how one could conceive of matter without

quantity? This might be answered by a retort. How then do you (as you

do) manage to conceive of it without quality? Do you again object,

by what conception or intelligence could it be reached? By the very

indetermination of the soul. Since that which knows must be similar to

that which is known (as Aristotle[298] quotes from Empedocles), the

indeterminate must be grasped by the indeterminate. Reason, indeed,

may be determined in respect to the indeterminate; but the glance

which reason directs on the indeterminate itself is indeterminate.

If everything were known by reason and by intelligence, reason here

tells us about matter what reason rightly should tell us about it. By

wishing to conceive of matter in an intellectual manner, intelligence

arrives at a state which is the absence of intelligence, or rather,

reason forms of matter a "bastard" or "illegitimate" image, which is

derived from the other, which is not true, and which is composed of the

other (deceptive material called) reason. That is why Plato[299] said

that matter is perceived by a "bastard reasoning." In what does the

indetermination of the soul consist? In an absolute ignorance, or in

a complete absence of all knowledge? No: the indeterminate condition

of the soul implies something positive (besides something negative).

As for the eye, darkness is the matter of all invisible color, so

the soul, by making abstraction in sense-objects of all things that

somehow are luminous, cannot determine what then remains; and likewise,

as the eye, in darkness (becomes assimilated to darkness), the soul

becomes assimilated to what she sees. Does she then see anything else?

Doubtless, she sees something without figure, without color, without

light, or even without magnitude.[300] If this thing had any magnitude,

the soul would lend it a form.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 350 / 467 题