THE ARISTOTELIAN INTELLIGIBLE MATTER.

2. Let us first examine whether this (latter intelligible) matter

exists, how it exists, and what it is. If (the nature) of matter

be something indeterminate, and shapeless, and if in the perfect

(intelligible beings) there must not be anything indeterminate or

shapeless, it seems as if there could not be any matter in the

intelligible world. As every (being) is simple, it could not have any

need of matter which, by uniting with something else, constitutes

something composite. Matter is necessary in begotten beings, which make

one thing arise out of another; for it is such beings that have led to

the conception of matter (as thought Aristotle).[282] It may however be

objected that in unbegotten beings matter would seem useless. Whence

could it have originated to enter in (among intelligible beings),

and remain there? If it were begotten, it must have been so by some

principle; if it be eternal, it must have had several principles; in

which case the beings that occupy the first rank would seem to be

contingent. Further, if (in those beings) form come to join matter,

their union will constitute a body, so that the intelligible (entities)

will be corporeal.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 341 / 467 题