WE CANNOT COMPREHEND UNITY, WHICH WE APPROACH ONLY BY A PRESENCE.

4. The principal cause of our uncertainty is that our comprehension of

the One comes to us neither by scientific knowledge, nor by thought, as

the knowledge of other intelligible things, but by a presence which is

superior to science. When the soul acquires the scientific knowledge

of something, she withdraws from unity and ceases being entirely one;

for science implies discursive reason and discursive reason implies

manifoldness. (To attain Unity) we must therefore rise above science,

and never withdraw from what is essentially One; we must therefore

renounce science, the objects of science, and every other right (except

that of the One); even to that of beauty; for beauty is posterior to

unity, and is derived therefrom, as the day-light comes from the sun.

That is why Plato[193] says of (Unity) that it is unspeakable and

undescribable. Nevertheless we speak of it, we write about it, but only

to excite our souls by our discussions, and to direct them towards this

divine spectacle, just as one might point out the road to somebody who

desired to see some object. Instruction, indeed, goes as far as showing

the road, and guiding us in the way; but to obtain the vision (of the

divinity), is the work suitable to him who has desired to obtain it.

THOSE WHO SEE GOD WITHOUT EMOTION HAVE FAILED TO RID THEMSELVES OF

PHYSICAL HINDRANCES, AND HAVE NOT BECOME UNIFIED.

If your soul does not succeed in enjoying this spectacle, if she does

not have the intuition of the divine light, if she remains cold and

does not, within herself, feel a rapture such as that of a lover who

sees the beloved object, and who rests within it, a rapture felt by him

who has seen the true light, and whose soul has been overwhelmed with

brilliance on approaching this light, then you have tried to rise to

the divinity without having freed yourself from the hindrances which

arrest your progress, and hinder your contemplation. You did not rise

alone, and you retained within yourself something that separated you

from Him; or rather, you were not yet unified. Though He be absent

from all beings, He is absent from none, so that He is present (to

all) without being present (to them). He is present only for those

who are able to receive Him, and who are prepared for Him, and who

are capable of harmonizing themselves with Him, to reach Him, and as

it were to touch Him by virtue of the conformity they have with Him,

and also by virtue of an innate power analogous to that which flows

from Him, when at last their souls find themselves in the state where

they were after having communicated with Him; then they can see Him

so far as his nature is visible. I repeat: if you have not yet risen

so far, the conclusion must be that you are still at a distance from

Him, either by the obstacles of which we spoke above, or by the lack

of such instruction as would have taught you the road to follow, and

which would have imbued you with faith in things divine. In any case,

you have no fault to find with any but yourself; for, to be alone, all

you need to do is to detach yourself from everything. Lack of faith in

arguments about it may be remedied by the following considerations.

HOW SUCH AS RISE AS FAR AS THE SOUL MAY ACHIEVE FAITH IN THE

INTELLIGIBLE.

5. Such as imagine that beings are governed by luck or chance, and

that they depend on material causes are far removed from the divinity,

and from the conception of unity. It is not such men that we are

addressing, but such as admit the existence of a nature different from

the corporeal one, and who at least rise (to an acknowledgment of the

existence of) the Soul. These should apply themselves to the study of

the nature of the soul, learning, among other truths, that she proceeds

from Intelligence, and that she can achieve virtue by participating in

Intelligence through reason. They must then acknowledge the existence

of an Intelligence superior to the intelligence that reasons, namely,

to discursive reason. They must (also realize) that reasonings imply

an interval (between notions), and a movement (by which the soul

bridges this interval). They must be brought to see that scientific

knowledge consists also of reasons of the same nature (namely, rational

notions), reasons suitable to the soul, but which have become clear,

because the soul has received the succession of intelligence which is

the source of scientific knowledge. By intelligence (which belongs to

her), the soul sees the divine Intellect, which to it seems sensual,

in this sense that it is perceptible by intelligence, which dominates

the soul, and is her father;[194] that is, the intelligible world, a

calm intellect which vibrates without issuing from its tranquility,

which contains everything, and which is all. It is both definite and

indefinite manifoldness, for the ideas it contains are not distinct

like the reasons (the rational notions), which are conceived one by

one. Nevertheless, they do not become confused. Each of them becomes

distinct from the others, just as in a science all the notions,

though forming an indivisible whole, yet each has its own separate

individual existence.[195] This multitude of ideas taken together

constitutes the intelligible world. This is the (entity) nearest

to the First. Its existence is inevitably demonstrated by reason,

as much as the necessity of the existence of the Soul herself; but

though the intelligible world is something superior to the Soul, it is

nevertheless not yet the First, because it is neither one, nor simple,

while the one, the principle of all beings, is perfectly simple.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 284 / 467 题