THE STOIC POLEMIC AGAINST THE EPICUREANS.

To begin with, even if we do admit such atomic principles, their

existence does not in any way inevitably lead to either the necessity

of all things, or fatality. Let us, indeed, grant the existence of

atoms; now some will move downwards--that is, if there is an up

and down in the universe--others obliquely, by chance, in various

directions. As there will be no order, there will be nothing

determinate. Only what will be born of the atoms will be determinate.

It will therefore be impossible to guess or predict events, whether by

art--and indeed, how could there be any art in the midst of orderless

things?--or by enthusiasm, or divine inspiration; for prediction

implies that the future is determined. True, bodies will obey the

impulses necessarily communicated to them by the atoms; but how could

you explain the operations and affections of the soul by movements of

atoms? How could atomic shock, whether vertical or oblique, produce

in the soul these our reasonings, or appetites, whether necessarily,

or in any other way? What explanation could they give of the soul's

resistance to the impulsions of the body? By what concourse of atoms

will one man become a geometrician, another become a mathematician

and astronomer, and the other a philosopher? For, according to that

doctrine we no longer produce any act for which we are responsible, we

are even no longer living beings, since we undergo the impulsion of

bodies that affect us just as they do inanimate things.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 195 / 467 题