IF THE SOUL IS NOT SIMPLE MATTER, SHE MUST BE A SUBSTANTIAL FORM.

4. (f) (If the soul is anything but simple matter, she must be

constituted by a substantial form.) Those who claim that the soul

is a body are, by the very force of the truth, forced to recognize

the existence, before and above them, of a form proper to the soul;

for they acknowledge the existence of an intelligent spirit, and an

intellectual fire (as do the Stoics, following in the footsteps of

Heraclitus, Stobaeus[49]). According to them, it seems that, without

spirit or fire, there cannot be any superior nature in the order of

beings, and that the soul needs a location where she may be built

up. On the contrary, it is bodies alone that need to be built up on

something, and indeed, they are founded on the powers of the soul.

If really we do believe that the soul and life are no more than a

spirit, why add the qualification "of a certain characteristic,"[50]

a meaningless term employed when forced to admit an active nature

superior to that of bodies. As there are thousands of inanimate

spirits, not every spirit is a soul. If only that spirit is a

soul which possesses that "special characteristic," this "special

characteristic" and this "manner of being" will either be something

real, or will be nothing. If they are nothing, there will be nothing

real but spirit, and this alleged "manner of being" is nothing more

than a word. In that system, therefore, nothing but matter really

exists. God, the soul, and all other things are no more than a word;

the body alone really subsists. If, on the contrary, that "manner of

being" is something real, if it is anything else than substrate or

matter, if it resides in matter without being material or composed of

matter, it must then be a nature different from the body, namely, a

reason (by a pun).[51]

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 1 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 156 / 467 题